<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Money Because of Your Blog as Opposed to Making Money Directly From Your Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:59:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noemi</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-285436</link>
		<dc:creator>Noemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 06:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-285436</guid>
		<description>My blogs have been around since 2001. It&#039;s only in the last couple of months that I added adsense and text links and now earn quite a modest amount. If I had know blogs had that income potential, I should have started in 2003 but I resisted because the ads looked ugly then. I just thought of trying it out to see if it did give income and when it did, I changed my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blogs have been around since 2001. It&#8217;s only in the last couple of months that I added adsense and text links and now earn quite a modest amount. If I had know blogs had that income potential, I should have started in 2003 but I resisted because the ads looked ugly then. I just thought of trying it out to see if it did give income and when it did, I changed my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bugged Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; your blog is your marketing tool!</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-248877</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bugged Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; your blog is your marketing tool!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-248877</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Making money because of your blog&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;Making money directly from your blog&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Making money because of your blog&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;Making money directly from your blog&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bugged Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-248869</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bugged Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-248869</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-228249</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-228249</guid>
		<description>Making Money is not the real fundamental reason why a blog is in existence. I strongly disagree with the notion that blogs should be created to make money. Conversely, I can&#039;t deny that there are some people who do. The more important reason for blogs to exist is to communicate and reach out to people whom you do not usually reach out to, and to put your ideas out to people who may have need of them. You don&#039;t have to visit my blog to make me money. Conversely, I have to visit my own blog to really think. It&#039;s a tool for emotional outletting, and it&#039;s a great way to expand my present model of the world. Nobody who has the ability to write should be denied the opportunity to blog, but they should never blog for the sake of money making. In my ideal world, people genuinely contribute to a blog so that they get a discussion going that makes a difference to the world. I&#039;ve been training for a good 13 years now, and all the knowledge I have gained will go to waste if it isn&#039;t properly organized and taught to people who could benefit from it. 
Life presents itself as a short game. Whatever happens, the game will end. But people will forever remember committed players, determination on the field, and the desire to extend beyond what you apparently thought you were humanly capable of. Blogging is an extension of that life, or that world we live.
We don&#039;t make money from our life. We make because in our life, we grow and touch the lives of others. Their growth and development gives us permission to make some money from it. But without the intrinsic value of our life and our contribution, there is no permission. So, no - we don&#039;t make money because of our life (or blog) either. We make it because it grows and helps others grow in this never ending cycle of learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making Money is not the real fundamental reason why a blog is in existence. I strongly disagree with the notion that blogs should be created to make money. Conversely, I can&#8217;t deny that there are some people who do. The more important reason for blogs to exist is to communicate and reach out to people whom you do not usually reach out to, and to put your ideas out to people who may have need of them. You don&#8217;t have to visit my blog to make me money. Conversely, I have to visit my own blog to really think. It&#8217;s a tool for emotional outletting, and it&#8217;s a great way to expand my present model of the world. Nobody who has the ability to write should be denied the opportunity to blog, but they should never blog for the sake of money making. In my ideal world, people genuinely contribute to a blog so that they get a discussion going that makes a difference to the world. I&#8217;ve been training for a good 13 years now, and all the knowledge I have gained will go to waste if it isn&#8217;t properly organized and taught to people who could benefit from it.<br />
Life presents itself as a short game. Whatever happens, the game will end. But people will forever remember committed players, determination on the field, and the desire to extend beyond what you apparently thought you were humanly capable of. Blogging is an extension of that life, or that world we live.<br />
We don&#8217;t make money from our life. We make because in our life, we grow and touch the lives of others. Their growth and development gives us permission to make some money from it. But without the intrinsic value of our life and our contribution, there is no permission. So, no &#8211; we don&#8217;t make money because of our life (or blog) either. We make it because it grows and helps others grow in this never ending cycle of learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Weil</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-193571</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Weil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-193571</guid>
		<description>So... a number of &quot;offers&quot; from publishers but no book contract?? Direct or indirect, &quot;from&quot; or &quot;because,&quot; I can tell you first-hand that writing a book is a heck of a lot harder than blogging.

