<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Automated Blogging Tools Should Be Avoided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elvin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-3/#comment-4785476</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4785476</guid>
		<description>Hi, Darren

Thanks your advice. 

In my opinion, automated tools will help to save time, but we should not rely on it totally. We may automate some contents but we need to put in some effort to deliver quality contents also. This will create uniqeness to our blog while save some time of blogging for busy people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Darren</p>
<p>Thanks your advice. </p>
<p>In my opinion, automated tools will help to save time, but we should not rely on it totally. We may automate some contents but we need to put in some effort to deliver quality contents also. This will create uniqeness to our blog while save some time of blogging for busy people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alek</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-3/#comment-4780699</link>
		<dc:creator>Alek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4780699</guid>
		<description>There is a constructive way of using these tools where it adds value instead of taking. They can be used as a tool for speeding up certain things, instead of the flashy &quot;run a blog on autopilot&quot; marketing. Here&#039;s how I see it.

(must) Only use supervised posting (nothing gets posted to the blog automatically)

1) Guest posts---&gt;

These plugins find any new articles on article directories that fit your theme... Say (wordpress design)... So i have it post the article in my drafts folder, with the following template:

-&gt; [My introduction text, like hey guys, this is a nice article on wordpress design by a guest poster, check it out]
-&gt; [The actual article]
-&gt; [The resource box]
-&gt; [My outro for my readers]

* I just write/edit the intro/outro
** The point of this is that you can feature 1-2 relevant guest posts per week without doing too much work... You get all the related articles in your drafts folder, you just publish the ones you like.

2) Yahoo Answers

Quite a few these plugins have a &quot;yahoo answers module&quot;... What this is, is that it pulls all the yahoo answers related to your blog&#039;s theme, and turns them into drafts. Here&#039;s what My template looks like for these:


Here&#039;s another interesting question I found at yahoo answers guys. See what [name] wants to know.

[question]

And here&#039;s what I think the best answer is... (this is where I answer that question)

And, here&#039;s what some of the other folks on yahoo answers answered:

[other answers].

*I put in my answer and sometimes customize the intro if needed.


STRATEGY:

Mix&amp;Match... I have something like :
-4-5 yahoo answers I post a week, and 
-1-3 guest posts (articles) I Feature
-1-3 articles I write in my own voice*
... In addition to me writing 3-4 articles from scratch a week.

*If I like the theme subject of one of these articles that end up in the drafts, but I don&#039;t like how the person wrote it, I just write it in my own voice/opinion. Keeping the title

This a legit, value-adding way of using these tools... It allows for a busier, faster growing blog, while adding value at the same time.

**How you add value**

- The yahoo answers end up being about 70% unique content (just adding 1 paragraph answer makes for an awesome looking post) and I give an awesome to-the-point answer (these attract a lot of long-tail traffic coz they&#039;re natural real-world questions)
- The guest posts add value to the original author (these are article from article directories with republishing rights) as the author gets a free backlink (the autoposter keeps the author box intact)... adds value to my blog (these get almost as much traffic as my original articles from scratch, and adds value to my readers (find out about other authors)
-The articles from inspired writing... As any post you would write. You just use the original article to inspire you. Its a topic you go &quot;wow, why didn&#039;t i think of writing that article!&quot;... And you just write the same article in your own opinion/voice.


How it saves time:

