<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Get a New Top 100 &#8211; Temporarily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-238880</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-238880</guid>
		<description>I moved up from around 435 to number 72 temporarily.

http://thomashawk.com/2006/03/thomas-hawk-makes-technorati-100.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved up from around 435 to number 72 temporarily.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/03/thomas-hawk-makes-technorati-100.html" rel="nofollow">http://thomashawk.com/2006/03/thomas-hawk-makes-technorati-100.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-238539</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-238539</guid>
		<description>Apologies for the glitch; we tracked down the cause and fixed it now. Those of you interested in showing up in top N lists should have a look at tagging your blogs and getting into the blogfinder topic-specific lists:

http://technorati.com/help/blogfinder.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for the glitch; we tracked down the cause and fixed it now. Those of you interested in showing up in top N lists should have a look at tagging your blogs and getting into the blogfinder topic-specific lists:</p>
<p><a href="http://technorati.com/help/blogfinder.html" rel="nofollow">http://technorati.com/help/blogfinder.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237644</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237644</guid>
		<description>100 more unique links and I&#039;m in the Top 100!  Much better than needing 1,000 more unique links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100 more unique links and I&#8217;m in the Top 100!  Much better than needing 1,000 more unique links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237632</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237632</guid>
		<description>Wow, it still hasn&#039;t been fixed yet. I wonder when they will notice the glitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it still hasn&#8217;t been fixed yet. I wonder when they will notice the glitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237591</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237591</guid>
		<description>And this wrong list puts Technorati founder David Sifry at #87 and #96! 

Maybe they should alway have their Top 100 from somewhere lower down - that way when the popularity you get from being on the list kicks in, you end up getting promoted up off the list and out of view, ensuring ongoing exposure to newer blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this wrong list puts Technorati founder David Sifry at #87 and #96! </p>
<p>Maybe they should alway have their Top 100 from somewhere lower down &#8211; that way when the popularity you get from being on the list kicks in, you end up getting promoted up off the list and out of view, ensuring ongoing exposure to newer blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Busy Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237582</link>
		<dc:creator>Busy Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237582</guid>
		<description>Why, oh why, couldn&#039;t it be the 2,000&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why, oh why, couldn&#8217;t it be the 2,000&#8242;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brem</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237510</link>
		<dc:creator>brem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237510</guid>
		<description>They keep adding features we don&#039;t really want. And they don&#039;t insure their basic service is running smoothly. That&#039;s poor management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They keep adding features we don&#8217;t really want. And they don&#8217;t insure their basic service is running smoothly. That&#8217;s poor management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brem</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237508</link>
		<dc:creator>brem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237508</guid>
		<description>Steve, you&#039;ve just summarized my thoughts exactly.

First mover doesn&#039;t cut it if you give shitty service.

If another company put its act together, it might just push technorati over the abyss.

not that I would mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you&#8217;ve just summarized my thoughts exactly.</p>
<p>First mover doesn&#8217;t cut it if you give shitty service.</p>
<p>If another company put its act together, it might just push technorati over the abyss.</p>
<p>not that I would mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237452</guid>
		<description>weird...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weird&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237449</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237449</guid>
		<description>Wow. I... like... don&#039;t know who any of those people are. :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8230; like&#8230; don&#8217;t know who any of those people are. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237441</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237441</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so not close to 100, I didn&#039;t even notice the bug. (blush)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so not close to 100, I didn&#8217;t even notice the bug. (blush)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237437</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237437</guid>
		<description>Oh boy... I made the list at #76.  Last time I checked my genuine ranking was 436.  Finally a Technorati bug that works in my favor!

