<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging vs Social Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:59:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Bonfield</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-2/#comment-4247458</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Bonfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-4247458</guid>
		<description>I think blogging plus social networking is a great way to get traffic i dont see why people would not do both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think blogging plus social networking is a great way to get traffic i dont see why people would not do both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lind'a Merhouzi'</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-2/#comment-2617690</link>
		<dc:creator>Lind'a Merhouzi'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2617690</guid>
		<description>well, deep inside my mind i think darren n all th bloggers r  working on social networking blv it or not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, deep inside my mind i think darren n all th bloggers r  working on social networking blv it or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-2/#comment-2442711</link>
		<dc:creator>Complete Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2442711</guid>
		<description>I just wonder why your friend felt he had to give up blogging completely. It doesn&#039;t have to be all or nothing. I enjoy the relationships more on my blog than on social networks. When someone comments on my blog then I know they took time out of their day to read something I put a lot of effort into. Social network comments never seem to have much substance. 

Of course that&#039;s just my opinion, I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder why your friend felt he had to give up blogging completely. It doesn&#8217;t have to be all or nothing. I enjoy the relationships more on my blog than on social networks. When someone comments on my blog then I know they took time out of their day to read something I put a lot of effort into. Social network comments never seem to have much substance. </p>
<p>Of course that&#8217;s just my opinion, I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2402489</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2402489</guid>
		<description>The ex-blogger in your powerful example was part of the herd charging away from content and toward connection. As I wrote a few weeks ago:
What’s changing on the web right now is the relative emphasis between two ingredients of conversation: content and connection. Traditional blogging emphasizes content. Social networks, of course, emphasize connection. 
If you can stand to read more of this, you can do so at:
http://changingway.org/2007/11/19/conversation-content-connection/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ex-blogger in your powerful example was part of the herd charging away from content and toward connection. As I wrote a few weeks ago:<br />
What’s changing on the web right now is the relative emphasis between two ingredients of conversation: content and connection. Traditional blogging emphasizes content. Social networks, of course, emphasize connection.<br />
If you can stand to read more of this, you can do so at:<br />
<a href="http://changingway.org/2007/11/19/conversation-content-connection/" rel="nofollow">http://changingway.org/2007/11/19/conversation-content-connection/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gisele B. from myBeautyMatch.com</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2392758</link>
		<dc:creator>Gisele B. from myBeautyMatch.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2392758</guid>
		<description>Darren,

This is very important post.

I&#039;d have to say (without any disrespect) that comparing blogging on your own blog versus blogger on a Myspace type of platform (so not your own brand) is like having your own business versus being part of a network marketing arm.

When you are in network marketing...you maybe building your unit, but in the end you REALLY are building the business of the company behind the networkd marketing.

Gisele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>This is very important post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to say (without any disrespect) that comparing blogging on your own blog versus blogger on a Myspace type of platform (so not your own brand) is like having your own business versus being part of a network marketing arm.</p>
<p>When you are in network marketing&#8230;you maybe building your unit, but in the end you REALLY are building the business of the company behind the networkd marketing.</p>
<p>Gisele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2392635</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2392635</guid>
		<description>Interesting topic, not least because I&#039;m developing something which at least starts to bridge the gap between social networking and blogging.

It&#039;s basically a group authentication system, which I&#039;ve termed as a &quot;conversation&quot; between bloggers. You can become a part of a group, then interact with the posts of others in that group directly from your own blog. Based off the whole idea behind trackbacks, but with a lot more practical uses (collaborations, debates etc).

Social networking can be a powerful tool for driving traffic back and forth, which is why I see my own development work as a way to drive readers between blogs, back and forth.

Been testing it out with a few bloggers recently in fact, and receiving some good feedback. I left a link to the early concept page I drew up (with screenshots) if you click on my name above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting topic, not least because I&#8217;m developing something which at least starts to bridge the gap between social networking and blogging.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically a group authentication system, which I&#8217;ve termed as a &#8220;conversation&#8221; between bloggers. You can become a part of a group, then interact with the posts of others in that group directly from your own blog. Based off the whole idea behind trackbacks, but with a lot more practical uses (collaborations, debates etc).</p>
<p>Social networking can be a powerful tool for driving traffic back and forth, which is why I see my own development work as a way to drive readers between blogs, back and forth.</p>
<p>Been testing it out with a few bloggers recently in fact, and receiving some good feedback. I left a link to the early concept page I drew up (with screenshots) if you click on my name above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 66tx</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2392092</link>
		<dc:creator>66tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2392092</guid>
		<description>I think the blog comes first, and the social network helps to promote it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the blog comes first, and the social network helps to promote it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Bilby</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2390803</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Bilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2390803</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this info. I have been a bit overwhelmed with the balance between my blog and social networking. While I realize that social networking is important, it is helpful to see someone put things back into perspective. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this info. I have been a bit overwhelmed with the balance between my blog and social networking. While I realize that social networking is important, it is helpful to see someone put things back into perspective. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderCover Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2386825</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderCover Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2386825</guid>
		<description>As others have said, I don&#039;t think blogging will ever go away. The ability to create your own brand, release your ideas, feelings and random thoughts to anyone and everyone is something special. The social networks can only go so far and I think they&#039;ve neared that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have said, I don&#8217;t think blogging will ever go away. The ability to create your own brand, release your ideas, feelings and random thoughts to anyone and everyone is something special. The social networks can only go so far and I think they&#8217;ve neared that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2385892</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2385892</guid>
		<description>I use social networking for fun but not as a replacement for blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use social networking for fun but not as a replacement for blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wypoczynek</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2379324</link>
		<dc:creator>Wypoczynek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2379324</guid>
		<description>problogger is cool :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>problogger is cool :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2379163</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2379163</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re just doing it for the money, both blogging and social networking will lose their appeal after a short while. Passion is key.

