<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Must Have&#8217; Sidebar Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:41:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-232721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-232721</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to add, that I never use search functions on webpages. Neither on corporate sites, news magazine&#039;s pages nor on weblogs. 
They are a source of eternal, tremendous annoyance most of the time. They usually give ugly, little saying lists of posts that I wasn&#039;t searching for. And even if there is a hit, I&#039;m often confused when reading the post: is this new? Is it outdated? Are there newer posts that relate to this? Am I getting the whole thing? 

Therefore, I almost exclusively use the category-links or tag-links and I love when there is a hierachy in them so that I can narrow down more and more. Actually, I think, tagging is the new search function if used properly.
If the categories give me very long lists of posts I might try to search for a &quot;show all&quot; link and hit ctrl+f to manually search the site. When I am really interested, I use google with the &quot;site:&quot;-parameter. But normally I just dump it or use a SE for links to that article on that blog.

This might sound a little odd, but I&#039;m not much of a blogger myself, yet. More a general reader. So I can imagine that there are more people like me that don&#039;t like to use extensive techniques of searching just to find a post in a blog... As a blogger, I still would offer a search function and a link to a page with a blogroll/archive on it to accomodate those who feel that these are essential features of a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to add, that I never use search functions on webpages. Neither on corporate sites, news magazine&#8217;s pages nor on weblogs.<br />
They are a source of eternal, tremendous annoyance most of the time. They usually give ugly, little saying lists of posts that I wasn&#8217;t searching for. And even if there is a hit, I&#8217;m often confused when reading the post: is this new? Is it outdated? Are there newer posts that relate to this? Am I getting the whole thing? </p>
<p>Therefore, I almost exclusively use the category-links or tag-links and I love when there is a hierachy in them so that I can narrow down more and more. Actually, I think, tagging is the new search function if used properly.<br />
If the categories give me very long lists of posts I might try to search for a &#8220;show all&#8221; link and hit ctrl+f to manually search the site. When I am really interested, I use google with the &#8220;site:&#8221;-parameter. But normally I just dump it or use a SE for links to that article on that blog.</p>
<p>This might sound a little odd, but I&#8217;m not much of a blogger myself, yet. More a general reader. So I can imagine that there are more people like me that don&#8217;t like to use extensive techniques of searching just to find a post in a blog&#8230; As a blogger, I still would offer a search function and a link to a page with a blogroll/archive on it to accomodate those who feel that these are essential features of a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Graham English Blog &#187; links for 2006-02-02</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-232539</link>
		<dc:creator>The Graham English Blog &#187; links for 2006-02-02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-232539</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘Must Have’ Sidebar Features: Blog Tips at ProBlogger (tags: blog blogging hacks tips) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘Must Have’ Sidebar Features: Blog Tips at ProBlogger (tags: blog blogging hacks tips) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stories from a Web Junkie life &#187; links, tools &#38; suggested reading</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-230014</link>
		<dc:creator>stories from a Web Junkie life &#187; links, tools &#38; suggested reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-230014</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘Must Have’ Sidebar Features [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘Must Have’ Sidebar Features [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-228741</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-228741</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s run with this &lt;a href=&quot;http://watershedstudio.com/portfolio/software/wp-email-notification.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;plugin&lt;/a&gt; for WordPress matej.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s run with this <a href="http://watershedstudio.com/portfolio/software/wp-email-notification.html" rel="nofollow">plugin</a> for WordPress matej.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matej</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-228740</link>
		<dc:creator>matej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-228740</guid>
		<description>I also like the part  where you can &quot;Subscribe to ProBlogger&#039;s Newsletter&quot;, but since I am not a programmer I don&#039;t know how to write such code. Could any one help me with that code?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the part  where you can &#8220;Subscribe to ProBlogger&#8217;s Newsletter&#8221;, but since I am not a programmer I don&#8217;t know how to write such code. Could any one help me with that code?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The banker</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-227295</link>
		<dc:creator>The banker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-227295</guid>
		<description>Hey Brian do you mean contact info for the girls or for the blogger;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brian do you mean contact info for the girls or for the blogger;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWL Almost Making Money via Yahoo Publisher Network &#38; More&#8230; at Secret Weapon Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-226318</link>
		<dc:creator>SWL Almost Making Money via Yahoo Publisher Network &#38; More&#8230; at Secret Weapon Labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-226318</guid>
		<description>[...] With that being said, YPN seems to work and is working towards paying A bill  as are the Chitika ads. Reading ProBlogger.net certainly helps. Darren (the blogger behind ProBlogger) does a genuine and honest job of assessing the good, the bad, and the ugly of blogging and, lucky for him, he seems to make good dough doing so! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With that being said, YPN seems to work and is working towards paying A bill  as are the Chitika ads. Reading ProBlogger.net certainly helps. Darren (the blogger behind ProBlogger) does a genuine and honest job of assessing the good, the bad, and the ugly of blogging and, lucky for him, he seems to make good dough doing so! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://ben.hamilton.id.au &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Snippets from the week</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-226156</link>
		<dc:creator>http://ben.hamilton.id.au &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Snippets from the week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-226156</guid>
		<description>[...] Darren list a bloggers Sidebar essentials [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren list a bloggers Sidebar essentials [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Slinger &#187; links for 2006-02-02</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224983</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Slinger &#187; links for 2006-02-02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224983</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘Must Have’ Sidebar Features: Blog Tips at ProBlogger (tags: @tocheck blog design) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘Must Have’ Sidebar Features: Blog Tips at ProBlogger (tags: @tocheck blog design) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224753</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224753</guid>
		<description>In most of the blogs I see, recent comments have a way of &quot;changing&quot; a page in content which means search engines may see this as advantage as in &quot;these pages change more often than others&quot;.

