<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2005 Weblog Awards Finalists Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/05/the-2005-weblog-awards-finalists-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/05/the-2005-weblog-awards-finalists-announced/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BusinessBlogWire</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/05/the-2005-weblog-awards-finalists-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-176089</link>
		<dc:creator>BusinessBlogWire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1887#comment-176089</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Are Blogging Awards Good or Evil?&lt;/strong&gt;

Earlier today, I offered a few comments at Paul Chaney&#8217;s post wherein he questions the reliability of blogging award programs (he particularly mentions his disapproval of the 2005 Weblog Awards). His main reasons for disliking blog awards: 1. Rea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are Blogging Awards Good or Evil?</strong></p>
<p>Earlier today, I offered a few comments at Paul Chaney&rsquo;s post wherein he questions the reliability of blogging award programs (he particularly mentions his disapproval of the 2005 Weblog Awards). His main reasons for disliking blog awards: 1. Rea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; links for 2005-12-06&#160;&#160;InsideGoogle &#187; part of the Blog News Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/05/the-2005-weblog-awards-finalists-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-175429</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; links for 2005-12-06&#160;&#160;InsideGoogle &#187; part of the Blog News Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 06:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1887#comment-175429</guid>
		<description>[...] The 2005 Weblog Awards Finalists Announced: Blog Tips at ProBlogger Too many good blogs in the Best Technology Blog category (tags: blogs awards) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 2005 Weblog Awards Finalists Announced: Blog Tips at ProBlogger Too many good blogs in the Best Technology Blog category (tags: blogs awards) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trollhattan Saab</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/05/the-2005-weblog-awards-finalists-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-175212</link>
		<dc:creator>Trollhattan Saab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1887#comment-175212</guid>
		<description>Have you heard any news yet, Darren?  Nothing on the Smartyhost site.  As for these awards, it&#039;s the usual set of politiblogs (yawn).  I think they just used the same names from last year, didn&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard any news yet, Darren?  Nothing on the Smartyhost site.  As for these awards, it&#8217;s the usual set of politiblogs (yawn).  I think they just used the same names from last year, didn&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
