<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Good Blogs Go Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are You Losing Readers? Why? : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1452256</link>
		<dc:creator>Are You Losing Readers? Why? : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-1452256</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;When Good Blogs Go Bad&#8221; by Problogger Darren Rowse, he analyzes why he was unhappy when a favorite blog changed from original content to blogging for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;When Good Blogs Go Bad&#8221; by Problogger Darren Rowse, he analyzes why he was unhappy when a favorite blog changed from original content to blogging for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg abel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-458807</link>
		<dc:creator>greg abel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-458807</guid>
		<description>&quot;Was this a new blogger or a long time blogger?
I’m getting the impression that it was a new blogger, starting out of the gate, all bright eyed and bushy tailed, thinking that he or she would cash in big time immediately on the blogging push.&quot;

You mean people are making money off this???

Greg 
http://www.DiCaprioBengals.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Was this a new blogger or a long time blogger?<br />
I’m getting the impression that it was a new blogger, starting out of the gate, all bright eyed and bushy tailed, thinking that he or she would cash in big time immediately on the blogging push.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean people are making money off this???</p>
<p>Greg<br />
<a href="http://www.DiCaprioBengals.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DiCaprioBengals.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-329857</link>
		<dc:creator>tom sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 18:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-329857</guid>
		<description>I can sort of sympathize with the sentiment here, but I wouldn&#039;t be posting this if I were Darren.

I love ProBlogger -- it&#039;s my favorite blog on the Web -- but this website is &lt;strong&gt;so damn saturated&lt;/strong&gt; with external javascripts as to be almost unusable.  It&#039;s all ad systems.  So in a way, the unnamed blog and ProBlogger are similar -- I think that the user experience at this site has been really compromised by overzealousness of advertising.

That said, I&#039;m not going to condemn Darren for trying to make a buck.  I&#039;m guilty of it too.  Probably guilty of too many external javascripts as well.

But the &lt;strong&gt;posting frequency&lt;/strong&gt; jab is unwarranted.  I think that ProBlogger posts &lt;em&gt;too frequently&lt;/em&gt; -- it actually keeps me from reading the blog as much.  Feels like I&#039;m inundated.  In Bloglines today I saw 100 unread posts from here (although half of those were dupes -- what&#039;s the problem?).  That deters me from reading.  I know there are different schools of thought on blogging frequency, but I &lt;a href=&quot;http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2006/04/how-often-update-blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prefer&lt;/a&gt; 3-10x per week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can sort of sympathize with the sentiment here, but I wouldn&#8217;t be posting this if I were Darren.</p>
<p>I love ProBlogger &#8212; it&#8217;s my favorite blog on the Web &#8212; but this website is <strong>so damn saturated</strong> with external javascripts as to be almost unusable.  It&#8217;s all ad systems.  So in a way, the unnamed blog and ProBlogger are similar &#8212; I think that the user experience at this site has been really compromised by overzealousness of advertising.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m not going to condemn Darren for trying to make a buck.  I&#8217;m guilty of it too.  Probably guilty of too many external javascripts as well.</p>
<p>But the <strong>posting frequency</strong> jab is unwarranted.  I think that ProBlogger posts <em>too frequently</em> &#8212; it actually keeps me from reading the blog as much.  Feels like I&#8217;m inundated.  In Bloglines today I saw 100 unread posts from here (although half of those were dupes &#8212; what&#8217;s the problem?).  That deters me from reading.  I know there are different schools of thought on blogging frequency, but I <a href="http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2006/04/how-often-update-blog" rel="nofollow">prefer</a> 3-10x per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Home of Free Cash $$$</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-325357</link>
		<dc:creator>The Home of Free Cash $$$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-325357</guid>
		<description>[...] Make Money Online with ProBlogger Blog Tips Affiliate Programs Helping Bloggers earn Money. &#8230; Free ProBlogger Newsletter. About. Darren Rowse. About ProBlogger &#183; About Darren Rowse &#183; ProBlogger FAQ &#183; Subscribe &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Make Money Online with ProBlogger Blog Tips Affiliate Programs Helping Bloggers earn Money. &#8230; Free ProBlogger Newsletter. About. Darren Rowse. About ProBlogger &middot; About Darren Rowse &middot; ProBlogger FAQ &middot; Subscribe &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web editor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keep your readership</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-316571</link>
		<dc:creator>Web editor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keep your readership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 20:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-316571</guid>
		<description>[...] When Good Blogs Go Bad: ProBlogger Blog Tips [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When Good Blogs Go Bad: ProBlogger Blog Tips [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-313973</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 10:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-313973</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have anything against the occassional relevant affiliate link - its just when thats all is written about that I lose interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have anything against the occassional relevant affiliate link &#8211; its just when thats all is written about that I lose interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam Hanna</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-312993</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam Hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 08:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-312993</guid>
		<description>Hi,
to be honest, I have not had any really good experiences with fedback for my blog so far. The feedback that I get most of the time is, um, you are the perfect site, love, blah-but nothing really beneficial!

