<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feedburner Ad Network &#8211; Three Months In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feedburner Ad Network for me ? i&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a mistake &#187; Reaper-X .:[ ID ]:.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1466812</link>
		<dc:creator>Feedburner Ad Network for me ? i&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a mistake &#187; Reaper-X .:[ ID ]:.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-1466812</guid>
		<description>[...] somewhere in the Feedburner system. Because based on what i read from someone else comment at&#160;Problogger, and Yugatech. You need to get at least 500 RSS Subscribers&#160;to join the Feedburner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] somewhere in the Feedburner system. Because based on what i read from someone else comment at&nbsp;Problogger, and Yugatech. You need to get at least 500 RSS Subscribers&nbsp;to join the Feedburner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412858</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412858</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m very keen to participate in FB&#039;s Ad Network. But, given my number of subscribers (at the moment), this is an aspiration! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m very keen to participate in FB&#8217;s Ad Network. But, given my number of subscribers (at the moment), this is an aspiration! ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412527</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412527</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Just wanted to touch base really quick on your comment. Darren made some great points in response to it but the real cause of Random Good Stuff&#039;s (RGS) large earnings was the fact that RGS is running ads on their site as well as in their feed.  The site ads contributed to the majority of RGS&#039;s earnings.

Also, just wanted to touch base on the subscriber threashold that everyone is talking about.  Darren is right when he says building the ad network is a balancing act.  We don&#039;t want to take on too much content too quickly and not be able to keep pace with the ad sales.  We really want publishers in the network to be successful (i.e. we have enough ads to make them some good money) so we are trying to take on publishers as we see ad demand for their content.  It doesn&#039;t have anything to do with us only working with the big guys and forgetting everyone else. The long tail of publishers is what makes FeedBurner, well, FeedBurner.  I am one of those bloggers in the long tail (plug! - ventureweek.com/blog) and so are many of my colleagues here.  I promise we won&#039;t forget our own people in the blogosphere. :-)

Cheers,
Eric Olson
FeedBurner - Business Development
E-mail: erico@feedburner.com
Office: 312.756.0022 x2034</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Just wanted to touch base really quick on your comment. Darren made some great points in response to it but the real cause of Random Good Stuff&#8217;s (RGS) large earnings was the fact that RGS is running ads on their site as well as in their feed.  The site ads contributed to the majority of RGS&#8217;s earnings.</p>
<p>Also, just wanted to touch base on the subscriber threashold that everyone is talking about.  Darren is right when he says building the ad network is a balancing act.  We don&#8217;t want to take on too much content too quickly and not be able to keep pace with the ad sales.  We really want publishers in the network to be successful (i.e. we have enough ads to make them some good money) so we are trying to take on publishers as we see ad demand for their content.  It doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with us only working with the big guys and forgetting everyone else. The long tail of publishers is what makes FeedBurner, well, FeedBurner.  I am one of those bloggers in the long tail (plug! &#8211; ventureweek.com/blog) and so are many of my colleagues here.  I promise we won&#8217;t forget our own people in the blogosphere. :-)</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Eric Olson<br />
FeedBurner &#8211; Business Development<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:erico@feedburner.com">erico@feedburner.com</a><br />
Office: 312.756.0022 x2034</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kunal</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412476</link>
		<dc:creator>kunal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412476</guid>
		<description>well, thanks darren and all for the reply. I think I have to wait a bit more :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, thanks darren and all for the reply. I think I have to wait a bit more :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412471</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412471</guid>
		<description>I signed up hopefully I get approved or accepted as a publisher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up hopefully I get approved or accepted as a publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Framgångsrik reklam via RSS?</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412460</link>
		<dc:creator>Framgångsrik reklam via RSS?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412460</guid>
		<description>[...] ProBlogger: Feedburner Ad Network - Three Months In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ProBlogger: Feedburner Ad Network &#8211; Three Months In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Blog Money &#124; Blog Archive &#187; Feedburner Ad Network</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412375</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Blog Money &#124; Blog Archive &#187; Feedburner Ad Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412375</guid>
		<description>[...] Darren Rowse of ProBlogger has briefly posted his thoughts on his first three months participation in FeedBurner&#8217;s Ad Network and earned him a tidy $79 for 10 days in his RSS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren Rowse of ProBlogger has briefly posted his thoughts on his first three months participation in FeedBurner&#8217;s Ad Network and earned him a tidy $79 for 10 days in his RSS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feedburner Ad Network at The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412199</link>
		<dc:creator>Feedburner Ad Network at The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412199</guid>
		<description>[...] Professional Blogging   Jul 30 at 10:50 pm by Matt -Darren has a brief three month review of the Feedburner Ad Network over at Problogger. Thought i&#8217;d chime in with my thoughts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Professional Blogging   Jul 30 at 10:50 pm by Matt -Darren has a brief three month review of the Feedburner Ad Network over at Problogger. Thought i&#8217;d chime in with my thoughts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412089</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412089</guid>
		<description>Steve - also - I&#039;m not seeing any ads in your feed today. Perhaps you should have a chat to Feedburner about why that might be the case? Maybe the channel you&#039;re a part of doesn&#039;t have enough inventory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; also &#8211; I&#8217;m not seeing any ads in your feed today. Perhaps you should have a chat to Feedburner about why that might be the case? Maybe the channel you&#8217;re a part of doesn&#8217;t have enough inventory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412087</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412087</guid>
		<description>Steve - take into consideration a couple of things:

1. different channels attract ads of different values (CPM). I&#039;ve seen ads for $1.50 CPM and ads for $7 CPM

2. different publishers choose to have ads show up at different frequencies (some have them every post, others every 3rd or so).

