<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good News and Bad News for Chitika Publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-166508</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-166508</guid>
		<description>Nice - I&#039;m a contradictory kind of guy! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8211; I&#8217;m a contradictory kind of guy! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varun</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-166487</link>
		<dc:creator>Varun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-166487</guid>
		<description>The sentence &lt;em&gt;&quot;It looks like things might have been tipped a little in favor of the publishers &quot;&lt;/em&gt; actually contradicts what you say later...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sentence <em>&#8220;It looks like things might have been tipped a little in favor of the publishers &#8220;</em> actually contradicts what you say later&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-166219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-166219</guid>
		<description>Chitika has updated their blog page to explain the curiousity clicks issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chitika has updated their blog page to explain the curiousity clicks issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Chin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-163721</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-163721</guid>
		<description>I echo what Mark Goldstein said. I&#039;ve just logged in to my Chitika account to note a tremendous drop in earnings - way more than half. Thanks Darren, for posting this - everything makes sense now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo what Mark Goldstein said. I&#8217;ve just logged in to my Chitika account to note a tremendous drop in earnings &#8211; way more than half. Thanks Darren, for posting this &#8211; everything makes sense now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-163630</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-163630</guid>
		<description>Blimey, they certainly meant what they said! My clickthrough rate and revenue has dropped by half overnight. I don&#039;t think their 10% adjustment is quite going to cover it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey, they certainly meant what they said! My clickthrough rate and revenue has dropped by half overnight. I don&#8217;t think their 10% adjustment is quite going to cover it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz Web Development &#187; Chitika Revenue Dropping?</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-163564</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz Web Development &#187; Chitika Revenue Dropping?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-163564</guid>
		<description>[...] Darren at Problogger.net mentions a change that Chitika is going through right now. After getting some more information from the Chitika support staff I think I understand what they&#8217;re going to do. Some of the text links on the ads are going to be converted to static links to the advertiser&#8217;s product description. From my understanding the links in the tabs (Best Deals, Search, etc) will still count toward your click through. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren at Problogger.net mentions a change that Chitika is going through right now. After getting some more information from the Chitika support staff I think I understand what they&#8217;re going to do. Some of the text links on the ads are going to be converted to static links to the advertiser&#8217;s product description. From my understanding the links in the tabs (Best Deals, Search, etc) will still count toward your click through. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-163142</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-163142</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still trying to build traffic levels, although I can see chitika ads performing best on my &quot;HART&#039;s Picks&quot; blog, than my other blogs. As for this topic .. I honestly don&#039;t like it being called &quot;curiousity clicks&quot; when there is an &quot;unaudited&quot; and &quot;audited&quot; difference. Does it not seem hypocritical to do both? If they have to adjust the rate - fine. We know they adjust the clicks for fraudulent clicking - fine. But - it just does not seem right doing both -  when you are hoping for some click rate, no matter how small, to earn you something. It&#039;s almost like putting amazon ads on  your site .. they don&#039;t pay  you commission until there is a sale. Is this where chitika is moving towards? If chitika is to survive, naturally they have to do what&#039;s best for themselves.

Maybe that geo-targetting will help for the publishers. Although,  being canadian myself, I hate surfing and clicking on other people&#039;s ads and getting &quot;Sorry-your are out of advertisers area&quot; message. Those alternate URL should be forced in those cases. We can create code to give a rough idea what to show, but we know nothing about the advertisers&#039; geo preferences being displayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still trying to build traffic levels, although I can see chitika ads performing best on my &#8220;HART&#8217;s Picks&#8221; blog, than my other blogs. As for this topic .. I honestly don&#8217;t like it being called &#8220;curiousity clicks&#8221; when there is an &#8220;unaudited&#8221; and &#8220;audited&#8221; difference. Does it not seem hypocritical to do both? If they have to adjust the rate &#8211; fine. We know they adjust the clicks for fraudulent clicking &#8211; fine. But &#8211; it just does not seem right doing both &#8211;  when you are hoping for some click rate, no matter how small, to earn you something. It&#8217;s almost like putting amazon ads on  your site .. they don&#8217;t pay  you commission until there is a sale. Is this where chitika is moving towards? If chitika is to survive, naturally they have to do what&#8217;s best for themselves.</p>
<p>Maybe that geo-targetting will help for the publishers. Although,  being canadian myself, I hate surfing and clicking on other people&#8217;s ads and getting &#8220;Sorry-your are out of advertisers area&#8221; message. Those alternate URL should be forced in those cases. We can create code to give a rough idea what to show, but we know nothing about the advertisers&#8217; geo preferences being displayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcunix</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-163113</link>
		<dc:creator>pcunix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-163113</guid>
		<description>I am also considering removing Chitika.  In fact, my finger is poised over the code in another window right now.

The payoff has been very, very low: a small percentage of what Google or Yahoo do.    I gave them a small percentage of my page views, but even when I tried increasing that, the results were dismal: $3.00  for the same number of pageviews that would bring in $30.00 on Google or Yahoo.

