<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesign of Problogger.net &#8211; Designer Tells All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-3695021</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-3695021</guid>
		<description>Did you ever do an audit on how the design impacted pageviews and whatnot in the longer term?  (That is, after the initial &quot;let&#039;s look around&quot; phase.)

I&#039;m especially curious about the vast amount of information in the footer which requires considerable scroll.  Is that there mostly for SEO purposes or does it really increase stickiness?  How does it compare to having similar information in the sidebars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever do an audit on how the design impacted pageviews and whatnot in the longer term?  (That is, after the initial &#8220;let&#8217;s look around&#8221; phase.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m especially curious about the vast amount of information in the footer which requires considerable scroll.  Is that there mostly for SEO purposes or does it really increase stickiness?  How does it compare to having similar information in the sidebars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcriber</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1609844</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcriber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1609844</guid>
		<description>It seems you have fixed the IE6 sidebar issue that I pointed out on 08/14.  Looking fine, no probs now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems you have fixed the IE6 sidebar issue that I pointed out on 08/14.  Looking fine, no probs now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1593602</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1593602</guid>
		<description>I can see the way you&#039;re taking Problogger, and think that Ben has done a good job of helping you in that direction... but it leaves behind some of the things I&#039;ve most appreciated about the site. More details at:
http://changingway.org/2007/08/19/redesign-of-probloggernet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the way you&#8217;re taking Problogger, and think that Ben has done a good job of helping you in that direction&#8230; but it leaves behind some of the things I&#8217;ve most appreciated about the site. More details at:<br />
<a href="http://changingway.org/2007/08/19/redesign-of-probloggernet/" rel="nofollow">http://changingway.org/2007/08/19/redesign-of-probloggernet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1575728</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1575728</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren,
the new Design is nice, clean, very professional and easy to navigate.

But it looks a little bit like a site of a faceless company or a nonserious SEO firm. And futher more it reminds me of TechCrunch - &#039;couse of the 125×125 ads.

... overall it&#039;s a nice style but a bit to professional ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren,<br />
the new Design is nice, clean, very professional and easy to navigate.</p>
<p>But it looks a little bit like a site of a faceless company or a nonserious SEO firm. And futher more it reminds me of TechCrunch &#8211; &#8216;couse of the 125×125 ads.</p>
<p>&#8230; overall it&#8217;s a nice style but a bit to professional ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpicePuppy</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1573890</link>
		<dc:creator>SpicePuppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1573890</guid>
		<description>Honestly Darren, the first time I ever saw problogger.net, I almost clicked the back button right away just because of the color scheme.  All that gray and orange just didn&#039;t do it for me.  When I saw the redesign I was instantly wowed.  I haven&#039;t even taken the time yet to really consider the design, but my gut reaction is that it just looks so much better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly Darren, the first time I ever saw problogger.net, I almost clicked the back button right away just because of the color scheme.  All that gray and orange just didn&#8217;t do it for me.  When I saw the redesign I was instantly wowed.  I haven&#8217;t even taken the time yet to really consider the design, but my gut reaction is that it just looks so much better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuba</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1573226</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1573226</guid>
		<description>Much better now. Maybe less original but more readable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better now. Maybe less original but more readable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1570332</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1570332</guid>
		<description>Darren, 

I love the new design of your blog. You have been a great help to me in learning how to become a better blogger.

Thanks for the post about decluttering your blog. I need to do this real soon!

God Bless You!

Andrea proudly wears size 11 shoes. http://www.yourfeetmakeyouunique.com is designed for women who love and wear plus-size shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, </p>
<p>I love the new design of your blog. You have been a great help to me in learning how to become a better blogger.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post about decluttering your blog. I need to do this real soon!</p>
<p>God Bless You!</p>
<p>Andrea proudly wears size 11 shoes. <a href="http://www.yourfeetmakeyouunique.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yourfeetmakeyouunique.com</a> is designed for women who love and wear plus-size shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1569798</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1569798</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what the big deal is with font size, but I think it suits the new look fine. I&#039;ve had no trouble reading or scanning anything. This, to me, is a very successful redesign. The content is organized and presented in a sensible way and the color scheme and &quot;module&quot; divisions are well served. It&#039;s a dramatic improvement from the former. I love it. :)

The placement of the extended footer links was a good idea. I&#039;ve read the comments and critiques questioning the footer and bemoaning the loss of the squares previously at the top, but I think that loss was offset nicely by the &#039;best of&#039; for beginners being prominently displayed. Nothing in the footer is really crucial so it makes sense to house the chosen content there. On the other hand, the search, subscribe, and recent posts are all located [mostly] above the fold, for all to see right away. If someone can&#039;t figure out how to scroll down for the the secondary content, well, words fail me.

