<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traffic Generation Programs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:11:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Car Hire Spain Man</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-4265266</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Hire Spain Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-4265266</guid>
		<description>I was considering one of these services, but I think your column and comments have persuaded me its a no go... thanks
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was considering one of these services, but I think your column and comments have persuaded me its a no go&#8230; thanks<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-3670658</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-3670658</guid>
		<description>Wow I only saw June 6th when leaving my above comment, I completely ignored the year. That answers part of my question concerning your use of EC, thanks anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I only saw June 6th when leaving my above comment, I completely ignored the year. That answers part of my question concerning your use of EC, thanks anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-3670604</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-3670604</guid>
		<description>I have used both EC and blog explosion to try and generate traffic to my blogs. They did help me get some initial traffic and some &quot;surfers&quot; did leave comments and actually read my posts, but like you said the majority of traffic is drop and go or click and go. If I had spent half the time wasted on traffic exchanges on writing post and making my blog better I probably would have more visitors now, or at least more of the kind I want. I noticed you used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illiteratepoet.com/2008/05/web-money-entrecard-credit-give-away.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EC&lt;/a&gt; for a little while, was it the inspiration behind this post? Out of curiosity, If you had to use a traffic program which one would you use? As always great post and one I needed to read to shake my addiction to traffic programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used both EC and blog explosion to try and generate traffic to my blogs. They did help me get some initial traffic and some &#8220;surfers&#8221; did leave comments and actually read my posts, but like you said the majority of traffic is drop and go or click and go. If I had spent half the time wasted on traffic exchanges on writing post and making my blog better I probably would have more visitors now, or at least more of the kind I want. I noticed you used <a href="http://www.illiteratepoet.com/2008/05/web-money-entrecard-credit-give-away.html" rel="nofollow">EC</a> for a little while, was it the inspiration behind this post? Out of curiosity, If you had to use a traffic program which one would you use? As always great post and one I needed to read to shake my addiction to traffic programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prasanga</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-1760552</link>
		<dc:creator>prasanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-1760552</guid>
		<description>thanks for the info Darren, great post. I just red a thread at ewealth that these traffic programs can get you lot  of traffic. Now I know what the risks are, thanks again .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the info Darren, great post. I just red a thread at ewealth that these traffic programs can get you lot  of traffic. Now I know what the risks are, thanks again .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-656343</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-656343</guid>
		<description>Just write good articles and submit them to the best 50 sites, syndication will then multiply them to hundreds of PR4+ sites.

The mistake most people make, is that any articles submitted is always mediocre in content information. Spend a month doing some cutting edge research, compile your report and submit. Instead of gaining a few extra site visits a day, you will get hundreds of extra traffic each day from one quality article. 

Go for quality not quantity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just write good articles and submit them to the best 50 sites, syndication will then multiply them to hundreds of PR4+ sites.</p>
<p>The mistake most people make, is that any articles submitted is always mediocre in content information. Spend a month doing some cutting edge research, compile your report and submit. Instead of gaining a few extra site visits a day, you will get hundreds of extra traffic each day from one quality article. </p>
<p>Go for quality not quantity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-466017</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-466017</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know for sure if Blog Explosion is against adsense rules? I found that it is a good way to find sites and since my blog is very new maybe it will expose somebody new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know for sure if Blog Explosion is against adsense rules? I found that it is a good way to find sites and since my blog is very new maybe it will expose somebody new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-354716</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-354716</guid>
		<description>Well every traffic program gave me a couple thousand vistors to start out with except none came back but I didn&#039;t try any of the sites mentioned ill try them and well. These sites may give u a few readers and couple thousand veiws. www.126hits.com or www.216hits.com and www.trafficzap.com.( You just sign up and get the extra visitors that i said no work at all oh yeah another site that gave me 4000 page veiws was www.traffic-cc.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well every traffic program gave me a couple thousand vistors to start out with except none came back but I didn&#8217;t try any of the sites mentioned ill try them and well. These sites may give u a few readers and couple thousand veiws. <a href="http://www.126hits.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.126hits.com</a> or <a href="http://www.216hits.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.216hits.com</a> and <a href="http://www.trafficzap.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trafficzap.com</a>.( You just sign up and get the extra visitors that i said no work at all oh yeah another site that gave me 4000 page veiws was <a href="http://www.traffic-cc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.traffic-cc.com</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogophilia</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-352326</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogophilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-352326</guid>
		<description>The traffic exchange and &quot;paid to surf&quot; programs are not the kind of traffic you can afford to have.  As Dave Dash points out, he was a link-clicking monkey 2 hours a day.  That time is better spent on creating better content.  

