<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Squidoo Optimized Well for Search Engines?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotPieGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2657708</link>
		<dc:creator>PotPieGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-2657708</guid>
		<description>Darren -

It sure is nice to see the improvements made by Squidoo since the time of your blog post.

Just the change in the title structure alone is a big SEO boost.

When someone makes a lens with hope that it will rank well in the search engines, there are most definitely certain Squidoo SEO techniques that need to be paid attention to.

Search engine ranking of a Squidoo lens is not just luck and is far from all about how fresh your content is or how &#039;pretty&#039; your lens looks  =)

What happens OFF your Squidoo lens is a very important factor...very. (hint)

Thanks for the great blog!  It is a joy to read !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren -</p>
<p>It sure is nice to see the improvements made by Squidoo since the time of your blog post.</p>
<p>Just the change in the title structure alone is a big SEO boost.</p>
<p>When someone makes a lens with hope that it will rank well in the search engines, there are most definitely certain Squidoo SEO techniques that need to be paid attention to.</p>
<p>Search engine ranking of a Squidoo lens is not just luck and is far from all about how fresh your content is or how &#8216;pretty&#8217; your lens looks  =)</p>
<p>What happens OFF your Squidoo lens is a very important factor&#8230;very. (hint)</p>
<p>Thanks for the great blog!  It is a joy to read !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cher</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-1122641</link>
		<dc:creator>cher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-1122641</guid>
		<description>I think Squidoo gives higher imporatnce to the title and the url. We should target by using keyword phrases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Squidoo gives higher imporatnce to the title and the url. We should target by using keyword phrases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-283204</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-283204</guid>
		<description>Great pointers.

An update on the &quot;title tag&quot; since this article was written...  it seems Sqidoo has moved the lensmaster&#039;s keywords to the front (which is good, probably, for SEO).

So a lensmaster&#039;s site might now read:   &quot;keyword or keyword phrase on Squidoo&quot;  (rather than &quot;Squido being up front).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great pointers.</p>
<p>An update on the &#8220;title tag&#8221; since this article was written&#8230;  it seems Sqidoo has moved the lensmaster&#8217;s keywords to the front (which is good, probably, for SEO).</p>
<p>So a lensmaster&#8217;s site might now read:   &#8220;keyword or keyword phrase on Squidoo&#8221;  (rather than &#8220;Squido being up front).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why All The Fuss Over Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-250689</link>
		<dc:creator>Why All The Fuss Over Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-250689</guid>
		<description>Spammy stuff in the long run will not work for the search engines as it becomes more smarter each day. Better be safe than sorry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spammy stuff in the long run will not work for the search engines as it becomes more smarter each day. Better be safe than sorry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Most Profitable Lens on Squidoo - Earnings Revealed: ProBlogger Blog Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-229020</link>
		<dc:creator>The Most Profitable Lens on Squidoo - Earnings Revealed: ProBlogger Blog Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-229020</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m still unsure about Squidoo. My initial concerns over it&#8217;s poor SEO tactics still remain (although they&#8217;ve made a few changes including removing the word &#8216;Lenses&#8217; from the lens title tags as I suggested) and I do see a bit of spammy stuff going on there, but overall I guess I have to say based on my own experience that the jury is still out somewhat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m still unsure about Squidoo. My initial concerns over it&#8217;s poor SEO tactics still remain (although they&#8217;ve made a few changes including removing the word &#8216;Lenses&#8217; from the lens title tags as I suggested) and I do see a bit of spammy stuff going on there, but overall I guess I have to say based on my own experience that the jury is still out somewhat. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybernetics &#187; links for 2005-12-14</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-183475</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybernetics &#187; links for 2005-12-14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-183475</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Squidoo Optimized Well for Search Engines?: Blog Tips at ProBlogger (tags: squidoo Kyzen blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Squidoo Optimized Well for Search Engines?: Blog Tips at ProBlogger (tags: squidoo Kyzen blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-181407</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-181407</guid>
		<description>&quot;AJ, do you really consider ‘tidying up’ code to be about removing tabs? You’re not a Microsoft programmer, are you?&quot;

Andy, Yes. I am a developer first and formost so all my websites have been hand coded just because that is what I am used to. I initialy started indenting HTML but soon realised it was just a waste of bandwidth.

Not only does removing ALL whitespace characters mean the search engine bots have to read through less, so does your visitors browser (i.e. quicker page loading) and you also reduce your bandwith costs. 

Most bots have enough data to wade through to find the actual page content you want indexing without adding more unecessary bytes that just get ignored.

