<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving Underperforming Posts a Second Chance with Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bybrifsadasty</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2440415</link>
		<dc:creator>bybrifsadasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-2440415</guid>
		<description>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 11 Ways to Spring Clean Your Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2335651</link>
		<dc:creator>11 Ways to Spring Clean Your Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-2335651</guid>
		<description>[...] Updating Old Posts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Updating Old Posts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seasonal Traffic and How to Capture It for Your Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1395299</link>
		<dc:creator>Seasonal Traffic and How to Capture It for Your Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1395299</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a month ago about giving Underperforming Posts a Second Chance with Updates. The theory was that sometimes putting an old post back in the spotlight with some good updates can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a month ago about giving Underperforming Posts a Second Chance with Updates. The theory was that sometimes putting an old post back in the spotlight with some good updates can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1162714</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1162714</guid>
		<description>Eeesh!  Sorry about the double post!  Didn&#039;t seem like the 1st one went thru...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eeesh!  Sorry about the double post!  Didn&#8217;t seem like the 1st one went thru&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1160153</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 07:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1160153</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been in the habit of &quot;deep linking&quot; back to older posts for some time now but I&#039;ve really made a concerted effort to do even more of that in recent months.

I&#039;ve also been using Armen Thomassian&#039;s recent trick that he covered in his &lt;a href=&quot;http://iffect.net/2007/05/02/1-stupidly-simple-tip-that-will-boost-pr-and-seo&quot; title=&quot;Armen Thomassian&#039;s &quot;1 Stupidly Simple Tip That Will Boost PR and SEO&quot; article&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1 Stupidly Simple Tip That Will Boost PR and SEO&lt;/a&gt; article for a couple of weeks now and I&#039;m already seeing some payoff from that.

I&#039;m kinda with Sharon Sarmiento in that some of my blog entries were real labors of love that I drafted, then reworked, and refined still more before ever posting them.  So, I just hate when I see those favorites not getting as much notice as I&#039;d hoped or generating any comments.  So, I try to find ways to link back to those posts so they&#039;ll see a bit more light of day...

Now the bizarre thing that I haven&#039;t been able to figure out is that I have a post from back in Jan. &#039;06 called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2dolphins.com/2006/01/pretty-in-pink_27.html&quot; title=&quot;Read about the pink-colored Chinese Indo-pacific Humpback dolphins in my &quot;Pretty in Pink&quot; post from January 27, 2006&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pretty in Pink&lt;/a&gt; about a group of Indo-pacific Humpback dolphins in the Pearl River Delta, between Hong Kong &amp; Macau, that are bubble-gum pink-colored that shows up in my top 10-15 visited pages nearly every month despite having never done anything to specifically promote that page.  I&#039;ve never deep-linked back to it.  And the phrase &quot;pink dolphins&quot; shows up as one of the top 10 search terms nearly every month too.  Maybe there&#039;s some sexual connotation to that phrase that I&#039;m unaware of?  I just wish I knew how to get some of my more favored entries to get as many hits as this little post has garnered...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in the habit of &#8220;deep linking&#8221; back to older posts for some time now but I&#8217;ve really made a concerted effort to do even more of that in recent months.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been using Armen Thomassian&#8217;s recent trick that he covered in his <a href="http://iffect.net/2007/05/02/1-stupidly-simple-tip-that-will-boost-pr-and-seo" title="Armen Thomassian's &quot;1 Stupidly Simple Tip That Will Boost PR and SEO&quot; article" rel="nofollow">1 Stupidly Simple Tip That Will Boost PR and SEO</a> article for a couple of weeks now and I&#8217;m already seeing some payoff from that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kinda with Sharon Sarmiento in that some of my blog entries were real labors of love that I drafted, then reworked, and refined still more before ever posting them.  So, I just hate when I see those favorites not getting as much notice as I&#8217;d hoped or generating any comments.  So, I try to find ways to link back to those posts so they&#8217;ll see a bit more light of day&#8230;</p>
<p>Now the bizarre thing that I haven&#8217;t been able to figure out is that I have a post from back in Jan. &#8217;06 called <a href="http://www.2dolphins.com/2006/01/pretty-in-pink_27.html" title="Read about the pink-colored Chinese Indo-pacific Humpback dolphins in my &quot;Pretty in Pink&quot; post from January 27, 2006" rel="nofollow">Pretty in Pink</a> about a group of Indo-pacific Humpback dolphins in the Pearl River Delta, between Hong Kong &amp; Macau, that are bubble-gum pink-colored that shows up in my top 10-15 visited pages nearly every month despite having never done anything to specifically promote that page.  I&#8217;ve never deep-linked back to it.  And the phrase &#8220;pink dolphins&#8221; shows up as one of the top 10 search terms nearly every month too.  Maybe there&#8217;s some sexual connotation to that phrase that I&#8217;m unaware of?  I just wish I knew how to get some of my more favored entries to get as many hits as this little post has garnered&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1159461</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 02:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1159461</guid>
		<description>I have never done this- but may look into it! Thanks for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never done this- but may look into it! Thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1159044</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 23:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1159044</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found recently that providing links to older posts in other blogs comments does indeed payoff.  After reading about this trick on another blogging tips post a few weeks ago, I began been using this as a means of drawing attention to older, really meaningful (to me, anyway) posts that never really got the exposure I&#039;d hoped they would.  And sure enough, it does seem to be bringing some of my older entries back into the light of day.

