<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush Launches Phase 2 &#8211; My First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2591209</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-2591209</guid>
		<description>How about a review of Arkayne?

Its a way better service than BlogRush, its based on content.

http://www.arkayne.com

These guys are doing everything BlogRush is not, mainly caring about your content and the users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a review of Arkayne?</p>
<p>Its a way better service than BlogRush, its based on content.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arkayne.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.arkayne.com</a></p>
<p>These guys are doing everything BlogRush is not, mainly caring about your content and the users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2354287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-2354287</guid>
		<description>it seems there was a lot of hype at first, but now people are realizing how useless it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems there was a lot of hype at first, but now people are realizing how useless it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1992662</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1992662</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how BlogRush could be useful, it has such a low CTR that it isn&#039;t really worth anyones time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how BlogRush could be useful, it has such a low CTR that it isn&#8217;t really worth anyones time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara East</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1971784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara East</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1971784</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I  wasn&#039;t too happy with the results. It looks pretty but I will give it more time. We will see what happens with it in coming months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I  wasn&#8217;t too happy with the results. It looks pretty but I will give it more time. We will see what happens with it in coming months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markowe</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1970303</link>
		<dc:creator>markowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1970303</guid>
		<description>Well, one thing you can say is that this whole topic is sparking off some emotion! I think it must be something to do with our expectations. We don&#039;t like to feel that we fell for someone&#039;s &quot;empty promises&quot; or were used or manipulated in some way.

There&#039;s got to be a happy medium somewhere - to give any new service (or anyone in life, for that matter) the benefit of the doubt, yet not go all the way and commit blindly to something that is not tried and tested.

I would say there is not much in life you could fully put your trust in (in fact I think I know what Darren would say if it came to the crunch, and I would agree), but I&#039;m all for giving something like Blogrush a chance, and even recommending it to others, at the same time without building unrealistic expectations in myself or others. When we trust in something on the basis of our own expectations, that&#039;s generally a recipe for disappointment..!

If that something does disappoint, we don&#039;t have to feel stupid for having &quot;fallen for it&quot; - we just gave it the benefit of the doubt and it didn&#039;t measure up... The jury, I see, seems to be making a fairly rapid return after its deliberations on Blogrush. I&#039;m going to give it just that little bit more of a chance - the same as I would like others to give me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, one thing you can say is that this whole topic is sparking off some emotion! I think it must be something to do with our expectations. We don&#8217;t like to feel that we fell for someone&#8217;s &#8220;empty promises&#8221; or were used or manipulated in some way.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s got to be a happy medium somewhere &#8211; to give any new service (or anyone in life, for that matter) the benefit of the doubt, yet not go all the way and commit blindly to something that is not tried and tested.</p>
<p>I would say there is not much in life you could fully put your trust in (in fact I think I know what Darren would say if it came to the crunch, and I would agree), but I&#8217;m all for giving something like Blogrush a chance, and even recommending it to others, at the same time without building unrealistic expectations in myself or others. When we trust in something on the basis of our own expectations, that&#8217;s generally a recipe for disappointment..!</p>
<p>If that something does disappoint, we don&#8217;t have to feel stupid for having &#8220;fallen for it&#8221; &#8211; we just gave it the benefit of the doubt and it didn&#8217;t measure up&#8230; The jury, I see, seems to be making a fairly rapid return after its deliberations on Blogrush. I&#8217;m going to give it just that little bit more of a chance &#8211; the same as I would like others to give me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1970261</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1970261</guid>
		<description>Darren it is important to differentiate between earned credtis, bonus credits, and credits from your referral network.

There are some problems with the stats still, maybe they were not tracking bonus stats correctly in the early days.

When I added it up yesterday, the internal stats show 202 visitors with up to a 0.5% CTR, and even more current posts achieving 0.25% (which is over 1% for the widget possibly)

The thing is my 3rd party tracking reports over 260 visitors.

Don&#039;t forget you can use plugins to optimize feeds used by Blogrush so it possibly points to a highly converting landing page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren it is important to differentiate between earned credtis, bonus credits, and credits from your referral network.</p>
<p>There are some problems with the stats still, maybe they were not tracking bonus stats correctly in the early days.</p>
<p>When I added it up yesterday, the internal stats show 202 visitors with up to a 0.5% CTR, and even more current posts achieving 0.25% (which is over 1% for the widget possibly)</p>
<p>The thing is my 3rd party tracking reports over 260 visitors.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget you can use plugins to optimize feeds used by Blogrush so it possibly points to a highly converting landing page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geomark</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1970220</link>
		<dc:creator>geomark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1970220</guid>
		<description>I ran the widget for a while on one of my blogs, gave them 10,000 impressions, and received exactly 0 visitors back from it. No brainer, I removed it.

