<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qumana &#8211; First Impression Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:11:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Introduction to Desktop Blog Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-537978</link>
		<dc:creator>Introduction to Desktop Blog Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-537978</guid>
		<description>[...] LifeHacker ran a reader poll last week on what desktop blog editors bloggers are using. The results showed that just over 60% don&#8217;t use any. It was a close race after that with Performancing&#8217;s Firefox extension winning out with 11.7% and w.bloggar coming in second at 10.2%. Ecto, Qumana (I reviewed an early version of Qumana here) and Zoundry were the others but got only between 8.4% and 3.2%. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LifeHacker ran a reader poll last week on what desktop blog editors bloggers are using. The results showed that just over 60% don&#8217;t use any. It was a close race after that with Performancing&#8217;s Firefox extension winning out with 11.7% and w.bloggar coming in second at 10.2%. Ecto, Qumana (I reviewed an early version of Qumana here) and Zoundry were the others but got only between 8.4% and 3.2%. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-231100</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-231100</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great.  I do have an e-mail in with Google to see what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great.  I do have an e-mail in with Google to see what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khong Co Ai</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-231088</link>
		<dc:creator>Khong Co Ai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-231088</guid>
		<description>Tris, Darren,

Thanks for help, my blog has been reviewed, verified, and whitelisted!!! Everything is normal.

Tris: I will post again with Qumana again and see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tris, Darren,</p>
<p>Thanks for help, my blog has been reviewed, verified, and whitelisted!!! Everything is normal.</p>
<p>Tris: I will post again with Qumana again and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-231021</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-231021</guid>
		<description>Khong Co Ai,

Thank you for alerting us to this potential problem.  This is the first time we&#039;ve heard of this kind of thing happening and we will be looking into it ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khong Co Ai,</p>
<p>Thank you for alerting us to this potential problem.  This is the first time we&#8217;ve heard of this kind of thing happening and we will be looking into it ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khong Co Ai</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230820</link>
		<dc:creator>Khong Co Ai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230820</guid>
		<description>Darren, I just post my comment a 8:21, and you answered at 8:26...Jeezzz!!!!
With regards to your busy days I was not expected any answer from you...
Many thanks for your quick reaction, and also for your help!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, I just post my comment a 8:21, and you answered at 8:26&#8230;Jeezzz!!!!<br />
With regards to your busy days I was not expected any answer from you&#8230;<br />
Many thanks for your quick reaction, and also for your help!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230817</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230817</guid>
		<description>Khong Co Ai - I would email Qumana ASAP and get them to look into this.

I&#039;d also respond to Blogger and assure them that your blog is being updated by you personally and not automatically as a splog. 

I do notice that you have some largish quotes on your blog - perhaps this is one of the reasons? I&#039;d ask Blogger for more information but definately let Qumana know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khong Co Ai &#8211; I would email Qumana ASAP and get them to look into this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also respond to Blogger and assure them that your blog is being updated by you personally and not automatically as a splog. </p>
<p>I do notice that you have some largish quotes on your blog &#8211; perhaps this is one of the reasons? I&#8217;d ask Blogger for more information but definately let Qumana know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khong Co Ai</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230816</link>
		<dc:creator>Khong Co Ai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230816</guid>
		<description>Sorry for my english!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for my english!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khong Co Ai</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230815</link>
		<dc:creator>Khong Co Ai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230815</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren,

After reading your post about, i decided to give a shot and try this freeware.

During my trial, every time i post to my blogger account, one message said that my post was saved because of the spam firewall of Blogger... So every time i needed to go to Blogger dashnoard in order to publish the draft post.

Today i had a great surprise on my dashboard: 

&quot;Blogger&#039;s spam-prevention robots have detected that your blog has characteristics of a spam blog. [...] You won&#039;t be able to publish posts to your blog until one of our humans reviews it and verifies that it is not a spam blog. [...] If we don&#039;t hear from you, though, we will remove your blog from Blog*Spot within 10 days.&quot; 

I don t know if Qumana have any part of responsability in this, but i really consider to not use it until I have some feedback from some others users... May Blogger don&#039;t remove my blog.
:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren,</p>
<p>After reading your post about, i decided to give a shot and try this freeware.</p>
<p>During my trial, every time i post to my blogger account, one message said that my post was saved because of the spam firewall of Blogger&#8230; So every time i needed to go to Blogger dashnoard in order to publish the draft post.</p>
<p>Today i had a great surprise on my dashboard: </p>
<p>&#8220;Blogger&#8217;s spam-prevention robots have detected that your blog has characteristics of a spam blog. [...] You won&#8217;t be able to publish posts to your blog until one of our humans reviews it and verifies that it is not a spam blog. [...] If we don&#8217;t hear from you, though, we will remove your blog from Blog*Spot within 10 days.&#8221; </p>
<p>I don t know if Qumana have any part of responsability in this, but i really consider to not use it until I have some feedback from some others users&#8230; May Blogger don&#8217;t remove my blog.<br />
:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashif</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230393</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Tris. I will give it a try and do a review in my blog about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Tris. I will give it a try and do a review in my blog about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230329</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230329</guid>
		<description>Kashif,

