<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanilla Forums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Scalf</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-229289</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Scalf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-229289</guid>
		<description>Darren,  I&#039;ve not run Vanilla, but I have installed and administrated many PHPbb and co-administered a few vBulletin.  Personally, I feel PHPbb is the better system, though it does have more security issues.  For the most part, though, keeping on top of security fixes is relatively easy, and fixes are usually issued within a day or so of a new bug being reported (depending on how bad the bug).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,  I&#8217;ve not run Vanilla, but I have installed and administrated many PHPbb and co-administered a few vBulletin.  Personally, I feel PHPbb is the better system, though it does have more security issues.  For the most part, though, keeping on top of security fixes is relatively easy, and fixes are usually issued within a day or so of a new bug being reported (depending on how bad the bug).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-228761</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-228761</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m not a PHP guy, I have to admit vBulletin is largely the best in its class, and the code is a lot tighter than I&#039;ve seen elsewhere. phpBB is a bloated and risky app by most popular accounts. That Vanilla app is interesting. Simple is good.

I ended up writing my own forum app years ago (http://www.popforums.com), and started giving it away a few years ago. I haven&#039;t revised it in two years, but I&#039;m getting there. The ASP.NET folks aren&#039;t quite as nutty as the PHP people, so the demand isn&#039;t as high. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m not a PHP guy, I have to admit vBulletin is largely the best in its class, and the code is a lot tighter than I&#8217;ve seen elsewhere. phpBB is a bloated and risky app by most popular accounts. That Vanilla app is interesting. Simple is good.</p>
<p>I ended up writing my own forum app years ago (<a href="http://www.popforums.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.popforums.com</a>), and started giving it away a few years ago. I haven&#8217;t revised it in two years, but I&#8217;m getting there. The ASP.NET folks aren&#8217;t quite as nutty as the PHP people, so the demand isn&#8217;t as high. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Sharpe</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-228037</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Sharpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-228037</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Mac user but for some reason, I just don&#039;t like Vanilla forums. Yeah, they look really pretty, but I guess I&#039;m so used to the traditional layout of message boards that I just don&#039;t &quot;connect&quot; with Vanilla for some reason. Most of the time when I hit a Vanilla forum, I think &quot;Ooh, cool, pretty&quot; scan the headlines then end up surfing somewhere else. Not sure why that is,  but that&#039;s my ongoing reaction to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Mac user but for some reason, I just don&#8217;t like Vanilla forums. Yeah, they look really pretty, but I guess I&#8217;m so used to the traditional layout of message boards that I just don&#8217;t &#8220;connect&#8221; with Vanilla for some reason. Most of the time when I hit a Vanilla forum, I think &#8220;Ooh, cool, pretty&#8221; scan the headlines then end up surfing somewhere else. Not sure why that is,  but that&#8217;s my ongoing reaction to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227999</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227999</guid>
		<description>In general, Mac users tend to *love* vanilla. I personally can&#039;t stand it. ;) Many of my non-Mac friends don&#039;t like it either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, Mac users tend to *love* vanilla. I personally can&#8217;t stand it. ;) Many of my non-Mac friends don&#8217;t like it either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227838</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227838</guid>
		<description>I installed vanilla recently. i had used phpbb and smforums on some other sites. Vanilla was easy to setup. I haven&#039;t customized it yet (or announced to my readres that it&#039;s online yet, but you can look here:

http://candyaddict.com/forums

brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed vanilla recently. i had used phpbb and smforums on some other sites. Vanilla was easy to setup. I haven&#8217;t customized it yet (or announced to my readres that it&#8217;s online yet, but you can look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://candyaddict.com/forums" rel="nofollow">http://candyaddict.com/forums</a></p>
<p>brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatem</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227743</link>
		<dc:creator>hatem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227743</guid>
		<description>I use it in www.phpmagazine.net/talk/, and its really great but i suggest you to wait till the 0.9.3 will be released and become more stable. There is lot of compatibilities problems and stability of the soft, othewise you may consider installing the latest stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use it in <a href="http://www.phpmagazine.net/talk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.phpmagazine.net/talk/</a>, and its really great but i suggest you to wait till the 0.9.3 will be released and become more stable. There is lot of compatibilities problems and stability of the soft, othewise you may consider installing the latest stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emacle</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227726</link>
		<dc:creator>Emacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227726</guid>
		<description>Darren.  I tried it on UrbanSkaters and nearly all my visitors found it confusing (they aren&#039;t forum users, or they were used to PHPBB etc).  In my opinion it loses to much by trying to be to simple.  Stick with the other forums, Vanilla should only be used by small closed groups, in my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren.  I tried it on UrbanSkaters and nearly all my visitors found it confusing (they aren&#8217;t forum users, or they were used to PHPBB etc).  In my opinion it loses to much by trying to be to simple.  Stick with the other forums, Vanilla should only be used by small closed groups, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buxx</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227712</link>
		<dc:creator>buxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227712</guid>
		<description>I have set the brandnew version of my Dutch forum for weblog related items up with this Vanilla forum software and i like it.
It is much more intuïve in use then the &#039;old&#039; fora like phpbb etc.