Then the phase 2 email comes so I think I might try again, log into my account and see they disapproved my blog. It&#039;s a 3 year old blog with 1400 posts and updated regularly. WTF, I can&#039;t say much positive about these people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran the widget for a while on one of my blogs, gave them 10,000 impressions, and received exactly 0 visitors back from it. No brainer, I removed it.</p>
<p>Then the phase 2 email comes so I think I might try again, log into my account and see they disapproved my blog. It&#8217;s a 3 year old blog with 1400 posts and updated regularly. WTF, I can&#8217;t say much positive about these people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne Teo</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1969842</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne Teo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1969842</guid>
		<description>I have removed my blogrush after 5 weeks of experiment. I find that this widget is not meant for me, it is not worth putting another widget to add extra loading time, i rather i save that few  milli seconds of loading and stick to other social marketing to generate traffic.

I seriously don&#039;t get much traffic from blogrush alone, i guess even if i were to just drop a comment on a blog, i can easily hit the traffic given from blogrush to me. That is how bad it is, so it&#039;s out for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have removed my blogrush after 5 weeks of experiment. I find that this widget is not meant for me, it is not worth putting another widget to add extra loading time, i rather i save that few  milli seconds of loading and stick to other social marketing to generate traffic.</p>
<p>I seriously don&#8217;t get much traffic from blogrush alone, i guess even if i were to just drop a comment on a blog, i can easily hit the traffic given from blogrush to me. That is how bad it is, so it&#8217;s out for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dalton</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1969713</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1969713</guid>
		<description>@Stefan
The BlogRush widget is rendered entirely by JavaScript so it is not seen by search engines. Therefore it should not affect your PageRank in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stefan<br />
The BlogRush widget is rendered entirely by JavaScript so it is not seen by search engines. Therefore it should not affect your PageRank in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marios Alexandrou</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1969123</link>
		<dc:creator>Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1969123</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sticking with BlogRush for now. It&#039;ll become clear in short order whether the upgraded system will be of value and it&#039;d be shame to miss out just because the service seemed weak at the start. 

I also find the prospects more interesting than MyBlogBlog which has been around for many, many months and still sends little traffic my way. I actually just wrote a post speculating that MyBlogLog would be replaced by BlogRush (website link above points to this post).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sticking with BlogRush for now. It&#8217;ll become clear in short order whether the upgraded system will be of value and it&#8217;d be shame to miss out just because the service seemed weak at the start. </p>
<p>I also find the prospects more interesting than MyBlogBlog which has been around for many, many months and still sends little traffic my way. I actually just wrote a post speculating that MyBlogLog would be replaced by BlogRush (website link above points to this post).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoskred</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968815</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoskred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968815</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not using Blogrush and I never have used it. The reason for that is I tend to be one of those people who doesn&#039;t get sucked into the hype for things - I&#039;ve always been that way. For example - I won&#039;t go to see a movie if it&#039;s shoved down my throat during ad breaks.

I have to say that this whole Blogrush debacle made me lose respect for a few of the bloggers I used to respect. I can&#039;t lie and say you&#039;re not among the people I lost respect for. I just felt like every blogger in the universe was trying to shove this thing down my throat in order to benefit themselves because of the pyramid thing, and you were posting about it just like everyone else. Although you weren&#039;t quite as &quot;this is the best thing since sliced bread sign up now by clicking this link&quot; about it as many of the other bloggers were, it did add to the echo chamber effect.

That&#039;s a difficult thing to say, especially to you, but I wanted to make the point because I feel it is really important for all bloggers to realise what kind of effect their posts can have. 

I don&#039;t blame the bloggers for it as much as I blame Blogrush for putting in that ridiculous multi-level-marketing style pyramid referral system. That is precisely what caused the problem because bloggers felt like if they didn&#039;t post about it and encourage people to sign up using their referral then they would miss out on a lot of traffic. I believe that is quite unethical for any company to do that. They created themselves a lot of buzz - and then it backfired on them.

If a blogger supports something new, something untried and untested and it turns out to be the dismal failure that Blogrush turned out to be - and there is no denying it is a dismal failure - then bloggers who post about it like it is a cure for Cancer put their reputations at risk.