Regarded from the point of a fresh page, which other content do you add else?  If you really want to go without comments, archives by date are a possibility (at least once a month a change).

In order for the reader to not be irritated about cluttering: just hide them after a certain amount of time, but let them in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In most of the blogs I see, recent comments have a way of &#8220;changing&#8221; a page in content which means search engines may see this as advantage as in &#8220;these pages change more often than others&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regarded from the point of a fresh page, which other content do you add else?  If you really want to go without comments, archives by date are a possibility (at least once a month a change).</p>
<p>In order for the reader to not be irritated about cluttering: just hide them after a certain amount of time, but let them in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224602</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224602</guid>
		<description>I also include an RSS aggregation of the 10 most recent post on my &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; blogs -- useful for bloggers with multiple blogs looking to keep them connected and share link love among them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also include an RSS aggregation of the 10 most recent post on my <em>other</em> blogs &#8212; useful for bloggers with multiple blogs looking to keep them connected and share link love among them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224599</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224599</guid>
		<description>I would agree on principle with most of these but disagree on practice.

2. Archives are great for search engines but suck for users.  Ever try to track down an entry you &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; you saw on a site sometime between &lt;em&gt;September and December of 2004&lt;/em&gt;?  If the goal is to keep things one to two clicks away, categories or tagging are better.  I would suggest readers consider moving Archives (which are essential for a blog if not the sidebar) to their own pages.  Still benefit from SEO but implement user connectivity in a different fashion.

3. Blogrolls are old skool.  I did away with my blogroll a long time ago. Like you, Darren, I connect excellent content via my content. That&#039;s why I use an RSS reader... so I can filter that information for my users.

4. Recent Comments I like alot and have striven to keep them.  That said, it is likely one of the first items to get the axe if necessary.

5. Consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technosailor.com/tagging-your-blog-2-types-of-tags-and-choosing-your-poison/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tagging as an alternative to categories&lt;/a&gt;. I think it makes more sense.

6. Popular posts work with a busy blog like this one.  It&#039;s only a source of frustration and discouragement to less-trafficked bloggers. I&#039;d say no to this.