The portal-like idea is a good one, and I have a feeling we&#039;ll see more and more bloggers taking this approach with their home pages. Particularly for a blog as mature and content-heavy as ProBlogger, it&#039;s a solid choice, though it may take some time for readers to acclimate.

My one complaint - the far left sidebar could be cinched up a bit more in the width, as someone said. It would give more weight to the main content, and a little breathing room. 

In my ever so humble opinion, the entire site is much more inviting now, and the content more distinguishable... Job well done Darren and Ben. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the big deal is with font size, but I think it suits the new look fine. I&#8217;ve had no trouble reading or scanning anything. This, to me, is a very successful redesign. The content is organized and presented in a sensible way and the color scheme and &#8220;module&#8221; divisions are well served. It&#8217;s a dramatic improvement from the former. I love it. :)</p>
<p>The placement of the extended footer links was a good idea. I&#8217;ve read the comments and critiques questioning the footer and bemoaning the loss of the squares previously at the top, but I think that loss was offset nicely by the &#8216;best of&#8217; for beginners being prominently displayed. Nothing in the footer is really crucial so it makes sense to house the chosen content there. On the other hand, the search, subscribe, and recent posts are all located [mostly] above the fold, for all to see right away. If someone can&#8217;t figure out how to scroll down for the the secondary content, well, words fail me.</p>
<p>The portal-like idea is a good one, and I have a feeling we&#8217;ll see more and more bloggers taking this approach with their home pages. Particularly for a blog as mature and content-heavy as ProBlogger, it&#8217;s a solid choice, though it may take some time for readers to acclimate.</p>
<p>My one complaint &#8211; the far left sidebar could be cinched up a bit more in the width, as someone said. It would give more weight to the main content, and a little breathing room. </p>
<p>In my ever so humble opinion, the entire site is much more inviting now, and the content more distinguishable&#8230; Job well done Darren and Ben. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1568708</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1568708</guid>
		<description>Darren, beautiful redesign, very clean and well organized. Looks great on Firefox and Safari. Just one thing...
It still looks bad on IE 6. The sidebar is still improperly aligned towards the bottom of the page. Good luck!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, beautiful redesign, very clean and well organized. Looks great on Firefox and Safari. Just one thing&#8230;<br />
It still looks bad on IE 6. The sidebar is still improperly aligned towards the bottom of the page. Good luck!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1568433</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1568433</guid>
		<description>The design is solid and clean, but it reminds me instantly of Copyblogger.com, and the layout/dimensions of many new designs I&#039;m seeing around. I guess this is the new web style?

I do like it, it&#039;s very readable... but I think your old design, colors and branding were very recognizable. Perhaps a little less clean, less styled... but distinctive nonetheless. Maybe it&#039;ll grow on me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design is solid and clean, but it reminds me instantly of Copyblogger.com, and the layout/dimensions of many new designs I&#8217;m seeing around. I guess this is the new web style?</p>
<p>I do like it, it&#8217;s very readable&#8230; but I think your old design, colors and branding were very recognizable. Perhaps a little less clean, less styled&#8230; but distinctive nonetheless. Maybe it&#8217;ll grow on me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1567162</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1567162</guid>
		<description>Did linkworth buy all 3 left over advertising slots on the RHS?

It looks a little odd... hehe :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did linkworth buy all 3 left over advertising slots on the RHS?</p>
<p>It looks a little odd&#8230; hehe :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcriber</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1566376</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcriber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1566376</guid>
		<description>You say the IE6 sidebar issue has been fixated but on my IE6, I am viewing this page with the rightside bar pushed down separately from the main contents, huh?  Same is the case with your home page.