But I *like* the ads, and I just do not understand why they don&#039;t do better.  They are on-target, they look good, it just doesn&#039;t make sense.  When I hear Darren and other people say they are doing well, I believe them: these *should* do well.  But for some reason they just do not work for me.

I was going to say I might as well let &#039;em run out the month, but really, it&#039;s pointless.   A 10% bonus on a couple of bucks doesn&#039;t amount to anything.  Even Amazon does better than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also considering removing Chitika.  In fact, my finger is poised over the code in another window right now.</p>
<p>The payoff has been very, very low: a small percentage of what Google or Yahoo do.    I gave them a small percentage of my page views, but even when I tried increasing that, the results were dismal: $3.00  for the same number of pageviews that would bring in $30.00 on Google or Yahoo.</p>
<p>But I *like* the ads, and I just do not understand why they don&#8217;t do better.  They are on-target, they look good, it just doesn&#8217;t make sense.  When I hear Darren and other people say they are doing well, I believe them: these *should* do well.  But for some reason they just do not work for me.</p>
<p>I was going to say I might as well let &#8216;em run out the month, but really, it&#8217;s pointless.   A 10% bonus on a couple of bucks doesn&#8217;t amount to anything.  Even Amazon does better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162741</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162741</guid>
		<description>I think Chitika should shift more responsibility to advertisers by having an advertiser write the description. Then, only allow Chitika ads to default open with the description. 

As it stands, advertisers can place full responsibility on Chitika for poor ad performance. Chitika should take a lesson from Adsense and distribute the responsibility for ad performance.

I believe Chitika promised exceptional click rates to advertisers and they have delivered exactly that. I&#039;m also convinced that advertisers translate high click through to high conversion. When that didn&#039;t happen Chitika was took full responsibility, that&#039;s just not appropriate.

Chitika is a wonderful business model with high potential for advertisers and promoters. In order to pull it off they are going to have to shift some of the responsibility back to the advertisers by requiring them to actively participate in ad writing (descriptions). So when an ad under performs it&#039;s not just Chitika that is held responsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Chitika should shift more responsibility to advertisers by having an advertiser write the description. Then, only allow Chitika ads to default open with the description. </p>
<p>As it stands, advertisers can place full responsibility on Chitika for poor ad performance. Chitika should take a lesson from Adsense and distribute the responsibility for ad performance.</p>
<p>I believe Chitika promised exceptional click rates to advertisers and they have delivered exactly that. I&#8217;m also convinced that advertisers translate high click through to high conversion. When that didn&#8217;t happen Chitika was took full responsibility, that&#8217;s just not appropriate.</p>
<p>Chitika is a wonderful business model with high potential for advertisers and promoters. In order to pull it off they are going to have to shift some of the responsibility back to the advertisers by requiring them to actively participate in ad writing (descriptions). So when an ad under performs it&#8217;s not just Chitika that is held responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162740</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162740</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Chitika&#039;s had its own share of problems with click fraud because of all the publicity they&#039;ve been getting. It may be more of a problem than you think. But yes, I&#039;m sure there are &quot;gawkers&quot; who are just kicking the tires and causing the advertisers to pay for no good reason, hence the change. I guess &quot;click fraud&quot; is a bit harsh, but &quot;non-converting clicks&quot; is obviously a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Chitika&#8217;s had its own share of problems with click fraud because of all the publicity they&#8217;ve been getting. It may be more of a problem than you think. But yes, I&#8217;m sure there are &#8220;gawkers&#8221; who are just kicking the tires and causing the advertisers to pay for no good reason, hence the change. I guess &#8220;click fraud&#8221; is a bit harsh, but &#8220;non-converting clicks&#8221; is obviously a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Estes</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162736</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Estes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162736</guid>
		<description>The only thing I have seen with them is plenty of impressions and very few clicks,hopefully this will get better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I have seen with them is plenty of impressions and very few clicks,hopefully this will get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162735</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162735</guid>
		<description>I translate &#039;curiosity clicks&#039; not as click fraud (if someone wants to do that they&#039;ll do it whatever you do to the ads) but as people who click with less intention of buying than people who click because they&#039;re in the market...


its a bit of a bizarre one - on one level I understand it but it seems strange that they have to make it harder to click an ad to make it more valuable to advertisers. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I translate &#8216;curiosity clicks&#8217; not as click fraud (if someone wants to do that they&#8217;ll do it whatever you do to the ads) but as people who click with less intention of buying than people who click because they&#8217;re in the market&#8230;</p>
<p>its a bit of a bizarre one &#8211; on one level I understand it but it seems strange that they have to make it harder to click an ad to make it more valuable to advertisers. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashif</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162732</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162732</guid>
		<description>I am still waiting for October audits. After that I will be able to ascertain if chitika is better than adsense or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still waiting for October audits. After that I will be able to ascertain if chitika is better than adsense or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162729</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162729</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I didn&#039;t read “curiosity clicks” as meaning click fraud at all...I was kind of picturing people who click just to get more info, but not to actually buy.