Another trick I employ frequently is &quot;deep linking&quot; within never posts to older blog posts that are directly relevant.  For example, I have an entry that&#039;ll be going live tomorrow about the postage rate hike.  In it, I&#039;ve referenced back to an entry I did just prior to the last postage bump called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2dolphins.com/2006/01/postage-rates-just-went-up-but-so-what.html&quot; title=&quot;Rob ponders, &quot;Postage Rates Just Went Up - But So What?&quot; in this Jan. &#039;06 blog entry.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Postage Rates Just Went Up - But So What?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, in the hopes that readers will click thru to that older content while reading the new post.

One odd thing I keep noticing is that one page in particular - a post titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://rodeod.powweb.com/2006/01/pretty-in-pink_27.html&quot; title=&quot;Learn more about the Indo-pacific Humpback dolphins living off Hong Kong&#039;s coasts in my &quot;Pretty in Pink&quot; blog post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Pretty in Pink&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - that seems to always be in my top 10-15 visited pages despite the fact that I&#039;ve never directly backlinked, deep linked, or done anything else specfically to promote that page.  And &quot;pink dolphin&quot; is almost always a top search phrase as well.  Makes me wonder if that has some kind of sexual connotation that I&#039;m unaware of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found recently that providing links to older posts in other blogs comments does indeed payoff.  After reading about this trick on another blogging tips post a few weeks ago, I began been using this as a means of drawing attention to older, really meaningful (to me, anyway) posts that never really got the exposure I&#8217;d hoped they would.  And sure enough, it does seem to be bringing some of my older entries back into the light of day.</p>
<p>Another trick I employ frequently is &#8220;deep linking&#8221; within never posts to older blog posts that are directly relevant.  For example, I have an entry that&#8217;ll be going live tomorrow about the postage rate hike.  In it, I&#8217;ve referenced back to an entry I did just prior to the last postage bump called <a href="http://www.2dolphins.com/2006/01/postage-rates-just-went-up-but-so-what.html" title="Rob ponders, &quot;Postage Rates Just Went Up - But So What?&quot; in this Jan. '06 blog entry." rel="nofollow">&quot;Postage Rates Just Went Up &#8211; But So What?&quot;</a>, in the hopes that readers will click thru to that older content while reading the new post.</p>
<p>One odd thing I keep noticing is that one page in particular &#8211; a post titled <a href="http://rodeod.powweb.com/2006/01/pretty-in-pink_27.html" title="Learn more about the Indo-pacific Humpback dolphins living off Hong Kong's coasts in my &quot;Pretty in Pink&quot; blog post" rel="nofollow">&quot;Pretty in Pink&quot;</a> &#8211; that seems to always be in my top 10-15 visited pages despite the fact that I&#8217;ve never directly backlinked, deep linked, or done anything else specfically to promote that page.  And &#8220;pink dolphin&#8221; is almost always a top search phrase as well.  Makes me wonder if that has some kind of sexual connotation that I&#8217;m unaware of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusieJ</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1158495</link>
		<dc:creator>SusieJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1158495</guid>
		<description>I go over my stats each month, and I update my sidebar with a list called: Top Posts, and I list the top 4 or 5.  This does generate quite a bit of hits.  I did not know you could update a post and change the date. (There is no date in my permalink structure.) I linked to them, but didn&#039;t think about just changing the date.  This is a good idea.  