I&#039;ve noticed that boggers tend to be the people who have more of a personal agenda, they have a message and they want that message to be heard. The really good bloggers are usually writers at heart. If they weren&#039;t blogging, they&#039;d be writing for a newspaper or magazine, they&#039;d be writing books or screenplays, they&#039;d be writing poems or songs. Fundamentally, they are writers.

Networkers tend to be more social butterflies. They&#039;re more interested in other people and in relationships. They like to build things, to code, to develop. If they weren&#039;t in social networking, they&#039;d be in gaming or something similar. 

Ultimately, it&#039;s not about what&#039;s blogging versus social networking; it&#039;s about doing what you&#039;re passionate about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re just doing it for the money, both blogging and social networking will lose their appeal after a short while. Passion is key.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that boggers tend to be the people who have more of a personal agenda, they have a message and they want that message to be heard. The really good bloggers are usually writers at heart. If they weren&#8217;t blogging, they&#8217;d be writing for a newspaper or magazine, they&#8217;d be writing books or screenplays, they&#8217;d be writing poems or songs. Fundamentally, they are writers.</p>
<p>Networkers tend to be more social butterflies. They&#8217;re more interested in other people and in relationships. They like to build things, to code, to develop. If they weren&#8217;t in social networking, they&#8217;d be in gaming or something similar. </p>
<p>Ultimately, it&#8217;s not about what&#8217;s blogging versus social networking; it&#8217;s about doing what you&#8217;re passionate about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2379135</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2379135</guid>
		<description>I think both have their place and that blogging has matured to a point where only those willing to commit the time and effort will continue to do it. Blogging, today, is all about creating real value for the reader, as the previous commenter Brian Clark asserts. 

For conversational media marketing purposes, I see a blog as strategic headquarters, the fountainhead from which all other initiatives flow. 

Like the friend you cited, I, too, gave up blogging in favor of playing in the social media sandbox, but only for a short time. 

I&#039;ve learned three valuable lessons: 

1. That my blog is where I really get down to business dealing with the topic about which I&#039;m passionate

2. That anecdotal, daily life type of journaling can easily be accommodated via Facebook and Twitter

3. That social networks like the aforementioned can be used as announcement and syndication systems for the posts on my blog, resulting in a greater level of awareness and heightened participation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think both have their place and that blogging has matured to a point where only those willing to commit the time and effort will continue to do it. Blogging, today, is all about creating real value for the reader, as the previous commenter Brian Clark asserts. </p>
<p>For conversational media marketing purposes, I see a blog as strategic headquarters, the fountainhead from which all other initiatives flow. </p>
<p>Like the friend you cited, I, too, gave up blogging in favor of playing in the social media sandbox, but only for a short time. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned three valuable lessons: </p>
<p>1. That my blog is where I really get down to business dealing with the topic about which I&#8217;m passionate</p>
<p>2. That anecdotal, daily life type of journaling can easily be accommodated via Facebook and Twitter</p>
<p>3. That social networks like the aforementioned can be used as announcement and syndication systems for the posts on my blog, resulting in a greater level of awareness and heightened participation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2378776</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2378776</guid>
		<description>I personally concentrate more on my blogging and how to improve on that...and the social networking when I get a chance. I do think that they both go hand in hand...but I enjoy the blogging much more...more personal and directed at people who want to read about what I write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally concentrate more on my blogging and how to improve on that&#8230;and the social networking when I get a chance. I do think that they both go hand in hand&#8230;but I enjoy the blogging much more&#8230;more personal and directed at people who want to read about what I write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2378767</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2378767</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;I now have a brand on someone else’s property….”

This is the key. These people have gone from developing a digital asset of their own that could have real value, to becoming someone else&#039;s user-generated content.

Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;I now have a brand on someone else’s property….”</p>
<p>This is the key. These people have gone from developing a digital asset of their own that could have real value, to becoming someone else&#8217;s user-generated content.</p>
<p>Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DefogMyBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2378133</link>
		<dc:creator>DefogMyBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2378133</guid>
		<description>I think it is best to hang on to your blog. I would say that wouldn&#039;t I. Seriously I think we need to blog and interact with social networks and remember that our blogs are our piece of real estate and the owner of the social network can make up the rules as he/she goes along and not necessarily in our favour. 

We think about Google a lot but does Google think about us? Their main aim is to give their customer a terrific experience so they remain loyal and when they think of bloggers their main focus is getting them to toe the line and provide that experience.

