<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Values &#8211; How Much is your Blog Worth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-1764993</link>
		<dc:creator>Darel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-1764993</guid>
		<description>The figures are hype they are not in line with the true acquisition of a business model at all.  For sure Google has purchased startups which have not made a dime but in a traditional since and good rule of thumb you simply take the gross revenue and multiply by a factor of 10.  Of line this is the same basic method I use to purchase failing businesses or profitable opportunities.  For example:  A local pizza shop posted a gross income of $127,000 last year.  The business had no real assets other then its equipment.  I purchased it for $825,000.00 in less then four months I have increased the business income five fold.  Two months ago I bought a online tool shop which sells USA made tools the online business had a blogg and a store and I bought it for very little because the owner had not created any income at all.  I bought it for $5,000 and last month I made $4k.  

In closing may I call your attention to the value of our US dollar?   Please note the devaluation is caused in part due the International Monetary Fund which stated early this year their intent to devalue the dollar by 20%.  Please note the Federal Reserve is not federally owned by privately owned by a group of small investors or &quot;Money Families&quot;  Please take the time to learn the truth about our dollar and call your congressman and senate to demand an end to the federal reserve. 

If you review history you will note we never had to worry about inflation but when the Federal Reserve started to suck our dollar and devalue the value we have had inflation, depression, hyper inflation, etc.  The very issues the fed is supposed to protect our economy from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The figures are hype they are not in line with the true acquisition of a business model at all.  For sure Google has purchased startups which have not made a dime but in a traditional since and good rule of thumb you simply take the gross revenue and multiply by a factor of 10.  Of line this is the same basic method I use to purchase failing businesses or profitable opportunities.  For example:  A local pizza shop posted a gross income of $127,000 last year.  The business had no real assets other then its equipment.  I purchased it for $825,000.00 in less then four months I have increased the business income five fold.  Two months ago I bought a online tool shop which sells USA made tools the online business had a blogg and a store and I bought it for very little because the owner had not created any income at all.  I bought it for $5,000 and last month I made $4k.  </p>
<p>In closing may I call your attention to the value of our US dollar?   Please note the devaluation is caused in part due the International Monetary Fund which stated early this year their intent to devalue the dollar by 20%.  Please note the Federal Reserve is not federally owned by privately owned by a group of small investors or &#8220;Money Families&#8221;  Please take the time to learn the truth about our dollar and call your congressman and senate to demand an end to the federal reserve. </p>
<p>If you review history you will note we never had to worry about inflation but when the Federal Reserve started to suck our dollar and devalue the value we have had inflation, depression, hyper inflation, etc.  The very issues the fed is supposed to protect our economy from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Princess Kiki</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-544333</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-544333</guid>
		<description>mine bites..ugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mine bites..ugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PreZ</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-404680</link>
		<dc:creator>PreZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-404680</guid>
		<description>My blog is easily worth 2 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog is easily worth 2 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Newberger&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bubble-Era Buyouts, more signs of the Apocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-198029</link>
		<dc:creator>David Newberger&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bubble-Era Buyouts, more signs of the Apocalypse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-198029</guid>
		<description>[...] Update 2: Darren Rowse of ProBlogger ponders what this really means. Of particular interest to me is the analysis of what the acquisition price was on a per user of the sites sold (I�m presuming that it�s daily users/visitors - although I can�t see �user� defined in the article). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update 2: Darren Rowse of ProBlogger ponders what this really means. Of particular interest to me is the analysis of what the acquisition price was on a per user of the sites sold (I�m presuming that it�s daily users/visitors &#8211; although I can�t see �user� defined in the article). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171899</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171899</guid>
		<description>What we&#039;re all talking about here is, to an economist, the &quot;willing to pay&quot; price. Ie what the buyer is prepared to fork out. The other side of the coin is called the &quot;willing to accept&quot; price (the seller&#039;s reserve). These two have to overlap if a transaction is to occur. It&#039;s a general fact that people&#039;s WTA is larger than their WTP (known as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment_effect&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;endowment effect&lt;/a&gt;). It&#039;s probably true of blogs too.

