<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping your Blog&#8217;s Statistics Accurate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO India</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-4716043</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-4716043</guid>
		<description>Ya really good advice. Now i follow these tips. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya really good advice. Now i follow these tips. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCSO</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-4591000</link>
		<dc:creator>PCSO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-4591000</guid>
		<description>Haha! I&#039;m guilty of this!
Now I am trying to redo it.
Thanks for the tips...any stat counter site suggestion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! I&#8217;m guilty of this!<br />
Now I am trying to redo it.<br />
Thanks for the tips&#8230;any stat counter site suggestion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zolt</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-3884893</link>
		<dc:creator>Zolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-3884893</guid>
		<description>In try not to look at any websites that I&#039;m working on too much except for when I have to and I&#039;m adding new content.

But blocking you own IP is a good idea if you&#039;re just starting out and not getting many visitors to get an idea of your tru stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In try not to look at any websites that I&#8217;m working on too much except for when I have to and I&#8217;m adding new content.</p>
<p>But blocking you own IP is a good idea if you&#8217;re just starting out and not getting many visitors to get an idea of your tru stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-413550</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-413550</guid>
		<description>Satish - I am not really sure what you&#039;re talking about but piecing together your angry words it seems that you&#039;re complaining that I rank for the words &#039;&#039;new era wisp stats&quot; in Google?

When you do a search for that Problogger is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=NEW+ERA+WISP+STATS&amp;start=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ranked in the top 10&lt;/a&gt; or so. 

The page that ranks well for it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/09/15-blogging-tips-and-tools-blog-case-study/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;.

The reason it ranks well is because you left a comment using those words - not because of anything I&#039;ve done. Read through the comments and you&#039;ll see it&#039;s not me &#039;bashing&#039; your site - you&#039;re the only one who mentioned it.

I&#039;m sorry if this upsets you but I cannot be held responsible for ranking well for words that you use in your comments can I?

In terms of me moderating comments - I have a moderation system and when comments come in while I&#039;m asleep (like yours) it takes a few hours for them to be approved. This is to combat comment spam but any legitimate comment gets approved.

I don&#039;t know why you have to bring my parents into this - they are nice people who love their son. Please leave them out of it.

If you have any problems with ProBlogger or what appears on this site please email me. You don&#039;t need to resort to this type of comment to get a response. All you&#039;ve done is make me angry and less likely to take on board your concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satish &#8211; I am not really sure what you&#8217;re talking about but piecing together your angry words it seems that you&#8217;re complaining that I rank for the words &#8221;new era wisp stats&#8221; in Google?</p>
<p>When you do a search for that Problogger is <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=NEW+ERA+WISP+STATS&#038;start=0&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official" rel="nofollow">ranked in the top 10</a> or so. </p>
<p>The page that ranks well for it is <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/09/15-blogging-tips-and-tools-blog-case-study/" rel="nofollow">this one</a>.</p>
<p>The reason it ranks well is because you left a comment using those words &#8211; not because of anything I&#8217;ve done. Read through the comments and you&#8217;ll see it&#8217;s not me &#8216;bashing&#8217; your site &#8211; you&#8217;re the only one who mentioned it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if this upsets you but I cannot be held responsible for ranking well for words that you use in your comments can I?</p>
<p>In terms of me moderating comments &#8211; I have a moderation system and when comments come in while I&#8217;m asleep (like yours) it takes a few hours for them to be approved. This is to combat comment spam but any legitimate comment gets approved.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why you have to bring my parents into this &#8211; they are nice people who love their son. Please leave them out of it.</p>
<p>If you have any problems with ProBlogger or what appears on this site please email me. You don&#8217;t need to resort to this type of comment to get a response. All you&#8217;ve done is make me angry and less likely to take on board your concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Bhardwaj</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-413020</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-413020</guid>
		<description>aS LONG AS MY COMMENTS WILL BE MODERATED BY PROBLOGGER MAY IN STATE THAT HIS PARENTS MIGHT BE MIGHTY PROUD THAT THEIR SON PROMOTES HIS BLOG BY BASHING PEOPLE OR BLOGS HE DOES NOT KNOW. IF THEY ARE PROUD OF THEIR SON SHA,ME ON THEM TOO.