Anyway, the image of the blog that you have put here is appealing compared to your earlier version,  where the earlier had a spilled-vomit design. (Sorry for that harsh criticism).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say the IE6 sidebar issue has been fixated but on my IE6, I am viewing this page with the rightside bar pushed down separately from the main contents, huh?  Same is the case with your home page.</p>
<p>Anyway, the image of the blog that you have put here is appealing compared to your earlier version,  where the earlier had a spilled-vomit design. (Sorry for that harsh criticism).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1565842</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1565842</guid>
		<description>Change is always good and eventually will grow on people. There will always be opinions and comments, and I guess I may as well leave my 2 cents too :)

Front Page:
- Over the past few days .. I&#039;ve been appreciating what Ben refers as the &quot;DOM scripting&quot; for the archives, and I&#039;ve actually been able to surf the archives without having to think of a search term. I would expand the links to at least 50 in the older categories - as you probably have them ..
- if possible, it would be a great utility source if there was a 5th tab .. of the group efforts and writing projects (community efforts) ... and, for the people out there who like to link back to Problogger, the entire &quot;Best of Problogger&quot; section could be replicated to it&#039;s own page or unique URL.
- I&#039;d switch the left column with the center column. Because you have to scroll down the left side, your eyes tend to just scan over directly to the slide bar and the right and miss the center altogether.

SinglePage:
- I think it&#039;s wasted space to put the commentor&#039;s name to the left of the comment, or at least it hurts the eyes to scroll left/right/left/right to read comments and the person&#039;s name who wrote the comments .. my eyes are trained to scroll down, not sideways. It&#039;s never good to have a screen that scrolls right/left .. there&#039;s a reason - and it&#039;s the same with the comments.
- I agree with everyone who suggested that the font size and type just isn&#039;t right here .. it&#039;s too small and spread out and tires you to read even an average post. If you used the same type of font and spacing as other b5media templates .. it would kind of tie in with the rest of the network, even though it is different on the front page and the footer. 
- The &quot;Problogger Sponsors&quot; six 125x125 ads are vertical and misaligned down the page in a semi-left adjusted format on my IE v7.0.5730.11 browser

Archives:
- It&#039;s missing a step. The posts for the month. You go from month to the posts, yet only 9 posts showed up. How do I know which post to read? I have to scroll down to the bottom, then through previous pages for that month to hope to find something. I would place a complete list of all posts in the month at the top before it shows the 2-paragraph teaser. 

Comments:
- I was and am sad to see no &quot;live preview&quot; or ability to preview to see how bad a typist I am, or what lousy grammar I have. nudge,nudge,say no more.

Overall:
- Ultimately (i.m.h.o.) when the content is good the design doesn&#039;t matter .. and people will get used to this design. As long as I get to a the permalink/single page when I click on the post titles in my Bloglines .. then I really have to ask myself .. &quot;how does it affect me?&quot;   The answer is - it doesn&#039;t.