I have no doubt you&#039;ll earn that respect back as time goes by. That&#039;s why I am still here reading. Many of the other bloggers will not be able to earn it back and I will find myself questioning their motives with every post they write now. I&#039;ll be thinking &quot;Why are they telling me about this&quot; and &quot;What&#039;s in it for them&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not using Blogrush and I never have used it. The reason for that is I tend to be one of those people who doesn&#8217;t get sucked into the hype for things &#8211; I&#8217;ve always been that way. For example &#8211; I won&#8217;t go to see a movie if it&#8217;s shoved down my throat during ad breaks.</p>
<p>I have to say that this whole Blogrush debacle made me lose respect for a few of the bloggers I used to respect. I can&#8217;t lie and say you&#8217;re not among the people I lost respect for. I just felt like every blogger in the universe was trying to shove this thing down my throat in order to benefit themselves because of the pyramid thing, and you were posting about it just like everyone else. Although you weren&#8217;t quite as &#8220;this is the best thing since sliced bread sign up now by clicking this link&#8221; about it as many of the other bloggers were, it did add to the echo chamber effect.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a difficult thing to say, especially to you, but I wanted to make the point because I feel it is really important for all bloggers to realise what kind of effect their posts can have. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame the bloggers for it as much as I blame Blogrush for putting in that ridiculous multi-level-marketing style pyramid referral system. That is precisely what caused the problem because bloggers felt like if they didn&#8217;t post about it and encourage people to sign up using their referral then they would miss out on a lot of traffic. I believe that is quite unethical for any company to do that. They created themselves a lot of buzz &#8211; and then it backfired on them.</p>
<p>If a blogger supports something new, something untried and untested and it turns out to be the dismal failure that Blogrush turned out to be &#8211; and there is no denying it is a dismal failure &#8211; then bloggers who post about it like it is a cure for Cancer put their reputations at risk.</p>
<p>I have no doubt you&#8217;ll earn that respect back as time goes by. That&#8217;s why I am still here reading. Many of the other bloggers will not be able to earn it back and I will find myself questioning their motives with every post they write now. I&#8217;ll be thinking &#8220;Why are they telling me about this&#8221; and &#8220;What&#8217;s in it for them&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968778</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968778</guid>
		<description>Does BlogRush lower your PageRank since it may display links to websites with non relevant content? I bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does BlogRush lower your PageRank since it may display links to websites with non relevant content? I bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Blick</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968751</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Blick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968751</guid>
		<description>I dropped it last week. I just was not seeing anything significant happening and felt the categories weren&#039;t helping much either. The idea sounds good but for now, I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped it last week. I just was not seeing anything significant happening and felt the categories weren&#8217;t helping much either. The idea sounds good but for now, I&#8217;m out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968635</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968635</guid>
		<description>Steven - yep I watched the video and heard John&#039;s explanation about how clicks are more valuable than people think. I agree and don&#039;t take the 900 or so extra readers that went to my blogs for granted - I agree with him, however I&#039;m sure even John would admit that 900 visitors from 1.5 million impressions isn&#039;t really that great a conversion.

Like I say in the post - there are a few promising signs that they will improve and it&#039;s just early days for BR - but even I (the post patient and optimistic man in the blogosphere) am getting a little weary of waiting to see conversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven &#8211; yep I watched the video and heard John&#8217;s explanation about how clicks are more valuable than people think. I agree and don&#8217;t take the 900 or so extra readers that went to my blogs for granted &#8211; I agree with him, however I&#8217;m sure even John would admit that 900 visitors from 1.5 million impressions isn&#8217;t really that great a conversion.</p>
<p>Like I say in the post &#8211; there are a few promising signs that they will improve and it&#8217;s just early days for BR &#8211; but even I (the post patient and optimistic man in the blogosphere) am getting a little weary of waiting to see conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968342</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968342</guid>
		<description>My first impression upon visiting phase 2 was that they purposely buried the visitors stat, making it hard to access and use. They&#039;re aware that it&#039;s a terrible clickthrough rate and they appear to be trying to distract publishers by showing them their THOUSAND OF IMPRESSIONS WOO!!!

It&#039;s pretty sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impression upon visiting phase 2 was that they purposely buried the visitors stat, making it hard to access and use. They&#8217;re aware that it&#8217;s a terrible clickthrough rate and they appear to be trying to distract publishers by showing them their THOUSAND OF IMPRESSIONS WOO!!!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968173</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968173</guid>
		<description>Darren did you watch the video explaining the changes?

I mostly agree with your assessment, but there were a couple of things mentioned in the video explaining phase 2 that I thought had potential.

The first was John&#039;s mentioning how while clicks are low, they are probably coming more often from other bloggers. That might make the traffic a little more valuable since other bloggers are more likely to talk about you and link to you. So one blogrush click could conceivably lead to many more links and clicks from other sources.