Vanilla is an forum in the web 2.0 style.
www.weblogforum.nl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have set the brandnew version of my Dutch forum for weblog related items up with this Vanilla forum software and i like it.<br />
It is much more intuïve in use then the &#8216;old&#8217; fora like phpbb etc.</p>
<p>Vanilla is an forum in the web 2.0 style.<br />
<a href="http://www.weblogforum.nl" rel="nofollow">http://www.weblogforum.nl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buxx</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227711</link>
		<dc:creator>buxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227711</guid>
		<description>I have set the brandnew version of my Dutch forum for weblog related items up with this Vanilla forum software and i like it.
It is much more intuïve in use then the &#039;old&#039; fora like phpbb etc.

Vanilla is an forum in the web 2.0 style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have set the brandnew version of my Dutch forum for weblog related items up with this Vanilla forum software and i like it.<br />
It is much more intuïve in use then the &#8216;old&#8217; fora like phpbb etc.</p>
<p>Vanilla is an forum in the web 2.0 style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227709</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227709</guid>
		<description>Hey you&#039;re a Mac user Darren - you&#039;re different :)

I think if people want to participate in your forum they&#039;ll learn the system it uses. I&#039;ve not seen Vanilla but there must be something about it you like. I think you have to be comfortable with it as an administrator, particularly if there will be a large volume of users and posts. I don&#039;t like the way phpBB (at least the version I use) handles user admin - too time-consuming to search for a user, do some admin, search for another, etc. - no global options for when a bunch of idiots sign up 20 spam accounts that need taking down.

A lot of the forums do seem to use bloated, 1990s-style coding - you know, loads of tables, fonts, rubbish like that. Not only does it look bad but it&#039;s bad for SEO and your bandwidth. I&#039;d go for whatever gives you the cleanest, most easily maintainable code base. IMO phpBB is not it. Maybe Vanilla is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you&#8217;re a Mac user Darren &#8211; you&#8217;re different :)</p>
<p>I think if people want to participate in your forum they&#8217;ll learn the system it uses. I&#8217;ve not seen Vanilla but there must be something about it you like. I think you have to be comfortable with it as an administrator, particularly if there will be a large volume of users and posts. I don&#8217;t like the way phpBB (at least the version I use) handles user admin &#8211; too time-consuming to search for a user, do some admin, search for another, etc. &#8211; no global options for when a bunch of idiots sign up 20 spam accounts that need taking down.</p>
<p>A lot of the forums do seem to use bloated, 1990s-style coding &#8211; you know, loads of tables, fonts, rubbish like that. Not only does it look bad but it&#8217;s bad for SEO and your bandwidth. I&#8217;d go for whatever gives you the cleanest, most easily maintainable code base. IMO phpBB is not it. Maybe Vanilla is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard McGarry</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227696</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227696</guid>
		<description>Darren: I remember the guys at Performancing saying that they run their blog off a system called Drupal, which is actually open source forum software. I&#039;ve no direct experience with it, but it might also be worth a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren: I remember the guys at Performancing saying that they run their blog off a system called Drupal, which is actually open source forum software. I&#8217;ve no direct experience with it, but it might also be worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227693</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227693</guid>
		<description>One big boo is that vanilla isn&#039;t optimized for search engines yet and i haven&#039;t found a plugin some months ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One big boo is that vanilla isn&#8217;t optimized for search engines yet and i haven&#8217;t found a plugin some months ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227691</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227691</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the typo, that was surposed to say free feature rich not feature free...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the typo, that was surposed to say free feature rich not feature free&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227690</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227690</guid>
		<description>It depends on whether you want something that is feature rich or just simple... None of those are a bad thing unless it becomes full of useless features or none at all which I feel neither Vanilla or PHPBB/VB has done. 

What i&#039;ve seen of it, I like Vb... I&#039;ve used it a bit behind the scenes and I loved it! Just the cost that kept me away

As for vanilla, I love the looks and for a community like this you just want a place to chat and share knowledge without all the added features, it should work!