7. Contact Info - Toss up. I choose not to list mine actively but I&#039;m too easy to take advantage of so it&#039;s by design.

10. RSS buttons are the spawn of the devil. With auto discovery, who needs them?

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree on principle with most of these but disagree on practice.</p>
<p>2. Archives are great for search engines but suck for users.  Ever try to track down an entry you <em>think</em> you saw on a site sometime between <em>September and December of 2004</em>?  If the goal is to keep things one to two clicks away, categories or tagging are better.  I would suggest readers consider moving Archives (which are essential for a blog if not the sidebar) to their own pages.  Still benefit from SEO but implement user connectivity in a different fashion.</p>
<p>3. Blogrolls are old skool.  I did away with my blogroll a long time ago. Like you, Darren, I connect excellent content via my content. That&#8217;s why I use an RSS reader&#8230; so I can filter that information for my users.</p>
<p>4. Recent Comments I like alot and have striven to keep them.  That said, it is likely one of the first items to get the axe if necessary.</p>
<p>5. Consider <a href="http://www.technosailor.com/tagging-your-blog-2-types-of-tags-and-choosing-your-poison/" rel="nofollow">tagging as an alternative to categories</a>. I think it makes more sense.</p>
<p>6. Popular posts work with a busy blog like this one.  It&#8217;s only a source of frustration and discouragement to less-trafficked bloggers. I&#8217;d say no to this.</p>
<p>7. Contact Info &#8211; Toss up. I choose not to list mine actively but I&#8217;m too easy to take advantage of so it&#8217;s by design.</p>
<p>10. RSS buttons are the spawn of the devil. With auto discovery, who needs them?</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.u</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224550</link>
		<dc:creator>j.u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224550</guid>
		<description>Blogrolling plays an important part of website network building, but having a hundred links on a blogroll is ridiculous. On my site I suggest and implement a &lt;a href=&quot;http://jason.ungos.com/2006/01/31/blog-sidebar-requirements/&quot; title=&quot;Blog Sidebar&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;shorter randomized blogroll&lt;/a&gt;. This gives every link a chance to be &quot;featured&quot; while saving some sidebar real estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogrolling plays an important part of website network building, but having a hundred links on a blogroll is ridiculous. On my site I suggest and implement a <a href="http://jason.ungos.com/2006/01/31/blog-sidebar-requirements/" title="Blog Sidebar" rel="nofollow">shorter randomized blogroll</a>. This gives every link a chance to be &#8220;featured&#8221; while saving some sidebar real estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224548</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224548</guid>
		<description>I think everyone should have pictures of girls making out in their sidebar. Also contact info if there&#039;s room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone should have pictures of girls making out in their sidebar. Also contact info if there&#8217;s room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: row1</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224494</link>
		<dc:creator>row1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224494</guid>
		<description>how about ads on your sidebar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about ads on your sidebar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Changing Way &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sidebar Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224462</link>
		<dc:creator>Changing Way &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sidebar Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224462</guid>
		<description>[...] What should go in the sidebar? What&#8217;s a question recently posed on ProBlogger and on BlogSEO. I&#8217;ve been giving it some thought recently, since I&#8217;m thinking of re-theming this blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What should go in the sidebar? What&#8217;s a question recently posed on ProBlogger and on BlogSEO. I&#8217;ve been giving it some thought recently, since I&#8217;m thinking of re-theming this blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Shih</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224461</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Shih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224461</guid>
		<description>I wrote about this a couple months ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brianshih.com/2005/11/28/blog-sidebar-design/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Personally, I think the list BlogSEO has provided is _way_ too bloated. There is such a thing as too much information, and crowding your sidebar is an easy way to cause your viewers to &quot;freak out&quot; at the overload of links and completely ignore it.