Of course whitespace is only the start and simplest to remove.

Finally a tip for you Andy...
You can get the pages working with indented HTML, then save a copy and on the original do a simple search and replace to remove the tabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;AJ, do you really consider ‘tidying up’ code to be about removing tabs? You’re not a Microsoft programmer, are you?&#8221;</p>
<p>Andy, Yes. I am a developer first and formost so all my websites have been hand coded just because that is what I am used to. I initialy started indenting HTML but soon realised it was just a waste of bandwidth.</p>
<p>Not only does removing ALL whitespace characters mean the search engine bots have to read through less, so does your visitors browser (i.e. quicker page loading) and you also reduce your bandwith costs. </p>
<p>Most bots have enough data to wade through to find the actual page content you want indexing without adding more unecessary bytes that just get ignored.</p>
<p>Of course whitespace is only the start and simplest to remove.</p>
<p>Finally a tip for you Andy&#8230;<br />
You can get the pages working with indented HTML, then save a copy and on the original do a simple search and replace to remove the tabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squidoo: First Impressions &#187; zombiecoder kay: best practices web development</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-181247</link>
		<dc:creator>Squidoo: First Impressions &#187; zombiecoder kay: best practices web development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-181247</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been playing with Squidoo - I&#8217;d read about it when Seth Godin first announced it, but didn&#8217;t check it out fully until I read about Darren Rowes&#8217; experimentations with it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been playing with Squidoo &#8211; I&#8217;d read about it when Seth Godin first announced it, but didn&#8217;t check it out fully until I read about Darren Rowes&#8217; experimentations with it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Squidoo for SEO : Blog Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180699</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Squidoo for SEO : Blog Search Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180699</guid>
		<description>[...] How many of you have opened Squidoo lens ? It&#8217;s quite a handy website that lets you create mini websites that&#8217;s akin to social bookmarking and Blogger rolled into one. Darren Rowse (Problogger) wonders if its well optimized for search engines. Frankly, I feel Squidoo will do as a personal bookmark site for the mean time and not be commercially viable yet. One of the things I’ve been wondering about it is how well it will do in terms of SEO. Will the pages there rank highly in search engines? While SE traffic might not be the prime goal of Squidoo I suspect it’s owners wouldn’t mind if their pages rank well. So how well is it optimized for Google and Yahoo!? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How many of you have opened Squidoo lens ? It&#8217;s quite a handy website that lets you create mini websites that&#8217;s akin to social bookmarking and Blogger rolled into one. Darren Rowse (Problogger) wonders if its well optimized for search engines. Frankly, I feel Squidoo will do as a personal bookmark site for the mean time and not be commercially viable yet. One of the things I’ve been wondering about it is how well it will do in terms of SEO. Will the pages there rank highly in search engines? While SE traffic might not be the prime goal of Squidoo I suspect it’s owners wouldn’t mind if their pages rank well. So how well is it optimized for Google and Yahoo!? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colbert</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180688</link>
		<dc:creator>colbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180688</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve opened a few too. not too sure if it does well for now. time will tell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve opened a few too. not too sure if it does well for now. time will tell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180663</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180663</guid>
		<description>AJ, do you really consider &#039;tidying up&#039; code to be about removing tabs? You&#039;re not a Microsoft programmer, are you?

I spent a long time on one of my blogs ensuring that the code is properly indented, because believe me, it&#039;s too complicated to spend ages working out where the DIV tag or some other piece of code should go if it&#039;s not well formatted. SEs shouldn&#039;t really care too much about either the formatting or of Javascript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ, do you really consider &#8216;tidying up&#8217; code to be about removing tabs? You&#8217;re not a Microsoft programmer, are you?</p>
<p>I spent a long time on one of my blogs ensuring that the code is properly indented, because believe me, it&#8217;s too complicated to spend ages working out where the DIV tag or some other piece of code should go if it&#8217;s not well formatted. SEs shouldn&#8217;t really care too much about either the formatting or of Javascript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignat</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180656</guid>
		<description>Darren,

John Battelle sums it up the best:

&quot;...it&#039;s built to attract search crawlers and to rank well in search, increasing the value of Adsense and other monetization schemes (there&#039;s that word again) such as affiliate networks.&quot;

You can check out his post &lt;a href=&quot;http://battellemedia.com/archives/002108.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. You can see in his &quot;UPDATE&quot; that he enjoys Squidoo and so do I :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>John Battelle sums it up the best:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;it&#8217;s built to attract search crawlers and to rank well in search, increasing the value of Adsense and other monetization schemes (there&#8217;s that word again) such as affiliate networks.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can check out his post <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002108.php" rel="nofollow">here</a>. You can see in his &#8220;UPDATE&#8221; that he enjoys Squidoo and so do I :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julieanne</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180602</link>
		<dc:creator>Julieanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180602</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren, I&#039;ve been setting up a few lenses especially for Scuba Diving. I wanted to be first to get &quot;decent names&quot;.  I noticed they are allowing numbers in the domain name which doesn&#039;t seem right to me.  Those with numbers are getting a lower ranking within Squidoo too.  