I want real visitors, not &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.writingup.com/blogophilia/are_your_visitors_just_link_clicking_monkeys&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link-clicking monkeys.   If they are ohnly intereste in getting clicks to their site, I don&#039;t want them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traffic exchange and &#8220;paid to surf&#8221; programs are not the kind of traffic you can afford to have.  As Dave Dash points out, he was a link-clicking monkey 2 hours a day.  That time is better spent on creating better content.  </p>
<p>I want real visitors, not <a HREF="http://www.writingup.com/blogophilia/are_your_visitors_just_link_clicking_monkeys" rel="nofollow">link-clicking monkeys.   If they are ohnly intereste in getting clicks to their site, I don&#8217;t want them!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogHelper &#187; How To Be A Better Blogger - My Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-336923</link>
		<dc:creator>blogHelper &#187; How To Be A Better Blogger - My Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-336923</guid>
		<description>[...] Edit: There’s a ridiculously excellently-timed post (published today) on traffic generation programs like BlogExplosion and why you shouldn’t use them over at ProBlogger.                +Del.icio.us +Furl It +Spurl +Tag!RawSugar +My Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edit: There’s a ridiculously excellently-timed post (published today) on traffic generation programs like BlogExplosion and why you shouldn’t use them over at ProBlogger.                +Del.icio.us +Furl It +Spurl +Tag!RawSugar +My Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-336354</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-336354</guid>
		<description>I would feel slightly dishonest using traffic generation programs since I would be taking money for impressions generated by mostly disinterested visitors. So I steer clear of those. I don&#039;t get much traffic yet, but I much prefer &quot;organic traffic&quot;. Then I can feel good about taking advertisers&#039; money. 

By the way, isn&#039;t it &quot;Word of Mouth Traffic&quot; that was meant instead of &quot;World of Mouth Traffic&quot; ? Sorry to nitpick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would feel slightly dishonest using traffic generation programs since I would be taking money for impressions generated by mostly disinterested visitors. So I steer clear of those. I don&#8217;t get much traffic yet, but I much prefer &#8220;organic traffic&#8221;. Then I can feel good about taking advertisers&#8217; money. </p>
<p>By the way, isn&#8217;t it &#8220;Word of Mouth Traffic&#8221; that was meant instead of &#8220;World of Mouth Traffic&#8221; ? Sorry to nitpick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-336049</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-336049</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren! I have tried these traffic exchanges at one point, but decided to scrap it after realizing that I have to spend atleast one to two hours surfing other blogs to get traffic back...just not sustainable for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren! I have tried these traffic exchanges at one point, but decided to scrap it after realizing that I have to spend atleast one to two hours surfing other blogs to get traffic back&#8230;just not sustainable for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsien Lei</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335995</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien Lei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335995</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that BlogExplosion and BlogClicker have done all right by me.  Enough people from these traffic exchange programs leave me genuine comments and I&#039;ve made friends and readers out of several.  Overall, it&#039;s worth it if you&#039;ve got the time to go clicking yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that BlogExplosion and BlogClicker have done all right by me.  Enough people from these traffic exchange programs leave me genuine comments and I&#8217;ve made friends and readers out of several.  Overall, it&#8217;s worth it if you&#8217;ve got the time to go clicking yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335875</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335875</guid>
		<description>Organic traffic is always nice because people finding a blog through a search engine or linking always seem to check things out in a blog more than people stopping by via Blog Explosion or some other traffic service.

People who find something they like will usually look at a couple of posts -- rather than bailing out at the end of the obligatory 30 seconds they need to get a surfing credit.

When I used to use a blog traffic service, I found my pageviews equalled my unique visitors.  There wasn&#039;t much variation.

When I started getting organic traffic, I found that people looked at four or five posts.  Pageviews increased as well because people were looking beyond the homepage.

