<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MovableType 4 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creamer</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4066328</link>
		<dc:creator>Creamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-4066328</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t think that movable type is a cool thing to play with, even though it has a simple installation, even modifying a page takes forever and you have to edit a template that it contains template itself, and that template  contains widgets too. Let alone creating a style. Everything is messy, if it takes 1 minute to add a swf file into html, it takes forever in MT, and finally I couldn&#039;t even make tabs and edit my community solution. I would not rate more that 5% on ease of use, unless you put 3 months to learn it&#039;s new programming language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t think that movable type is a cool thing to play with, even though it has a simple installation, even modifying a page takes forever and you have to edit a template that it contains template itself, and that template  contains widgets too. Let alone creating a style. Everything is messy, if it takes 1 minute to add a swf file into html, it takes forever in MT, and finally I couldn&#8217;t even make tabs and edit my community solution. I would not rate more that 5% on ease of use, unless you put 3 months to learn it&#8217;s new programming language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1762535</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1762535</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a long-time MT user, although I took a blogging hiatus for a couple of years. So, in a way I was new to blogging again. My favorites are still MT (love the new one) and (gasp!) blogspot. Wordpress was fine enough, but meh. I didn&#039;t like that you had to pay to customize the templates. If I pay, I&#039;d rather have the software on my own server and just pay for server space. I&#039;m old-school I guess. 

But to digress, I do agree that the MT themes are lacking. I like the cartoony ones, but I like cutesy stuff like that. However, I will be making my own anyway, so it doesn&#039;t really matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a long-time MT user, although I took a blogging hiatus for a couple of years. So, in a way I was new to blogging again. My favorites are still MT (love the new one) and (gasp!) blogspot. WordPress was fine enough, but meh. I didn&#8217;t like that you had to pay to customize the templates. If I pay, I&#8217;d rather have the software on my own server and just pay for server space. I&#8217;m old-school I guess. </p>
<p>But to digress, I do agree that the MT themes are lacking. I like the cartoony ones, but I like cutesy stuff like that. However, I will be making my own anyway, so it doesn&#8217;t really matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nakamura</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1635508</link>
		<dc:creator>Nakamura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1635508</guid>
		<description>you know, Darren, the new MT4 is a cool thing to play with! it&#039;s my first encounter with this platform, have used WP long time. but all i can say, it&#039;s efective, it has lots of built-in features otheres don&#039;t, and it has a future - the buzz created around it will sure wake up peoples interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, Darren, the new MT4 is a cool thing to play with! it&#8217;s my first encounter with this platform, have used WP long time. but all i can say, it&#8217;s efective, it has lots of built-in features otheres don&#8217;t, and it has a future &#8211; the buzz created around it will sure wake up peoples interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1624428</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1624428</guid>
		<description>The MT4 installation is pretty simple. Successfully migrating/updating/reconfiguring everything you had from MT 3.x is not so much.

But it&#039;s what I&#039;m used to, so I&#039;m working with it. That and I had a horrible time trying to import stuff to WP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MT4 installation is pretty simple. Successfully migrating/updating/reconfiguring everything you had from MT 3.x is not so much.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s what I&#8217;m used to, so I&#8217;m working with it. That and I had a horrible time trying to import stuff to WP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Laitano</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1622878</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Laitano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1622878</guid>
		<description>Actually.. most people maybe tried installing MT4 when it was beta, but right now it&#039;s pretty easy installing. Just have your database info (server, name, username, password) , type in your mail server, and then your account info.. and that&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually.. most people maybe tried installing MT4 when it was beta, but right now it&#8217;s pretty easy installing. Just have your database info (server, name, username, password) , type in your mail server, and then your account info.. and that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Million Dollar Homeboy</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1622285</link>
		<dc:creator>Million Dollar Homeboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1622285</guid>
		<description>When initially setting up my milliondollarhomeboy blog, I installed MT and WP on my local computer to test and play with before deciding which one to use. Although the admin side of MT feels a bit better aesthetically to me, the plug-ins, number of themes, ability to customize, and overall support from the WP community was the ultimate decision to go and stick with WP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When initially setting up my milliondollarhomeboy blog, I installed MT and WP on my local computer to test and play with before deciding which one to use. Although the admin side of MT feels a bit better aesthetically to me, the plug-ins, number of themes, ability to customize, and overall support from the WP community was the ultimate decision to go and stick with WP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Baskind</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1620988</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Baskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1620988</guid>
		<description>My initial impressions of MT4 are positive -- to my own surprise.

The main thing I can say about the installation (which is different, though not difficult) is that Six Apart isn&#039;t kidding about those file permissions in the /cgi-bin/mt/ directory. If it ends with .cgi, it *must* be 755. I had a few frustrations before realizing my FTP client had not respected this.

There&#039;s no doubt WP remains the stronger platform -- for now. WP has such a huge base of themes, plugins, and support. But there are some things I really like about MT4, particularly with respect to the workflow. The Dashboard is vastly superior to WP, and that&#039;s where most of my time gets spent.

I&#039;m converting my personal blog to MT4. If all goes well, our next project will likely be on MT. It has a lot of potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial impressions of MT4 are positive &#8212; to my own surprise.</p>
<p>The main thing I can say about the installation (which is different, though not difficult) is that Six Apart isn&#8217;t kidding about those file permissions in the /cgi-bin/mt/ directory. If it ends with .cgi, it *must* be 755. I had a few frustrations before realizing my FTP client had not respected this.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt WP remains the stronger platform &#8212; for now. WP has such a huge base of themes, plugins, and support. But there are some things I really like about MT4, particularly with respect to the workflow. The Dashboard is vastly superior to WP, and that&#8217;s where most of my time gets spent.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m converting my personal blog to MT4. If all goes well, our next project will likely be on MT. It has a lot of potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1620674</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1620674</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using MT for about 5 years now and 4 is a definite improvement over older versions.