-Yahoo answers: I get 5-6 unique pieces of content a week with basically... a total of 5 minutes work altogether... Saves a few hours of trying to think what people want to know answered. You end up just needing to write a paragraph of 30 seconds, instead of researching for 20-30 minutes.
-Article ideas - these just appear straight in your drafts... If you like the author&#039;s original article, just click publish and you both win. If you like the point of the article, but not how its written, select the full text, hit delete, and write it in your own words... Saves hours a week of thinking what to write about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a constructive way of using these tools where it adds value instead of taking. They can be used as a tool for speeding up certain things, instead of the flashy &#8220;run a blog on autopilot&#8221; marketing. Here&#8217;s how I see it.</p>
<p>(must) Only use supervised posting (nothing gets posted to the blog automatically)</p>
<p>1) Guest posts&#8212;&gt;</p>
<p>These plugins find any new articles on article directories that fit your theme&#8230; Say (wordpress design)&#8230; So i have it post the article in my drafts folder, with the following template:</p>
<p>-&gt; [My introduction text, like hey guys, this is a nice article on wordpress design by a guest poster, check it out]<br />
-&gt; [The actual article]<br />
-&gt; [The resource box]<br />
-&gt; [My outro for my readers]</p>
<p>* I just write/edit the intro/outro<br />
** The point of this is that you can feature 1-2 relevant guest posts per week without doing too much work&#8230; You get all the related articles in your drafts folder, you just publish the ones you like.</p>
<p>2) Yahoo Answers</p>
<p>Quite a few these plugins have a &#8220;yahoo answers module&#8221;&#8230; What this is, is that it pulls all the yahoo answers related to your blog&#8217;s theme, and turns them into drafts. Here&#8217;s what My template looks like for these:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another interesting question I found at yahoo answers guys. See what [name] wants to know.</p>
<p>[question]</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s what I think the best answer is&#8230; (this is where I answer that question)</p>
<p>And, here&#8217;s what some of the other folks on yahoo answers answered:</p>
<p>[other answers].</p>
<p>*I put in my answer and sometimes customize the intro if needed.</p>
<p>STRATEGY:</p>
<p>Mix&amp;Match&#8230; I have something like :<br />
-4-5 yahoo answers I post a week, and<br />
-1-3 guest posts (articles) I Feature<br />
-1-3 articles I write in my own voice*<br />
&#8230; In addition to me writing 3-4 articles from scratch a week.</p>
<p>*If I like the theme subject of one of these articles that end up in the drafts, but I don&#8217;t like how the person wrote it, I just write it in my own voice/opinion. Keeping the title</p>
<p>This a legit, value-adding way of using these tools&#8230; It allows for a busier, faster growing blog, while adding value at the same time.</p>
<p>**How you add value**</p>
<p>- The yahoo answers end up being about 70% unique content (just adding 1 paragraph answer makes for an awesome looking post) and I give an awesome to-the-point answer (these attract a lot of long-tail traffic coz they&#8217;re natural real-world questions)<br />
- The guest posts add value to the original author (these are article from article directories with republishing rights) as the author gets a free backlink (the autoposter keeps the author box intact)&#8230; adds value to my blog (these get almost as much traffic as my original articles from scratch, and adds value to my readers (find out about other authors)<br />
-The articles from inspired writing&#8230; As any post you would write. You just use the original article to inspire you. Its a topic you go &#8220;wow, why didn&#8217;t i think of writing that article!&#8221;&#8230; And you just write the same article in your own opinion/voice.</p>
<p>How it saves time:</p>
<p>-Yahoo answers: I get 5-6 unique pieces of content a week with basically&#8230; a total of 5 minutes work altogether&#8230; Saves a few hours of trying to think what people want to know answered. You end up just needing to write a paragraph of 30 seconds, instead of researching for 20-30 minutes.<br />
-Article ideas &#8211; these just appear straight in your drafts&#8230; If you like the author&#8217;s original article, just click publish and you both win. If you like the point of the article, but not how its written, select the full text, hit delete, and write it in your own words&#8230; Saves hours a week of thinking what to write about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romanzick</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4779120</link>
		<dc:creator>romanzick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4779120</guid>
		<description>for master maybe it is not important, but for newbie? it is very curious things to try honestly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for master maybe it is not important, but for newbie? it is very curious things to try honestly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4775719</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4775719</guid>
		<description>Hello, are you saying Automated blogging is not good enough for blogging?If yes What are your options?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, are you saying Automated blogging is not good enough for blogging?If yes What are your options?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backlink builders</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4774800</link>
		<dc:creator>backlink builders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4774800</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thanks for the post. It was o.k..  I have a backlink builders site at  when you have the time!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thanks for the post. It was o.k..  I have a backlink builders site at  when you have the time!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Hardy bags</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4772079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hardy bags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4772079</guid>
		<description>You kindly responded to an email question about this by saying that with full feeds ‘less people visit but more people are reading’ but I think there is also a marginally reduced risk of people ripping off content with abbreviated RSS feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You kindly responded to an email question about this by saying that with full feeds ‘less people visit but more people are reading’ but I think there is also a marginally reduced risk of people ripping off content with abbreviated RSS feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4771649</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4771649</guid>
		<description>I also wonder whether providing full or abbreviated RSS feeds has an impact on these automated content splogging systems that are in turn based on RSS pulls (for those who aren&#039;t aware Feedburner for example gives you an option to provide abbreviated posts only). 