Darren, I challenge you to get a contract (and an advance, of course) and write a book! I see your book as more of a confessional: &quot;How I became a professional blogger&quot; kind of thing. With lots of practical tips thrown in. Just my two cents. Could be a great read!

Well, back to my book. I&#039;m in the homestretch of completing &quot;The Corporate Blogging Book: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know to Get It Right&quot; (Penguin Portfolio 2006). www.TheCorporateBloggingBook.com

Happy holidays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; a number of &#8220;offers&#8221; from publishers but no book contract?? Direct or indirect, &#8220;from&#8221; or &#8220;because,&#8221; I can tell you first-hand that writing a book is a heck of a lot harder than blogging.</p>
<p>Darren, I challenge you to get a contract (and an advance, of course) and write a book! I see your book as more of a confessional: &#8220;How I became a professional blogger&#8221; kind of thing. With lots of practical tips thrown in. Just my two cents. Could be a great read!</p>
<p>Well, back to my book. I&#8217;m in the homestretch of completing &#8220;The Corporate Blogging Book: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know to Get It Right&#8221; (Penguin Portfolio 2006). <a href="http://www.TheCorporateBloggingBook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.TheCorporateBloggingBook.com</a></p>
<p>Happy holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-186490</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-186490</guid>
		<description>Great post Darren. When Andy Wibbels and I teach our Business Blog Basics course, one of the first things we go over is the difference between the direct and indirect revenue streams.

I work with people on both sides of this approach every day. The strategies and approaches are totally different. Let me give a very brief example. 

I&#039;m in the midst of designing two blogs. One is for direct revenue (a consumer review site), the other indirect (a consultant). On the direct site, it&#039;s all about the ads. The design considerations ultimately come down to this: capture the eye, quickly lead it around the page, and have it land on a relevant ad. The content should grab the reader just enough to have them pause before clicking on an ad.

For the consultant&#039;s site, the design&#039;s ultimate purpose is to present a boat-load of content in a clear, efficient way. We&#039;re trying to develop the personality of the site - to present the author as a trusted expert with a unique, effective approach. The approach to layout and structure is totally different than with a direct revenue site.

The point is that there are fundamental differences in the goals of each blog. The metrics used to determine success are wildly different. There is some common ground, but not a ton. Do I see another blog in your future Darren?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Darren. When Andy Wibbels and I teach our Business Blog Basics course, one of the first things we go over is the difference between the direct and indirect revenue streams.</p>
<p>I work with people on both sides of this approach every day. The strategies and approaches are totally different. Let me give a very brief example. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the midst of designing two blogs. One is for direct revenue (a consumer review site), the other indirect (a consultant). On the direct site, it&#8217;s all about the ads. The design considerations ultimately come down to this: capture the eye, quickly lead it around the page, and have it land on a relevant ad. The content should grab the reader just enough to have them pause before clicking on an ad.</p>
<p>For the consultant&#8217;s site, the design&#8217;s ultimate purpose is to present a boat-load of content in a clear, efficient way. We&#8217;re trying to develop the personality of the site &#8211; to present the author as a trusted expert with a unique, effective approach. The approach to layout and structure is totally different than with a direct revenue site.</p>
<p>The point is that there are fundamental differences in the goals of each blog. The metrics used to determine success are wildly different. There is some common ground, but not a ton. Do I see another blog in your future Darren?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ralya</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185790</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Ralya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185790</guid>
		<description>Vanessa: Thanks for tackling that question -- your answer was quite helpful. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vanessa: Thanks for tackling that question &#8212; your answer was quite helpful. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviad Ben Dov</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185466</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviad Ben Dov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185466</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;vanessa: Something that interests me is how many bloggers self-publish or would consider self-publishing rather than taking a book deal. What would people here do?&lt;/em&gt;

Tell you the truth, I wouldn&#039;t know where to start if I wanted to. It&#039;s not just writing the book, it&#039;s getting people to actually buy it which seems difficult to me.