As it happens, there&#039;s only &lt;a href=&quot;http://ghill.customer.netspace.net.au/speccy/2005/11/put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one person I&#039;ve heard of who has quantified their willing to accept price - and you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/26/blogger-starts-shut-up-jar/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read it here last week!&lt;/a&gt;

Cheers,

-Greg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we&#8217;re all talking about here is, to an economist, the &#8220;willing to pay&#8221; price. Ie what the buyer is prepared to fork out. The other side of the coin is called the &#8220;willing to accept&#8221; price (the seller&#8217;s reserve). These two have to overlap if a transaction is to occur. It&#8217;s a general fact that people&#8217;s WTA is larger than their WTP (known as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment_effect" rel="nofollow">endowment effect</a>). It&#8217;s probably true of blogs too.</p>
<p>As it happens, there&#8217;s only <a href="http://ghill.customer.netspace.net.au/speccy/2005/11/put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is.html" rel="nofollow">one person I&#8217;ve heard of who has quantified their willing to accept price &#8211; and you </a><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/26/blogger-starts-shut-up-jar/#comments" rel="nofollow">read it here last week!</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-Greg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Eyed Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171751</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Eyed Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171751</guid>
		<description>Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I blogged about this over at another blog that I write for, located at http:/zoints.blogspot.com 

I&#039;m sorry if this seems like comment spam, but I just wanted to let you know since blogspot doesn&#039;t support trackbacks. :)

Here&#039;s the url of the article: http://zoints.blogspot.com/2005/11/website-buyouts-put-price-of-average.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I blogged about this over at another blog that I write for, located at http:/zoints.blogspot.com </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if this seems like comment spam, but I just wanted to let you know since blogspot doesn&#8217;t support trackbacks. :)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the url of the article: <a href="http://zoints.blogspot.com/2005/11/website-buyouts-put-price-of-average.html" rel="nofollow">http://zoints.blogspot.com/2005/11/website-buyouts-put-price-of-average.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guide To Build Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171564</link>
		<dc:creator>Guide To Build Computer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171564</guid>
		<description>Finally all business moves around dollers. The definite plan to give value to visitors and create valur inturn is important. Think of proper monetisation mechanism without disturbing the value addition system created for your users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally all business moves around dollers. The definite plan to give value to visitors and create valur inturn is important. Think of proper monetisation mechanism without disturbing the value addition system created for your users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris P.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171438</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171438</guid>
		<description>That figure seems absolutely ridiculous to me. If $38 per visitor is the current going rate for the industry, I think we ALL ought to hop on the blog bandwagon.

Clearly, this estimate doesn&#039;t apply to your typical blog, and as far as I&#039;m concerned, using Chitika and AdSense qualify as fairly cushy deals. I mean, who starts a SINGLE blog and expects to break the bank?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That figure seems absolutely ridiculous to me. If $38 per visitor is the current going rate for the industry, I think we ALL ought to hop on the blog bandwagon.</p>
<p>Clearly, this estimate doesn&#8217;t apply to your typical blog, and as far as I&#8217;m concerned, using Chitika and AdSense qualify as fairly cushy deals. I mean, who starts a SINGLE blog and expects to break the bank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Eyed Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171054</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Eyed Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171054</guid>
		<description>$38 a visitor is a VERY liberal estimate, especially for a blog, as a few other commenters have noted. My 11-month old blog, by this estimate would be worth $24,282.  However, in the 11 months that I&#039;ve had the blog, I&#039;ve only made maybe $40 total off of it. Granted, I just optimized the placement of my adsense ads a few weeks ago, but even since then I&#039;ve had only 3 actual clicks, for a grand total of $0.14. Every few months I can buy a book or a cd with my Amazon commission. 

The point is: there&#039;s no way I&#039;d pay anything near $24,282 for my blog. Would I sell it for that much? Probably not. I mean it&#039;s my personal blog, it&#039;d be pretty useless without me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$38 a visitor is a VERY liberal estimate, especially for a blog, as a few other commenters have noted. My 11-month old blog, by this estimate would be worth $24,282.  However, in the 11 months that I&#8217;ve had the blog, I&#8217;ve only made maybe $40 total off of it. Granted, I just optimized the placement of my adsense ads a few weeks ago, but even since then I&#8217;ve had only 3 actual clicks, for a grand total of $0.14. Every few months I can buy a book or a cd with my Amazon commission. </p>
<p>The point is: there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;d pay anything near $24,282 for my blog. Would I sell it for that much? Probably not. I mean it&#8217;s my personal blog, it&#8217;d be pretty useless without me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171021</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171021</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take the $824,600 and put it all on black. Or red. No wait black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take the $824,600 and put it all on black. Or red. No wait black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171013</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171013</guid>
		<description>The terminology used in the article is about being paid by eyeballers....

I&#039;d prefer it if it was $38 per users eyeball....easy way to double the money :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terminology used in the article is about being paid by eyeballers&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer it if it was $38 per users eyeball&#8230;.easy way to double the money :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171012</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171012</guid>
		<description>In many &quot;buyout&quot; situations, there are often non-competition clauses, and an extensive handover period.

