<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The latest Full vs Partial Feed Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1755348</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1755348</guid>
		<description>&quot;If at any point in this a feed gets boring I just mark all as read and go to the next feed. It’s a grazing metaphor. I’m looking for a green blade of grass so I’ll look through a lot of brown grass to get that.&quot;

Comment by scobleizer — November 28, 2005 @ 2:53 am

What is the point of offering full feeds then?
Mark as as read - why the hell did we waste bandwidth delivering our full content to him in the first place?

We&#039;re treating our internet sources like we treat our oil supply - ahh, just use however much bandwidth that you want - there will always be more.

Rewind the clock a bit - put Scoble, et all back on a 300 baud dial-up, see if their view of partial feeds change any ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If at any point in this a feed gets boring I just mark all as read and go to the next feed. It’s a grazing metaphor. I’m looking for a green blade of grass so I’ll look through a lot of brown grass to get that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Comment by scobleizer — November 28, 2005 @ 2:53 am</p>
<p>What is the point of offering full feeds then?<br />
Mark as as read &#8211; why the hell did we waste bandwidth delivering our full content to him in the first place?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re treating our internet sources like we treat our oil supply &#8211; ahh, just use however much bandwidth that you want &#8211; there will always be more.</p>
<p>Rewind the clock a bit &#8211; put Scoble, et all back on a 300 baud dial-up, see if their view of partial feeds change any ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1755316</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1755316</guid>
		<description>I prefer to treat RSS based upon its original purpose, as a Rich Site Summary - syndication has NOTHING to do with it, in fact, it ISN&#039;T syndicated at all (Bet the cartoonist are laughing their heads off at all the blogger who feel Syndicated because they have a feed)

That said, RSS should be used as a tool to let other people know that there is, in fact, some new content on your site - it is not, was not intended to ship around entire web-sites as the full feed is now causing it to do - hell, people who subscribe to full feeds probably don&#039;t read it anyhow - Scoble himself says that he initially just &quot;glances&quot; at it.

So, then...someone should come up with a Bookmark Reader...

And one last thing - those full feeds - the ones which are stolen and duplicated on those crappy link-bait sites? Yeah, I am very tired of trying to Google something, only to be taken to a site like that - having a full feed only contributes to that mess - until Google quits indexing link bait sites, why don&#039;t you all just publish partial Rich Site Summaries instead..

k, nuff siad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to treat RSS based upon its original purpose, as a Rich Site Summary &#8211; syndication has NOTHING to do with it, in fact, it ISN&#8217;T syndicated at all (Bet the cartoonist are laughing their heads off at all the blogger who feel Syndicated because they have a feed)</p>
<p>That said, RSS should be used as a tool to let other people know that there is, in fact, some new content on your site &#8211; it is not, was not intended to ship around entire web-sites as the full feed is now causing it to do &#8211; hell, people who subscribe to full feeds probably don&#8217;t read it anyhow &#8211; Scoble himself says that he initially just &#8220;glances&#8221; at it.</p>
<p>So, then&#8230;someone should come up with a Bookmark Reader&#8230;</p>
<p>And one last thing &#8211; those full feeds &#8211; the ones which are stolen and duplicated on those crappy link-bait sites? Yeah, I am very tired of trying to Google something, only to be taken to a site like that &#8211; having a full feed only contributes to that mess &#8211; until Google quits indexing link bait sites, why don&#8217;t you all just publish partial Rich Site Summaries instead..</p>
<p>k, nuff siad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Tester</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1752654</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1752654</guid>
		<description>Sorry, a type error of my blog URL. It&#039;s http://NetInformatiK.C.La/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, a type error of my blog URL. It&#8217;s <a href="http://NetInformatiK.C.La/" rel="nofollow">http://NetInformatiK.C.La/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Tester</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1752638</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1752638</guid>
		<description>Personally, I offer partial feed only.

Why ?

Because my articles are generally quite big. So, I think it&#039;s better to get a preview of what is written. If it&#039;s interesting go ahead and read. You&#039;re not, then go ahead and go find something other interresting.