I also use StumbleUpon, and have noticed there is a cycle of hits on older posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go over my stats each month, and I update my sidebar with a list called: Top Posts, and I list the top 4 or 5.  This does generate quite a bit of hits.  I did not know you could update a post and change the date. (There is no date in my permalink structure.) I linked to them, but didn&#8217;t think about just changing the date.  This is a good idea.  </p>
<p>I also use StumbleUpon, and have noticed there is a cycle of hits on older posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Mohta</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1156495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 06:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1156495</guid>
		<description>I keep track my posts with respect to the news. If the news has changed I update with the according to the links. Its a good idea to bring back the posts actually. But we need to make it real good. One more thing is It can help many bloggers who are doing now well but there old posts are never seen. So they bring back the old posts with good images and modfications.

But there is one problem. The comments if there are any, has to be modiffied or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep track my posts with respect to the news. If the news has changed I update with the according to the links. Its a good idea to bring back the posts actually. But we need to make it real good. One more thing is It can help many bloggers who are doing now well but there old posts are never seen. So they bring back the old posts with good images and modfications.</p>
<p>But there is one problem. The comments if there are any, has to be modiffied or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Weekly Column - Blogoholica &#124; Evolvor</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1156028</link>
		<dc:creator>New Weekly Column - Blogoholica &#124; Evolvor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1156028</guid>
		<description>[...] Darren discusses digging up old blog posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren discusses digging up old blog posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duplicate Content Checker</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152943</link>
		<dc:creator>Duplicate Content Checker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 02:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152943</guid>
		<description>Sure, a lot of readers appreciate updated re-posts because they either didn&#039;t get it the first time or didn&#039;t know it existed at all. A lot of my favorite bloggers do it; sparingly, of course, which I think is crucial, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, a lot of readers appreciate updated re-posts because they either didn&#8217;t get it the first time or didn&#8217;t know it existed at all. A lot of my favorite bloggers do it; sparingly, of course, which I think is crucial, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152785</guid>
		<description>Great post Darren. I had through this many times. my post didn&#039;t get any attention of my readers at all. I don&#039;t know why. I manage to get traffic about 300 visitors daily. i will implemented your thought here to my blog.Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Darren. I had through this many times. my post didn&#8217;t get any attention of my readers at all. I don&#8217;t know why. I manage to get traffic about 300 visitors daily. i will implemented your thought here to my blog.Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Sarmiento</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152786</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Sarmiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152786</guid>
		<description>Yes, I update posts, because the time that I invest in them (usually 2-7 writing hours) makes it worth it to me to give them a second chance to shine. Here are my methods:

1) I find ways to link back to my favorite posts. I actually did this with my entry to the Problogger Group Writing Project. The topic of my post was &quot;Top 5 Hottest Blogger Fantasies&quot; and in writing the list, it just seemed natural to link back to one of my all-time favorite posts I&#039;ve written, which was about Leonardo da Vinci. (This post tied into one of my fantasies.) So, it was really cool to get emails this week from Problogger readers who ended up reading my Leonardo post and being touched by it. :-) 

2) I put links to my favorite posts in my side bar.

