<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternate Ads and the noscript Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:13:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RkMailer</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1374166</link>
		<dc:creator>RkMailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-1374166</guid>
		<description>Excellent idea Eric.  However, I have a problem with with AdSense code when the code is inside the iframe.  Users are not able to click the AdSense Ads @ http://www.orientalads.com/default.asp/

Any help why the ads are not clickable (javascript is enabled), please.

Thanks,
RkMailer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent idea Eric.  However, I have a problem with with AdSense code when the code is inside the iframe.  Users are not able to click the AdSense Ads @ <a href="http://www.orientalads.com/default.asp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.orientalads.com/default.asp/</a></p>
<p>Any help why the ads are not clickable (javascript is enabled), please.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
RkMailer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-305080</link>
		<dc:creator>LD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 13:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-305080</guid>
		<description>Eric, thank You very much for excellent practical tutorial!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, thank You very much for excellent practical tutorial!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-285039</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-285039</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t figure this out.  I am using a friend&#039;s computer and I cannot click on Adsense ads on some sites.  I can click on AdSense ads at Canada.com though - not sure why.  

eg. http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/index.html (in red near bottom of page)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t figure this out.  I am using a friend&#8217;s computer and I cannot click on Adsense ads on some sites.  I can click on AdSense ads at Canada.com though &#8211; not sure why.  </p>
<p>eg. <a href="http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/index.html</a> (in red near bottom of page)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-285010</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-285010</guid>
		<description>Well, this would be a special case. Sometimes AdSense publishers use software like this to prevent themselves from clicking on ads on their own sites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this would be a special case. Sometimes AdSense publishers use software like this to prevent themselves from clicking on ads on their own sites&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-285000</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-285000</guid>
		<description>The ads are displayed - why would the user not be able to click on the ads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ads are displayed &#8211; why would the user not be able to click on the ads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-284986</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-284986</guid>
		<description>No. If you&#039;re seeing ads, it means that the JavaScript is running. The  tag only gets invoked when JavaScript is disabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. If you&#8217;re seeing ads, it means that the JavaScript is running. The  tag only gets invoked when JavaScript is disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-284964</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-284964</guid>
		<description>I noticed that if the user has some kind of ad blocking software, Adsense and YPN ads are displayed, but nothing happens if the user clicks on the ad.  Can the noscript tag be used here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that if the user has some kind of ad blocking software, Adsense and YPN ads are displayed, but nothing happens if the user clicks on the ad.  Can the noscript tag be used here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-268706</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-268706</guid>
		<description>I think the point is made well about utilizing the noscript tags, that often are overlooked. It&#039;s not about ad-blocking in particular. Tech savvy surfers who block ads do so by other means. Disabling JavaScript for the sole purpose of blocking ads is about as bright as blocking flash to block ads.

Something that might work better than showing essentially bottom-tier ads/affiliate links(unless server generated and well-targetted) is making a banner or text blurb stating that the site is supported by advertising and if the user wishes to block ads, a store purchase or donaation/tip would be appreciated to help cover costs and time spent on it. It really depends on your content and site/business model though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point is made well about utilizing the noscript tags, that often are overlooked. It&#8217;s not about ad-blocking in particular. Tech savvy surfers who block ads do so by other means. Disabling JavaScript for the sole purpose of blocking ads is about as bright as blocking flash to block ads.</p>
<p>Something that might work better than showing essentially bottom-tier ads/affiliate links(unless server generated and well-targetted) is making a banner or text blurb stating that the site is supported by advertising and if the user wishes to block ads, a store purchase or donaation/tip would be appreciated to help cover costs and time spent on it. It really depends on your content and site/business model though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-268262</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-268262</guid>
		<description>Obviously, there are different approaches that publishers can take with respect to displaying or not displaying ads. On some of my sites, for example, I go to the extra effort of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.memwg.com/blog/adsense/How-to-prevent-ads-from-printing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hiding ads when printing&lt;/a&gt; a page, because the ads are useless in that case. It all depends on your situation. Only you know what&#039;s best for your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, there are different approaches that publishers can take with respect to displaying or not displaying ads. On some of my sites, for example, I go to the extra effort of <a href="http://www.memwg.com/blog/adsense/How-to-prevent-ads-from-printing.html" rel="nofollow">hiding ads when printing</a> a page, because the ads are useless in that case. It all depends on your situation. Only you know what&#8217;s best for your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.B. Dada</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-268244</link>
		<dc:creator>A.B. Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-268244</guid>
		<description>The question is why would you force some sort of advertisement on people who went through the trouble of blocking yours?  It is NOT the equivalent of TV shows adding product placement within the show -- it is like TV shows finding ways to move commercials past the Tivos and PVRs so they&#039;re still displayed, much to the chagrin of the consumer who doesn&#039;t want to see them.

In this situation, it is more important to find out WHY your readers don&#039;t want to look at your advertising.  Are they just swamped by ads that aren&#039;t relevant?  Do they not want to buy online?

My top 5 readers are also my top 5 commenters.  They&#039;re also generally ad-blockers (which I&#039;ve confirmed by seeing that their visits to my sites don&#039;t seem to update my pageviews in AdSense but do on my counters).  Why would I be happy that they don&#039;t view ads?

