<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Apart Launches Business Blogging Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HalloMarkus</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-236047</link>
		<dc:creator>HalloMarkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2313#comment-236047</guid>
		<description>Excellent idea to offer a pro service. 90$ is nothing for a pro service forget about GB!!! I have very small customers like doctors for whom I produce &quot;homepages&quot; based on geeklog.net blog / CMS software. I also host them because they don`t know who else to ask and I just realize that I must charge a little more soon...

What do pros also need? Lets hear what you think!

I`d say:
- a sound forum adding to the comments
- an excellent autoresponder instead of a standard news list crap
- a groupware tool in the background with calendar, things to do, task planing etc. 
- a highly available and mirrored server in case one crashes or is interrupted
- a ticketing system for incoming emails
- experts to help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent idea to offer a pro service. 90$ is nothing for a pro service forget about GB!!! I have very small customers like doctors for whom I produce &#8220;homepages&#8221; based on geeklog.net blog / CMS software. I also host them because they don`t know who else to ask and I just realize that I must charge a little more soon&#8230;</p>
<p>What do pros also need? Lets hear what you think!</p>
<p>I`d say:<br />
- a sound forum adding to the comments<br />
- an excellent autoresponder instead of a standard news list crap<br />
- a groupware tool in the background with calendar, things to do, task planing etc.<br />
- a highly available and mirrored server in case one crashes or is interrupted<br />
- a ticketing system for incoming emails<br />
- experts to help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-235683</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2313#comment-235683</guid>
		<description>Whew, that&#039;s a bit steep on the monthly outlay for what you&#039;re actually getting. Only 4BG of storage. I suppose for a company this may be well suited for them, but WordPress is just too good and being Open Source, you just can&#039;t beat it. I don&#039;t see this being a very lucrative development for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew, that&#8217;s a bit steep on the monthly outlay for what you&#8217;re actually getting. Only 4BG of storage. I suppose for a company this may be well suited for them, but WordPress is just too good and being Open Source, you just can&#8217;t beat it. I don&#8217;t see this being a very lucrative development for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Boudreau</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-235659</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boudreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2313#comment-235659</guid>
		<description>I am currently in the process of moving one of my two blogs from Typepad due to the recent spate of reliability problems. It&#039;s off to the vibrant, community supported WordPress for F1 Prospects.Com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently in the process of moving one of my two blogs from Typepad due to the recent spate of reliability problems. It&#8217;s off to the vibrant, community supported WordPress for F1 Prospects.Com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-235623</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2313#comment-235623</guid>
		<description>&quot;advanced customization for layout control, advanced comment and spam controls&quot;

That&#039;s a bummer. To me, business class should entail more bandwith, better support, etc. But the features quoted above (especially spam control and advanced comment control) should be a part of any of their Typepad paid services. It almost sounds like us &quot;Pro&quot; account users don&#039;t really have good &quot;spam&quot; or &quot;comment&quot; control now, or they are obsolete...

Oh well, can&#039;t win &#039;em all....

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;advanced customization for layout control, advanced comment and spam controls&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a bummer. To me, business class should entail more bandwith, better support, etc. But the features quoted above (especially spam control and advanced comment control) should be a part of any of their Typepad paid services. It almost sounds like us &#8220;Pro&#8221; account users don&#8217;t really have good &#8220;spam&#8221; or &#8220;comment&#8221; control now, or they are obsolete&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh well, can&#8217;t win &#8216;em all&#8230;.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Changing Way &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TypePad Business Class</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-235618</link>
		<dc:creator>Changing Way &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TypePad Business Class</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2313#comment-235618</guid>
		<description>[...] I saw this on ProBlogger, which links to an article at Publish. I couldn&#8217;t find anything about it at Six Apart&#8217;s site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I saw this on ProBlogger, which links to an article at Publish. I couldn&#8217;t find anything about it at Six Apart&#8217;s site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaEMoN</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/03/07/six-apart-launches-business-blogging-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-235607</link>
		<dc:creator>DaEMoN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2313#comment-235607</guid>
		<description>Maybe decent for a company.
But pointless for the entrepreneur blogger: we&#039;re much better off with payed hosting and CMS of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe decent for a company.<br />
But pointless for the entrepreneur blogger: we&#8217;re much better off with payed hosting and CMS of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.048 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 04:43:35 -->