3. some publishers have them show up on short posts, others only on longer ones

4. I&#039;ve noticed even on the blogs where I choose to have them show up on every post (no matter what length) that they don&#039;t always show up. I&#039;m not sure if this is because feedburner don&#039;t have enough inventory on some channels or whether it&#039;s something else but I don&#039;t think you can just look at traffic as being the only factor to determine how much the ads will earn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; take into consideration a couple of things:</p>
<p>1. different channels attract ads of different values (CPM). I&#8217;ve seen ads for $1.50 CPM and ads for $7 CPM</p>
<p>2. different publishers choose to have ads show up at different frequencies (some have them every post, others every 3rd or so).</p>
<p>3. some publishers have them show up on short posts, others only on longer ones</p>
<p>4. I&#8217;ve noticed even on the blogs where I choose to have them show up on every post (no matter what length) that they don&#8217;t always show up. I&#8217;m not sure if this is because feedburner don&#8217;t have enough inventory on some channels or whether it&#8217;s something else but I don&#8217;t think you can just look at traffic as being the only factor to determine how much the ads will earn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412078</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412078</guid>
		<description>Wait - someone made $300 in a month off 500 subscribers?  That can&#039;t be right - I have about 600 subscribers, 6-7 posts a day, and so far I&#039;m averaging about $5 a month from feedburner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait &#8211; someone made $300 in a month off 500 subscribers?  That can&#8217;t be right &#8211; I have about 600 subscribers, 6-7 posts a day, and so far I&#8217;m averaging about $5 a month from feedburner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412037</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412037</guid>
		<description>the smallest blog I have it running on has a subscriber base of over 600 but I&#039;ve heard 500 would be ok too.

I think the reason they are limiting it to larger sites is that they&#039;re still building up their advertiser list. If they let everyone in they&#039;ve have an over supply of publishers and not enough advertisers to service them all (this is my best guess at why).

I&#039;ve heard that they&#039;re looking to increase the number of publishers as they increase advertisers - sounds like a balancing act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the smallest blog I have it running on has a subscriber base of over 600 but I&#8217;ve heard 500 would be ok too.</p>
<p>I think the reason they are limiting it to larger sites is that they&#8217;re still building up their advertiser list. If they let everyone in they&#8217;ve have an over supply of publishers and not enough advertisers to service them all (this is my best guess at why).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that they&#8217;re looking to increase the number of publishers as they increase advertisers &#8211; sounds like a balancing act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcunix</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-412022</link>
		<dc:creator>pcunix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-412022</guid>
		<description>I applied and they told me they needed 500.  I&#039;m only at 290 or so right now, so I need to improve a little or they need to lower their standards :-)

They say the issue is that they don&#039;t have enough advertisers right now..

But I&#039;ve never understood this &quot;We only want the big guys&quot;.  Take 10 sites of my size on different subjects and you probably have almost no duplicate subscribers.. so what&#039;s the problem?

Oh well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applied and they told me they needed 500.  I&#8217;m only at 290 or so right now, so I need to improve a little or they need to lower their standards :-)</p>
<p>They say the issue is that they don&#8217;t have enough advertisers right now..</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve never understood this &#8220;We only want the big guys&#8221;.  Take 10 sites of my size on different subjects and you probably have almost no duplicate subscribers.. so what&#8217;s the problem?</p>
<p>Oh well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Reklam i nyhetsflödet</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-411845</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Reklam i nyhetsflödet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-411845</guid>
		<description>[...] Pro Blogger: Feedburner Ad Network - Three Months In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pro Blogger: Feedburner Ad Network &#8211; Three Months In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Good Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-411768</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Good Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-411768</guid>
		<description>You need to have 500 subscribers average..

I managed to get my 500 in June and it was Feedburner who got in touch with me and asked if I wanna add FeedBurner ads.

So since June 2006 I am displaying Feedburner ads and in the first month I made $300 bucks... SWEET!

July is much less ... not sure why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to have 500 subscribers average..</p>
<p>I managed to get my 500 in June and it was Feedburner who got in touch with me and asked if I wanna add FeedBurner ads.</p>
<p>So since June 2006 I am displaying Feedburner ads and in the first month I made $300 bucks&#8230; SWEET!</p>
<p>July is much less &#8230; not sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kunal</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-411759</link>
		<dc:creator>kunal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-411759</guid>
		<description>Darren,

How many subscribers on an avg. you need to apply. I know they say a large sub. base and I surely don&#039;t have that much compared to problogger. So can you tell me the approx. subscribers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>How many subscribers on an avg. you need to apply. I know they say a large sub. base and I surely don&#8217;t have that much compared to problogger. So can you tell me the approx. subscribers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-411741</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-411741</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading a lot of your posts on this website and your Living Room one and I must say you have a certain knack at this blogging thing.  Personally, I think that you deserve every AdSense dollar that you come across.  You have a way with words that not to many bloggers have and I think that is why you have succeeded so.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading a lot of your posts on this website and your Living Room one and I must say you have a certain knack at this blogging thing.  Personally, I think that you deserve every AdSense dollar that you come across.  You have a way with words that not to many bloggers have and I think that is why you have succeeded so.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/comment-page-1/#comment-411716</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/30/feedburner-ad-network-three-months-in/#comment-411716</guid>
		<description>Since my blawg is largely a public service announcement,  I am not worried about my rss feed being captured, modified for &quot;fair use&quot;, and monetized on a higher traffic site.  Envious perhaps.

But since you want to make money from your rss feeds, how do you prevent the &quot;fair use&quot; scrappers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since my blawg is largely a public service announcement,  I am not worried about my rss feed being captured, modified for &#8220;fair use&#8221;, and monetized on a higher traffic site.  Envious perhaps.</p>
<p>But since you want to make money from your rss feeds, how do you prevent the &#8220;fair use&#8221; scrappers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.172 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 03:26:37 -->
