<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asep</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4646077</link>
		<dc:creator>Asep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-4646077</guid>
		<description>I hate spammers, many trick such as use machine or robots to spam email inbox, they makes me angry. Thanks for your tips darren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate spammers, many trick such as use machine or robots to spam email inbox, they makes me angry. Thanks for your tips darren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeAway</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4547303</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeAway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-4547303</guid>
		<description>I added this page to my Stumbleupon account</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added this page to my Stumbleupon account</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 環保袋</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3351087</link>
		<dc:creator>環保袋</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-3351087</guid>
		<description>the spam image “spams” your layout on my IE 6.0. It leaves a huge white spaces and is shown only after the sidebar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the spam image “spams” your layout on my IE 6.0. It leaves a huge white spaces and is shown only after the sidebar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-248779</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-248779</guid>
		<description>Weird. I opened my mailbox this morning and while deleting the spam I noticed I&#039;ve received a couple of the spam messages you describe, exactly the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird. I opened my mailbox this morning and while deleting the spam I noticed I&#8217;ve received a couple of the spam messages you describe, exactly the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-248077</link>
		<dc:creator>D Yu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-248077</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a few search strings I monitor that are beginning to fill with spam blogs.  It really is a tough thing to create the right search term that captures what you want without being too broad.  I&#039;ve noticed this a lot in my Technorati searches.

I search mostly travel/tourism type stuff and there are a handful of &#039;offenders&#039; in lodging that I see in my area.  Are they knowingly participating in these spam blogs?  The real surprise is that they could even be this &#039;saavy&#039; in their marketing.  Is it possible to buy into spam networks?  I was tempted to contact one business since I deal with them as a client in another capacity, but is it my place to castigate them?   I hate Spam.

On an unrelated note, my son is doing a report on Hawaii.  They eat 5.5 cans of Spam per/person/year.  Yummy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a few search strings I monitor that are beginning to fill with spam blogs.  It really is a tough thing to create the right search term that captures what you want without being too broad.  I&#8217;ve noticed this a lot in my Technorati searches.</p>
<p>I search mostly travel/tourism type stuff and there are a handful of &#8216;offenders&#8217; in lodging that I see in my area.  Are they knowingly participating in these spam blogs?  The real surprise is that they could even be this &#8217;saavy&#8217; in their marketing.  Is it possible to buy into spam networks?  I was tempted to contact one business since I deal with them as a client in another capacity, but is it my place to castigate them?   I hate Spam.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, my son is doing a report on Hawaii.  They eat 5.5 cans of Spam per/person/year.  Yummy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-248033</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-248033</guid>
		<description>I just noticed something else (sorry to hog the comments) but i think the spammers were trying to make their ads look like your text link ads that appears below the post (it&#039;s the same colours and borders etc.).

Very crafty!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed something else (sorry to hog the comments) but i think the spammers were trying to make their ads look like your text link ads that appears below the post (it&#8217;s the same colours and borders etc.).</p>
<p>Very crafty!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-248032</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-248032</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I haven&#039;t started a blof - it&#039;s actually a BLOG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I haven&#8217;t started a blof &#8211; it&#8217;s actually a BLOG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-248030</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-248030</guid>
		<description>I get the same as Dainiel. 

One question: What makes spammers like this think that anyone will actually look at this when it is obviously out of context and plainly spam?

I&#039;ve just recently launched my own blof for the community I live in and dread to think of what I may have to filter out ...

Nice site by the way Darren, I&#039;ve learned a lot from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the same as Dainiel. </p>
<p>One question: What makes spammers like this think that anyone will actually look at this when it is obviously out of context and plainly spam?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just recently launched my own blof for the community I live in and dread to think of what I may have to filter out &#8230;</p>
<p>Nice site by the way Darren, I&#8217;ve learned a lot from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brem</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247939</link>
		<dc:creator>brem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247939</guid>
		<description>A great tool for spammers would be fonts with wrongly assigned letters.

I go to sleep now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great tool for spammers would be fonts with wrongly assigned letters.</p>
<p>I go to sleep now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fluck</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247914</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247914</guid>
		<description>Ehmmmm..... the spam image &quot;spams&quot; your layout on my IE 6.0. It leaves a huge white spaces and is shown only after the sidebar. Unbelievable what they can do these days with spam! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehmmmm&#8230;.. the spam image &#8220;spams&#8221; your layout on my IE 6.0. It leaves a huge white spaces and is shown only after the sidebar. Unbelievable what they can do these days with spam! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247904</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247904</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already seen that crap a few hundred times. Did I really  have to see it again? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already seen that crap a few hundred times. Did I really  have to see it again? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fluck</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247903</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247903</guid>
		<description>Ehmmm... the spam image &quot;spams&quot; your layout on my IE 6.0. The image is only shown after the sidebar which leaves a huge white space on your page.

But nice content anway. Get those pictures for quite a while now as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehmmm&#8230; the spam image &#8220;spams&#8221; your layout on my IE 6.0. The image is only shown after the sidebar which leaves a huge white space on your page.</p>
<p>But nice content anway. Get those pictures for quite a while now as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247899</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247899</guid>
		<description>very true Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very true Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247898</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247898</guid>
		<description>Also I&#039;m not sure how Web 2.0 this really is - it&#039;s just some spammers have worked out how to use their cracked copies of Photoshop a little better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I&#8217;m not sure how Web 2.0 this really is &#8211; it&#8217;s just some spammers have worked out how to use their cracked copies of Photoshop a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247897</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247897</guid>
		<description>This c**p generally doesn&#039;t get past me - I never load images directly from an email (many images contain tracking codes) - it often gets filtered - and the rest, well to be blunt I&#039;m not interested in any of those products. Ginseng will do for me, if you catch my drift :)

Ahem, anyway...

The worst spam for me is blog spam because you have to check some of the fith people write about (I can&#039;t simply mark all as spam because occasionally new users&#039; first comments are caught in the spam folder)

I never click on them though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This c**p generally doesn&#8217;t get past me &#8211; I never load images directly from an email (many images contain tracking codes) &#8211; it often gets filtered &#8211; and the rest, well to be blunt I&#8217;m not interested in any of those products. Ginseng will do for me, if you catch my drift :)</p>
<p>Ahem, anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>The worst spam for me is blog spam because you have to check some of the fith people write about (I can&#8217;t simply mark all as spam because occasionally new users&#8217; first comments are caught in the spam folder)</p>
<p>I never click on them though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunnybrook</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunnybrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247873</guid>
		<description>I have also noticed this one in my gmail&#039;s spam folder. I only go in the spam folder when I&#039;m bored though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also noticed this one in my gmail&#8217;s spam folder. I only go in the spam folder when I&#8217;m bored though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.B. Dada</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/31/web-20-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-247862</link>
		<dc:creator>A.B. Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 04:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2329#comment-247862</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed the same -- the worst spam seems to come from people who are new to spamming, but the pros are really making it readable and even &quot;desirable&quot; to click through just because of the professional feel.

Scares me to think that they may have found new ways to make a buck off by legitimatizing their look, even if the content of the end result is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the same &#8212; the worst spam seems to come from people who are new to spamming, but the pros are really making it readable and even &#8220;desirable&#8221; to click through just because of the professional feel.</p>
<p>Scares me to think that they may have found new ways to make a buck off by legitimatizing their look, even if the content of the end result is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