Stick with the basics and draw attention to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about this a couple months ago <a href="http://www.brianshih.com/2005/11/28/blog-sidebar-design/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Personally, I think the list BlogSEO has provided is _way_ too bloated. There is such a thing as too much information, and crowding your sidebar is an easy way to cause your viewers to &#8220;freak out&#8221; at the overload of links and completely ignore it.</p>
<p>Stick with the basics and draw attention to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224449</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224449</guid>
		<description>Yay! I have most of those 10 things, except popular posts and categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! I have most of those 10 things, except popular posts and categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcunix</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224446</link>
		<dc:creator>pcunix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224446</guid>
		<description>I do a &quot;Recent Comments&quot; but I fold all threads together (in other words if there have been 8 comments on one post, that&#039;s just one recent comment to me) and I limit it to seven total: if people are commenting on more than seven posts today, the older ones just slide away, although I do have another page where you can see more of them if you really want to.

Blogrolls?  Nope.  Way too many nowadays.  I do have a few &quot;Recent Links&quot; that I update sporadically, but I limit those too.

Search?  Of course, on *every* page, along with a link for RSS and the proper header  code for RSS aware browsers to spot it.

Archives, yeah, by date though I&#039;m surprised to see that it gets used frequently.  Archives by subject topic gets used more.  

What really surprised me is that the Popular Articles pages (which I break down by day, week, month and all time) get used much more than I ever thought they would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do a &#8220;Recent Comments&#8221; but I fold all threads together (in other words if there have been 8 comments on one post, that&#8217;s just one recent comment to me) and I limit it to seven total: if people are commenting on more than seven posts today, the older ones just slide away, although I do have another page where you can see more of them if you really want to.</p>
<p>Blogrolls?  Nope.  Way too many nowadays.  I do have a few &#8220;Recent Links&#8221; that I update sporadically, but I limit those too.</p>
<p>Search?  Of course, on *every* page, along with a link for RSS and the proper header  code for RSS aware browsers to spot it.</p>
<p>Archives, yeah, by date though I&#8217;m surprised to see that it gets used frequently.  Archives by subject topic gets used more.  </p>
<p>What really surprised me is that the Popular Articles pages (which I break down by day, week, month and all time) get used much more than I ever thought they would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Moncur</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/02/01/must-have-sidebar-features/comment-page-1/#comment-224438</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Moncur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=2129#comment-224438</guid>
		<description>Site search / Contact Info: Essential, I&#039;m amazed some sites don&#039;t have it.

Archives: Yes, but lose the links for each month in the sidebar and/or calendar that some software includes by default. They just end up being long, useless lists (if you post a lot) or tiny lists that tell everyone how rarely you post. If anyone&#039;s looking for something date-specific, they can click an &quot;Archives&quot; link first.

Blogroll: Waste of space. Put it on a separate page. Blogrolls are &quot;so&quot; 2002. All of the cool kids read so many blogs there&#039;s no room to list them all.

Recent Comments: There&#039;s a window where this is useful, but if your site is too small (like most of mine) or too large (like Problogger) it&#039;s a waste of space.

Most Popular Posts: I prefer &quot;Featured Posts&quot; selected manually. This lets me promote articles that deserve it rather than those that have stumbled into a popular search result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site search / Contact Info: Essential, I&#8217;m amazed some sites don&#8217;t have it.</p>
<p>Archives: Yes, but lose the links for each month in the sidebar and/or calendar that some software includes by default. They just end up being long, useless lists (if you post a lot) or tiny lists that tell everyone how rarely you post. If anyone&#8217;s looking for something date-specific, they can click an &#8220;Archives&#8221; link first.</p>
<p>Blogroll: Waste of space. Put it on a separate page. Blogrolls are &#8220;so&#8221; 2002. All of the cool kids read so many blogs there&#8217;s no room to list them all.</p>
<p>Recent Comments: There&#8217;s a window where this is useful, but if your site is too small (like most of mine) or too large (like Problogger) it&#8217;s a waste of space.</p>
<p>Most Popular Posts: I prefer &#8220;Featured Posts&#8221; selected manually. This lets me promote articles that deserve it rather than those that have stumbled into a popular search result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