3) Sometimes I blog on bigger blogs than mine that get much higher traffic, and on a couple of occasions I have taken ideas from my favorite posts on my own blog, and have re-worked them to address the audience of the bigger blog. It&#039;s really rewarding to publish on a blog with much higher readership and see the comments and trackbacks start pouring in, especially if the post that I originally wrote for my own blog fell flat. Also, there is indirect traffic that comes to my own blog from my author link on the bigger blog.

4) Re-work posts and turn them into articles for online article submissions. Not all blog posts are suitable for online article submissions (the articles need to be more formally written and kind of timeless with minimal links), but when I write a post that is &quot;article-worthy&quot; I&#039;ll take some extra time and re-write it so that it&#039;s appropriate for article submissions. The article is reaching a completely different (wider) audience than my blog post, and it has the potential to get picked up for publication in an ezine.  I think I&#039;ve had pretty good success with this, since at least one of my articles was picked up by an ezine with a big subscriber list, which resulted in a jump in RSS subscribers to my blog.

BTW--I always hear folks fretting about duplicate content with the online article submissions, but the submission service I use allows me to create unlimited variations of certain elements of my article (title, intro paragraph, resource box, and various sentences within the article) so that potentially each publisher will each receive a unique, well-written version of my article. 

5) Another thing I do is re-work some of my more detailed comments that I leave on folks&#039; blogs to be entire posts on my blog. In fact, this comment right here is taking on &quot;post worthy&quot; proportions ;-), and I may just end up turning it into a post on my own blog! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I update posts, because the time that I invest in them (usually 2-7 writing hours) makes it worth it to me to give them a second chance to shine. Here are my methods:</p>
<p>1) I find ways to link back to my favorite posts. I actually did this with my entry to the Problogger Group Writing Project. The topic of my post was &#8220;Top 5 Hottest Blogger Fantasies&#8221; and in writing the list, it just seemed natural to link back to one of my all-time favorite posts I&#8217;ve written, which was about Leonardo da Vinci. (This post tied into one of my fantasies.) So, it was really cool to get emails this week from Problogger readers who ended up reading my Leonardo post and being touched by it. :-) </p>
<p>2) I put links to my favorite posts in my side bar.</p>
<p>3) Sometimes I blog on bigger blogs than mine that get much higher traffic, and on a couple of occasions I have taken ideas from my favorite posts on my own blog, and have re-worked them to address the audience of the bigger blog. It&#8217;s really rewarding to publish on a blog with much higher readership and see the comments and trackbacks start pouring in, especially if the post that I originally wrote for my own blog fell flat. Also, there is indirect traffic that comes to my own blog from my author link on the bigger blog.</p>
<p>4) Re-work posts and turn them into articles for online article submissions. Not all blog posts are suitable for online article submissions (the articles need to be more formally written and kind of timeless with minimal links), but when I write a post that is &#8220;article-worthy&#8221; I&#8217;ll take some extra time and re-write it so that it&#8217;s appropriate for article submissions. The article is reaching a completely different (wider) audience than my blog post, and it has the potential to get picked up for publication in an ezine.  I think I&#8217;ve had pretty good success with this, since at least one of my articles was picked up by an ezine with a big subscriber list, which resulted in a jump in RSS subscribers to my blog.</p>
<p>BTW&#8211;I always hear folks fretting about duplicate content with the online article submissions, but the submission service I use allows me to create unlimited variations of certain elements of my article (title, intro paragraph, resource box, and various sentences within the article) so that potentially each publisher will each receive a unique, well-written version of my article. </p>
<p>5) Another thing I do is re-work some of my more detailed comments that I leave on folks&#8217; blogs to be entire posts on my blog. In fact, this comment right here is taking on &#8220;post worthy&#8221; proportions ;-), and I may just end up turning it into a post on my own blog! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjlight</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152493</link>
		<dc:creator>rjlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152493</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I was just thinking about some old posts of mine that I thought were so much better than others that got more attention. I was wondering about &quot;replaying&quot; them. I&#039;ve thought about doing a my favorite posts post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I was just thinking about some old posts of mine that I thought were so much better than others that got more attention. I was wondering about &#8220;replaying&#8221; them. I&#8217;ve thought about doing a my favorite posts post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Dorkin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152482</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Dorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 23:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152482</guid>
		<description>That is another great suggestion, Darren.  I absolutely think that recycling old posts is important.  The use of sidebars and footers seems to be more and more commonplace these days.  Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is another great suggestion, Darren.  I absolutely think that recycling old posts is important.  The use of sidebars and footers seems to be more and more commonplace these days.  Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Y-N</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Y-N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 23:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152416</guid>
		<description>My recently-used technique for ressurrecting some of my favourite content was to use five existing stories as the basis of my &quot;Top 5&quot; post to your competition!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recently-used technique for ressurrecting some of my favourite content was to use five existing stories as the basis of my &#8220;Top 5&#8243; post to your competition!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zahra</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152332</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152332</guid>
		<description>Since my blog is relatively new I haven&#039;t had to deal with that issue yet. I&#039;m still trying to find my voice. I appreciate all the tips you have here. They&#039;ve really helped me formulate ideas of where I want to go with my site. I&#039;m still working on generating content at this stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since my blog is relatively new I haven&#8217;t had to deal with that issue yet. I&#8217;m still trying to find my voice. I appreciate all the tips you have here. They&#8217;ve really helped me formulate ideas of where I want to go with my site. I&#8217;m still working on generating content at this stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152316</guid>
		<description>I will surely bring about my old posts now and then. I usually tend to link back to the best of the month.

