<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Link Lust for Lifehacker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee Broun</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-329637</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Broun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-329637</guid>
		<description>Agnus castus can help to regulate a cycle. As you have only been off the Pill for five months, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spermamax-shop.info/improve-sperm.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;improve sperm&lt;/a&gt;  it is still early days. In general, taking the Pill does not seem to reduce fertility and 90 per cent of previously fertile women who stop using the Pill have a baby within 30 months. This is only two months longer than the average figures for women who had previously used the diaphragm or coil, and is thought to reflect that fact that many women stop the Pill two to three months before trying to conceive a child so the hormones are out of their system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agnus castus can help to regulate a cycle. As you have only been off the Pill for five months, <a href="http://www.spermamax-shop.info/improve-sperm.html" rel="nofollow">improve sperm</a>  it is still early days. In general, taking the Pill does not seem to reduce fertility and 90 per cent of previously fertile women who stop using the Pill have a baby within 30 months. This is only two months longer than the average figures for women who had previously used the diaphragm or coil, and is thought to reflect that fact that many women stop the Pill two to three months before trying to conceive a child so the hormones are out of their system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloglogs</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-281223</link>
		<dc:creator>bloglogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-281223</guid>
		<description>Lifehacker should give you a home page link for life, considering the wonderful piece that you wrote about them. 
-----------------
bloglogs.net: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloglogs.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bloglogs.net&lt;/a&gt;
blogtricks.net: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogtricks.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blogtricks.net&lt;/a&gt;
-----------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifehacker should give you a home page link for life, considering the wonderful piece that you wrote about them.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
bloglogs.net: <a href="http://www.bloglogs.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloglogs.net</a><br />
blogtricks.net: <a href="http://www.blogtricks.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogtricks.net</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Trapani</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-280170</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 02:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-280170</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks, Darren! This post is such a compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks, Darren! This post is such a compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrono Cr@cker</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-279289</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrono Cr@cker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 09:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-279289</guid>
		<description>Hmm....You are right Darren... I&#039;ve got a link from LH once about a keyboard shortcuts post of mine and the inflow was steady for the first week and now &amp; then I still get three. Lifehacker has a good stream of users.

On the other, comparing recent trends, it would be interesting to check how a link from Techcrunch affects people, though it&#039;s a shame that Techcrunch hardly links to other blogs. :( Infact not many blogs do that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;.You are right Darren&#8230; I&#8217;ve got a link from LH once about a keyboard shortcuts post of mine and the inflow was steady for the first week and now &amp; then I still get three. Lifehacker has a good stream of users.</p>
<p>On the other, comparing recent trends, it would be interesting to check how a link from Techcrunch affects people, though it&#8217;s a shame that Techcrunch hardly links to other blogs. :( Infact not many blogs do that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan del Villano</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-279069</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan del Villano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-279069</guid>
		<description>Ironic.  I just did a post about Lifehacker and an underappreciated article.  Sure, I&#039;d love a link.  But I really just want to be able to comment!  However,  I guess I am going to have to earn it.

- Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic.  I just did a post about Lifehacker and an underappreciated article.  Sure, I&#8217;d love a link.  But I really just want to be able to comment!  However,  I guess I am going to have to earn it.</p>
<p>- Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278972</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 22:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278972</guid>
		<description>it just happens Darren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it just happens Darren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278680</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 17:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278680</guid>
		<description>Darren,

Do you tailor your content to specifically try to attract links from them, or is it just something that happens?

Darren M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>Do you tailor your content to specifically try to attract links from them, or is it just something that happens?</p>
<p>Darren M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [GEEKS ARE SEXY] Tech. News</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278662</link>
		<dc:creator>[GEEKS ARE SEXY] Tech. News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 16:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278662</guid>
		<description>5 months ago, LifeHacker posted a link to one of my Data Recovery article, and the effect was quite spectacular. I received A LOT of traffic from them, and now, almost 6 months later, I still receive some pretty decent hits from them.

I prefer to be on DIGG anyway :) the &quot;collateral&quot; effect they cause are a lot more important.

Kiltak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 months ago, LifeHacker posted a link to one of my Data Recovery article, and the effect was quite spectacular. I received A LOT of traffic from them, and now, almost 6 months later, I still receive some pretty decent hits from them.</p>
<p>I prefer to be on DIGG anyway :) the &#8220;collateral&#8221; effect they cause are a lot more important.</p>
<p>Kiltak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278653</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278653</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve noticed your digital photography blog getting a couple links there too - congrats. Must be a nice boost. Lifehacker has 8,072 subscribers on bloglines alone. Those are big numbers compared to the sites I subscribe to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve noticed your digital photography blog getting a couple links there too &#8211; congrats. Must be a nice boost. Lifehacker has 8,072 subscribers on bloglines alone. Those are big numbers compared to the sites I subscribe to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackbeard</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278634</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 15:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278634</guid>
		<description>In my experience working with various blogs, I&#039;ve also found some problems with Digg users sometimes being a bit on the snarky side. However, in the arena of a spreading links to your site, Digg can be very effective. Actually, I think the secondary links that Digg inevatibly brings are more valuable traffic-wise than the short-term burst of traffic. The more links you get from blogs and message boards, the higher your site will show up in search engines, so while the Digg effect might not bring in a lot of advertising revenue at first, over time the links that Digg helps to create will have a very positive effect on your blog&#039;s advertising revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience working with various blogs, I&#8217;ve also found some problems with Digg users sometimes being a bit on the snarky side. However, in the arena of a spreading links to your site, Digg can be very effective. Actually, I think the secondary links that Digg inevatibly brings are more valuable traffic-wise than the short-term burst of traffic. The more links you get from blogs and message boards, the higher your site will show up in search engines, so while the Digg effect might not bring in a lot of advertising revenue at first, over time the links that Digg helps to create will have a very positive effect on your blog&#8217;s advertising revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278630</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278630</guid>
		<description>This happened to me last week. 37 Signals linked to my Copywriting 101 series, which brought tons of traffic, subscribers, bookmarks and secondary links.  Then Lifehacker picked it up, and it started all over again.

700 del.cio.us bookmarks later...

Lifehacker really is one of the Holy Grail&#039;s of linkage.  But 37 Signals is no slouch either! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happened to me last week. 37 Signals linked to my Copywriting 101 series, which brought tons of traffic, subscribers, bookmarks and secondary links.  Then Lifehacker picked it up, and it started all over again.</p>
<p>700 del.cio.us bookmarks later&#8230;</p>
<p>Lifehacker really is one of the Holy Grail&#8217;s of linkage.  But 37 Signals is no slouch either! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/13/my-link-lust-for-lifehacker/comment-page-1/#comment-278617</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 14:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2580#comment-278617</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted some articles on their Community Beta section at lifehacker.org, and noticed an increase in traffic when they get posted to the front page.

The nice thing about that is not a lot of people post articles in that section, so your post can end up hanging on the front page for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted some articles on their Community Beta section at lifehacker.org, and noticed an increase in traffic when they get posted to the front page.</p>
<p>The nice thing about that is not a lot of people post articles in that section, so your post can end up hanging on the front page for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