A one-man business is worth nothing compared to a large network that would be sustainable even with it&#039;s head chopped off.

The sum is worth much more than it&#039;s individual parts, and allows for much greater long-term leverage.

The netwroks being picked up are in no way micro-managed, they could each through organic growth double in size each year.

I doubt most blogs if sold would realize more than 6 months revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many &#8220;buyout&#8221; situations, there are often non-competition clauses, and an extensive handover period.</p>
<p>A one-man business is worth nothing compared to a large network that would be sustainable even with it&#8217;s head chopped off.</p>
<p>The sum is worth much more than it&#8217;s individual parts, and allows for much greater long-term leverage.</p>
<p>The netwroks being picked up are in no way micro-managed, they could each through organic growth double in size each year.</p>
<p>I doubt most blogs if sold would realize more than 6 months revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Business 2.0 values Druge Report at $120 million, Gawker Media at $76 million: ambulance called as Blog Herald editor starts to choke after laughing so much The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171011</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Business 2.0 values Druge Report at $120 million, Gawker Media at $76 million: ambulance called as Blog Herald editor starts to choke after laughing so much The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171011</guid>
		<description>[...] 29th, 2005 and is filed under News Brief. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently notallowed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 29th, 2005 and is filed under News Brief. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently notallowed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171010</link>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171010</guid>
		<description>I know a lot of people may not agree with me about this not being a bubble and that the price we are seeing today is just an iceberg to the price and aquasiation that we will see in the next couple of months.
what most be notted here is that we have the mainstream so to say and the advertiser focusing on the medium at the moment and that mean a lot of cash flowing into blogs. As such blogosphere will be experencing a dramatic upturn in value. I  can bet on this. how much my blog network is worth is a factor of this and is certainly way above weblogincs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a lot of people may not agree with me about this not being a bubble and that the price we are seeing today is just an iceberg to the price and aquasiation that we will see in the next couple of months.<br />
what most be notted here is that we have the mainstream so to say and the advertiser focusing on the medium at the moment and that mean a lot of cash flowing into blogs. As such blogosphere will be experencing a dramatic upturn in value. I  can bet on this. how much my blog network is worth is a factor of this and is certainly way above weblogincs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171004</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171004</guid>
		<description>Jason C has also posted on this - along the lines of my last comment &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calacanis.com/2005/11/29/ok-lets-stop-the-bubble-machine-right-now/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason C has also posted on this &#8211; along the lines of my last comment <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2005/11/29/ok-lets-stop-the-bubble-machine-right-now/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171001</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171001</guid>
		<description>Good comment Michael - you&#039;re right. These numbers are so silly to apply to any blog/site randomly. 

The best advice I&#039;ve heard recently was Jason C who said don&#039;t build a web asset up to sell/flip - instead build a income stream. I think this applies here.

Don&#039;t make your primary goal to get to XXXXXX visitors per day or month - this guarantees nothing in terms of a sale. What people buying up websites are looking for is revenue streams and sites with traffic that can convert into sales, ad revenue or some other benefit (usually with a $ bottom line).

Still - it&#039;s fun to dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment Michael &#8211; you&#8217;re right. These numbers are so silly to apply to any blog/site randomly. </p>
<p>The best advice I&#8217;ve heard recently was Jason C who said don&#8217;t build a web asset up to sell/flip &#8211; instead build a income stream. I think this applies here.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t make your primary goal to get to XXXXXX visitors per day or month &#8211; this guarantees nothing in terms of a sale. What people buying up websites are looking for is revenue streams and sites with traffic that can convert into sales, ad revenue or some other benefit (usually with a $ bottom line).</p>
<p>Still &#8211; it&#8217;s fun to dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-171000</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-171000</guid>
		<description>Does that mean that now the Technorati based valuations are defunct? Damm. It was informing to read how much people&#039;s blogs where worth based on inbound links. At least now we&#039;ve got a real high quality scale to measure the value of blogs. Oh wait but won&#039;t one blog&#039;s vistors be worth more on a per user basis than anothers? Of course it will but it&#039;s a great little topic to get everyone excited so they get commenting and linking so lets post it anyway. Why anyone would link to this BS for any other reason is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean that now the Technorati based valuations are defunct? Damm. It was informing to read how much people&#8217;s blogs where worth based on inbound links. At least now we&#8217;ve got a real high quality scale to measure the value of blogs. Oh wait but won&#8217;t one blog&#8217;s vistors be worth more on a per user basis than anothers? Of course it will but it&#8217;s a great little topic to get everyone excited so they get commenting and linking so lets post it anyway. Why anyone would link to this BS for any other reason is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-170998</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-170998</guid>
		<description>Wow, I see my site as worthless and something to mess around on.  Using this estimate, I would be worth around $12k.  Some one would have to be crazy to even think about buying it for that much.  Heh, I would take $200 and just start working on something else.  I always have tons of other projects I wish I had the time for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I see my site as worthless and something to mess around on.  Using this estimate, I would be worth around $12k.  Some one would have to be crazy to even think about buying it for that much.  Heh, I would take $200 and just start working on something else.  I always have tons of other projects I wish I had the time for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Currie</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-170997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Currie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-170997</guid>
		<description>My two main sites fluctuate between 5k and 12k uniques a day. And they have done that in four months so I am pretty confident that they will hit a collective 20k uniques per day this time next year.