I did write quite a few things when I had like 5 readers, as opposed to the 250+ now, that didn&#039;t get noticed. Hopefully as my readership increases I&#039;ll be bringing olden goldies up and again, but not too much as you pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will surely bring about my old posts now and then. I usually tend to link back to the best of the month.</p>
<p>I did write quite a few things when I had like 5 readers, as opposed to the 250+ now, that didn&#8217;t get noticed. Hopefully as my readership increases I&#8217;ll be bringing olden goldies up and again, but not too much as you pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152274</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing that a lot with old content published under a earlier and different blogging client. The files have been sitting unconnected in an old web folder. I&#039;ve brought them forward, polished them up and, because of the age and disconnect, given them new titles and URLs. It seems to be working fairly well. Once I&#039;ve finished the process, I&#039;ll delete the old files and block that directory in my Robots file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing that a lot with old content published under a earlier and different blogging client. The files have been sitting unconnected in an old web folder. I&#8217;ve brought them forward, polished them up and, because of the age and disconnect, given them new titles and URLs. It seems to be working fairly well. Once I&#8217;ve finished the process, I&#8217;ll delete the old files and block that directory in my Robots file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPeach</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1152227</link>
		<dc:creator>DPeach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/05/11/giving-underperforming-posts-a-second-chance-with-updates/#comment-1152227</guid>
		<description>One thing I have been doing recently has been to add a podcast to my blog. My podcast is basically an audio version of what goes into the blog. Not every story makes it into the podcast, and the podcast is not a word for word re-hash of the blog. Rather the podcast is sometimes just a summary of, or much more content than the blog. They are complimentary.

My point is that I can take a post and expand it if necessary on the other medium. I also do a section of the podcast where I highlight a &quot;classic post&quot; or two. I usually look about a year back and find an interesting post to comment on with the idea to drive traffic to the post. I also put a show notes link back to the original post.

DPeach
www.mythoughtspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I have been doing recently has been to add a podcast to my blog. My podcast is basically an audio version of what goes into the blog. Not every story makes it into the podcast, and the podcast is not a word for word re-hash of the blog. Rather the podcast is sometimes just a summary of, or much more content than the blog. They are complimentary.</p>
<p>My point is that I can take a post and expand it if necessary on the other medium. I also do a section of the podcast where I highlight a &#8220;classic post&#8221; or two. I usually look about a year back and find an interesting post to comment on with the idea to drive traffic to the post. I also put a show notes link back to the original post.</p>
<p>DPeach<br />
<a href="http://www.mythoughtspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mythoughtspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/26 queries in 0.148 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 05:15:08 -->