That said, I still am trying to get a few cents together each day from blogging so.... I guess I don&#039;t have that money-magic. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>vanessa: Something that interests me is how many bloggers self-publish or would consider self-publishing rather than taking a book deal. What would people here do?</em></p>
<p>Tell you the truth, I wouldn&#8217;t know where to start if I wanted to. It&#8217;s not just writing the book, it&#8217;s getting people to actually buy it which seems difficult to me.</p>
<p>That said, I still am trying to get a few cents together each day from blogging so&#8230;. I guess I don&#8217;t have that money-magic. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Demopoulos</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185357</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Demopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185357</guid>
		<description>Great Article.
 
I usually refer to making money explicitly (via ads, affiliate links, direct product sales) versus making money implicitly (increased consulting and speaking opportunities etc).

I started blogging to make money implicitly and to have fun. Success on both counts :) I&#039;ve certainly had success making money explicitly too, but I&#039;ve never put much effort or made a priority of it.

I have gotten two book contracts from blogging however - nothing in print yet, although the first can be preordered from Amazon.

Writing a book is not that similar to blogging, in my experience, but overall a great experience. DON&#039;T expect to get rich writing books though, except perhaps implicitly . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article.</p>
<p>I usually refer to making money explicitly (via ads, affiliate links, direct product sales) versus making money implicitly (increased consulting and speaking opportunities etc).</p>
<p>I started blogging to make money implicitly and to have fun. Success on both counts :) I&#8217;ve certainly had success making money explicitly too, but I&#8217;ve never put much effort or made a priority of it.</p>
<p>I have gotten two book contracts from blogging however &#8211; nothing in print yet, although the first can be preordered from Amazon.</p>
<p>Writing a book is not that similar to blogging, in my experience, but overall a great experience. DON&#8217;T expect to get rich writing books though, except perhaps implicitly . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185212</link>
		<dc:creator>vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185212</guid>
		<description>Martin Ralya---

I might be able to shed some light on your question about book deals. Basically, there&#039;s a big difference in the way things work for fiction and non-fiction titles, and it comes down to supply and demand. 

Publishers are inundated with manuscripts for novels, children&#039;s books etc, so getting an agent they respect to represent you and spruik your work is (usually) vital. 

In contrast, non-fiction is usually commissioned, and the commissioning editor has a quota of titles they have to produce each year. 

Finding someone who (1) is an expert in the field you want a book in, and (2) can write, can be really hard. A good blogger is a perfect candidate for a book deal: you can already judge their writing ability and their knowledge of their field, AND they have a profile in their community, a verifiable number of readers, and often some kind of mailing list. It&#039;s a marketing hole-in-one.

Something that interests me is how many bloggers self-publish or would consider self-publishing rather than taking a book deal. What would people here do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Ralya&#8212;</p>
<p>I might be able to shed some light on your question about book deals. Basically, there&#8217;s a big difference in the way things work for fiction and non-fiction titles, and it comes down to supply and demand. </p>
<p>Publishers are inundated with manuscripts for novels, children&#8217;s books etc, so getting an agent they respect to represent you and spruik your work is (usually) vital. </p>
<p>In contrast, non-fiction is usually commissioned, and the commissioning editor has a quota of titles they have to produce each year. </p>
<p>Finding someone who (1) is an expert in the field you want a book in, and (2) can write, can be really hard. A good blogger is a perfect candidate for a book deal: you can already judge their writing ability and their knowledge of their field, AND they have a profile in their community, a verifiable number of readers, and often some kind of mailing list. It&#8217;s a marketing hole-in-one.</p>
<p>Something that interests me is how many bloggers self-publish or would consider self-publishing rather than taking a book deal. What would people here do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Book</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185168</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185168</guid>
		<description>Being newbiew in blogging is very difficult for me, someone create blog just for revenue, but the other one blogging  is for life. Its depend on you, life without money is nothing.. huh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being newbiew in blogging is very difficult for me, someone create blog just for revenue, but the other one blogging  is for life. Its depend on you, life without money is nothing.. huh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185071</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185071</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;“Content is the king”. If you provide a quality content on your blog the flow of visitors will automaically increase and so is the revenue.&lt;/em&gt;
Isn&#039;t that a trite and naive statement.  That really has very little to do with problogging.  If I&#039;m an indirect problogger, maybe I&#039;m not trying to get revenue to increasse from the blog. Maybe I&#039;m trying to shop my influence.