Take care // HART</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change is always good and eventually will grow on people. There will always be opinions and comments, and I guess I may as well leave my 2 cents too :)</p>
<p>Front Page:<br />
- Over the past few days .. I&#8217;ve been appreciating what Ben refers as the &#8220;DOM scripting&#8221; for the archives, and I&#8217;ve actually been able to surf the archives without having to think of a search term. I would expand the links to at least 50 in the older categories &#8211; as you probably have them ..<br />
- if possible, it would be a great utility source if there was a 5th tab .. of the group efforts and writing projects (community efforts) &#8230; and, for the people out there who like to link back to Problogger, the entire &#8220;Best of Problogger&#8221; section could be replicated to it&#8217;s own page or unique URL.<br />
- I&#8217;d switch the left column with the center column. Because you have to scroll down the left side, your eyes tend to just scan over directly to the slide bar and the right and miss the center altogether.</p>
<p>SinglePage:<br />
- I think it&#8217;s wasted space to put the commentor&#8217;s name to the left of the comment, or at least it hurts the eyes to scroll left/right/left/right to read comments and the person&#8217;s name who wrote the comments .. my eyes are trained to scroll down, not sideways. It&#8217;s never good to have a screen that scrolls right/left .. there&#8217;s a reason &#8211; and it&#8217;s the same with the comments.<br />
- I agree with everyone who suggested that the font size and type just isn&#8217;t right here .. it&#8217;s too small and spread out and tires you to read even an average post. If you used the same type of font and spacing as other b5media templates .. it would kind of tie in with the rest of the network, even though it is different on the front page and the footer.<br />
- The &#8220;Problogger Sponsors&#8221; six 125&#215;125 ads are vertical and misaligned down the page in a semi-left adjusted format on my IE v7.0.5730.11 browser</p>
<p>Archives:<br />
- It&#8217;s missing a step. The posts for the month. You go from month to the posts, yet only 9 posts showed up. How do I know which post to read? I have to scroll down to the bottom, then through previous pages for that month to hope to find something. I would place a complete list of all posts in the month at the top before it shows the 2-paragraph teaser. </p>
<p>Comments:<br />
- I was and am sad to see no &#8220;live preview&#8221; or ability to preview to see how bad a typist I am, or what lousy grammar I have. nudge,nudge,say no more.</p>
<p>Overall:<br />
- Ultimately (i.m.h.o.) when the content is good the design doesn&#8217;t matter .. and people will get used to this design. As long as I get to a the permalink/single page when I click on the post titles in my Bloglines .. then I really have to ask myself .. &#8220;how does it affect me?&#8221;   The answer is &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Take care // HART</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milo</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1565766</link>
		<dc:creator>milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1565766</guid>
		<description>Should&#039;ve used a heatmap, so you two could follow your visitors, as of now it a 08/15 type of blog = no more outstanding. e.g.the post titles of the featured post looks like a G adsense code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should&#8217;ve used a heatmap, so you two could follow your visitors, as of now it a 08/15 type of blog = no more outstanding. e.g.the post titles of the featured post looks like a G adsense code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyvind</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1564968</link>
		<dc:creator>Oyvind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1564968</guid>
		<description>Eurostile I think.

http://www.fontseek.com/fonts/eurostile.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eurostile I think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fontseek.com/fonts/eurostile.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fontseek.com/fonts/eurostile.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary-Ann Horley</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1564733</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary-Ann Horley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1564733</guid>
		<description>The design doesn&#039;t make me go &quot;wow&quot; but it certainly does the job and that&#039;s as good or better. Can anyone tell me what the new logo font is? I&#039;ve been looking for it for a few days for one of my own projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design doesn&#8217;t make me go &#8220;wow&#8221; but it certainly does the job and that&#8217;s as good or better. Can anyone tell me what the new logo font is? I&#8217;ve been looking for it for a few days for one of my own projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1564216</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1564216</guid>
		<description>Hey Darren, a friend of mine that is a designer had a look and wasn&#039;t as impressed as he should have been. He tore a strip off the design in a huge post on my blog. Have a look, most of it is typography, something that could be easily fixed.

Your buddy,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Darren, a friend of mine that is a designer had a look and wasn&#8217;t as impressed as he should have been. He tore a strip off the design in a huge post on my blog. Have a look, most of it is typography, something that could be easily fixed.</p>
<p>Your buddy,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kroll</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1563818</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1563818</guid>
		<description>I like that this design allows for flexibility in the future if you choose to do a host of different things.  This design still lets us know it&#039;s a blog, but it also opens things up for whatever the future plans are for Problogger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that this design allows for flexibility in the future if you choose to do a host of different things.  This design still lets us know it&#8217;s a blog, but it also opens things up for whatever the future plans are for Problogger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1563710</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1563710</guid>
		<description>I like the design, i&#039;ve not been here for a few months, but i was a regular reader, just not been online much lately, im interested to know why you have decided against adsense, or maybe you posted on this previously.

Best of luck with the new house!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the design, i&#8217;ve not been here for a few months, but i was a regular reader, just not been online much lately, im interested to know why you have decided against adsense, or maybe you posted on this previously.</p>
<p>Best of luck with the new house!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1563206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/08/13/redesign-of-probloggernet-the-designer-tells-all/#comment-1563206</guid>
		<description>This design also loads quicker on a dial up which is a good thing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This design also loads quicker on a dial up which is a good thing :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