About finding ideas...um, going for a walk is sth that really helps me. I can write more about that if you wish me to!

Best regards
Tam Hanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
to be honest, I have not had any really good experiences with fedback for my blog so far. The feedback that I get most of the time is, um, you are the perfect site, love, blah-but nothing really beneficial!</p>
<p>About finding ideas&#8230;um, going for a walk is sth that really helps me. I can write more about that if you wish me to!</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Tam Hanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Participant</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-312283</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Participant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 06:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-312283</guid>
		<description>Given that readers don&#039;t want to read about affiliate links. Cluttering up your blog with them is pointless and counter productive.

All things considered I think it is more profitable to write good content, about subjects reasonable earnings per click, that people want to read about. It&#039;s a threefold path. 

Lord knows the web doesn&#039;t need an extra &quot;mesothelioma&quot; blog, even though good old mesothelioma is the best paying keyword on the internet.

So just keep on keeping on, and rely on the network power rule n*(n-1)/2, over time you will suceed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that readers don&#8217;t want to read about affiliate links. Cluttering up your blog with them is pointless and counter productive.</p>
<p>All things considered I think it is more profitable to write good content, about subjects reasonable earnings per click, that people want to read about. It&#8217;s a threefold path. </p>
<p>Lord knows the web doesn&#8217;t need an extra &#8220;mesothelioma&#8221; blog, even though good old mesothelioma is the best paying keyword on the internet.</p>
<p>So just keep on keeping on, and rely on the network power rule n*(n-1)/2, over time you will suceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-310765</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 02:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-310765</guid>
		<description>I think you address an issue that happens frequently -- blogs that turn from consumer reviews / unbiased advice into basically advertisements for other companies.  I&#039;ve never been presented with the situation myself, so I can&#039;t judge, but I think a lot of bloggers see dollar signs instead of progressing their blog in a normal manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you address an issue that happens frequently &#8212; blogs that turn from consumer reviews / unbiased advice into basically advertisements for other companies.  I&#8217;ve never been presented with the situation myself, so I can&#8217;t judge, but I think a lot of bloggers see dollar signs instead of progressing their blog in a normal manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-310445</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 01:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-310445</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be naming the blog. Sorry but I&#039;m just not going there friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be naming the blog. Sorry but I&#8217;m just not going there friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-309143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-309143</guid>
		<description>To me, it is very obvious who is being talked about here, because I have felt the same way about this blog for some time.  I used to really enjoy the blog, but it made a 180 degree change several months ago.  What do I know, though..... I am only an Entrepreneur, and it&#039;s been a long Journey.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it is very obvious who is being talked about here, because I have felt the same way about this blog for some time.  I used to really enjoy the blog, but it made a 180 degree change several months ago.  What do I know, though&#8230;.. I am only an Entrepreneur, and it&#8217;s been a long Journey&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-308161</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 19:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-308161</guid>
		<description>Sure .. I am nobody and this is just my opinion .. but I think bloggers who try to justify &quot;blogging frequency&quot; as a reason for removing RSS feed .. well ..they are almost as low as bloggers who claim content is king, but outcasts you already because of &quot;poor blog design&quot;