Is that what will happen? I don&#039;t know, but I can understand the thought process behind it.

The other thing mentioned was the concept of your hot posts. It wasn&#039;t entirely explained what made a post hot, but some factors would be how often it&#039;s seen and clicked and how long people who do land on the post stick around to read it.

There&#039;s going to be a second site launching (in a month?) that will be a list of hot posts. I guess it&#039;s a new spin on a social news site where the content is submitted based on what people are interested in on the BlogRush network.

Assuming the second site does present good content and gains traction I can see where it would have the potential to drive a lot more traffic than the widget. A couple of my posts are catergorized as hot even with just one click so you don&#039;t need clicks to go hot and be included on the proposed new site.

Again will this work? I don&#039;t know and it will certainly need some work and time, but it does sound like it has more potential. That potential might be enough to keep the widgets around for at least a little while longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren did you watch the video explaining the changes?</p>
<p>I mostly agree with your assessment, but there were a couple of things mentioned in the video explaining phase 2 that I thought had potential.</p>
<p>The first was John&#8217;s mentioning how while clicks are low, they are probably coming more often from other bloggers. That might make the traffic a little more valuable since other bloggers are more likely to talk about you and link to you. So one blogrush click could conceivably lead to many more links and clicks from other sources.</p>
<p>Is that what will happen? I don&#8217;t know, but I can understand the thought process behind it.</p>
<p>The other thing mentioned was the concept of your hot posts. It wasn&#8217;t entirely explained what made a post hot, but some factors would be how often it&#8217;s seen and clicked and how long people who do land on the post stick around to read it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s going to be a second site launching (in a month?) that will be a list of hot posts. I guess it&#8217;s a new spin on a social news site where the content is submitted based on what people are interested in on the BlogRush network.</p>
<p>Assuming the second site does present good content and gains traction I can see where it would have the potential to drive a lot more traffic than the widget. A couple of my posts are catergorized as hot even with just one click so you don&#8217;t need clicks to go hot and be included on the proposed new site.</p>
<p>Again will this work? I don&#8217;t know and it will certainly need some work and time, but it does sound like it has more potential. That potential might be enough to keep the widgets around for at least a little while longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968150</link>
		<dc:creator>About Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968150</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a supporter of the Blogrush widget ever since it first came out. My first impression of the dashboard is that it&#039;s been so long in development that it should have bells and whistles on it. Unfortunately it&#039;s pretty poor. The promotional video where John Reese explains the dashboard is pretty dull as a result, since there is so little that needs explaining.

It is interesting though to be able to see which of your posts are being syndicated and how many times. It would be nice if you could have more control over this. Unfortunately the most widely syndicated of my posts is one with a misleading headline. It is one of the weaknesses of the widget that a reader is supposed to make a judgement on a post purely from the headline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a supporter of the Blogrush widget ever since it first came out. My first impression of the dashboard is that it&#8217;s been so long in development that it should have bells and whistles on it. Unfortunately it&#8217;s pretty poor. The promotional video where John Reese explains the dashboard is pretty dull as a result, since there is so little that needs explaining.</p>
<p>It is interesting though to be able to see which of your posts are being syndicated and how many times. It would be nice if you could have more control over this. Unfortunately the most widely syndicated of my posts is one with a misleading headline. It is one of the weaknesses of the widget that a reader is supposed to make a judgement on a post purely from the headline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stealth Employed</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968139</link>
		<dc:creator>Stealth Employed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968139</guid>
		<description>I was on BlogRush right at 12 when it went live. I had that much anticipation. I posted my 2 cents on my blog as well. So far, the phase  2 seems to be doing very well. I hope I can get a couple of blogs back into the network though. I lost like 25% of my blogs after the whole quality audit thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on BlogRush right at 12 when it went live. I had that much anticipation. I posted my 2 cents on my blog as well. So far, the phase  2 seems to be doing very well. I hope I can get a couple of blogs back into the network though. I lost like 25% of my blogs after the whole quality audit thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schawbel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968125</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schawbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968125</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the value, therefore I don&#039;t think it&#039;s acceptable to deliver that much traffic while recieving a small fraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the value, therefore I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s acceptable to deliver that much traffic while recieving a small fraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1968080</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/11/01/blogrush-launches-phase-2-my-first-impressions/#comment-1968080</guid>
		<description>I think blogrush is way too far gone to salvage at this point.  The launch was underwhelming to say the least, and it hasn&#039;t gotten any better since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think blogrush is way too far gone to salvage at this point.  The launch was underwhelming to say the least, and it hasn&#8217;t gotten any better since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