If you write about the right topics and have a passion about your subjects, people will come to your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organic traffic is always nice because people finding a blog through a search engine or linking always seem to check things out in a blog more than people stopping by via Blog Explosion or some other traffic service.</p>
<p>People who find something they like will usually look at a couple of posts &#8212; rather than bailing out at the end of the obligatory 30 seconds they need to get a surfing credit.</p>
<p>When I used to use a blog traffic service, I found my pageviews equalled my unique visitors.  There wasn&#8217;t much variation.</p>
<p>When I started getting organic traffic, I found that people looked at four or five posts.  Pageviews increased as well because people were looking beyond the homepage.</p>
<p>If you write about the right topics and have a passion about your subjects, people will come to your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dash</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335788</guid>
		<description>redjade, Oragnic traffic is from search engines and people linking to you without you initiating anything (e.g. you&#039;re not paying for those links).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>redjade, Oragnic traffic is from search engines and people linking to you without you initiating anything (e.g. you&#8217;re not paying for those links).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dash</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335786</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335786</guid>
		<description>Hey Darren.  I&#039;ve dabbled with BlogExplosion and the other &quot;clones.&quot;  First of all, if you have no traffic they are pretty neat.  But they do get very old in a hurry.  Eventually your traffic changes won&#039;t be significant enough to justfiy surfing that much.  

At this point I get about 100 visits a day.  That&#039;s a bit more than I was ever getting with BlogExplosion.  It&#039;s not even all that much.  I needed to surf almost 100-200 sites to get the same ammount of traffic.  Each site requires you to be on the page for 30 seconds, which means you&#039;re easily spending 100 minutes, or two hours surfing.

I work a full time job (from home, but it still is 8 hours of my day) and I couldn&#039;t justify spending this time surfing around after a few weeks, because the traffic explosion wasn&#039;t significant anymore.  I felt that was time taking away from my real life, writing for my blog, and coding for my web sites.

A lot of the sites I saw were across the board from being interesting reads, to being quite out of my tastes.  I also figured, if I just wait 30 seconds just for the page to pass, I bet others are doing the same thing.  So I&#039;m getting 100 people who probably aren&#039;t even that interested.  You can narrow by topic, but my understanding is most people didn&#039;t.

I&#039;ve been privileged to post my content (even older content) around the web and get it picked up by other sites and that&#039;s worth a lot more than arbitrary visitors.

If time is money, let&#039;s say my time is $25 USD/hr, that&#039;s $50/day for 100 hits, I&#039;m much better off spending that money on targetted advertising (but I don&#039;t).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Darren.  I&#8217;ve dabbled with BlogExplosion and the other &#8220;clones.&#8221;  First of all, if you have no traffic they are pretty neat.  But they do get very old in a hurry.  Eventually your traffic changes won&#8217;t be significant enough to justfiy surfing that much.  </p>
<p>At this point I get about 100 visits a day.  That&#8217;s a bit more than I was ever getting with BlogExplosion.  It&#8217;s not even all that much.  I needed to surf almost 100-200 sites to get the same ammount of traffic.  Each site requires you to be on the page for 30 seconds, which means you&#8217;re easily spending 100 minutes, or two hours surfing.</p>
<p>I work a full time job (from home, but it still is 8 hours of my day) and I couldn&#8217;t justify spending this time surfing around after a few weeks, because the traffic explosion wasn&#8217;t significant anymore.  I felt that was time taking away from my real life, writing for my blog, and coding for my web sites.</p>
<p>A lot of the sites I saw were across the board from being interesting reads, to being quite out of my tastes.  I also figured, if I just wait 30 seconds just for the page to pass, I bet others are doing the same thing.  So I&#8217;m getting 100 people who probably aren&#8217;t even that interested.  You can narrow by topic, but my understanding is most people didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been privileged to post my content (even older content) around the web and get it picked up by other sites and that&#8217;s worth a lot more than arbitrary visitors.</p>
<p>If time is money, let&#8217;s say my time is $25 USD/hr, that&#8217;s $50/day for 100 hits, I&#8217;m much better off spending that money on targetted advertising (but I don&#8217;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redjade</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335780</link>
		<dc:creator>redjade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335780</guid>
		<description>thank you (again) for an thought provoking piece.

one question:  what is &#039;Organic Traffic&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you (again) for an thought provoking piece.</p>
<p>one question:  what is &#8216;Organic Traffic&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny Allman</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335760</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny Allman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335760</guid>
		<description>Well in my early days of bumbling around looking for traffic (of any kind) I tested many different traffic sources. I don&#039;t actually mention the real stinkers in my writings anymore, but there are many.

Watch out for the companies that claim to give you 1000, 10,000, 10,000, uniques for a small flat fee. Usually it won&#039;t work. If you can choose keywords that relatively not competitive, you can maybe net a few bucks, but if you try highly competitive keywords you won&#039;t see much action on your site.

Another problem is if you are using Adsense for your revenue. Back in the day when I was testing all the &quot;crap traffic&quot;, I received a polite email from the Adsense team, questioning the quality of my traffic source.

I got rid of the particular &quot;crap traffic&quot; source, let Adsense know, and I was back in their good books.