If you don&#039;t like what you are reading, you don&#039;t have to keep the feed .. but let&#039;s be honest about it and less snobbish and hypocritical, Mmmmmmmmmm kay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure .. I am nobody and this is just my opinion .. but I think bloggers who try to justify &#8220;blogging frequency&#8221; as a reason for removing RSS feed .. well ..they are almost as low as bloggers who claim content is king, but outcasts you already because of &#8220;poor blog design&#8221;</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like what you are reading, you don&#8217;t have to keep the feed .. but let&#8217;s be honest about it and less snobbish and hypocritical, Mmmmmmmmmm kay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-308155</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-308155</guid>
		<description>Everyone says about the second point Darren has given. For me the first is important. Darren was disappointed by worse frequency of posts. Does it mean that bloggers should try keep posting frequency by (almost) all cost? And does it mean that newbies should start small (with lower frequency) and adjust number of post if they&#039;re able to instead of challenging high posting frequency from the very beginning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone says about the second point Darren has given. For me the first is important. Darren was disappointed by worse frequency of posts. Does it mean that bloggers should try keep posting frequency by (almost) all cost? And does it mean that newbies should start small (with lower frequency) and adjust number of post if they&#8217;re able to instead of challenging high posting frequency from the very beginning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307549</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307549</guid>
		<description>Actually what you&#039;ve just mentioned here, it is not you the only one would felt that way, for sure there are numbers of readers on the blog you read, would be having the same thought and felt. 

For some reason, blogging is not just sell things for your affiliate nor helping them to be a salesman or salesgirl, if once in a while, the post mentioned about the affiliate products or introduce, it will be understandable for readers that read it, but what sells most on your blogs, is actually the idea, and your own words in the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually what you&#8217;ve just mentioned here, it is not you the only one would felt that way, for sure there are numbers of readers on the blog you read, would be having the same thought and felt. </p>
<p>For some reason, blogging is not just sell things for your affiliate nor helping them to be a salesman or salesgirl, if once in a while, the post mentioned about the affiliate products or introduce, it will be understandable for readers that read it, but what sells most on your blogs, is actually the idea, and your own words in the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.B. Dada</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307515</link>
		<dc:creator>A.B. Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307515</guid>
		<description>I think the best thing to do when you&#039;re falling apart blog-wise is to bring in young and fresh blood to your blog -- get other writers.  If you have a good amount of subscribers and readers, don&#039;t lose them because you&#039;re getting writer&#039;s cramp or boredom.

Bringing in just one or two fresh writers can help you create new topics, too, just out of replying to theirs.  My network of blogs is only 6 months old, but I&#039;ve already brought in 4 new writers to help me create better opinions and a larger base of thoughts.  My writing is actually UP in response to their varying opinions, and my traffic is well up (enough that I can financially compensate the other authors).

Don&#039;t let a good blog die -- just do what any business owner does and delegate responsibility to others.  The best part about doing this is that it gives new bloggers an option rather than building from scratch, and it also gives you additional marketing traffic in how they drive readers to the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best thing to do when you&#8217;re falling apart blog-wise is to bring in young and fresh blood to your blog &#8212; get other writers.  If you have a good amount of subscribers and readers, don&#8217;t lose them because you&#8217;re getting writer&#8217;s cramp or boredom.</p>
<p>Bringing in just one or two fresh writers can help you create new topics, too, just out of replying to theirs.  My network of blogs is only 6 months old, but I&#8217;ve already brought in 4 new writers to help me create better opinions and a larger base of thoughts.  My writing is actually UP in response to their varying opinions, and my traffic is well up (enough that I can financially compensate the other authors).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let a good blog die &#8212; just do what any business owner does and delegate responsibility to others.  The best part about doing this is that it gives new bloggers an option rather than building from scratch, and it also gives you additional marketing traffic in how they drive readers to the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 14:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307485</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;name them :-)&lt;/i&gt;

Is it just me, or is it fairly obvious who it is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>name them :-)</i></p>
<p>Is it just me, or is it fairly obvious who it is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307466</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Thilak and Duncan... give us a name! :-) I understand the lack of desire to speak poorly about someone in the blogsphere and then name them... but well... they made that choice when they changed their content to be a cash grab.