Fun as it is to contemplate $38.00/u/ day or 300,000 times call it $40.00 for a monthly value of 12 million, I look at my revenue numbers and know two things. First, I&#039;d be insane not to sell at that price. Second, just not quite as crazy as the person willing to buy.

A more realistic mental evaluation is this - lets say you make $1000.00 per month from your blog. At current interest rates - say 3% - how much money would you have to have in the bank to equal that return? Call it $400,000.00 and you would be about right. 

Now, do the same equation but demand that the value of the equity and the amount you make double every six months....there are no bank accounts which do that. Google shares have done the first part in the last year; but with no income to the shareholders.

Plus, and here is the key part, other than your time, what else have you invested? Most blogs are started with an investment of, well, zero. Which means ROI is effectively infinite.

Last, if you take a look at your time, and you want to have a little fun, along with the $ per month/hours add the month over month increase in equity. On the two blogs I am writing about I have seen a theoretical $100,000 a month increase in my equity on my more conservative projections. My paper per hour earnings, as these blogs take me an hour a day, are staggering....Now if I could just find a buyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two main sites fluctuate between 5k and 12k uniques a day. And they have done that in four months so I am pretty confident that they will hit a collective 20k uniques per day this time next year.</p>
<p>Fun as it is to contemplate $38.00/u/ day or 300,000 times call it $40.00 for a monthly value of 12 million, I look at my revenue numbers and know two things. First, I&#8217;d be insane not to sell at that price. Second, just not quite as crazy as the person willing to buy.</p>
<p>A more realistic mental evaluation is this &#8211; lets say you make $1000.00 per month from your blog. At current interest rates &#8211; say 3% &#8211; how much money would you have to have in the bank to equal that return? Call it $400,000.00 and you would be about right. </p>
<p>Now, do the same equation but demand that the value of the equity and the amount you make double every six months&#8230;.there are no bank accounts which do that. Google shares have done the first part in the last year; but with no income to the shareholders.</p>
<p>Plus, and here is the key part, other than your time, what else have you invested? Most blogs are started with an investment of, well, zero. Which means ROI is effectively infinite.</p>
<p>Last, if you take a look at your time, and you want to have a little fun, along with the $ per month/hours add the month over month increase in equity. On the two blogs I am writing about I have seen a theoretical $100,000 a month increase in my equity on my more conservative projections. My paper per hour earnings, as these blogs take me an hour a day, are staggering&#8230;.Now if I could just find a buyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Ritchey</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/29/blog-value/comment-page-1/#comment-170994</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Ritchey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1857#comment-170994</guid>
		<description>Michael Moncur&#039;s point about acquisitions is generally true- acquisitions tend to be overpriced.  That said, I&#039;m not sure we are in the bubble phase of blogs yet as advertisiers are just discovering blogs. 

Expressed another way, I think the available advertising dollars has just begun and the advertising models we have may be their infancy.  I haven&#039;t thought enough about the $38 number- but remember that takes into consideration the present revenue and discounted value of the future.  As Darren says, some blog content is worth much more than others.

As some have said, the blog author is important for some blogs and I would want the author on board for six months or a year-through a contract- before purchasing.  Otherwise it is just a domain, a title, and an archive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moncur&#8217;s point about acquisitions is generally true- acquisitions tend to be overpriced.  That said, I&#8217;m not sure we are in the bubble phase of blogs yet as advertisiers are just discovering blogs. </p>
<p>Expressed another way, I think the available advertising dollars has just begun and the advertising models we have may be their infancy.  I haven&#8217;t thought enough about the $38 number- but remember that takes into consideration the present revenue and discounted value of the future.  As Darren says, some blog content is worth much more than others.</p>
<p>As some have said, the blog author is important for some blogs and I would want the author on board for six months or a year-through a contract- before purchasing.  Otherwise it is just a domain, a title, and an archive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