You kindly responded to an email question about this by  saying that with full feeds &#039;less people visit but more people are reading&#039; but I think there is also a marginally reduced risk of people ripping off content with abbreviated RSS feeds. 

How big that risk is who knows: I was amazed when I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drivelry.com/how-to-succeed-in-blogging-without-really-trying-or-the-10-rules-for-blog-superstardom/304/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;spoof post about the worst blogging &#039;advice&#039; &lt;/a&gt; I&#039;d come across which included an imaginary splogging system &#039;Nichesplogger&#039; to then get an email from a reader asking for more info on it.. So I guess there&#039;s a market!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wonder whether providing full or abbreviated RSS feeds has an impact on these automated content splogging systems that are in turn based on RSS pulls (for those who aren&#8217;t aware Feedburner for example gives you an option to provide abbreviated posts only). </p>
<p>You kindly responded to an email question about this by  saying that with full feeds &#8216;less people visit but more people are reading&#8217; but I think there is also a marginally reduced risk of people ripping off content with abbreviated RSS feeds. </p>
<p>How big that risk is who knows: I was amazed when I wrote a <a href="http://www.drivelry.com/how-to-succeed-in-blogging-without-really-trying-or-the-10-rules-for-blog-superstardom/304/" rel="nofollow">spoof post about the worst blogging &#8216;advice&#8217; </a> I&#8217;d come across which included an imaginary splogging system &#8216;Nichesplogger&#8217; to then get an email from a reader asking for more info on it.. So I guess there&#8217;s a market!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SURVEYS FOR MONEY</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4771500</link>
		<dc:creator>SURVEYS FOR MONEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4771500</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point of blogging if your going to use automated tools. Blogging is the bloggers thoughts put into writing. Automated tools take away from unique and original content. You want to blog so the reader will remember or subscribe, and using automated tools just does the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point of blogging if your going to use automated tools. Blogging is the bloggers thoughts put into writing. Automated tools take away from unique and original content. You want to blog so the reader will remember or subscribe, and using automated tools just does the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770581</guid>
		<description>Good points all. 
I recently saw a system where a guy claimed to have put up 400 sites. He said 200 were making money. If that&#039;s true, and I don&#039;t know, then that&#039;s 400 crappy sites I might have to compete against. 
I want to start a blog and write about things that interests me and it wouldn&#039;t hurt my feelings to make enough to cover my expenses. But I don&#039;t see any way of making just a little money. It seems like you need 500-1000 visitors a day to make anything. And I don&#039;t know how to get that kind of traffic today without ranking on a search page. 
How can I blog about say, solar energy and expect anyone to ever see my post, let alone make any money.
I think Google needs to do a better job cleaning out the trash. That would be a good start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points all.<br />
I recently saw a system where a guy claimed to have put up 400 sites. He said 200 were making money. If that&#8217;s true, and I don&#8217;t know, then that&#8217;s 400 crappy sites I might have to compete against.<br />
I want to start a blog and write about things that interests me and it wouldn&#8217;t hurt my feelings to make enough to cover my expenses. But I don&#8217;t see any way of making just a little money. It seems like you need 500-1000 visitors a day to make anything. And I don&#8217;t know how to get that kind of traffic today without ranking on a search page.<br />
How can I blog about say, solar energy and expect anyone to ever see my post, let alone make any money.<br />
I think Google needs to do a better job cleaning out the trash. That would be a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Heister</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770558</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Heister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770558</guid>
		<description>Darren, just an excellant message... I&#039;ve been a nutritional researcher and health coach for 30 years and have just begun to learn about social media.  I see all of the hype ads on twitter and know that this has little value and much risk to ones reputation.  Your words bring much wisdom!  Be blessed.  Hank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, just an excellant message&#8230; I&#8217;ve been a nutritional researcher and health coach for 30 years and have just begun to learn about social media.  I see all of the hype ads on twitter and know that this has little value and much risk to ones reputation.  Your words bring much wisdom!  Be blessed.  Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Su</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770529</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Su</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770529</guid>
		<description>These tips were very helpful, Thanks.
As a blogger, I also have been offered some auto blogs or I was requested to advertise these autoblog tools which i turned down immediately.

