<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaked Video Reveals Google Reader Developments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: libby</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1710799</link>
		<dc:creator>libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1710799</guid>
		<description>good article 
http://web.enjoychn.com/blog/1730-leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article<br />
<a href="http://web.enjoychn.com/blog/1730-leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments" rel="nofollow">http://web.enjoychn.com/blog/1730-leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Shalman</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1708374</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Shalman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1708374</guid>
		<description>Hmm... so google is going to monetize google reader for their own benefit? Why does this not strike me as a &quot;good&quot; update?

The other features seem interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; so google is going to monetize google reader for their own benefit? Why does this not strike me as a &#8220;good&#8221; update?</p>
<p>The other features seem interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreio</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1708084</link>
		<dc:creator>andreio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1708084</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great news ... I love that Google moves fast. Some of these features were to be expected since Google bought Feedburner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great news &#8230; I love that Google moves fast. Some of these features were to be expected since Google bought Feedburner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarriorBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704440</link>
		<dc:creator>WarriorBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704440</guid>
		<description>That would be awesome. I will enjoy some of the features above since I use Google Reader myself :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be awesome. I will enjoy some of the features above since I use Google Reader myself :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704422</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704422</guid>
		<description>You are right, the recommending feeds will only benefit some giant weblogs only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, the recommending feeds will only benefit some giant weblogs only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamaipanese</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704317</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamaipanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704317</guid>
		<description>interesting

Google Reader is the only online reader I know, never had a reason to try another reader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting</p>
<p>Google Reader is the only online reader I know, never had a reason to try another reader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick's Marketing Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704308</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick's Marketing Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704308</guid>
		<description>I really think the &#039;leak&#039; was done on purpose.

I really like the idea of recommending feeds to readers based on what they have read before.  Kind of like Amazon&#039;s &quot;Customer who looked at this also looked x&quot;.  It&#039;s not perfect but sometimes it&#039;s works well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think the &#8216;leak&#8217; was done on purpose.</p>
<p>I really like the idea of recommending feeds to readers based on what they have read before.  Kind of like Amazon&#8217;s &#8220;Customer who looked at this also looked x&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not perfect but sometimes it&#8217;s works well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay (the sailboat guy)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704276</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay (the sailboat guy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704276</guid>
		<description>This reads to me as: 

This business is stepping towards a more disciplined approach and is about to get VERY serious.

It sounds similar to the auditing processes print publishers were forced to subject themselves to several years ago. 

This is to be expected, if the blogging industry wants to continue to attract the serious advertising budgets from the &quot;big end of town&quot;. 

Google is as much a pawn in this process as us mere mortals, in that,  if they wish to maintain their dominant market position and cash flow, they have to prove that real peoples purchasing decisions can be influenced using their resources. 

Maybe (big hope) it will help side line the cowboys creating non commercial swarms of &quot;Get Rich Quick&quot; inducing traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reads to me as: </p>
<p>This business is stepping towards a more disciplined approach and is about to get VERY serious.</p>
<p>It sounds similar to the auditing processes print publishers were forced to subject themselves to several years ago. </p>
<p>This is to be expected, if the blogging industry wants to continue to attract the serious advertising budgets from the &#8220;big end of town&#8221;. </p>
<p>Google is as much a pawn in this process as us mere mortals, in that,  if they wish to maintain their dominant market position and cash flow, they have to prove that real peoples purchasing decisions can be influenced using their resources. </p>
<p>Maybe (big hope) it will help side line the cowboys creating non commercial swarms of &#8220;Get Rich Quick&#8221; inducing traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badsra</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704133</link>
		<dc:creator>Badsra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704133</guid>
		<description>Letting people comment on someone&#039;s shared items might not be the best of ideas. After all, a blogger will benefit most if the readers leave comments at the original owner&#039;s blog. 

Taking ProBlogger as an example, if people leave comments on Scoble&#039;s shared items (for ProBlogger posts), there&#039;s a lesser chance for the blogger to gain feedback from the readers. Of course, not all blogs work this way but I&#039;d rather have at my blog the comments that are directed to my posts. 

BTW, I wrote more on this in a post on the same topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letting people comment on someone&#8217;s shared items might not be the best of ideas. After all, a blogger will benefit most if the readers leave comments at the original owner&#8217;s blog. </p>
<p>Taking ProBlogger as an example, if people leave comments on Scoble&#8217;s shared items (for ProBlogger posts), there&#8217;s a lesser chance for the blogger to gain feedback from the readers. Of course, not all blogs work this way but I&#8217;d rather have at my blog the comments that are directed to my posts. </p>
<p>BTW, I wrote more on this in a post on the same topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704090</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704090</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s awesome! Sounds like some great features. I&#039;m a huge fan of Google Reader, so anything like this is great for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s awesome! Sounds like some great features. I&#8217;m a huge fan of Google Reader, so anything like this is great for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiltak</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704080</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704080</guid>
		<description>Yeah right, leaked...

I&#039;m fairly sure that most of the time, &quot;leaked content&quot; is only a clever mean of building hype around a project..

Everyone does it, so why not google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah right, leaked&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fairly sure that most of the time, &#8220;leaked content&#8221; is only a clever mean of building hype around a project..</p>
<p>Everyone does it, so why not google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704079</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704079</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s going to be cool. At times, I have a hard time finding blogs I like, a list from Google about what ones fit me best would be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s going to be cool. At times, I have a hard time finding blogs I like, a list from Google about what ones fit me best would be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vangardx</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704078</link>
		<dc:creator>vangardx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704078</guid>
		<description>i interested to know more how they list the recommended feed :) maybe you can write about this next time darren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i interested to know more how they list the recommended feed :) maybe you can write about this next time darren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-1704070</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/09/12/leaked-video-reveals-google-reader-developments/#comment-1704070</guid>
		<description>Wow those features sound great... I guess getting on the recommended list will result in a case of the &#039;rich getting richer&#039;... but how &#039;rich&#039; you have to be in the first place will be what I want to hear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow those features sound great&#8230; I guess getting on the recommended list will result in a case of the &#8216;rich getting richer&#8217;&#8230; but how &#8216;rich&#8217; you have to be in the first place will be what I want to hear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