There are only two PPC networks I trust right now. Adwords and Overture - and I also trust that even with those networks I have to know what I&#039;m doing when I setup a campaign or I&#039;ll lose money....pronto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in my early days of bumbling around looking for traffic (of any kind) I tested many different traffic sources. I don&#8217;t actually mention the real stinkers in my writings anymore, but there are many.</p>
<p>Watch out for the companies that claim to give you 1000, 10,000, 10,000, uniques for a small flat fee. Usually it won&#8217;t work. If you can choose keywords that relatively not competitive, you can maybe net a few bucks, but if you try highly competitive keywords you won&#8217;t see much action on your site.</p>
<p>Another problem is if you are using Adsense for your revenue. Back in the day when I was testing all the &#8220;crap traffic&#8221;, I received a polite email from the Adsense team, questioning the quality of my traffic source.</p>
<p>I got rid of the particular &#8220;crap traffic&#8221; source, let Adsense know, and I was back in their good books.</p>
<p>There are only two PPC networks I trust right now. Adwords and Overture &#8211; and I also trust that even with those networks I have to know what I&#8217;m doing when I setup a campaign or I&#8217;ll lose money&#8230;.pronto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zsolt</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335751</link>
		<dc:creator>Zsolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335751</guid>
		<description>Hello Darren,

Yes, I totally agree with you. Traffic from these networks is - as you said - empty, to say the least. I once had an adventure with I need hits (I won&#039;t promote their link) which worked well on the technical side, but my site&#039;s logs showed that no one on they sent was interested in the site I was promoting.

Of course they are honest, because they don&#039;t even promise, anyone would be...

regards
Zsolt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Darren,</p>
<p>Yes, I totally agree with you. Traffic from these networks is &#8211; as you said &#8211; empty, to say the least. I once had an adventure with I need hits (I won&#8217;t promote their link) which worked well on the technical side, but my site&#8217;s logs showed that no one on they sent was interested in the site I was promoting.</p>
<p>Of course they are honest, because they don&#8217;t even promise, anyone would be&#8230;</p>
<p>regards<br />
Zsolt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335746</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335746</guid>
		<description>I used to use systems like Blog Explosion to generate traffic (this was before I knew I could make money from said traffic ;) ) and it did work out tremendously for me. When I was actively involved with BE I would get 100-200 visitors per week, 3-4 of which would either bookmark me or leave a comment, so I was happy.

I stopped using BE because of the possible monetization conflict but also because eventually incoming links and search engine results were generating more traffic than exchange programs and it was no longer worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use systems like Blog Explosion to generate traffic (this was before I knew I could make money from said traffic ;) ) and it did work out tremendously for me. When I was actively involved with BE I would get 100-200 visitors per week, 3-4 of which would either bookmark me or leave a comment, so I was happy.</p>
<p>I stopped using BE because of the possible monetization conflict but also because eventually incoming links and search engine results were generating more traffic than exchange programs and it was no longer worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squirrelinabox</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-335744</link>
		<dc:creator>Squirrelinabox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/06/06/traffic-generation-programs/#comment-335744</guid>
		<description>Great points as always Darren.  I&#039;ve seen way too many posts and forum threads dealing with bad experiences for me to try out one of these &quot;magic&quot; programs.  Like you said, there might be some out there that work, but there is a HUGE risk in getting &quot;unnatural&quot; traffic.

It all comes down to whether or not a few extra visitors are worth the risk of being banned from ad programs and search engines.  With that being said, the infamous Mook Jon guy from Sitepoint fame is actually doing a study using all sorts of traffic sources.  Though he hasn&#039;t posted any results yet, you can check out the progress at his blog http://www.aojon.com/category/traffic/ or on the Sitepoint forums http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384371.

Maybe he&#039;ll come up with something that actually works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points as always Darren.  I&#8217;ve seen way too many posts and forum threads dealing with bad experiences for me to try out one of these &#8220;magic&#8221; programs.  Like you said, there might be some out there that work, but there is a HUGE risk in getting &#8220;unnatural&#8221; traffic.</p>
<p>It all comes down to whether or not a few extra visitors are worth the risk of being banned from ad programs and search engines.  With that being said, the infamous Mook Jon guy from Sitepoint fame is actually doing a study using all sorts of traffic sources.  Though he hasn&#8217;t posted any results yet, you can check out the progress at his blog <a href="http://www.aojon.com/category/traffic/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aojon.com/category/traffic/</a> or on the Sitepoint forums <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384371" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384371</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe he&#8217;ll come up with something that actually works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