It can be a struggle get going and maintain a blog and maybe other people have a different vision and can cut it without one. Even if you do not have a blog for your particular business I think in the future it may be important to have one for your portfolio of skills, contacts and profile management. You can control the design and content of it more than a facebook or myspace page. Managing your profile across the lot may become key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is best to hang on to your blog. I would say that wouldn&#8217;t I. Seriously I think we need to blog and interact with social networks and remember that our blogs are our piece of real estate and the owner of the social network can make up the rules as he/she goes along and not necessarily in our favour. </p>
<p>We think about Google a lot but does Google think about us? Their main aim is to give their customer a terrific experience so they remain loyal and when they think of bloggers their main focus is getting them to toe the line and provide that experience.</p>
<p>It can be a struggle get going and maintain a blog and maybe other people have a different vision and can cut it without one. Even if you do not have a blog for your particular business I think in the future it may be important to have one for your portfolio of skills, contacts and profile management. You can control the design and content of it more than a facebook or myspace page. Managing your profile across the lot may become key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikilaw</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2377863</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikilaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2377863</guid>
		<description>A lot of people underestimate the power of Wikipedia for social network. To be sure, it&#039;s an explicitly disallowed policy (see [[WP:NOT#MYSPACE]]), but frankly a large part of my non-legal related blog relationships (my blog covers both the law and wikipedia) come from Wikipedia. It&#039;s certainly a relatively steady provider of traffic, and while I&#039;ll note that the numbers are small (I got more traffic in three days from a referral burst from lawschooldiscussion.com than I probably have in all time from Wikipedia) they are steady, consistent, interested (they leave comments) and return (It&#039;s the same users). This is hugely helpful to a small blog like mine, which averages only around 50 readers per day. Wikipedia relationships tend to make sure that at least half of those are returning visitors, and so this is extremely valuable to me.

Next time you&#039;re looking at a social networking tool to grow your blog, consider editing Wikipedia  (positively; don&#039;t give bloggers a bad name), and making some friends there. They might provide a steady traffic source for your growing blog.

Obviously this really won&#039;t help large bloggers so much, but then again, maybe it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people underestimate the power of Wikipedia for social network. To be sure, it&#8217;s an explicitly disallowed policy (see [[WP:NOT#MYSPACE]]), but frankly a large part of my non-legal related blog relationships (my blog covers both the law and wikipedia) come from Wikipedia. It&#8217;s certainly a relatively steady provider of traffic, and while I&#8217;ll note that the numbers are small (I got more traffic in three days from a referral burst from lawschooldiscussion.com than I probably have in all time from Wikipedia) they are steady, consistent, interested (they leave comments) and return (It&#8217;s the same users). This is hugely helpful to a small blog like mine, which averages only around 50 readers per day. Wikipedia relationships tend to make sure that at least half of those are returning visitors, and so this is extremely valuable to me.</p>
<p>Next time you&#8217;re looking at a social networking tool to grow your blog, consider editing Wikipedia  (positively; don&#8217;t give bloggers a bad name), and making some friends there. They might provide a steady traffic source for your growing blog.</p>
<p>Obviously this really won&#8217;t help large bloggers so much, but then again, maybe it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2376455</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2376455</guid>
		<description>Like some of the others, I do way more reading than actual writing since I started blogging.  When you take into account commenting and linking out to other blogs, really blogging is social networking ... but unlike myspace, facebook etc, most of the friends I make blogging have information that I actually want ... not many blogger posting surveys about their favorite color, who their crush is, and how old they were when they got their first kiss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like some of the others, I do way more reading than actual writing since I started blogging.  When you take into account commenting and linking out to other blogs, really blogging is social networking &#8230; but unlike myspace, facebook etc, most of the friends I make blogging have information that I actually want &#8230; not many blogger posting surveys about their favorite color, who their crush is, and how old they were when they got their first kiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2375633</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 05:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2375633</guid>
		<description>Heh. Sucker. What he says makes sense though. I need to use social networking more to power my blog. I have absolutely no friends on &lt;a href=&quot;http://myspace.com/leonrobinson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my MySpace&lt;/a&gt;, save for the omnipresent Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Sucker. What he says makes sense though. I need to use social networking more to power my blog. I have absolutely no friends on <a href="http://myspace.com/leonrobinson" rel="nofollow">my MySpace</a>, save for the omnipresent Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-2375554</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 05:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/09/blogging-vs-social-networking/#comment-2375554</guid>
		<description>I think you are correct. I personally would rather blog than do the social networking thing because I work online so don&#039;t have time to waste just playing. I&#039;m not very good at the blogging thing yet because I&#039;m very new to it but I&#039;m learning and already have a few followers. I like to try to write relevant commentary instead of the normal drivel you find on the social sites. Not all of them but most. :}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are correct. I personally would rather blog than do the social networking thing because I work online so don&#8217;t have time to waste just playing. I&#8217;m not very good at the blogging thing yet because I&#8217;m very new to it but I&#8217;m learning and already have a few followers. I like to try to write relevant commentary instead of the normal drivel you find on the social sites. Not all of them but most. :}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
