<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdBrite Announces Inline Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:53:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Mcconnahea</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1630436</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Mcconnahea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-1630436</guid>
		<description>If you guys don&#039;t like them, don&#039;t let them.  By this I mean.. and this is helpful for a lot of crap on the internet that slows you down:

First Get Firefox.  Second get an extension called &quot;NoScript.&quot;  What this lets you do is allow javascript, java (and other plugins), only for trusted domains.  Most of these inline ads run on javascript.  Really very few times does this hender your ability to find what you&#039;re looking for.  Text isn&#039;t javascript and it also blocks all those annoying flash banners that use your computer&#039;s resources.  If you want to allow a certain script to run on a site, you can click the little icon on the bottom of your browser and a convenient popup menu comes up with a list of scripts that are being blocked.  

Scripts come from different sources.  So the script that runs kontera or adbrite inline ads you can block, while say for instance allowing a script that runs a flash demo on the same site.  It&#039;s very versatile and you should just take my word for it -- It&#039;s the best Firefox addon ever created.  Surfing is 20 times better with this script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you guys don&#8217;t like them, don&#8217;t let them.  By this I mean.. and this is helpful for a lot of crap on the internet that slows you down:</p>
<p>First Get Firefox.  Second get an extension called &#8220;NoScript.&#8221;  What this lets you do is allow javascript, java (and other plugins), only for trusted domains.  Most of these inline ads run on javascript.  Really very few times does this hender your ability to find what you&#8217;re looking for.  Text isn&#8217;t javascript and it also blocks all those annoying flash banners that use your computer&#8217;s resources.  If you want to allow a certain script to run on a site, you can click the little icon on the bottom of your browser and a convenient popup menu comes up with a list of scripts that are being blocked.  </p>
<p>Scripts come from different sources.  So the script that runs kontera or adbrite inline ads you can block, while say for instance allowing a script that runs a flash demo on the same site.  It&#8217;s very versatile and you should just take my word for it &#8212; It&#8217;s the best Firefox addon ever created.  Surfing is 20 times better with this script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gutowski (largehearted boy)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-281585</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gutowski (largehearted boy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-281585</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the commenters, I dislike them on the sites I vist that contain inline ads. Visually, the site design is broken, I have yet to see a site that incorpotrates this type of ad seemlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the commenters, I dislike them on the sites I vist that contain inline ads. Visually, the site design is broken, I have yet to see a site that incorpotrates this type of ad seemlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-280921</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 07:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-280921</guid>
		<description>I have tried inline ads but I feel irritated after some time, it disturbs my layout and font settings and make the page look ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried inline ads but I feel irritated after some time, it disturbs my layout and font settings and make the page look ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-280288</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 09:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-280288</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s even more complex than that, Mike. The Windows Vista blog will have a mainly techie readership, at least at this stage of the Vista game. They&#039;ll be developers or in the trade. Most will be bloggers themselves, but they do click on some of the technical ads that Google serves up. In this case, Adsense becomes part of the info-stream, which is what it does at its best. Being a blogger or reader doesn&#039;t seem to matter in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s even more complex than that, Mike. The Windows Vista blog will have a mainly techie readership, at least at this stage of the Vista game. They&#8217;ll be developers or in the trade. Most will be bloggers themselves, but they do click on some of the technical ads that Google serves up. In this case, Adsense becomes part of the info-stream, which is what it does at its best. Being a blogger or reader doesn&#8217;t seem to matter in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-280149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 00:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-280149</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between readers and bloggers.

Bloggers rarely, if ever, contribute to your income by clicking on an ad.

Average readers click on ads. Don&#039;t ever confuse the two groups as they act completely different in testing situations.

Never,  ever make a decision based on what you &quot; think &quot; a customer will do. 

&lt;strong&gt;Don&#039;t even believe him if he tells you what he thinks he&#039;ll do.

Run a test and &quot; see &quot; what he&#039;ll actually do under given circumstances.&lt;/strong&gt;

Also, Darren, I had to use your name again. in my latest blog post.