****************************************************************************
Tech Tester
My Blog (In French) ==&gt; http://NetIformatiK.C.La/
Translated to English by Google ==&gt; http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;langpair=fr%7Cen&amp;u=http://netinformatik.c.la/&amp;prev=/language_tools</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I offer partial feed only.</p>
<p>Why ?</p>
<p>Because my articles are generally quite big. So, I think it&#8217;s better to get a preview of what is written. If it&#8217;s interesting go ahead and read. You&#8217;re not, then go ahead and go find something other interresting.</p>
<p>****************************************************************************<br />
Tech Tester<br />
My Blog (In French) ==&gt; <a href="http://NetIformatiK.C.La/" rel="nofollow">http://NetIformatiK.C.La/</a><br />
Translated to English by Google ==&gt; <a href="http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;langpair=fr%7Cen&amp;u=http://netinformatik.c.la/&amp;prev=/language_tools" rel="nofollow">http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;langpair=fr%7Cen&amp;u=http://netinformatik.c.la/&amp;prev=/language_tools</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read More? It&#8217;s Just Not Right! : iffect.net</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1135028</link>
		<dc:creator>Read More? It&#8217;s Just Not Right! : iffect.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1135028</guid>
		<description>[...] I am fully aware of the debates and arguments that come from both sides. But I don&#8217;t want to go down the road of saying who I agree with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am fully aware of the debates and arguments that come from both sides. But I don&#8217;t want to go down the road of saying who I agree with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feeds... &#171; ΦΤΕΡΑ &#38; ΠΟΥΠΟΥΛΑ</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1122436</link>
		<dc:creator>Feeds... &#171; ΦΤΕΡΑ &#38; ΠΟΥΠΟΥΛΑ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1122436</guid>
		<description>[...] decide which you want to use - it’s a matter of some debate as to which is best. Take a look at Problogger’s view and that of Feedster. Both have lots of links which are interesting to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decide which you want to use &#8211; it’s a matter of some debate as to which is best. Take a look at Problogger’s view and that of Feedster. Both have lots of links which are interesting to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technical Itch Beta Web Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; HOWTO: Full Text Feeds in WordPress 2.1</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1013208</link>
		<dc:creator>Technical Itch Beta Web Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; HOWTO: Full Text Feeds in WordPress 2.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-1013208</guid>
		<description>[...] There has been quite a lot of debate over full versus partial feeds, but personally I am in favour of full text feeds. I would be interested in your views on this subject. I&#8217;m quite happy to show my feeds in either full or partial format based on the comments I get on this. Full or Partial - you decide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has been quite a lot of debate over full versus partial feeds, but personally I am in favour of full text feeds. I would be interested in your views on this subject. I&#8217;m quite happy to show my feeds in either full or partial format based on the comments I get on this. Full or Partial &#8211; you decide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transmission Content + Creative, Mark Goren, New Marketing Coach &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full feed appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-953059</link>
		<dc:creator>Transmission Content + Creative, Mark Goren, New Marketing Coach &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full feed appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-953059</guid>
		<description>[...] • More on the debate: Problogger, Syndicative, Marketing Studies, 33 Rockers, Danny Wirken. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • More on the debate: Problogger, Syndicative, Marketing Studies, 33 Rockers, Danny Wirken. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOWTO: Full Text Feeds in WordPress 2.1</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-941771</link>
		<dc:creator>HOWTO: Full Text Feeds in WordPress 2.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-941771</guid>
		<description>[...] There has been quite a lot of debate over full versus partial feeds, but personally I am in favour of full text feeds. I would be interested in your views on this subject. I&#8217;m quite happy to show my feeds in either full or partial format based on the comments I get on this. Full or Partial - you decide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has been quite a lot of debate over full versus partial feeds, but personally I am in favour of full text feeds. I would be interested in your views on this subject. I&#8217;m quite happy to show my feeds in either full or partial format based on the comments I get on this. Full or Partial &#8211; you decide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek Goddess Blog - &#187; Partial feeds = partial interest</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-926869</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Goddess Blog - &#187; Partial feeds = partial interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-926869</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#039;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! (Don&#039;t worry, you won&#039;t see this again.)The full vs partial RSS feeds debate isn&#8217;t new (see ProBlogger, Robert Scoble, and Nick Bradbury), but neither is it settled. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! (Don&#8217;t worry, you won&#8217;t see this again.)The full vs partial RSS feeds debate isn&#8217;t new (see ProBlogger, Robert Scoble, and Nick Bradbury), but neither is it settled. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full or Partial Feeds &#124; Latent Semantic Indexing</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-902520</link>
		<dc:creator>Full or Partial Feeds &#124; Latent Semantic Indexing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-902520</guid>
		<description>[...] * The latest Full vs Partial Feed Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * The latest Full vs Partial Feed Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do You Prefer Full Or Partial Feeds? - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-902381</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Prefer Full Or Partial Feeds? - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-902381</guid>
		<description>[...] The latest Full vs Partial Feed Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The latest Full vs Partial Feed Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-802254</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-802254</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;ve arrived at this party late, but hopefully the band&#039;s still playing. I&#039;m not sure why this is generating such debate. I would have thought it was like most things in life...a personal choice.

My personal preference is for partial feeds because
a/ I want people to visit my blog and perhaps read some of my back catalog whilst they are there,and
b/ I tend to use a lot of pictures.

