<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proofread!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:41:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wow gold</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-4286538</link>
		<dc:creator>wow gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-4286538</guid>
		<description>Something a lot of people do is run their post through spell check without truly proofreading. Many times what happens is the words pass the spell check, but if they had actually proofread the post, they would see it actually had mistakes when given the context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something a lot of people do is run their post through spell check without truly proofreading. Many times what happens is the words pass the spell check, but if they had actually proofread the post, they would see it actually had mistakes when given the context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-1667180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-1667180</guid>
		<description>One of the best ways to catch your own typos and mistakes is to read the posting out loud.  Your ear will catch it before your mind does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best ways to catch your own typos and mistakes is to read the posting out loud.  Your ear will catch it before your mind does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essential Keystrokes &#187; Thirteen Things Every Website Needs</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-870826</link>
		<dc:creator>Essential Keystrokes &#187; Thirteen Things Every Website Needs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-870826</guid>
		<description>[...] Spell Check - Don&#8217;t tell me you forgot this one! Take the time to tend to the details like spell and grammar check - it will save you future embarrassment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spell Check &#8211; Don&#8217;t tell me you forgot this one! Take the time to tend to the details like spell and grammar check &#8211; it will save you future embarrassment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LennyP</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-766272</link>
		<dc:creator>LennyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-766272</guid>
		<description>Something a lot of people do is run their post through spell check without truly proofreading. Many times what happens is the words pass the spell check, but if they had actually proofread the post, they would see it actually had mistakes when given the context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something a lot of people do is run their post through spell check without truly proofreading. Many times what happens is the words pass the spell check, but if they had actually proofread the post, they would see it actually had mistakes when given the context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free of Grammatical Errors &#187; Business Analyst &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-674105</link>
		<dc:creator>Free of Grammatical Errors &#187; Business Analyst &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-674105</guid>
		<description>[...] In a recent blog entry by Darren Rowse for problogger.net, he featured an interesting hint submitted by Steve.  The blog suggests that writers should all aim for perfection while any infraction in grammar and language use may affect the readability of the entire article.  When writing for blogs or articles published on web, people only expect the best from the authors &#8212; all for the simple argument that if they can&#8217;t write ideas clearly, why else would they bother to visit the site.  Remember, there are millions of other sources available.      Friends Economy Facts Local Dating London Dating Home Improvement Online Education    Archives [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a recent blog entry by Darren Rowse for problogger.net, he featured an interesting hint submitted by Steve.  The blog suggests that writers should all aim for perfection while any infraction in grammar and language use may affect the readability of the entire article.  When writing for blogs or articles published on web, people only expect the best from the authors &#8212; all for the simple argument that if they can&#8217;t write ideas clearly, why else would they bother to visit the site.  Remember, there are millions of other sources available.      Friends Economy Facts Local Dating London Dating Home Improvement Online Education    Archives [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just another Gypsy</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-628968</link>
		<dc:creator>Just another Gypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-628968</guid>
		<description>Excellent suggestion, Darren.  

I know that you often make the mistake of using &quot;it&#039;s&quot; (contraction for &quot;it is&quot;) when you actually mean &quot;its&quot; (possessive), as you did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/google-adsense-christmas-gift-arrives-its-a-digital-photo-frame/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, when you wrote &quot;Every year Google sends it’s higher end AdSense publishers....&quot;

Let&#039;s hear it for better proofreading! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent suggestion, Darren.  </p>
<p>I know that you often make the mistake of using &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; (contraction for &#8220;it is&#8221;) when you actually mean &#8220;its&#8221; (possessive), as you did <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/google-adsense-christmas-gift-arrives-its-a-digital-photo-frame/" rel="nofollow">here</a>, when you wrote &#8220;Every year Google sends it’s higher end AdSense publishers&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear it for better proofreading! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Quick Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-628526</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Quick Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-628526</guid>
		<description>[...] Proofread! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proofread! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jackmanson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-625806</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jackmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-625806</guid>
		<description>If at all possible, get someone else to proofread your work.

By the time I finish a post I&#039;m weary (I tend to post feature articles rather than short ones) and ready to hit &#039;publish&#039;.

Also, your brain is very bad at proofreading your own work, because it is very good at working out what a sentence &lt;i&gt;means&lt;/i&gt; and screening out errors. I&#039;ve missed my own errors after reading something three or four times before.

But certainly, take a while to browse your posts in &#039;preview&#039; mode, if you have one. It helps quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If at all possible, get someone else to proofread your work.</p>
<p>By the time I finish a post I&#8217;m weary (I tend to post feature articles rather than short ones) and ready to hit &#8216;publish&#8217;.</p>
<p>Also, your brain is very bad at proofreading your own work, because it is very good at working out what a sentence <i>means</i> and screening out errors. I&#8217;ve missed my own errors after reading something three or four times before.</p>
<p>But certainly, take a while to browse your posts in &#8216;preview&#8217; mode, if you have one. It helps quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-624938</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-624938</guid>
		<description>great tip!  
I&#039;m glad I have a &#039;post as draft&#039; option in my performancing plugin at http://performancing.com so I can proof my text before publishing. With your timely reminder, I&#039;ll be more vigilant.