Hope you can help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between readers and bloggers.</p>
<p>Bloggers rarely, if ever, contribute to your income by clicking on an ad.</p>
<p>Average readers click on ads. Don&#8217;t ever confuse the two groups as they act completely different in testing situations.</p>
<p>Never,  ever make a decision based on what you &#8221; think &#8221; a customer will do. </p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t even believe him if he tells you what he thinks he&#8217;ll do.</p>
<p>Run a test and &#8221; see &#8221; what he&#8217;ll actually do under given circumstances.</strong></p>
<p>Also, Darren, I had to use your name again. in my latest blog post.</p>
<p>Hope you can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279649</guid>
		<description>As a quick not (I&#039;m bad, I&#039;m supposed to be offline), as Darren said this was a test across 5 blogs.

The parameters were: posts older than 30 days, not for logged in users, and using Kontera&#039;s new contextual engine.

We&#039;ve had some minor bugs with the code (WVW may not have the latest version, for example) but they should all be fixed now. Also, as Darren said, every reader on the blogs we&#039;re testing on has said they have 0 problem with them.

And, really, if you&#039;re a regular reader you should never, ever see them anyways. Sorry if folk did, though, that&#039;s my fault as I was doing testing / rollout.

We&#039;ll be discussing this more once I&#039;m back, though. End of the day the reason we&#039;re doing this is so that search readers and such can be more likely to find info they are looking for (ie: if they searched for &quot;windows vista&quot; or something we want them to go to a definitive page from our blogs even if the post they are on doesn&#039;t link to it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a quick not (I&#8217;m bad, I&#8217;m supposed to be offline), as Darren said this was a test across 5 blogs.</p>
<p>The parameters were: posts older than 30 days, not for logged in users, and using Kontera&#8217;s new contextual engine.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had some minor bugs with the code (WVW may not have the latest version, for example) but they should all be fixed now. Also, as Darren said, every reader on the blogs we&#8217;re testing on has said they have 0 problem with them.</p>
<p>And, really, if you&#8217;re a regular reader you should never, ever see them anyways. Sorry if folk did, though, that&#8217;s my fault as I was doing testing / rollout.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be discussing this more once I&#8217;m back, though. End of the day the reason we&#8217;re doing this is so that search readers and such can be more likely to find info they are looking for (ie: if they searched for &#8220;windows vista&#8221; or something we want them to go to a definitive page from our blogs even if the post they are on doesn&#8217;t link to it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279554</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279554</guid>
		<description>Yay for Safari - whatever is on the b5 samples doesn&#039;t show up, so it can&#039;t be using the same technology as other sites where I do get them - unless they&#039;ve been removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay for Safari &#8211; whatever is on the b5 samples doesn&#8217;t show up, so it can&#8217;t be using the same technology as other sites where I do get them &#8211; unless they&#8217;ve been removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279552</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279552</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;John&lt;/b&gt; - to me it comes down to quality of content on the sites that I know of that have them. For instance I&#039;m a regular of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photographyblog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PhotographyBLOG&lt;/a&gt; who uses them and I don&#039;t mind them because I value Mark&#039;s blogging. 

I hear what you say though - I&#039;m sure there are some who would unsubscribe/stop reading when they see them - but I wonder if it&#039;d be significant levels.

Having said that - that&#039;s what this test is about I guess. We&#039;re testing a variety of ad types, placements, sytems at b5 in the hope of finding a system that works both in terms of giving readers a quality experience, fitting with design and looking at income. I guess it&#039;s a balance of finding the place that works amidst them all. 

We&#039;ll see what we find I guess.

&lt;b&gt;Martin&lt;/b&gt; - not really red faced. We&#039;re learning as we go. In actual fact we have 4 bosses  scattered around the world (two of which are currently travelling - as I was when this all was implemented). At the head of b5 we have Jeremy, Duncan, Shai and myself.

We each have our own roles and are continuing to find our way on learning who is good at what etc.

You&#039;re right about it being an overwhelming negative reaction here in the comments of this post. I didn&#039;t expect anything different when I reported Adbrite&#039;s move. The interesting thing however is that those that have commented are all bloggers (and fairly tech savvy and experienced ones at that. I&#039;d be fascinated to find out what blog READERS think of these ads. I&#039;m not sure how we&#039;d survey them but I did talk to one blogger 6 months ago who was using these ads and he did a survey of his readers and found that they actually preferred them to many other forms of advertising because they didn&#039;t dominate the page and in some cases they were actually helpful to them.