First of all, it doesn&#039;t hurt my CTR -- they won&#039;t click anyway.  Secondly, I profit MORE from their input and continued commentary than by any 50 cent or $1 click from them.  Some readers take an hour out of every day to comment on my various articles -- one hour to pay 20 people to comment each is 20 hours times US$12 per hour.  I just gained US$240 (or more) worth of commentary rather than, say, US$10 in ad income.

I would MUCH rather get written input than ad clicks by people who won&#039;t buy from my advertisers.  I think the AdSense and YPN TOS is stupid to preventing people from talking about their ads in certain ways.  For example, I&#039;d rather be able to tell peope NOT to click if the ads aren&#039;t interesting, but this still draws attention to the ads, according to the networks.

In the long run, you write for a profit -- not just financial, but informational.  The input of readers is more profitable for me than monetizing ever will be.  Every new comment that is insightful makes me worth more money in my real job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is why would you force some sort of advertisement on people who went through the trouble of blocking yours?  It is NOT the equivalent of TV shows adding product placement within the show &#8212; it is like TV shows finding ways to move commercials past the Tivos and PVRs so they&#8217;re still displayed, much to the chagrin of the consumer who doesn&#8217;t want to see them.</p>
<p>In this situation, it is more important to find out WHY your readers don&#8217;t want to look at your advertising.  Are they just swamped by ads that aren&#8217;t relevant?  Do they not want to buy online?</p>
<p>My top 5 readers are also my top 5 commenters.  They&#8217;re also generally ad-blockers (which I&#8217;ve confirmed by seeing that their visits to my sites don&#8217;t seem to update my pageviews in AdSense but do on my counters).  Why would I be happy that they don&#8217;t view ads?</p>
<p>First of all, it doesn&#8217;t hurt my CTR &#8212; they won&#8217;t click anyway.  Secondly, I profit MORE from their input and continued commentary than by any 50 cent or $1 click from them.  Some readers take an hour out of every day to comment on my various articles &#8212; one hour to pay 20 people to comment each is 20 hours times US$12 per hour.  I just gained US$240 (or more) worth of commentary rather than, say, US$10 in ad income.</p>
<p>I would MUCH rather get written input than ad clicks by people who won&#8217;t buy from my advertisers.  I think the AdSense and YPN TOS is stupid to preventing people from talking about their ads in certain ways.  For example, I&#8217;d rather be able to tell peope NOT to click if the ads aren&#8217;t interesting, but this still draws attention to the ads, according to the networks.</p>
<p>In the long run, you write for a profit &#8212; not just financial, but informational.  The input of readers is more profitable for me than monetizing ever will be.  Every new comment that is insightful makes me worth more money in my real job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-266981</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-266981</guid>
		<description>eh, i think every at least little advanced webmaster knows how this works. but ok, there may be some beginners too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh, i think every at least little advanced webmaster knows how this works. but ok, there may be some beginners too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-266634</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-266634</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a slightly different case, but same principle. What you&#039;d do is wrap the entire script/noscript block with a conditional comment to exclude it from IE 7. Then you&#039;d add a new block consisting of just an iframe that you&#039;d wrap within another conditional comment, this time including the new block only on IE 7. Gets kind of ugly, though. However, it&#039;s my understanding that IE 7 blocking AdSense ads is just a bug... but I haven&#039;t tested it myself, as I&#039;m primarily a Firefox user at this point (see my blog for a nifty little Greasemonkey script that highlights AdSense ads...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a slightly different case, but same principle. What you&#8217;d do is wrap the entire script/noscript block with a conditional comment to exclude it from IE 7. Then you&#8217;d add a new block consisting of just an iframe that you&#8217;d wrap within another conditional comment, this time including the new block only on IE 7. Gets kind of ugly, though. However, it&#8217;s my understanding that IE 7 blocking AdSense ads is just a bug&#8230; but I haven&#8217;t tested it myself, as I&#8217;m primarily a Firefox user at this point (see my blog for a nifty little Greasemonkey script that highlights AdSense ads&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-266619</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-266619</guid>
		<description>Excellent tutorial.  Just the other day I was thinking about what I was going to do if IE 7 was going to handle scripts differently (I read an article on how Adsense didn&#039;t work in early versions of IE 7 Beta 1).  Now I know exactly what I need to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent tutorial.  Just the other day I was thinking about what I was going to do if IE 7 was going to handle scripts differently (I read an article on how Adsense didn&#8217;t work in early versions of IE 7 Beta 1).  Now I know exactly what I need to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-266612</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-266612</guid>
		<description>Glad you liked it, and thanks to Darren for running it here. I also like to wrap the entire script/noscript block in a div as well, but that&#039;s not a requirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you liked it, and thanks to Darren for running it here. I also like to wrap the entire script/noscript block in a div as well, but that&#8217;s not a requirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/04/28/alternate-ads-and-the-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-266523</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2511#comment-266523</guid>
		<description>Excellent tutorial Eric... as soon as I get a chance to tweak my templates I&#039;m going to put this one into play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent tutorial Eric&#8230; as soon as I get a chance to tweak my templates I&#8217;m going to put this one into play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/21 queries in 0.076 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 02:20:03 -->