WHEN PEOPLE LOOK FOR STATS THEY SHOULD GET STATS. NOT BASHING. I USED TO HAVE TOP SITES STATS. BUT THE TEMPLATE IS DESTROYED AND ONLY THE PIXELS PORTION OF THE BLOG IS INTACT. SO I CAN&#039;T GET THE STATS ANY MORE NOR CAN I POST ANY OTHER CONTENTS. LET THAT BE A LESSONS FOR THOSE THAT BUY PIXELS. THE LIFE OF THE PIXELS COULD BE VERY SHORT. NOT FIVE YEARS. BUT ON PIXELS HOMEPAGE AND NEW ERA WISP THE LIFE OF THE PIXELS IS ONLY ONE MONTH NOT FIVE YEAR. WHY AM I WRITING THIS PORTION OF THE COMMENT RELATED TO THE LIFE OF THE PIXELS. IT&#039;LL BE SEEN ONLY BY NASTY PRO BLOGGER AND HIS NASTY MOTHER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aS LONG AS MY COMMENTS WILL BE MODERATED BY PROBLOGGER MAY IN STATE THAT HIS PARENTS MIGHT BE MIGHTY PROUD THAT THEIR SON PROMOTES HIS BLOG BY BASHING PEOPLE OR BLOGS HE DOES NOT KNOW. IF THEY ARE PROUD OF THEIR SON SHA,ME ON THEM TOO.</p>
<p>WHEN PEOPLE LOOK FOR STATS THEY SHOULD GET STATS. NOT BASHING. I USED TO HAVE TOP SITES STATS. BUT THE TEMPLATE IS DESTROYED AND ONLY THE PIXELS PORTION OF THE BLOG IS INTACT. SO I CAN&#8217;T GET THE STATS ANY MORE NOR CAN I POST ANY OTHER CONTENTS. LET THAT BE A LESSONS FOR THOSE THAT BUY PIXELS. THE LIFE OF THE PIXELS COULD BE VERY SHORT. NOT FIVE YEARS. BUT ON PIXELS HOMEPAGE AND NEW ERA WISP THE LIFE OF THE PIXELS IS ONLY ONE MONTH NOT FIVE YEAR. WHY AM I WRITING THIS PORTION OF THE COMMENT RELATED TO THE LIFE OF THE PIXELS. IT&#8217;LL BE SEEN ONLY BY NASTY PRO BLOGGER AND HIS NASTY MOTHER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Bhardwaj</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-413013</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-413013</guid>
		<description>IT IS NOT PECTED THAT PROBLOGGER WILL STOOP TO A ROTTEN LOW. IF YOU USE THE KEYWORDS NEW ERA WISP STATS ON GOOGLE AND PROBABLY ON ALL OTHER SEARCH ENGINES YOU GET A VERY NASTY LISTING RELATED TO NEW ERA WISP AND  PIXELS HOMEPAGE 9BOTH OF MY BLOGS. IF YO CLICK ON IT YOU REACH PRO BLOGGER BLOG (NOT NECESSARILY THIS ONE WITH A BOXED CAPTION STATING THAT YOU REACHED THIS BLOG BECAUSE YOU SEARCHED FOR NEW ERA AND PIXELS HOMEPAGE. THE ORIGINAL LISTING STATED THAT THE COMBINED STATS OF BOTH THE BLOGS ARE VERY LOW. FOR PROBLOGGER INFORMATION WE DO NO INFORMATION. YET THE LISTINGS ENJOY PROMINENT POSITIONS IN ALL KEYWORDS. WE OFFER PIXEL RENTING ON BOTH OF THESE BLOGS. OTHER PIXEL SITES MAKE YOU ENTER INTO A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT. A FIVE YEAR 5000 PIXEL CELL WILL COST YOU $5000 FOR THE LIFE OF THE CONTRACT WITH NO GUARANTEE THAT YOUR INVESTMENT WILL PRDUCE TRAFFIC. PIXEL RENTING AT NEW ERA WIISP AND PIXELS HOMEPAGE WILL COST YOU 450 FOR A MONTH. NO FURTHER OBLIGATION. YOU WILL LOOSE ONLY $ IF THERE IS NO TRAFFIC EXCEPT WE&#039;LL KEEP YOUR AD FOR ONE AND TWO MORE MONTHS. PLUS YOUR AD IS INSERTED WHEN RECEIVED BUT YOUR RENT STARTS OB THE FIRST OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH.