And your short-sighted comment ignores the fact that it takes a certain personality to make direct revenue.  I know quite a few people who do put content out there - quality content - and for all the apparent reason should be making tons of money, but because thier personality is such that they don&#039;t have a lot of success selling ads, or running ezines, etc... they don&#039;t make alot of direct revenue.

Now granted some people have the fortune that everything they touch turns to gold, but not everyone is like that and I think it&#039;s pretty naive to think so.

I&#039;m not trying to attack your comment for it&#039;s intent. But I do attack your content as naive and misguided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Content is the king”. If you provide a quality content on your blog the flow of visitors will automaically increase and so is the revenue.</em><br />
Isn&#8217;t that a trite and naive statement.  That really has very little to do with problogging.  If I&#8217;m an indirect problogger, maybe I&#8217;m not trying to get revenue to increasse from the blog. Maybe I&#8217;m trying to shop my influence.</p>
<p>And your short-sighted comment ignores the fact that it takes a certain personality to make direct revenue.  I know quite a few people who do put content out there &#8211; quality content &#8211; and for all the apparent reason should be making tons of money, but because thier personality is such that they don&#8217;t have a lot of success selling ads, or running ezines, etc&#8230; they don&#8217;t make alot of direct revenue.</p>
<p>Now granted some people have the fortune that everything they touch turns to gold, but not everyone is like that and I think it&#8217;s pretty naive to think so.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to attack your comment for it&#8217;s intent. But I do attack your content as naive and misguided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetMeeting</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-185065</link>
		<dc:creator>NetMeeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-185065</guid>
		<description>&quot;Content is the king&quot;. If you provide a quality content on your blog the flow of visitors will automaically increase and so is the revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Content is the king&#8221;. If you provide a quality content on your blog the flow of visitors will automaically increase and so is the revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184704</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184704</guid>
		<description>Darren,
A great article - it&#039;s great you are showing interest in expanding on the &quot;making money direct from blogging&quot; here at ProB.

I always believed that there is more promise in making revenue because of your blog for the vast majority of us - sort of like using a blog as your main marketing tool.

I really wonder if people ponder your question: &lt;em&gt;Do you want to make money directly from your blog or because of your blog?’&lt;/em&gt; when they set out to blog professionally - as both are completely different kinds of blogging, imo.

Directly is more seo-focused and indirectly is more personal branding, building credibility.