Technorati has been so full of technical glitches that it makes me wonder if they&#039;re recruiting their programmers straight out of college.  I think they need to start hiring some smarter people, since it seems to me like the bugginess of their system is increasing, not decreasing.  I respect what their service is trying to do, but it&#039;s not of much value to me because I just don&#039;t trust it anymore.  I think they still have the first mover advantage, but if they don&#039;t get their act together, it may not be enough to save them.  Good intentions just aren&#039;t enough.  A high degree of competence is necessary too.  In lieu of adding new features, they should focus on stabilizing the ones they&#039;ve got.  Otherwise they&#039;re just making a bigger house of cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy&#8230; I made the list at #76.  Last time I checked my genuine ranking was 436.  Finally a Technorati bug that works in my favor!</p>
<p>Technorati has been so full of technical glitches that it makes me wonder if they&#8217;re recruiting their programmers straight out of college.  I think they need to start hiring some smarter people, since it seems to me like the bugginess of their system is increasing, not decreasing.  I respect what their service is trying to do, but it&#8217;s not of much value to me because I just don&#8217;t trust it anymore.  I think they still have the first mover advantage, but if they don&#8217;t get their act together, it may not be enough to save them.  Good intentions just aren&#8217;t enough.  A high degree of competence is necessary too.  In lieu of adding new features, they should focus on stabilizing the ones they&#8217;ve got.  Otherwise they&#8217;re just making a bigger house of cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.H</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237427</link>
		<dc:creator>A.H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237427</guid>
		<description>This whole technoarti thing is starting to stink, it should be about time when someone really realizes that and a new (professional) service will be up.

Oh wait, did i just say a really bad thing about the service that drives me dozens of visitors a day? hmmm...i pull that back.

A.H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole technoarti thing is starting to stink, it should be about time when someone really realizes that and a new (professional) service will be up.</p>
<p>Oh wait, did i just say a really bad thing about the service that drives me dozens of visitors a day? hmmm&#8230;i pull that back.</p>
<p>A.H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237413</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237413</guid>
		<description>*happy dance* :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*happy dance* :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prince</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237387</link>
		<dc:creator>Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237387</guid>
		<description>Getting to the first 10 or 100 or 1000 of blogs surely attracts some traffic, the first important thing is to get listed, then will go improving the position,

But how many blogs out the millions around can get listed, atleast in the top 10000 blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting to the first 10 or 100 or 1000 of blogs surely attracts some traffic, the first important thing is to get listed, then will go improving the position,</p>
<p>But how many blogs out the millions around can get listed, atleast in the top 10000 blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237381</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237381</guid>
		<description>All 13 of our Word Press blogs have disappeared from their service. Same for several of my friends.

Must be that new Anti-Word Press spray they&#039;re using !

Hopefully they&#039;ll find all the one&#039;s they&#039;ve lost...maybe in a back alley or under a desk.

No need to lose our temper&#039;s...they&#039;ve already lost our blogs !

Life&#039;s easy ... blog hard ... and hope Technorati doesn&#039;t lose you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All 13 of our Word Press blogs have disappeared from their service. Same for several of my friends.</p>
<p>Must be that new Anti-Word Press spray they&#8217;re using !</p>
<p>Hopefully they&#8217;ll find all the one&#8217;s they&#8217;ve lost&#8230;maybe in a back alley or under a desk.</p>
<p>No need to lose our temper&#8217;s&#8230;they&#8217;ve already lost our blogs !</p>
<p>Life&#8217;s easy &#8230; blog hard &#8230; and hope Technorati doesn&#8217;t lose you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237371</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237371</guid>
		<description>I wish I was boosted up. That means that I&#039;m looking for Technorati to mistakenly put blog #217,330 (at the moment) up to number 1.

It could happen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I was boosted up. That means that I&#8217;m looking for Technorati to mistakenly put blog #217,330 (at the moment) up to number 1.</p>
<p>It could happen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237359</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237359</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t help me out at all... darn ;) Hopefully it will bring some new visitors to these overlooked blogs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t help me out at all&#8230; darn ;) Hopefully it will bring some new visitors to these overlooked blogs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/11/technorati-get-a-new-top-100-temporarily/comment-page-1/#comment-237358</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2335#comment-237358</guid>
		<description>Oh, why couldn&#039;t it have been the 700&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, why couldn&#8217;t it have been the 700&#8242;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/25 queries in 0.082 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 02:57:31 -->