It seems they still have some work to do, so perhaps they&#039;ll see your post here and take your advice.  It will be interesting to see how the lenses work out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren, I&#8217;ve been setting up a few lenses especially for Scuba Diving. I wanted to be first to get &#8220;decent names&#8221;.  I noticed they are allowing numbers in the domain name which doesn&#8217;t seem right to me.  Those with numbers are getting a lower ranking within Squidoo too.  </p>
<p>It seems they still have some work to do, so perhaps they&#8217;ll see your post here and take your advice.  It will be interesting to see how the lenses work out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180580</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180580</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;re successful in branding then they will be able to drop the word &#039;lenses&#039; from the Title and leave just Squido together with the Lens name. And if it become a truly popular portal sytems for research then people will search by including the word &#039;Squidoo&#039; with their terms - much as they do with Wiki to see if there might be an entry in Wikipedia.

Ultimately their success in optimizing their pages will be determined by the popularity of the project - and if it does become huge then they will get away with much SEO sins that those of us with much smaller sites wouldn&#039;t.

I think we all have a lot to learn as to what role Lenses might play - maybe very little, or perhaps as Squidoo would like we&#039;ll have successful lenses about lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;re successful in branding then they will be able to drop the word &#8216;lenses&#8217; from the Title and leave just Squido together with the Lens name. And if it become a truly popular portal sytems for research then people will search by including the word &#8216;Squidoo&#8217; with their terms &#8211; much as they do with Wiki to see if there might be an entry in Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Ultimately their success in optimizing their pages will be determined by the popularity of the project &#8211; and if it does become huge then they will get away with much SEO sins that those of us with much smaller sites wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I think we all have a lot to learn as to what role Lenses might play &#8211; maybe very little, or perhaps as Squidoo would like we&#8217;ll have successful lenses about lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedbuzzard &#124; Maximize your adsense earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180464</link>
		<dc:creator>feedbuzzard &#124; Maximize your adsense earnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180464</guid>
		<description>It is my belief that meta-tags are absolutely useless in SEO.

Keywords are all but ignored, and description tags &quot;might&quot; show in your site&#039;s description in the SERPS, but that really has nothing to do with SEO, it is more of a HEO (human engine optimization).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my belief that meta-tags are absolutely useless in SEO.</p>
<p>Keywords are all but ignored, and description tags &#8220;might&#8221; show in your site&#8217;s description in the SERPS, but that really has nothing to do with SEO, it is more of a HEO (human engine optimization).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180380</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180380</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve setup a few lenses including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.squidoo.com/webcomics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;webcomics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.squidoo.com/boardgames/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;board games&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.squidoo.com/tutorials/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tutorials&lt;/a&gt;.  While I&#039;m pleased with the URLs and have lots of ideas for making these useful pages -- I agree the page title isn&#039;t very good for search engines and would like to see the &lt;em&gt;Squidoo : Lenses : xxxxxxxxxx&lt;/em&gt; structure changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve setup a few lenses including <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/webcomics/" rel="nofollow">webcomics</a>, <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/boardgames/" rel="nofollow">board games</a> and <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/tutorials/" rel="nofollow">tutorials</a>.  While I&#8217;m pleased with the URLs and have lots of ideas for making these useful pages &#8212; I agree the page title isn&#8217;t very good for search engines and would like to see the <em>Squidoo : Lenses : xxxxxxxxxx</em> structure changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/12/is-squidoo-optimized-well-for-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-180304</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1908#comment-180304</guid>
		<description>Darren,

The actual generated HTML could do with cleaning up by removing the TAB indenting and putting the java scrips in to a separate file, although this could be said for many auto generated Web Pages/Blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>The actual generated HTML could do with cleaning up by removing the TAB indenting and putting the java scrips in to a separate file, although this could be said for many auto generated Web Pages/Blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/23 queries in 0.073 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 03:44:10 -->