There are some things these companies are not telling you; sure the autoblog softwares work, but many of these have codes in them that links your blogs to theirs, so that they can get free back links. What that means is that they are using your blogs to get free advertisements for them!!!

So yea, Thank You Darren for using your blog to tell people that they should not use autoblogging softwares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These tips were very helpful, Thanks.<br />
As a blogger, I also have been offered some auto blogs or I was requested to advertise these autoblog tools which i turned down immediately.</p>
<p>There are some things these companies are not telling you; sure the autoblog softwares work, but many of these have codes in them that links your blogs to theirs, so that they can get free back links. What that means is that they are using your blogs to get free advertisements for them!!!</p>
<p>So yea, Thank You Darren for using your blog to tell people that they should not use autoblogging softwares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracelemental</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770482</link>
		<dc:creator>tracelemental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770482</guid>
		<description>Since I commented on this a few days ago, my blog content has been used as extracts with links to my blog twice.  Through this blog entry and discussion with a number of my twitter colleagues, I&#039;ve learnt the process for dealing with copyright infringement.  I useful exercise for any blogger I&#039;m sure!

One of these sites that is using my enteries simply scrapes hundreds upon hundreds of posts as extracts onto a blog with no creditials, no contact info.  

Its all good experience for me in defining and tuning into the type of internet/web blogger citizen I wish to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I commented on this a few days ago, my blog content has been used as extracts with links to my blog twice.  Through this blog entry and discussion with a number of my twitter colleagues, I&#8217;ve learnt the process for dealing with copyright infringement.  I useful exercise for any blogger I&#8217;m sure!</p>
<p>One of these sites that is using my enteries simply scrapes hundreds upon hundreds of posts as extracts onto a blog with no creditials, no contact info.  </p>
<p>Its all good experience for me in defining and tuning into the type of internet/web blogger citizen I wish to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Money</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770472</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770472</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, the &quot;content&quot; created by such plugins and other scripts has no use. But if you want to monitor some content then this can be useful but this aim can be achieved via a normal feed reader. 

Real Content Makes You King
Copied Content Makes You Miserable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, the &#8220;content&#8221; created by such plugins and other scripts has no use. But if you want to monitor some content then this can be useful but this aim can be achieved via a normal feed reader. </p>
<p>Real Content Makes You King<br />
Copied Content Makes You Miserable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Edie</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770402</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Edie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770402</guid>
		<description>I have never used them, but I haven&#039;t gotten that far to know of them.This is one for my book marks
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never used them, but I haven&#8217;t gotten that far to know of them.This is one for my book marks<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Money</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770355</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770355</guid>
		<description>Creating that kind of blogs are &quot;supporting blogs&quot; and they do not have value in google,as for getting your link juice for your main blog,it is good,so how this is different from &quot;paid links&quot;,many bloggers do not have money to pay links,so they decide to create this kind of blogs.IMHO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating that kind of blogs are &#8220;supporting blogs&#8221; and they do not have value in google,as for getting your link juice for your main blog,it is good,so how this is different from &#8220;paid links&#8221;,many bloggers do not have money to pay links,so they decide to create this kind of blogs.IMHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracelemental</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770259</link>
		<dc:creator>tracelemental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770259</guid>
		<description>I love it when I read articles like this.  Having turned my attention to internet marketing and blogging only 2 mnths ago, I&#039;ve found myself wading thru so much crud.  Its great to read truthful and straight forward info.

cheers Darren, you&#039;ve made my day :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when I read articles like this.  Having turned my attention to internet marketing and blogging only 2 mnths ago, I&#8217;ve found myself wading thru so much crud.  Its great to read truthful and straight forward info.</p>
<p>cheers Darren, you&#8217;ve made my day :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cell Phone blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770209</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell Phone blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770209</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that the automated way of doing things is a recipe for trouble.  These tools may be faster and more efficient, but produce a lower quality result and lessen the effectiveness of your message.  You have to look at quantity versus quality when it comes to what you are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that the automated way of doing things is a recipe for trouble.  These tools may be faster and more efficient, but produce a lower quality result and lessen the effectiveness of your message.  You have to look at quantity versus quality when it comes to what you are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tall Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770194</link>
		<dc:creator>Tall Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770194</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on that. I think writing isn&#039;t hard at all and should go from your heart and mean something to you and others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on that. I think writing isn&#8217;t hard at all and should go from your heart and mean something to you and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770143</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770143</guid>
		<description>Have to agree, after a little lesson on that over on Twitter.

