<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effective Blog Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:11:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bland</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-3571105</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-3571105</guid>
		<description>I think that you should have a search bar so that you can search for key words in blog archives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you should have a search bar so that you can search for key words in blog archives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-3244640</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-3244640</guid>
		<description>The problem with presenting blog archives in order of &quot;most comments&quot; is that some people just leave loads of silly one-word comments as part of their link campaign, to leave a backlink to their site, without actually taking the effort to write a comment that is relevent to the article/blog body. So a blog may have a lot of comments, but they might not be genuine comments.

You could arrange archive blogs into categories, like a directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with presenting blog archives in order of &#8220;most comments&#8221; is that some people just leave loads of silly one-word comments as part of their link campaign, to leave a backlink to their site, without actually taking the effort to write a comment that is relevent to the article/blog body. So a blog may have a lot of comments, but they might not be genuine comments.</p>
<p>You could arrange archive blogs into categories, like a directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Bobdon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-3194525</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Bobdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-3194525</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree. It&#039;s not just the age of the blog that it important, but also the content. I think that perhaps readers should have a choice to order the blogs either reverse chronological or number of comments, that way they can choose to see the newest, or most active blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree. It&#8217;s not just the age of the blog that it important, but also the content. I think that perhaps readers should have a choice to order the blogs either reverse chronological or number of comments, that way they can choose to see the newest, or most active blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalArch</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-2817416</link>
		<dc:creator>CalArch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-2817416</guid>
		<description>Love the blog, if i may ask, what software are you using? how much does it cost? where do you get it? If it&#039;s not a secret email me some details wouldya?

thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the blog, if i may ask, what software are you using? how much does it cost? where do you get it? If it&#8217;s not a secret email me some details wouldya?</p>
<p>thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-2725676</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-2725676</guid>
		<description>Well people can always skim past the ones that are irrelvant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well people can always skim past the ones that are irrelvant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdb</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-2328940</link>
		<dc:creator>bdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-2328940</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m just learning about blogging and trying to figure out a niche&#039; that i have but not sure how to get it out there

www.modelbuilding101.com  mainly  for college students but i have some other forums in there...

question is do you want to create a discussion or just review of work.......


b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m just learning about blogging and trying to figure out a niche&#8217; that i have but not sure how to get it out there</p>
<p><a href="http://www.modelbuilding101.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.modelbuilding101.com</a>  mainly  for college students but i have some other forums in there&#8230;</p>
<p>question is do you want to create a discussion or just review of work&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAKLAN</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-1271852</link>
		<dc:creator>PAKLAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-1271852</guid>
		<description>i think the best is to read from a good genuine blog which may represented his/her own works. not others. Just a new blogger myself.
cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the best is to read from a good genuine blog which may represented his/her own works. not others. Just a new blogger myself.<br />
cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technosailor Redesigns + Restructures (and So Will blogHelper) &#124; blogHelper</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-403932</link>
		<dc:creator>Technosailor Redesigns + Restructures (and So Will blogHelper) &#124; blogHelper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-403932</guid>
		<description>[...] This follows a breakthrough post (yet another one) by Chris Pearson who outlines a new way of looking at blog structures - which is then discussed by Aaron Brazell at ProBlogger and highlighted by David at Blogging Pro. (yes, this is one heck of a link list - this is why, and this is why I told you why). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This follows a breakthrough post (yet another one) by Chris Pearson who outlines a new way of looking at blog structures &#8211; which is then discussed by Aaron Brazell at ProBlogger and highlighted by David at Blogging Pro. (yes, this is one heck of a link list &#8211; this is why, and this is why I told you why). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-394417</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-394417</guid>
		<description>Also I&#039;d like to point out that this is one area YouTube has nailed.  With the tabs at the top you can switch to newest videos, most viewed, best rating, worst rated, etc.

You can spend literally hours watching all those videos, and they&#039;re only *one* click away from the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I&#8217;d like to point out that this is one area YouTube has nailed.  With the tabs at the top you can switch to newest videos, most viewed, best rating, worst rated, etc.</p>
<p>You can spend literally hours watching all those videos, and they&#8217;re only *one* click away from the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-394413</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-394413</guid>
		<description>It seems like the word &quot;blog&quot; has at least two different meanings nowdays and the issue at hand is essentially front page ordering.

There&#039;s &quot;blog&quot; as in a news-oriented site, where the date is obviously important.  I think the majority of our audience would only call news-oriented websites &quot;blogs.&quot;

But there&#039;s also &quot;blog&quot; as in publishing platform.  I think those of us who run one would call it a &quot;blog.&quot;  But in terms of layout... well we&#039;re simply running websites with blogging software.  It shouldn&#039;t necessarily have a blog format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the word &#8220;blog&#8221; has at least two different meanings nowdays and the issue at hand is essentially front page ordering.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s &#8220;blog&#8221; as in a news-oriented site, where the date is obviously important.  I think the majority of our audience would only call news-oriented websites &#8220;blogs.&#8221;</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s also &#8220;blog&#8221; as in publishing platform.  I think those of us who run one would call it a &#8220;blog.&#8221;  But in terms of layout&#8230; well we&#8217;re simply running websites with blogging software.  It shouldn&#8217;t necessarily have a blog format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Merz</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-390464</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Merz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-390464</guid>
		<description>Blog architecture is exactly the right description. The basic concept of that archive architecture has to be on a blueprint before you start a blog.