I&#039;m not sure this would be the case for all blog readers but I do wonder if the feeling in this comment thread is perhaps skewed. Definately an interesting discussion.

In terms of me announcing results - I don&#039;t tend to reveal everything about b5. What I share here in terms of actual details of earnings, findings etc tends to be more from my own personal blogs and not b5s.

And now - I&#039;m off to bed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>John</b> &#8211; to me it comes down to quality of content on the sites that I know of that have them. For instance I&#8217;m a regular of <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com" rel="nofollow">PhotographyBLOG</a> who uses them and I don&#8217;t mind them because I value Mark&#8217;s blogging. </p>
<p>I hear what you say though &#8211; I&#8217;m sure there are some who would unsubscribe/stop reading when they see them &#8211; but I wonder if it&#8217;d be significant levels.</p>
<p>Having said that &#8211; that&#8217;s what this test is about I guess. We&#8217;re testing a variety of ad types, placements, sytems at b5 in the hope of finding a system that works both in terms of giving readers a quality experience, fitting with design and looking at income. I guess it&#8217;s a balance of finding the place that works amidst them all. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what we find I guess.</p>
<p><b>Martin</b> &#8211; not really red faced. We&#8217;re learning as we go. In actual fact we have 4 bosses  scattered around the world (two of which are currently travelling &#8211; as I was when this all was implemented). At the head of b5 we have Jeremy, Duncan, Shai and myself.</p>
<p>We each have our own roles and are continuing to find our way on learning who is good at what etc.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about it being an overwhelming negative reaction here in the comments of this post. I didn&#8217;t expect anything different when I reported Adbrite&#8217;s move. The interesting thing however is that those that have commented are all bloggers (and fairly tech savvy and experienced ones at that. I&#8217;d be fascinated to find out what blog READERS think of these ads. I&#8217;m not sure how we&#8217;d survey them but I did talk to one blogger 6 months ago who was using these ads and he did a survey of his readers and found that they actually preferred them to many other forms of advertising because they didn&#8217;t dominate the page and in some cases they were actually helpful to them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure this would be the case for all blog readers but I do wonder if the feeling in this comment thread is perhaps skewed. Definately an interesting discussion.</p>
<p>In terms of me announcing results &#8211; I don&#8217;t tend to reveal everything about b5. What I share here in terms of actual details of earnings, findings etc tends to be more from my own personal blogs and not b5s.</p>
<p>And now &#8211; I&#8217;m off to bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279531</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279531</guid>
		<description>Darren,

Yikes must be a little red-faced :-) It&#039;s not easy having 3 bosses scattered around the world. Who handles such things at b5? Is there one person in charge of advertising at b5?

Reason: as John just said, I&#039;ve never seen an overwhelming reaction to any issue such as this one: very clear: the vast majority hate them with a passion.

Personally, I&#039;d get rid of them or at best have only one per post. 

Also, I really hope it doesn&#039;t give you guys great click thrus (with all due respect) because you&#039;ll report that here and then you&#039;ll see a thousand blogs going down that road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>Yikes must be a little red-faced :-) It&#8217;s not easy having 3 bosses scattered around the world. Who handles such things at b5? Is there one person in charge of advertising at b5?</p>
<p>Reason: as John just said, I&#8217;ve never seen an overwhelming reaction to any issue such as this one: very clear: the vast majority hate them with a passion.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d get rid of them or at best have only one per post. </p>
<p>Also, I really hope it doesn&#8217;t give you guys great click thrus (with all due respect) because you&#8217;ll report that here and then you&#8217;ll see a thousand blogs going down that road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279526</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279526</guid>
		<description>Darren, the overwhelming consensus of your loyal readership on this post is against them. And they are all pros too. For myself, I simply won&#039;t visit sites that give me this experience. It would be interesting though to see what traffic fall-off occurs over, say, a month. I don&#039;t mean search traffic, but RSS and plain domain traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, the overwhelming consensus of your loyal readership on this post is against them. And they are all pros too. For myself, I simply won&#8217;t visit sites that give me this experience. It would be interesting though to see what traffic fall-off occurs over, say, a month. I don&#8217;t mean search traffic, but RSS and plain domain traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279524</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279524</guid>
		<description>I can see the source code but not the ads.

