<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chitika Earnings &#8211; Poll of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:59:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-187497</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1954#comment-187497</guid>
		<description>Yirmumah - no - I mean it works well on some blogs and not others. When I look at how it performs on MY blogs it works well on some....and not others.

If you look at the poll results so far you&#039;ll see that there are a few others that seem to have good results too. The overwhelming vote so far is that people are not using it - but of those that are using it there are a handful who are a range of responses including a handful who are making decent money from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yirmumah &#8211; no &#8211; I mean it works well on some blogs and not others. When I look at how it performs on MY blogs it works well on some&#8230;.and not others.</p>
<p>If you look at the poll results so far you&#8217;ll see that there are a few others that seem to have good results too. The overwhelming vote so far is that people are not using it &#8211; but of those that are using it there are a handful who are a range of responses including a handful who are making decent money from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yirmumah</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-187493</link>
		<dc:creator>Yirmumah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1954#comment-187493</guid>
		<description>Do you mean it works well on YOUR blogs Darren? heh.... I don&#039;t hear many other people saying their rolling in Chitika cash. 

My October stats were miserable, and audited more than half. Actually, I&#039;d go and add up all of what I made in Oct and what was actually paid out, but Chitika doesn&#039;t have an easy way of looking at that.

Hopefully on this next payoout, it&#039;s MUCH better due to the alternate ads and them now auditing out bad clicks live. -- 

I love the Chitika system, but I think they&#039;ve focused too much on pleasing the advertisers and not really giving too much care to the actual publishers giving their ads top spots and placements. I don&#039;t know what the problem was with my account for October, but I can assure you the majority of ALL my traffic comes from the US, CAN and UK, and any clicks they get from my prime placements are total Quality clicks. I can understand if they take away repeat clicks and all, but it&#039;s not matching up to how my other ad systems have performed. Like i said, hopefully it gets better-- hopefully they&#039;re listening to the quality publishers out here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean it works well on YOUR blogs Darren? heh&#8230;. I don&#8217;t hear many other people saying their rolling in Chitika cash. </p>
<p>My October stats were miserable, and audited more than half. Actually, I&#8217;d go and add up all of what I made in Oct and what was actually paid out, but Chitika doesn&#8217;t have an easy way of looking at that.</p>
<p>Hopefully on this next payoout, it&#8217;s MUCH better due to the alternate ads and them now auditing out bad clicks live. &#8212; </p>
<p>I love the Chitika system, but I think they&#8217;ve focused too much on pleasing the advertisers and not really giving too much care to the actual publishers giving their ads top spots and placements. I don&#8217;t know what the problem was with my account for October, but I can assure you the majority of ALL my traffic comes from the US, CAN and UK, and any clicks they get from my prime placements are total Quality clicks. I can understand if they take away repeat clicks and all, but it&#8217;s not matching up to how my other ad systems have performed. Like i said, hopefully it gets better&#8211; hopefully they&#8217;re listening to the quality publishers out here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-187002</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1954#comment-187002</guid>
		<description>yeah Kim - seems to be something that works very well on some blogs and not so well on others depending upon topic, positioning but also taffic origin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah Kim &#8211; seems to be something that works very well on some blogs and not so well on others depending upon topic, positioning but also taffic origin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Dushinski</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-187000</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Dushinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1954#comment-187000</guid>
		<description>Despite following all the tips, doing what &quot;should&quot; work, I got a handful of clicks which all got audited out. Just not worth it at all. I now have it on my archive pages but nothing else. Could be my topic just doesn&#039;t work...

I will probably try it again with a different niched blog. For now, my scrapbooking blog will be Chitika free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite following all the tips, doing what &#8220;should&#8221; work, I got a handful of clicks which all got audited out. Just not worth it at all. I now have it on my archive pages but nothing else. Could be my topic just doesn&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
<p>I will probably try it again with a different niched blog. For now, my scrapbooking blog will be Chitika free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metal-news</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-186873</link>
		<dc:creator>Metal-news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1954#comment-186873</guid>
		<description>just a bit more then 1$ :)

think i need a lots of tips :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a bit more then 1$ :)</p>
<p>think i need a lots of tips :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/19/chitika-earnings-poll-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-186840</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1954#comment-186840</guid>
		<description>Not too much, as I just started at the end of October. Things have picked up considerably since I began implementing it across many sites, but a recent drop this week has been discouraging. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too much, as I just started at the end of October. Things have picked up considerably since I began implementing it across many sites, but a recent drop this week has been discouraging. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