That&#039;s my main reason why I have chosen a different system. I am using Textpattern (as an editorial system) which supports sections, categories and keywords. That&#039;s the basic structure. On that base you can build plenty of buildings with different levels for your readers.

To make a short story short ... it is very important to have an effective blog architecture in place before starting a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog architecture is exactly the right description. The basic concept of that archive architecture has to be on a blueprint before you start a blog.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my main reason why I have chosen a different system. I am using Textpattern (as an editorial system) which supports sections, categories and keywords. That&#8217;s the basic structure. On that base you can build plenty of buildings with different levels for your readers.</p>
<p>To make a short story short &#8230; it is very important to have an effective blog architecture in place before starting a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-389816</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 01:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-389816</guid>
		<description>I definitely like to set up my blog with more than one sidebar, two on the right, or one on each side.  This helps me out a lot when I am looking for areas of my blog to put an ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely like to set up my blog with more than one sidebar, two on the right, or one on each side.  This helps me out a lot when I am looking for areas of my blog to put an ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frostlight</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-389130</link>
		<dc:creator>Frostlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-389130</guid>
		<description>Well, I only started mine a few months ago, and one thing I noticed for my particular corner of the blog population (a dream journal) is that *everyone* sticks to the boring chronological date format. I&#039;ve always hated it, because when I find a good blog, I usually have to read through several years&#039; worth of material to find the things I&#039;m interested in.

So instead, I&#039;ve organised mine by category and genre, which is pretty unique as far as dream journals go. Each category has a detailed explanation, and each dream within the category has a brief explanation stating how it relates to that category. I have a link to the most current dream up on the main page, but my dreams are very long and I&#039;d rather my readers only had to sift through the ones they&#039;re actually interested by.

I&#039;m not a fan of only organising by date, at least for dream journals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I only started mine a few months ago, and one thing I noticed for my particular corner of the blog population (a dream journal) is that *everyone* sticks to the boring chronological date format. I&#8217;ve always hated it, because when I find a good blog, I usually have to read through several years&#8217; worth of material to find the things I&#8217;m interested in.</p>
<p>So instead, I&#8217;ve organised mine by category and genre, which is pretty unique as far as dream journals go. Each category has a detailed explanation, and each dream within the category has a brief explanation stating how it relates to that category. I have a link to the most current dream up on the main page, but my dreams are very long and I&#8217;d rather my readers only had to sift through the ones they&#8217;re actually interested by.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of only organising by date, at least for dream journals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MInTheGap</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-388139</link>
		<dc:creator>MInTheGap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-388139</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting thought and definitely worth considering.  I was just talking with a guy who wondered how you built a relationship with people if the conversation they were following fell off the front page and then into obscurity.  I&#039;ve also had people commenting into posts that were off the front page and it was harder to keep track of the conversation and give it visibility.

An interesting idea would be to have some kind of view or sort page that would let you see a digg style interface, so you could switch between that view and traditional view.  Maybe have it linked with a cookie so that the user&#039;s preference could be kept.

Either that, or have a most recent posts widget keep track of the recent posts as a sideline, and have the most popular posts in the foreground.

Again, an interesting idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting thought and definitely worth considering.  I was just talking with a guy who wondered how you built a relationship with people if the conversation they were following fell off the front page and then into obscurity.  I&#8217;ve also had people commenting into posts that were off the front page and it was harder to keep track of the conversation and give it visibility.</p>
<p>An interesting idea would be to have some kind of view or sort page that would let you see a digg style interface, so you could switch between that view and traditional view.  Maybe have it linked with a cookie so that the user&#8217;s preference could be kept.</p>
<p>Either that, or have a most recent posts widget keep track of the recent posts as a sideline, and have the most popular posts in the foreground.</p>
<p>Again, an interesting idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rework this Blog &#187; Technology, Blogging and New Media</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-388070</link>
		<dc:creator>Rework this Blog &#187; Technology, Blogging and New Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-388070</guid>
		<description>[...] So the question is to you, my readers, is how would you like to see this blog portrayed? I linked to an article yesterday from Problogger to Chris Pearson who talked about some novel concpets on blog architecture. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So the question is to you, my readers, is how would you like to see this blog portrayed? I linked to an article yesterday from Problogger to Chris Pearson who talked about some novel concpets on blog architecture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ahlsmith, CTC</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-387796</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ahlsmith, CTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-387796</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this really a navigation and display issue?

All blog content contains a variety of meta tags that could and should be used to facilitate custom navigation and displays.  The reverse-chronological sequence is not necessarily the best or the worst, it&#039;s just want we started with.