But ultimately it&#039;s different strokes for different folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;ve arrived at this party late, but hopefully the band&#8217;s still playing. I&#8217;m not sure why this is generating such debate. I would have thought it was like most things in life&#8230;a personal choice.</p>
<p>My personal preference is for partial feeds because<br />
a/ I want people to visit my blog and perhaps read some of my back catalog whilst they are there,and<br />
b/ I tend to use a lot of pictures.</p>
<p>But ultimately it&#8217;s different strokes for different folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BloggingCoach.com &#187; RSS Feeds: Should You Publish a Partial or Full RSS? &#124; Blogging 101 for small businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-800024</link>
		<dc:creator>BloggingCoach.com &#187; RSS Feeds: Should You Publish a Partial or Full RSS? &#124; Blogging 101 for small businesses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-800024</guid>
		<description>[...] Darren Rowse of Problogger.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren Rowse of Problogger.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I publish full feeds? at chilibean</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-768511</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I publish full feeds? at chilibean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-768511</guid>
		<description>[...] Darren Rowse, the ProBlogger, took a look at this issue in February last year (around the time of Scoble&#8217;s post) and came up with arguments for and against both partial and full feeds.  One of the distinctions between Rowse&#8217;s approach and Scoble&#8217;s is that Rowse preferred to subscribe to partial posts himself and Scoble preferred to subscribe to full feeds.  One of the benefits of partial feeds is that they force readers to your site if they want to read the full post and that exposes them to your ads and other means of generating some form of revenue from your blog.  Notwithstanding what I said above about this rationale, you may find that your readers are happy to visit your blog to read the full post and to support you by supporting your sponsors. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren Rowse, the ProBlogger, took a look at this issue in February last year (around the time of Scoble&#8217;s post) and came up with arguments for and against both partial and full feeds.  One of the distinctions between Rowse&#8217;s approach and Scoble&#8217;s is that Rowse preferred to subscribe to partial posts himself and Scoble preferred to subscribe to full feeds.  One of the benefits of partial feeds is that they force readers to your site if they want to read the full post and that exposes them to your ads and other means of generating some form of revenue from your blog.  Notwithstanding what I said above about this rationale, you may find that your readers are happy to visit your blog to read the full post and to support you by supporting your sponsors. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Business Blog &#124; Entrepreneurs-Journey.com</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-754086</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Business Blog &#124; Entrepreneurs-Journey.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-754086</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Full Or Partial RSS Feeds? - Let The People Decide!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Maybe this is old news, maybe this is really really old news, or maybe it&#8217;s just an ongoing debate that I&#8217;ve finally decided to throw my two cents in (actually I did write about this on another blog, but I can&#8217;t show you that yet).
I ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Full Or Partial RSS Feeds? &#8211; Let The People Decide!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Maybe this is old news, maybe this is really really old news, or maybe it&#8217;s just an ongoing debate that I&#8217;ve finally decided to throw my two cents in (actually I did write about this on another blog, but I can&#8217;t show you that yet).<br />
I &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote on Friday&#8217;s Featured Stock; Top 5 Google Faults &#124; InvestorTrip.com</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-601366</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote on Friday&#8217;s Featured Stock; Top 5 Google Faults &#124; InvestorTrip.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-601366</guid>
		<description>[...] After a few days of experimenting with partial feeds, InvestorTrip is now offering FULL RSS FEED content to readers. A post from Problogger on Partial Feeds got me thinking about the pros and cons of partial feeds. In my opinion, I don&#8217;t really like them because it limits the reader&#8217;s control. Feel free to read InvestorTrip from the comfort of your RSS Aggregator or visit the site and say &#8220;Hello.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After a few days of experimenting with partial feeds, InvestorTrip is now offering FULL RSS FEED content to readers. A post from Problogger on Partial Feeds got me thinking about the pros and cons of partial feeds. In my opinion, I don&#8217;t really like them because it limits the reader&#8217;s control. Feel free to read InvestorTrip from the comfort of your RSS Aggregator or visit the site and say &#8220;Hello.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Is RSS the Problem?</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-323597</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Is RSS the Problem?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 20:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-323597</guid>
		<description>[...] Truncating: Though the source of much debate, truncating an RSS feed can do a great deal to hamper RSS scrapers. By providing only a minimal amount of content, scrapers get almost no benefit from using your feed and are likely to move on to other targets. This helps minimize both the damage to your site and the potential benefit for a splogger. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Truncating: Though the source of much debate, truncating an RSS feed can do a great deal to hamper RSS scrapers. By providing only a minimal amount of content, scrapers get almost no benefit from using your feed and are likely to move on to other targets. This helps minimize both the damage to your site and the potential benefit for a splogger. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oft gestellte Fragen &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; I need some information about Feeds (and here (2.Link))</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-279983</link>
		<dc:creator>Oft gestellte Fragen &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; I need some information about Feeds (and here (2.Link))</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-279983</guid>
		<description>[...] You can decide which you want to use - it&#8217;s a matter of some debate as to which is best. Take a look at Problogger&#8217;s view and that of Feedster. Both have lots of links which are interesting to follow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can decide which you want to use &#8211; it&#8217;s a matter of some debate as to which is best. Take a look at Problogger&#8217;s view and that of Feedster. Both have lots of links which are interesting to follow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frequently Asked Questions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Feeds, stats, readers and more.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/23/the-latest-full-vs-partial-feed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-261805</link>
		<dc:creator>Frequently Asked Questions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Feeds, stats, readers and more.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2260#comment-261805</guid>
		<description>[...] You can decide which you want to use - it&#039;s a matter of some debate as to which is best. Take a look at Problogger&#039;s view and that of Feedster. Both have lots of links which are interesting to follow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can decide which you want to use &#8211; it&#39;s a matter of some debate as to which is best. Take a look at Problogger&#39;s view and that of Feedster. Both have lots of links which are interesting to follow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
