<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feedster Top 500 Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Johansson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-167350</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Johansson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-167350</guid>
		<description>I also made it onto the list for the first time. I&#039;m a little surprised to see that it&#039;s only sent one or two visitors my way so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also made it onto the list for the first time. I&#8217;m a little surprised to see that it&#8217;s only sent one or two visitors my way so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-167335</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-167335</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think it is, but  I assumed there was at least some kind of correlation between that and traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think it is, but  I assumed there was at least some kind of correlation between that and traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-167321</link>
		<dc:creator>IO ERROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-167321</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that the top 500 list was ranked more-or-less by inbound links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that the top 500 list was ranked more-or-less by inbound links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-167215</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-167215</guid>
		<description>At first glance, the upper echelon of the list contained no surprises, all very well known blogs, all somewhat skewed to an internet-savvy urban audience.

When I thought a bit more about it, I started to think about my own feed.  I get what I think is fairly reasonable traffic to my site - Sitemeter tells me we&#039;ve had nearly 600k visits this month - but the RSS feed has never taken off - I have about 250 subscribers.

Gridskipper, on the other hand, is #11 on feedsters&#039;s list - great positioning. Yet take a look at gridskipper&#039;s traffic figures:

http://www.nickdenton.org/002013.html

Unless I&#039;m reading that wrong, Gridskipper is averaging only about 5-6k visits a day.  Which would suggest their RSS feed is MUCH more popular than the site itself.  If anything, this has to show that the monetization of RSS feeds is going to become a top priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, the upper echelon of the list contained no surprises, all very well known blogs, all somewhat skewed to an internet-savvy urban audience.</p>
<p>When I thought a bit more about it, I started to think about my own feed.  I get what I think is fairly reasonable traffic to my site &#8211; Sitemeter tells me we&#8217;ve had nearly 600k visits this month &#8211; but the RSS feed has never taken off &#8211; I have about 250 subscribers.</p>
<p>Gridskipper, on the other hand, is #11 on feedsters&#8217;s list &#8211; great positioning. Yet take a look at gridskipper&#8217;s traffic figures:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nickdenton.org/002013.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nickdenton.org/002013.html</a></p>
<p>Unless I&#8217;m reading that wrong, Gridskipper is averaging only about 5-6k visits a day.  Which would suggest their RSS feed is MUCH more popular than the site itself.  If anything, this has to show that the monetization of RSS feeds is going to become a top priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Johnson of Feedster</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-167046</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Johnson of Feedster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-167046</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren, 

I&#039;m sorry for the problems you&#039;ve had and, seeing this entry, I took the liberty of uploading the picture from your blog for you.  Hope this helps.

Best
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry for the problems you&#8217;ve had and, seeing this entry, I took the liberty of uploading the picture from your blog for you.  Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Best<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-166955</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-166955</guid>
		<description>Darren-

Congrats on making it again! We have put a link on the right hand side of the top 500 page that says, &quot;click here to add your own icon&quot; Give it a try, Scott has really flushed a lot of the problems out of the icon system, so it should work. If that still doesn&#039;t work, you can email your pic to jgross AT feedster dot com and I will do it for you. We really want to get everyone in the top 500 to have their own icon. 

Thanks for the feedback.
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren-</p>
<p>Congrats on making it again! We have put a link on the right hand side of the top 500 page that says, &#8220;click here to add your own icon&#8221; Give it a try, Scott has really flushed a lot of the problems out of the icon system, so it should work. If that still doesn&#8217;t work, you can email your pic to jgross AT feedster dot com and I will do it for you. We really want to get everyone in the top 500 to have their own icon. </p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/23/feedster-top-500-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-166937</link>
		<dc:creator>IO ERROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1825#comment-166937</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;m on the list for the first time at #457. Now, I guess I&#039;d better figure out where they got those tags from, and add a few new ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m on the list for the first time at #457. Now, I guess I&#8217;d better figure out where they got those tags from, and add a few new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