PHPBB was good as well, it was definatly one of the most feature FREE forum softwares I used...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on whether you want something that is feature rich or just simple&#8230; None of those are a bad thing unless it becomes full of useless features or none at all which I feel neither Vanilla or PHPBB/VB has done. </p>
<p>What i&#8217;ve seen of it, I like Vb&#8230; I&#8217;ve used it a bit behind the scenes and I loved it! Just the cost that kept me away</p>
<p>As for vanilla, I love the looks and for a community like this you just want a place to chat and share knowledge without all the added features, it should work!</p>
<p>PHPBB was good as well, it was definatly one of the most feature FREE forum softwares I used&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227688</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227688</guid>
		<description>Definitely go with VB as it&#039;s the BEST one out there! If you rather want a free one, phpBB is quite good and they&#039;re tons of themes for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely go with VB as it&#8217;s the BEST one out there! If you rather want a free one, phpBB is quite good and they&#8217;re tons of themes for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227684</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227684</guid>
		<description>I say go for vB and pay for a template.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say go for vB and pay for a template.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangeguru</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227683</link>
		<dc:creator>orangeguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227683</guid>
		<description>Vanilla is fast and lightweight, but it lacks many features you want when you run larger communities / boards. The plugin architecture promises a great future - but it simply isn&#039;t there yet. Sure - it&#039;s not even version 1.0 ... but it will be great.

For a production enviroment: vB or phpBB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vanilla is fast and lightweight, but it lacks many features you want when you run larger communities / boards. The plugin architecture promises a great future &#8211; but it simply isn&#8217;t there yet. Sure &#8211; it&#8217;s not even version 1.0 &#8230; but it will be great.</p>
<p>For a production enviroment: vB or phpBB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227678</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227678</guid>
		<description>Darren, try http://www.mybboard.com/ aswell. See it in action at http://www.trueblogging.com (not mine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, try <a href="http://www.mybboard.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mybboard.com/</a> aswell. See it in action at <a href="http://www.trueblogging.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trueblogging.com</a> (not mine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227672</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227672</guid>
		<description>I think when it comes down to which forum to choose, functionality and &#039;being different&#039; are not the only factors that should be considered.
It has been said before that phpBB is unsafe and messy. This may be true to some extent, however one also needs to keep in mind that it&#039;s one of the most popular forum platform and thus receives a lot of attention.
This is a good thing on the one hand because it&#039;s got a large active developper community and a very active help forum. On the other hand of course lots of people deliberately try to break it, which is why it&#039;s been called &#039;unsafe&#039;.

With the Vanilla forum, ask yourself: is it really that much safer or is it just that it hasn&#039;t gotten that much attention yet and less people have tried to find a security hole? What&#039;s the support forum like, are you likely to have your questions answered or is there simply not enough activity. And finally how many people work on this open source project and is it likely that there will still be ongoing development and feature improvements in a few years?
Switching forum platforms because the open source developper community is not longer supporting it is labour intensive....

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when it comes down to which forum to choose, functionality and &#8216;being different&#8217; are not the only factors that should be considered.<br />
It has been said before that phpBB is unsafe and messy. This may be true to some extent, however one also needs to keep in mind that it&#8217;s one of the most popular forum platform and thus receives a lot of attention.<br />
This is a good thing on the one hand because it&#8217;s got a large active developper community and a very active help forum. On the other hand of course lots of people deliberately try to break it, which is why it&#8217;s been called &#8216;unsafe&#8217;.</p>
<p>With the Vanilla forum, ask yourself: is it really that much safer or is it just that it hasn&#8217;t gotten that much attention yet and less people have tried to find a security hole? What&#8217;s the support forum like, are you likely to have your questions answered or is there simply not enough activity. And finally how many people work on this open source project and is it likely that there will still be ongoing development and feature improvements in a few years?<br />
Switching forum platforms because the open source developper community is not longer supporting it is labour intensive&#8230;.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sim'</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/10/vanilla-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-227665</link>
		<dc:creator>Sim'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2178#comment-227665</guid>
		<description>Darren - I understand your desire to consider cool, new stuff ... but really, what are you trying to achieve here ? Do you really want to experiment ? Or do you want to run forums and just get on with the discusison with a minimum of administrative overhead holding you back !?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8211; I understand your desire to consider cool, new stuff &#8230; but really, what are you trying to achieve here ? Do you really want to experiment ? Or do you want to run forums and just get on with the discusison with a minimum of administrative overhead holding you back !?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/26 queries in 0.153 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 22:58:07 -->