Your comment is valid ... which is why in v3 our output is XHTML compliant. Looks great in WP and old platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kashif,</p>
<p>Your comment is valid &#8230; which is why in v3 our output is XHTML compliant. Looks great in WP and old platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashif Aziz</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230242</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashif Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230242</guid>
		<description>I have one reservation against these editors, they generate html (that is if I preview the post from my WP editor, it will show the html markup) which is rather fuzzy to edit from the WP editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one reservation against these editors, they generate html (that is if I preview the post from my WP editor, it will show the html markup) which is rather fuzzy to edit from the WP editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230198</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230198</guid>
		<description>Unless you use WP2.0.1 you will get and error when uploading pictures. However when uploading pics in 2.0.1 it is smooth as silk. Unfortunately I have both versions running, because I really like the convenience and feel of Quamana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you use WP2.0.1 you will get and error when uploading pictures. However when uploading pics in 2.0.1 it is smooth as silk. Unfortunately I have both versions running, because I really like the convenience and feel of Quamana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Heizer</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Heizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230197</guid>
		<description>Looks like a useful program.  I have been looking for an app to run under Windows, but I keep getting incorrect user/pass when I go to log in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a useful program.  I have been looking for an app to run under Windows, but I keep getting incorrect user/pass when I go to log in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb D</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230193</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230193</guid>
		<description>I too had a problem uploading pictures.  It would be nice if you just had the option to ftp images to whatever location you like kind of like you can with w.bloggar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too had a problem uploading pictures.  It would be nice if you just had the option to ftp images to whatever location you like kind of like you can with w.bloggar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hamman</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230191</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230191</guid>
		<description>A couple of other nice features to have would be a Flickr interface, excerpt and category selecting. Also, even though my blog software works fine with this (communityserver.org - uses metablog api), it would be nice to see it under the list of supported. 
Another feature would be to have scheduled post.
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of other nice features to have would be a Flickr interface, excerpt and category selecting. Also, even though my blog software works fine with this (communityserver.org &#8211; uses metablog api), it would be nice to see it under the list of supported.<br />
Another feature would be to have scheduled post.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230190</guid>
		<description>Yeah Darren, that might be it.  If you&#039;re still having a problem ... ping Ianiv and we&#039;ll give you a hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Darren, that might be it.  If you&#8217;re still having a problem &#8230; ping Ianiv and we&#8217;ll give you a hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Ottum</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230183</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Ottum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230183</guid>
		<description>Darren:

I used the earlier version of Qumana and found it too clunky--especially with images. I switched to a trial of BlogJet for awhile. At present, however, I am using Post2Blog with both a TypePad and WordPress.com blog. My Post2Blog experience is far superior to either Qumana or BlogJet. My blogs are &lt;a href=&quot;http://estrategyone.blogs.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The eStrategyOne Buzz&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://estrategyone.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Business Blog Consulting.&lt;/a&gt;

Rich Ottum
eStrategyOne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren:</p>
<p>I used the earlier version of Qumana and found it too clunky&#8211;especially with images. I switched to a trial of BlogJet for awhile. At present, however, I am using Post2Blog with both a TypePad and WordPress.com blog. My Post2Blog experience is far superior to either Qumana or BlogJet. My blogs are <a href="http://estrategyone.blogs.com" rel="nofollow">The eStrategyOne Buzz</a> and <a href="http://estrategyone.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Business Blog Consulting.</a></p>
<p>Rich Ottum<br />
eStrategyOne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230178</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230178</guid>
		<description>Tris - I&#039;m definately using the b2 version but am using WP 1.5.1.3 still so that could be the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tris &#8211; I&#8217;m definately using the b2 version but am using WP 1.5.1.3 still so that could be the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230176</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230176</guid>
		<description>Darren,  Thanks for the review mate.  On the XML-RPC error, just double-check two things.  One, that you&#039;re using WP 2.01 (that makes a difference with the uploads) and the you&#039;re using the b2 beta (which I think you are).  Then try removing problogger and re-adding it.  If this doesn&#039;t help ... ping me.

Your suggestions are also spot on.  I&#039;ve asked Ianiv to put auto-save in as well (I&#039;ve lost my fair share of posts too).

Keep the suggestions coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,  Thanks for the review mate.  On the XML-RPC error, just double-check two things.  One, that you&#8217;re using WP 2.01 (that makes a difference with the uploads) and the you&#8217;re using the b2 beta (which I think you are).  Then try removing problogger and re-adding it.  If this doesn&#8217;t help &#8230; ping me.</p>
<p>Your suggestions are also spot on.  I&#8217;ve asked Ianiv to put auto-save in as well (I&#8217;ve lost my fair share of posts too).</p>
<p>Keep the suggestions coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/comment-page-1/#comment-230172</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/20/qumana-first-impression-review/#comment-230172</guid>
		<description>Darren--

In the windows version, you can go into preferences and have the Powered by tagline not included by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren&#8211;</p>
<p>In the windows version, you can go into preferences and have the Powered by tagline not included by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