Points well made either way though Darren. I think a lot of us, especially those of us that didn&#039;t start with the idea of blogging for dinero, can lose sight of why we were blogging in the first place and just start being blinded by dollar signs.

It&#039;s natural for me to be skeptical of anyone that promotes an affiliate. I realize that there&#039;s nothing wrong with it - just as there&#039;s nothing wrong with sales of anything - but I&#039;d be a whole lot more interested in a product if someone suggested it and wasn&#039;t making cash off it. A blog that is just affiliate touting is completely useless in my books - there are too many other blogs that find a medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Thilak and Duncan&#8230; give us a name! :-) I understand the lack of desire to speak poorly about someone in the blogsphere and then name them&#8230; but well&#8230; they made that choice when they changed their content to be a cash grab.</p>
<p>Points well made either way though Darren. I think a lot of us, especially those of us that didn&#8217;t start with the idea of blogging for dinero, can lose sight of why we were blogging in the first place and just start being blinded by dollar signs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s natural for me to be skeptical of anyone that promotes an affiliate. I realize that there&#8217;s nothing wrong with it &#8211; just as there&#8217;s nothing wrong with sales of anything &#8211; but I&#8217;d be a whole lot more interested in a product if someone suggested it and wasn&#8217;t making cash off it. A blog that is just affiliate touting is completely useless in my books &#8211; there are too many other blogs that find a medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 13:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307419</guid>
		<description>Gulp...hope it&#039;s not me and my old site. I plead insanity :)

K, no-one cleans the mess, they just become comment spam breeding zones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gulp&#8230;hope it&#8217;s not me and my old site. I plead insanity :)</p>
<p>K, no-one cleans the mess, they just become comment spam breeding zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307404</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 13:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307404</guid>
		<description>Was this a new blogger or a long time blogger?
I&#039;m getting the impression that it was a new blogger, starting out of the gate, all bright eyed and bushy tailed, thinking that he or she would cash in big time immediately on the blogging push.
Once it didn&#039;t happen yesterday, the blogger got disillusioned and went &quot;on strike&quot; only producing posts with a better chance of driving dollars.
I&#039;ve seen that happen more than once.

So curious, as a non tech person, what happens to all the dead blogs (especially the freebie ones)?
Who cleans up that mess?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this a new blogger or a long time blogger?<br />
I&#8217;m getting the impression that it was a new blogger, starting out of the gate, all bright eyed and bushy tailed, thinking that he or she would cash in big time immediately on the blogging push.<br />
Once it didn&#8217;t happen yesterday, the blogger got disillusioned and went &#8220;on strike&#8221; only producing posts with a better chance of driving dollars.<br />
I&#8217;ve seen that happen more than once.</p>
<p>So curious, as a non tech person, what happens to all the dead blogs (especially the freebie ones)?<br />
Who cleans up that mess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/29/when-good-blogs-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-307373</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2660#comment-307373</guid>
		<description>Darren McLaughlin has a good point. 

People say that the blogging world will become saturated, but the reality is that to write with frequency about a topic that is not self centered and narcissistic is hard work. So the quantity and quality is always going to be a scarce commodity and the earning opportunities will be with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren McLaughlin has a good point. </p>
<p>People say that the blogging world will become saturated, but the reality is that to write with frequency about a topic that is not self centered and narcissistic is hard work. So the quantity and quality is always going to be a scarce commodity and the earning opportunities will be with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/26 queries in 0.088 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 22:11:01 -->