Not only does it have more features, it publishes much faster as well, and has improved user management.

The only problem I have with it (but it&#039;s really a blessing in disguise) is that the system now has it&#039;s own &quot;language&quot; for lack of a better term.

That means that while older MT tags (IE MTEntries, etc) will continue to work, you probably don&#039;t get the full benefit of the new system.

On the plus site, MT4 WILL NOT overwrite your templates, even when you ask it to.  I foolishly tried to overwrite my index template with the default and it wouldn&#039;t.  Good thing too because I set up a test blog to see what the new default template was like and it&#039;s quite different.

Overall though I&#039;m very happy with the new system.  Makes managing my sites much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using MT for about 5 years now and 4 is a definite improvement over older versions.</p>
<p>Not only does it have more features, it publishes much faster as well, and has improved user management.</p>
<p>The only problem I have with it (but it&#8217;s really a blessing in disguise) is that the system now has it&#8217;s own &#8220;language&#8221; for lack of a better term.</p>
<p>That means that while older MT tags (IE MTEntries, etc) will continue to work, you probably don&#8217;t get the full benefit of the new system.</p>
<p>On the plus site, MT4 WILL NOT overwrite your templates, even when you ask it to.  I foolishly tried to overwrite my index template with the default and it wouldn&#8217;t.  Good thing too because I set up a test blog to see what the new default template was like and it&#8217;s quite different.</p>
<p>Overall though I&#8217;m very happy with the new system.  Makes managing my sites much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1620541</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1620541</guid>
		<description>In case it didn&#039;t come out in my entry, I agree with Jacob. It is my biggest frustration with MT4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case it didn&#8217;t come out in my entry, I agree with Jacob. It is my biggest frustration with MT4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Pishchour</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1620486</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Pishchour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1620486</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using MT for about 4 years already and can&#039;t say I&#039;m happy with the new version. It&#039;s definitely more powerful than MT3.xx, but it also lost some of its clarity and simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using MT for about 4 years already and can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m happy with the new version. It&#8217;s definitely more powerful than MT3.xx, but it also lost some of its clarity and simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwall_hp</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1620246</link>
		<dc:creator>redwall_hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1620246</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1619829&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sean&lt;/a&gt;, you didn&#039;t know what Movable Type was? And you call yourself a blogger! :D Read up on your blogging history! Six Apart&#039;s Movable Type was &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; blogging software of choice before Wordpress came along. Six Apart invented Trackback, and innovated many other things that we take for granted in modern blog software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1619829" rel="nofollow">Sean</a>, you didn&#8217;t know what Movable Type was? And you call yourself a blogger! :D Read up on your blogging history! Six Apart&#8217;s Movable Type was <i>the</i> blogging software of choice before WordPress came along. Six Apart invented Trackback, and innovated many other things that we take for granted in modern blog software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1620091</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1620091</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren,

I used MT4 beta for a while after resurrecting HumaneIA, and I liked it - saw a lot of potential for it, especially as a way of managing multiple blogs. In the end I abandoned it (perhaps cruelly, perhaps prematurely) for WordPress because that was what I was (and am) used to. 

Cheers, Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren,</p>
<p>I used MT4 beta for a while after resurrecting HumaneIA, and I liked it &#8211; saw a lot of potential for it, especially as a way of managing multiple blogs. In the end I abandoned it (perhaps cruelly, perhaps prematurely) for WordPress because that was what I was (and am) used to. </p>
<p>Cheers, Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1619903</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1619903</guid>
		<description>gav13 - if you mean this site (problogger) yes - it runs on WP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gav13 &#8211; if you mean this site (problogger) yes &#8211; it runs on WP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1619829</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1619829</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what Movable Type 4 was until 5 minutes ago when I did the research.

Dam, the Interface look very nice. I wanna install it now since you&#039;re a pro blogger and if you&#039;re thinking of installing it, then it must be good...

Whoa, definitely not easy to install from what I am reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.movabletype.org/documentation/installation/before-you-begin.html
&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; 

At least I learned something new today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what Movable Type 4 was until 5 minutes ago when I did the research.</p>
<p>Dam, the Interface look very nice. I wanna install it now since you&#8217;re a pro blogger and if you&#8217;re thinking of installing it, then it must be good&#8230;</p>
<p>Whoa, definitely not easy to install from what I am reading <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/documentation/installation/before-you-begin.html<br />
">here</a> </p>
<p>At least I learned something new today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsv13</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1619667</link>
		<dc:creator>gsv13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1619667</guid>
		<description>Currently this site is running on wordpress na?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently this site is running on wordpress na?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1619473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/26/movabletype-4-review/#comment-1619473</guid>
		<description>I tried it for a few hours, was impressed with the power and the interface -- however, the lack of user-made themes was a big downer.

Plus I&#039;m just too used to WP by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it for a few hours, was impressed with the power and the interface &#8212; however, the lack of user-made themes was a big downer.</p>
<p>Plus I&#8217;m just too used to WP by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/22 queries in 0.069 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 16:50:59 -->