Keep going down this route in 2006, Darren, and I&#039;m back on the bandwagon ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,<br />
A great article &#8211; it&#8217;s great you are showing interest in expanding on the &#8220;making money direct from blogging&#8221; here at ProB.</p>
<p>I always believed that there is more promise in making revenue because of your blog for the vast majority of us &#8211; sort of like using a blog as your main marketing tool.</p>
<p>I really wonder if people ponder your question: <em>Do you want to make money directly from your blog or because of your blog?’</em> when they set out to blog professionally &#8211; as both are completely different kinds of blogging, imo.</p>
<p>Directly is more seo-focused and indirectly is more personal branding, building credibility.</p>
<p>Keep going down this route in 2006, Darren, and I&#8217;m back on the bandwagon ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaron</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184629</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184629</guid>
		<description>Been blogging a few months now. No passion, just a means to make money. All my income is from affiliate sales. Discovered your blog a week ago, and cant stop reading it. :) Lots of good info. 
Consulting would be a nice way to go. Get lots of people amazed that an illiterate working class yobbo with zero education can make a good full time income from blogging.
Teaching others how to do it, and getting paid for it would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been blogging a few months now. No passion, just a means to make money. All my income is from affiliate sales. Discovered your blog a week ago, and cant stop reading it. :) Lots of good info.<br />
Consulting would be a nice way to go. Get lots of people amazed that an illiterate working class yobbo with zero education can make a good full time income from blogging.<br />
Teaching others how to do it, and getting paid for it would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184627</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184627</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually trying to do the opposite, moving away from the intensive consulting time-limited business that I do right now to a passive business. About the term Problogger, it&#039;s funny because I think myself as one of these generic probloggers you read about - in a sense that a problogger is spending all his working time on blogs (Which I am doing and shouldn&#039;t be doing). It&#039;s funny, but I can get such a kick earning .. let&#039;s say $5.00 in one DAY because that&#039;s like 200% increase over yesterday .. and waste a day trying to figure out why I didn&#039;t make $5.00 the next day ... but meanwhile, if I shut off the computer I can make 10 times that amount in less than an hour&#039;s work. 

I think I would have to be on the wishing side of the fence that wants to make money directly from the blog, than because of it. I&#039;m not looking for publicity .. I&#039;m looking for residual income. Is that bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually trying to do the opposite, moving away from the intensive consulting time-limited business that I do right now to a passive business. About the term Problogger, it&#8217;s funny because I think myself as one of these generic probloggers you read about &#8211; in a sense that a problogger is spending all his working time on blogs (Which I am doing and shouldn&#8217;t be doing). It&#8217;s funny, but I can get such a kick earning .. let&#8217;s say $5.00 in one DAY because that&#8217;s like 200% increase over yesterday .. and waste a day trying to figure out why I didn&#8217;t make $5.00 the next day &#8230; but meanwhile, if I shut off the computer I can make 10 times that amount in less than an hour&#8217;s work. </p>
<p>I think I would have to be on the wishing side of the fence that wants to make money directly from the blog, than because of it. I&#8217;m not looking for publicity .. I&#8217;m looking for residual income. Is that bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The banker</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184461</link>
		<dc:creator>The banker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184461</guid>
		<description>My goal is to get visitors from my blog to my other website. If the buy something from my affiliate links that is fine but not the main goal. And when they are at my other site I would like them to sign up through on of my affiliate links to one of the many pokersites that I advertise for. 

If they do I will get a certain percentage of the rake (the money the pokersite takes out of every pot), and then I would get a bit of money every month without having to work for it. After that I plan to take over the world;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goal is to get visitors from my blog to my other website. If the buy something from my affiliate links that is fine but not the main goal. And when they are at my other site I would like them to sign up through on of my affiliate links to one of the many pokersites that I advertise for. </p>
<p>If they do I will get a certain percentage of the rake (the money the pokersite takes out of every pot), and then I would get a bit of money every month without having to work for it. After that I plan to take over the world;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184434</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184434</guid>
		<description>Thanks Aaron - understood where you were coming from - although I do feel partly responsible. When I started ProBlogger I did start with a broader goal in mind for this blog. Hopefully as I grow in my own experience with blogging opportunities in a more indirect way I&#039;ll be able to inject more of this into what I write here. I&#039;ll also be on the look out for the experiences of others - if you or anyone ever writes anything in this sphere let me know as I often link to what others write (no promises that I&#039;ll link to everything sent in but it&#039;ll at least help educate me).

Looking forward to 2006 and how it developes in these ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Aaron &#8211; understood where you were coming from &#8211; although I do feel partly responsible. When I started ProBlogger I did start with a broader goal in mind for this blog. Hopefully as I grow in my own experience with blogging opportunities in a more indirect way I&#8217;ll be able to inject more of this into what I write here. I&#8217;ll also be on the look out for the experiences of others &#8211; if you or anyone ever writes anything in this sphere let me know as I often link to what others write (no promises that I&#8217;ll link to everything sent in but it&#8217;ll at least help educate me).</p>
<p>Looking forward to 2006 and how it developes in these ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184425</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184425</guid>
		<description>Darren--

I agree that it is a tough one and let me just say for the record, I don&#039;t resent &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; for the term problogger. I resent the folks who have ran with it and essentially made those of us who don&#039;t blog for a salary lesser entities - whether overtly or inadvertently.

