<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changes in WordPress 2.0.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/10/22/changes-in-wordpress-205/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/10/22/changes-in-wordpress-205/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:13:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/10/22/changes-in-wordpress-205/comment-page-1/#comment-541509</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/10/22/changes-in-wordpress-205/#comment-541509</guid>
		<description>I have been a Six Apart fan for a while now and run my main business site on Movable Type.  I have recently been having problems with my MT installation and while it is probably my fault or my developer&#039;s fault, I have found myself leaning more towards WordPress again as a replacement for MT on my main business site.

Hmm ...  At the risk of asking a really silly question, how does WordPress compare to MT in terms of stability and security?  Are MT and WordPress on a par?  My developer commented to me that one of the good things about MT is that you can publish your archives as html files and that is apparently a good thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a Six Apart fan for a while now and run my main business site on Movable Type.  I have recently been having problems with my MT installation and while it is probably my fault or my developer&#8217;s fault, I have found myself leaning more towards WordPress again as a replacement for MT on my main business site.</p>
<p>Hmm &#8230;  At the risk of asking a really silly question, how does WordPress compare to MT in terms of stability and security?  Are MT and WordPress on a par?  My developer commented to me that one of the good things about MT is that you can publish your archives as html files and that is apparently a good thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