For awhile I&#039;d been using my Friendfeed-aggregated news links to automate providing news items, which saved me heaps of time having to search for such news myself.

However, one of my Twitter followers pointed out that he&#039;d been talking to a few other Twitterers and had come to the conclusion it wasn&#039;t a good thing.

I did my own survey of other Twitter followers and found they too had problems with it.  Extra layer of linking, for one, detracting from my usual &quot;voice&quot; another...you get the drift.

There was also a problem I&#039;d noted personally...that news items often came in ten-item bursts, which I found personally not what I&#039;d wanted.

It was a correct decision to cut out all ABC Australia news items from my Twitter feed from that aggregation, as well as Herald-Sun items.

I still leave TechCrunch and geek.com feeds from Friendfeed there, and it seems I haven&#039;t heard anyone complaining yet.  This is more newsworthy to my local followers...and it&#039;s spread out a bit more evenly.

For a while, doing this helped me concentrate on the conversation side of Twitter, but it still had a negative effect and it was a valid point to do something to solve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree, after a little lesson on that over on Twitter.</p>
<p>For awhile I&#8217;d been using my Friendfeed-aggregated news links to automate providing news items, which saved me heaps of time having to search for such news myself.</p>
<p>However, one of my Twitter followers pointed out that he&#8217;d been talking to a few other Twitterers and had come to the conclusion it wasn&#8217;t a good thing.</p>
<p>I did my own survey of other Twitter followers and found they too had problems with it.  Extra layer of linking, for one, detracting from my usual &#8220;voice&#8221; another&#8230;you get the drift.</p>
<p>There was also a problem I&#8217;d noted personally&#8230;that news items often came in ten-item bursts, which I found personally not what I&#8217;d wanted.</p>
<p>It was a correct decision to cut out all ABC Australia news items from my Twitter feed from that aggregation, as well as Herald-Sun items.</p>
<p>I still leave TechCrunch and geek.com feeds from Friendfeed there, and it seems I haven&#8217;t heard anyone complaining yet.  This is more newsworthy to my local followers&#8230;and it&#8217;s spread out a bit more evenly.</p>
<p>For a while, doing this helped me concentrate on the conversation side of Twitter, but it still had a negative effect and it was a valid point to do something to solve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/07/09/why-automated-blogging-tools-should-be-avoided/comment-page-2/#comment-4770042</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=8197#comment-4770042</guid>
		<description>Excellent illustration on why you should never use &quot;zombie&quot; tools to build your business. I don&#039;t have any experience with any kind of automated blogging tools, but I&#039;ve seen people rave about these new automated backlink builders like Free Traffic System and Linkvana. Those are very similar to what you&#039;ve described. The first one is free and Linkvana is ridiculously expensive ($150 a month) The idea behind those is that they supposedly spin one of your articles and you get 30+ backlinks just from one article. 

The fact of the matter is – your content becomes junk spread over hundreds of blogs. I personally think it&#039;s a waste of bandwidth and almost certain Google will be banning sites using these services in a near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent illustration on why you should never use &#8220;zombie&#8221; tools to build your business. I don&#8217;t have any experience with any kind of automated blogging tools, but I&#8217;ve seen people rave about these new automated backlink builders like Free Traffic System and Linkvana. Those are very similar to what you&#8217;ve described. The first one is free and Linkvana is ridiculously expensive ($150 a month) The idea behind those is that they supposedly spin one of your articles and you get 30+ backlinks just from one article. </p>
<p>The fact of the matter is – your content becomes junk spread over hundreds of blogs. I personally think it&#8217;s a waste of bandwidth and almost certain Google will be banning sites using these services in a near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