I also kick myself when I mistype a web url. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great tip!<br />
I&#8217;m glad I have a &#8216;post as draft&#8217; option in my performancing plugin at <a href="http://performancing.com" rel="nofollow">http://performancing.com</a> so I can proof my text before publishing. With your timely reminder, I&#8217;ll be more vigilant.</p>
<p>I also kick myself when I mistype a web url. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Ecommerce</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-624830</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Ecommerce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-624830</guid>
		<description>It seems that a lot of focus is placed on post frequency and that seems to attribute to a lot of typos or what I like to call...&#039;&lt;i&gt;miss key punches&lt;/i&gt;&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that a lot of focus is placed on post frequency and that seems to attribute to a lot of typos or what I like to call&#8230;&#8217;<i>miss key punches</i>&#8216;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Ecommerce</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-624831</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Ecommerce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-624831</guid>
		<description>It seems that a lot of focus is placed on post frequency and that seems to attribute to a lot of typos or what I like to call...&#039;&lt;i&gt;miss key punches&lt;/i&gt;&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that a lot of focus is placed on post frequency and that seems to attribute to a lot of typos or what I like to call&#8230;&#8217;<i>miss key punches</i>&#8216;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-624487</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-624487</guid>
		<description>If English is a second language, errors can be acceptable because the effort is there.  Not so much, though, with those who should know better and simply don&#039;t care.  Too many writers are sloppy about their art; well, I can&#039;t explain or understand that.  How would that same sloppy writer feel if the mechanic forgot to tighten the lug nuts after rotating the tires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If English is a second language, errors can be acceptable because the effort is there.  Not so much, though, with those who should know better and simply don&#8217;t care.  Too many writers are sloppy about their art; well, I can&#8217;t explain or understand that.  How would that same sloppy writer feel if the mechanic forgot to tighten the lug nuts after rotating the tires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Positivity Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-624339</link>
		<dc:creator>The Positivity Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-624339</guid>
		<description>Good tip. As a non-english native speaker it´s important for me to go through my articles and at least make sure no letters are missing or that the sentences are comprehensible. I guess it will become a lot easier a few more months down the road when I get more accustomed to writing in english.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tip. As a non-english native speaker it´s important for me to go through my articles and at least make sure no letters are missing or that the sentences are comprehensible. I guess it will become a lot easier a few more months down the road when I get more accustomed to writing in english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-623798</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-623798</guid>
		<description>Darren I just noticed that your feed count has diminished marginally today.I remember your blog having about 7000+ feed readers just couple of days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren I just noticed that your feed count has diminished marginally today.I remember your blog having about 7000+ feed readers just couple of days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: window</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-623553</link>
		<dc:creator>window</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-623553</guid>
		<description>Ok, Ok, the dude doesn&#039;t have to yell it in somebody&#039;s face. Just because Steve&#039;s blog sucks, doesn&#039;t give him a right to take out his frustrations on others.

He should take advice from this blog rather than criticizing it.  Most websites on making money are crappy, so be glad for god&#039;s sake that this exception exists.

Perhaps Steve might like to visit one of those one-page, scroll-down, order my amazing system, type of sites. At least they don&#039;t have typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Ok, the dude doesn&#8217;t have to yell it in somebody&#8217;s face. Just because Steve&#8217;s blog sucks, doesn&#8217;t give him a right to take out his frustrations on others.</p>
<p>He should take advice from this blog rather than criticizing it.  Most websites on making money are crappy, so be glad for god&#8217;s sake that this exception exists.</p>
<p>Perhaps Steve might like to visit one of those one-page, scroll-down, order my amazing system, type of sites. At least they don&#8217;t have typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-623535</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-623535</guid>
		<description>Grammatical errors and words spelled incorrectly definitely bother me!  Sometimes you can read something though and not see the mistakes until later.  You ask yourself how in the world you missed such an obvious error.  And there are those bloggers that make you wonder what in the world they&#039;re saying and who hired them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammatical errors and words spelled incorrectly definitely bother me!  Sometimes you can read something though and not see the mistakes until later.  You ask yourself how in the world you missed such an obvious error.  And there are those bloggers that make you wonder what in the world they&#8217;re saying and who hired them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Hot Image</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-623522</link>
		<dc:creator>My Hot Image</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-623522</guid>
		<description>nice catch J :d

it&#039;s not always easy to write 100% correct article especially when it comes to a non-english oriented blogger

but writing more often will strengthen your skills and a language course won&#039;t hurt though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice catch J :d</p>
<p>it&#8217;s not always easy to write 100% correct article especially when it comes to a non-english oriented blogger</p>
<p>but writing more often will strengthen your skills and a language course won&#8217;t hurt though ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-623457</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-623457</guid>
		<description>nice pick up &#039;j&#039; - I&#039;m sure Steve did that as a test :-) (fixed)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice pick up &#8216;j&#8217; &#8211; I&#8217;m sure Steve did that as a test :-) (fixed)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/comment-page-1/#comment-623441</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/11/26/proofread/#comment-623441</guid>
		<description>Funny. I was just thinking the same thing earlier today while reading an article online. Oh, and normally I wouldn&#039;t post a reply just because of a small error, but isn&#039;t this sentence missing an &quot;a&quot;:
 &quot;... to determine the meaning of [a] poorly written sentence...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny. I was just thinking the same thing earlier today while reading an article online. Oh, and normally I wouldn&#8217;t post a reply just because of a small error, but isn&#8217;t this sentence missing an &#8220;a&#8221;:<br />
 &#8220;&#8230; to determine the meaning of [a] poorly written sentence&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