PROBLOGGER SHAME ON YOU FOR NEEDLESS BASHING TO PROMOTE YOUR BLOG. SHAME ON YOU .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT IS NOT PECTED THAT PROBLOGGER WILL STOOP TO A ROTTEN LOW. IF YOU USE THE KEYWORDS NEW ERA WISP STATS ON GOOGLE AND PROBABLY ON ALL OTHER SEARCH ENGINES YOU GET A VERY NASTY LISTING RELATED TO NEW ERA WISP AND  PIXELS HOMEPAGE 9BOTH OF MY BLOGS. IF YO CLICK ON IT YOU REACH PRO BLOGGER BLOG (NOT NECESSARILY THIS ONE WITH A BOXED CAPTION STATING THAT YOU REACHED THIS BLOG BECAUSE YOU SEARCHED FOR NEW ERA AND PIXELS HOMEPAGE. THE ORIGINAL LISTING STATED THAT THE COMBINED STATS OF BOTH THE BLOGS ARE VERY LOW. FOR PROBLOGGER INFORMATION WE DO NO INFORMATION. YET THE LISTINGS ENJOY PROMINENT POSITIONS IN ALL KEYWORDS. WE OFFER PIXEL RENTING ON BOTH OF THESE BLOGS. OTHER PIXEL SITES MAKE YOU ENTER INTO A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT. A FIVE YEAR 5000 PIXEL CELL WILL COST YOU $5000 FOR THE LIFE OF THE CONTRACT WITH NO GUARANTEE THAT YOUR INVESTMENT WILL PRDUCE TRAFFIC. PIXEL RENTING AT NEW ERA WIISP AND PIXELS HOMEPAGE WILL COST YOU 450 FOR A MONTH. NO FURTHER OBLIGATION. YOU WILL LOOSE ONLY $ IF THERE IS NO TRAFFIC EXCEPT WE&#8217;LL KEEP YOUR AD FOR ONE AND TWO MORE MONTHS. PLUS YOUR AD IS INSERTED WHEN RECEIVED BUT YOUR RENT STARTS OB THE FIRST OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH.</p>
<p>PROBLOGGER SHAME ON YOU FOR NEEDLESS BASHING TO PROMOTE YOUR BLOG. SHAME ON YOU .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jotsheet</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-351523</link>
		<dc:creator>jotsheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-351523</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AdSense publishers should block ads...&lt;/strong&gt;

For purity of stats and to be safe, AdSense publishers should block ads....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AdSense publishers should block ads&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>For purity of stats and to be safe, AdSense publishers should block ads&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-277204</link>
		<dc:creator>tom sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 05:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-277204</guid>
		<description>The solution?  AdSense publishers should block ads.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2006/05/adsense-publishers-should-block-ads&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;No, really.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution?  AdSense publishers should block ads.  <a href="http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2006/05/adsense-publishers-should-block-ads" rel="nofollow">No, really.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberWyre</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-275797</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberWyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 15:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-275797</guid>
		<description>From the very beginning, I knew that accurate stats from your webstie are important to your success. Take a look at this article:

http://www.cwire.org/2006/03/27/9am-friday-the-best-time-to-blog/

From analyzing your stats, you can quickly determine the most effective time to post a new blog entry for maximum exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the very beginning, I knew that accurate stats from your webstie are important to your success. Take a look at this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cwire.org/2006/03/27/9am-friday-the-best-time-to-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cwire.org/2006/03/27/9am-friday-the-best-time-to-blog/</a></p>
<p>From analyzing your stats, you can quickly determine the most effective time to post a new blog entry for maximum exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-275673</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 13:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-275673</guid>
		<description>I check my sitemeter frequently to see from where the hits are coming. I am not concerned to block my own IP. Instead to me, only important thing is what people are searching in net and which keywords are bringing them to my site. I have noticed that from Problogger.net, I get 3-5 hits after each time I post a comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I check my sitemeter frequently to see from where the hits are coming. I am not concerned to block my own IP. Instead to me, only important thing is what people are searching in net and which keywords are bringing them to my site. I have noticed that from Problogger.net, I get 3-5 hits after each time I post a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogtweaks</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274904</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogtweaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274904</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More accurate Google Analytics&lt;/strong&gt;

Are you frustrated because you cannot 100% trust Google Analytics&#039; numbers? Well, first of all, forget the idea that there&#039;s such a thing as &quot;100% accuracy&quot; with web statistics - but here&#039;s an idea if you&#039;re using WordPress as a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More accurate Google Analytics</strong></p>
<p>Are you frustrated because you cannot 100% trust Google Analytics&#8217; numbers? Well, first of all, forget the idea that there&#8217;s such a thing as &#8220;100% accuracy&#8221; with web statistics &#8211; but here&#8217;s an idea if you&#8217;re using WordPress as a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula G</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274876</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 17:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274876</guid>
		<description>Great article.  I was wondering if there are similar workarounds to exclude your visits (writing posts, QC-ing your page, etc.) from other stats packages like Sitemeter?  I am using Wordpress....

While I try to be conscious of how often I check my site -- I tend to check it to send people references to previous posts &amp; then of course there is actual composing, managing posts &amp; comments, and viewing your front page to make all is well...and over time it can really add up &amp; skew stats.

If you or any of your loyal readers know...I&#039;d love to know...

Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  I was wondering if there are similar workarounds to exclude your visits (writing posts, QC-ing your page, etc.) from other stats packages like Sitemeter?  I am using Wordpress&#8230;.</p>
<p>While I try to be conscious of how often I check my site &#8212; I tend to check it to send people references to previous posts &amp; then of course there is actual composing, managing posts &amp; comments, and viewing your front page to make all is well&#8230;and over time it can really add up &amp; skew stats.</p>
<p>If you or any of your loyal readers know&#8230;I&#8217;d love to know&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brem</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274499</link>
		<dc:creator>brem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 10:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274499</guid>
		<description>The way I do it, since I&#039;m using different computers is to use a string within my browser&#039;s user agent, such as brem, or something unique to me.