I&#039;ve done a little digging and it seems that we&#039;re testing them on a small number of our blogs and that they were introduced just before my last holiday when I was packing and getting my guest blogs ready (hence me not being up with it).

I&#039;m also told that they are only supposed to be on old posts and not new ones - obviously not working if you can see them on the last two posts.

We&#039;ll be discussing whether to continue with them in the weeks ahead.

My own personal opinion is that I don&#039;t like this type of advertising. I think it&#039;s confusing to readers to see different types of ads.

I do however know of some blogs that use them in a way that is less disruptive than others (ie I think some ad systems let you limit how many appear on a page and let you considerably change the appearance of them.

Anyway - It&#039;s definately something we&#039;ll be discussing further as directors.

My lesson - no more holidays for me! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the source code but not the ads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a little digging and it seems that we&#8217;re testing them on a small number of our blogs and that they were introduced just before my last holiday when I was packing and getting my guest blogs ready (hence me not being up with it).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also told that they are only supposed to be on old posts and not new ones &#8211; obviously not working if you can see them on the last two posts.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be discussing whether to continue with them in the weeks ahead.</p>
<p>My own personal opinion is that I don&#8217;t like this type of advertising. I think it&#8217;s confusing to readers to see different types of ads.</p>
<p>I do however know of some blogs that use them in a way that is less disruptive than others (ie I think some ad systems let you limit how many appear on a page and let you considerably change the appearance of them.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; It&#8217;s definately something we&#8217;ll be discussing further as directors.</p>
<p>My lesson &#8211; no more holidays for me! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279521</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279521</guid>
		<description>Maybe only Windows XP picks them up. I seem to remember something about smart tags in the original spec. If you&#039;re on a Mac, Darren, that may be the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe only Windows XP picks them up. I seem to remember something about smart tags in the original spec. If you&#8217;re on a Mac, Darren, that may be the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279517</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279517</guid>
		<description>John, 
Yep you see it and I see it too so it&#039;s not a bug on the user side. It&#039;s clearly been placed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Yep you see it and I see it too so it&#8217;s not a bug on the user side. It&#8217;s clearly been placed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279515</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279515</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a virus, Martin. It&#039;s embedded in the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a virus, Martin. It&#8217;s embedded in the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279514</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279514</guid>
		<description>Darren,
You know I&#039;m in the same city as you and I see them. The 2 latest posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,<br />
You know I&#8217;m in the same city as you and I see them. The 2 latest posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279512</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279512</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s really odd - I can&#039;t see them. I&#039;ll check into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s really odd &#8211; I can&#8217;t see them. I&#8217;ll check into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279511</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just checked it again and they&#039;re there, but there is a delay then they appear and they are relevant to the text. No other website I&#039;ve visited today does that. Maybe it&#039;s UK only?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just checked it again and they&#8217;re there, but there is a delay then they appear and they are relevant to the text. No other website I&#8217;ve visited today does that. Maybe it&#8217;s UK only?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279510</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279510</guid>
		<description>Shit, I just had a quick look at Windows Vista and yep they are there! They&#039;re the green links.

That&#039;s a real shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shit, I just had a quick look at Windows Vista and yep they are there! They&#8217;re the green links.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a real shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279509</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing Kontera ones on Vista Weblog too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing Kontera ones on Vista Weblog too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/12/adbrite-announces-inline-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-279507</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2578#comment-279507</guid>
		<description>John,
I&#039;ve had past experience where my computer has been infected by a virus that did this. Could that be it?

I&#039;ve never encountered it at any b5 blog ... and I hope I never do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
I&#8217;ve had past experience where my computer has been infected by a virus that did this. Could that be it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never encountered it at any b5 blog &#8230; and I hope I never do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