I think that maybe guest bloggers could fill the gap where you feel you don&#039;t have the expertise.  I am not necessarily volunteering but I&#039;m sure there&#039;s quite a few people who could apply a professional touch to the &#039;indirect&#039; genre once, twice or in an ongoing feature set.

I know in our book, we have chapters dedicated to how blogging can help your job, relationships, ideas, hobbies and company... all of those are the indirects you&#039;re talking about.

I commend what you are doing here.  The approach you take to blogging and bringing it to the masses is admirable.

Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren&#8211;</p>
<p>I agree that it is a tough one and let me just say for the record, I don&#8217;t resent <em>you</em> for the term problogger. I resent the folks who have ran with it and essentially made those of us who don&#8217;t blog for a salary lesser entities &#8211; whether overtly or inadvertently.</p>
<p>I think that maybe guest bloggers could fill the gap where you feel you don&#8217;t have the expertise.  I am not necessarily volunteering but I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s quite a few people who could apply a professional touch to the &#8216;indirect&#8217; genre once, twice or in an ongoing feature set.</p>
<p>I know in our book, we have chapters dedicated to how blogging can help your job, relationships, ideas, hobbies and company&#8230; all of those are the indirects you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>I commend what you are doing here.  The approach you take to blogging and bringing it to the masses is admirable.</p>
<p>Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ralya</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/17/making-money-because-of-your-blog-as-opposed-to-making-money-directly-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-184267</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Ralya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1939#comment-184267</guid>
		<description>(Darren) &lt;i&gt;I’m open to ideas from people of how to approach the topic more to be more inclusive of both types of probloggers.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s a tough one!

My guess is that indirect problogging is much more individual than direct problogging. In other words, successful direct problogs seem like they&#039;d have more in common than successful indirect ones.

But there&#039;s also a lot of crossover, as you mentioned -- things that work for one work for the other, too. That&#039;s one reason I&#039;m attempting to do both, with an emphasis on the indirect route. Why not make a bit of money on the way to meeting the larger, indirect goal?

Personally, I&#039;d be interested in seeing tips aimed at the book deal aspect of things. I&#039;m very surprised at how (relatively) often it sounds like people are getting deals out of the blue -- I&#039;d have thought that it would be more common to build a profile through your blog, then approach publishers with your book idea. (More like the traditional &quot;get an agent, send out your manuscript&quot; approach, in other words.)

Also, areas where the two &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; overlap seem like fertile ground for a post, for folks (like me) who are combining the two goals into one blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Darren) <i>I’m open to ideas from people of how to approach the topic more to be more inclusive of both types of probloggers.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s a tough one!</p>
<p>My guess is that indirect problogging is much more individual than direct problogging. In other words, successful direct problogs seem like they&#8217;d have more in common than successful indirect ones.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s also a lot of crossover, as you mentioned &#8212; things that work for one work for the other, too. That&#8217;s one reason I&#8217;m attempting to do both, with an emphasis on the indirect route. Why not make a bit of money on the way to meeting the larger, indirect goal?</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d be interested in seeing tips aimed at the book deal aspect of things. I&#8217;m very surprised at how (relatively) often it sounds like people are getting deals out of the blue &#8212; I&#8217;d have thought that it would be more common to build a profile through your blog, then approach publishers with your book idea. (More like the traditional &#8220;get an agent, send out your manuscript&#8221; approach, in other words.)</p>
<p>Also, areas where the two <i>don&#8217;t</i> overlap seem like fertile ground for a post, for folks (like me) who are combining the two goals into one blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