Then I filter my stats (I use awstats) so that it ignores anything with my signature.

To change your useragen in firefox, first, go to the About dialog, then copy your current user agent in the clipboard.

type &quot;about:config&quot; in the browser and hit enter.

click with the right button of the mouse and create a new string entry called: &quot;general.useragent.override&quot; with the string value of the content of the clipboard, plus your added string signature.

As simple as that.

I do that to every firefox browser on any computer I use so that my stats aren&#039;T skewed.

Pretty clever huh? hehehehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I do it, since I&#8217;m using different computers is to use a string within my browser&#8217;s user agent, such as brem, or something unique to me.</p>
<p>Then I filter my stats (I use awstats) so that it ignores anything with my signature.</p>
<p>To change your useragen in firefox, first, go to the About dialog, then copy your current user agent in the clipboard.</p>
<p>type &#8220;about:config&#8221; in the browser and hit enter.</p>
<p>click with the right button of the mouse and create a new string entry called: &#8220;general.useragent.override&#8221; with the string value of the content of the clipboard, plus your added string signature.</p>
<p>As simple as that.</p>
<p>I do that to every firefox browser on any computer I use so that my stats aren&#8217;T skewed.</p>
<p>Pretty clever huh? hehehehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274488</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 08:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274488</guid>
		<description>Its good suggestion to keep ones statistics accurate. I was skewing my statistics until i learned how to block my IP from the stats. Thanks for the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good suggestion to keep ones statistics accurate. I was skewing my statistics until i learned how to block my IP from the stats. Thanks for the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonic</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 07:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274459</guid>
		<description>Great, thanks! I&#039;ll have to use that... Especially considering how Adsense can sometimes slow your page load down... It would be handy for that not to happen in the preview which I never use anyway... Maybe if it used DHTML to update it in real time it might be useful...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, thanks! I&#8217;ll have to use that&#8230; Especially considering how Adsense can sometimes slow your page load down&#8230; It would be handy for that not to happen in the preview which I never use anyway&#8230; Maybe if it used DHTML to update it in real time it might be useful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274457</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 07:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274457</guid>
		<description>Dang, Wordpress ate my comment. Here&#039;s without markup:

         if( !is_preview() &amp;&amp; !$current_user-&gt;wp_capabilities[&#039;administrator&#039;] ) {
                include( &#039;adsense_bottom.html&#039; );
           }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, Wordpress ate my comment. Here&#8217;s without markup:</p>
<p>         if( !is_preview() &amp;&amp; !$current_user-&gt;wp_capabilities['administrator'] ) {<br />
                include( &#8216;adsense_bottom.html&#8217; );<br />
           }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274456</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 07:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274456</guid>
		<description>@Jonic: I couldn&#039;t find a Wordpress tag to get the information of the currently logged in user so I had to access the user data directly. Probably not the best approach, but it works:

&lt;code&gt;
        wp_capabilities[&#039;administrator&#039;] ) {
                include( &#039;adsense_bottom.html&#039; );
           }
        ?&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonic: I couldn&#8217;t find a Wordpress tag to get the information of the currently logged in user so I had to access the user data directly. Probably not the best approach, but it works:</p>
<p><code><br />
        wp_capabilities['administrator'] ) {<br />
                include( 'adsense_bottom.html' );<br />
           }<br />
        ?&gt;<br />
</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonic</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274451</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 06:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274451</guid>
		<description>That sounds interesting Bart... How did you make that happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds interesting Bart&#8230; How did you make that happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 06:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274450</guid>
		<description>This is a bit of a tangent, but you also want to avoid decreasing your AdSense CTR by viewing your own website. I&#039;ve modified my Wordpress templates to not display AdSense in the preview window (avoid the AdSense crawler from reading your page before you&#039;re done writing!) and for admin users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit of a tangent, but you also want to avoid decreasing your AdSense CTR by viewing your own website. I&#8217;ve modified my Wordpress templates to not display AdSense in the preview window (avoid the AdSense crawler from reading your page before you&#8217;re done writing!) and for admin users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehanson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/05/08/keeping-your-blogs-statistics-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-274423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 03:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2558#comment-274423</guid>
		<description>This code will come in handy in the future.

I check my statistics often but always wonder how many hits are actually unique and how many are my own. It is especially frustrating for new blogger&#039;s because of low traffic levels.

Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This code will come in handy in the future.</p>
<p>I check my statistics often but always wonder how many hits are actually unique and how many are my own. It is especially frustrating for new blogger&#8217;s because of low traffic levels.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