I use NEO (Nelson Email Organizer) to generate different views of my Outlook email messages and attachments.  I have more than 40,000 messages stored in Outlook/NEO and can view them in ascending or descending chronological order.  I can also view them by read or unread, by sender or recipient, by type of attachment, by subject, or category, or urgency, or any number of other meta data.

I would like to view blog content the way I view email content -- anyway I want it with whatever filters I select.  The only display layout not available in NEO that would be really cool in a blog organizer would be a mind map.

Mind maps present a GUI showing how abstract posts and comments relate  or don&#039;t relate to each other.  It&#039;s a powerful tool that lets the reader navigate with ease from &quot;big picture&quot; to organic detail and back.

The first blog service that offers a mind map view has my business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this really a navigation and display issue?</p>
<p>All blog content contains a variety of meta tags that could and should be used to facilitate custom navigation and displays.  The reverse-chronological sequence is not necessarily the best or the worst, it&#8217;s just want we started with.</p>
<p>I use NEO (Nelson Email Organizer) to generate different views of my Outlook email messages and attachments.  I have more than 40,000 messages stored in Outlook/NEO and can view them in ascending or descending chronological order.  I can also view them by read or unread, by sender or recipient, by type of attachment, by subject, or category, or urgency, or any number of other meta data.</p>
<p>I would like to view blog content the way I view email content &#8212; anyway I want it with whatever filters I select.  The only display layout not available in NEO that would be really cool in a blog organizer would be a mind map.</p>
<p>Mind maps present a GUI showing how abstract posts and comments relate  or don&#8217;t relate to each other.  It&#8217;s a powerful tool that lets the reader navigate with ease from &#8220;big picture&#8221; to organic detail and back.</p>
<p>The first blog service that offers a mind map view has my business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-387674</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-387674</guid>
		<description>I personally dislike blogs not ordered reverse-chronologically.  Seeing &#039;best of&#039; somewhere on the page is cool and useful, but I open the blogs I frequent en masse as regular forefox bookmarks and would hate to be forced into using RSS just to see the LATEST content.

Though I wouldn&#039;t mind if the author still had chronological order in one section that lets me browse like normal, and had the homepage or wherever using a &#039;best of&#039; thing, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally dislike blogs not ordered reverse-chronologically.  Seeing &#8216;best of&#8217; somewhere on the page is cool and useful, but I open the blogs I frequent en masse as regular forefox bookmarks and would hate to be forced into using RSS just to see the LATEST content.</p>
<p>Though I wouldn&#8217;t mind if the author still had chronological order in one section that lets me browse like normal, and had the homepage or wherever using a &#8216;best of&#8217; thing, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-387629</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-387629</guid>
		<description>Well, there&#039;s that &#039;Related Posts/Entries&#039; plugins that&#039;s so common nowadays, another trick could be newsletters.

Still, I&#039;m interested in how this topic would progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s that &#8216;Related Posts/Entries&#8217; plugins that&#8217;s so common nowadays, another trick could be newsletters.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m interested in how this topic would progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starked SF &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town for Tuesday&#8211;a day that seems light years from friday</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-387626</link>
		<dc:creator>Starked SF &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town for Tuesday&#8211;a day that seems light years from friday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-387626</guid>
		<description>[...] Problogger on blog architecture and archiving. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Problogger on blog architecture and archiving. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcunix</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-387625</link>
		<dc:creator>pcunix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/07/11/effective-blog-architecture/#comment-387625</guid>
		<description>I try to give &#039;em whatever they want.

I have a full blog style page where current articles flow in reverse chronological order.  I have the same thing with abbreviated snippets, and the same thing again in traditional index style.

I have &quot;Most Popular&quot; pages, by today, this week, this month and all time.

For each major section of my site, there&#039;s a directory that lists all relevant articles.  So if your only interest is Mac OS X, you go to /MacOSX/index.html , and if it&#039;s Linux you love, then /Linux/index.html has your articles.

Of course we have Search - Google&#039;s and my own highly optimized Swishe search.

Only want to check comments?  No problem.  I have a page for that.

I also offer listings by less popular tags, and for the really bored, there&#039;s always the Random Page picker..

Give &#039;em whatever the heck they want..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try to give &#8216;em whatever they want.</p>
<p>I have a full blog style page where current articles flow in reverse chronological order.  I have the same thing with abbreviated snippets, and the same thing again in traditional index style.</p>
<p>I have &#8220;Most Popular&#8221; pages, by today, this week, this month and all time.</p>
<p>For each major section of my site, there&#8217;s a directory that lists all relevant articles.  So if your only interest is Mac OS X, you go to /MacOSX/index.html , and if it&#8217;s Linux you love, then /Linux/index.html has your articles.</p>
<p>Of course we have Search &#8211; Google&#8217;s and my own highly optimized Swishe search.</p>
<p>Only want to check comments?  No problem.  I have a page for that.</p>
<p>I also offer listings by less popular tags, and for the really bored, there&#8217;s always the Random Page picker..</p>
<p>Give &#8216;em whatever the heck they want..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