Hey James, I really dig your site :) You might consider targeting *specific* products you think your readers would be interested in...also, I would highly recommend Chitika Ads on your individual post pages, either directly above or directly below your post...this is the placement that does well on my sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I didn&#8217;t read “curiosity clicks” as meaning click fraud at all&#8230;I was kind of picturing people who click just to get more info, but not to actually buy.</p>
<p>Hey James, I really dig your site :) You might consider targeting *specific* products you think your readers would be interested in&#8230;also, I would highly recommend Chitika Ads on your individual post pages, either directly above or directly below your post&#8230;this is the placement that does well on my sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162724</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162724</guid>
		<description>Chitika&#039;s terminology is funny, &quot;curiosity clicks&quot; is the politest term for &quot;click fraud&quot; that I&#039;ve seen so far. Makes it sound almost positive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chitika&#8217;s terminology is funny, &#8220;curiosity clicks&#8221; is the politest term for &#8220;click fraud&#8221; that I&#8217;ve seen so far. Makes it sound almost positive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162720</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162720</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had extremely low CTR with Chitika, to the point that I&#039;ll be removing it from my site. It simply doesn&#039;t perform as well in my niche as Adsense. I can see how it could be a profitable marketing tool for selling goods like cameras on a camera review site, but the lack of effective targeting causes no end of problems in a less targeted niche.

To compound Chitika&#039;s faults, I suspect there&#039;ll be a massive Chitika backlash eventually. Their ads are incredibly distinctive and seem to be popping up everywhere. I already ignore them, and I expect Chitika ad-blindness will be a growing problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had extremely low CTR with Chitika, to the point that I&#8217;ll be removing it from my site. It simply doesn&#8217;t perform as well in my niche as Adsense. I can see how it could be a profitable marketing tool for selling goods like cameras on a camera review site, but the lack of effective targeting causes no end of problems in a less targeted niche.</p>
<p>To compound Chitika&#8217;s faults, I suspect there&#8217;ll be a massive Chitika backlash eventually. Their ads are incredibly distinctive and seem to be popping up everywhere. I already ignore them, and I expect Chitika ad-blindness will be a growing problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162685</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Jacob, I have a few sites in different niches and despite tragetting tight products, still I&#039;m only seeing .20/click on average with only a fraction of Adsense&#039;s CTR. Still trying to figure out what the fuss is all about with these ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Jacob, I have a few sites in different niches and despite tragetting tight products, still I&#8217;m only seeing .20/click on average with only a fraction of Adsense&#8217;s CTR. Still trying to figure out what the fuss is all about with these ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162649</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162649</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had nothing but good times with Chitika, and while no one wants to lose revenue, if it helps keep Chitika viable I&#039;m all for it.

A little short-term loss for long-term gain isn&#039;t a problem for me at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had nothing but good times with Chitika, and while no one wants to lose revenue, if it helps keep Chitika viable I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
<p>A little short-term loss for long-term gain isn&#8217;t a problem for me at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162538</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162538</guid>
		<description>Good point Jacob. I completely take your point and should have qualified that (and I will) with that I was speaking of my own personal experience.

In terms of the referral program - yep you&#039;re right. I do use it (along with every other Tom Dick and Harry. But I don&#039;t use it in every post (including this one).

I think I&#039;m pretty fair with my review of Chitika. I&#039;ve acknowledged a low CTR in my review of it as well as other negatives including that it doesn&#039;t perform as well on non product sites, that their statistics has a lot of room to grow etc.

Yep my experience is excellent overall in terms of earnings - it&#039;s been around triple Adsense the past week - so why wouldn&#039;t I rave about it? I attempt to contain my excitement about it and give realistic reviews but sometimes I guess it all just bubbles over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Jacob. I completely take your point and should have qualified that (and I will) with that I was speaking of my own personal experience.</p>
<p>In terms of the referral program &#8211; yep you&#8217;re right. I do use it (along with every other Tom Dick and Harry. But I don&#8217;t use it in every post (including this one).</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m pretty fair with my review of Chitika. I&#8217;ve acknowledged a low CTR in my review of it as well as other negatives including that it doesn&#8217;t perform as well on non product sites, that their statistics has a lot of room to grow etc.</p>
<p>Yep my experience is excellent overall in terms of earnings &#8211; it&#8217;s been around triple Adsense the past week &#8211; so why wouldn&#8217;t I rave about it? I attempt to contain my excitement about it and give realistic reviews but sometimes I guess it all just bubbles over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/16/good-news-and-bad-news-for-chitika-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-162489</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1797#comment-162489</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right to state something such as: &quot;already generous click values&quot; when referring to Chitika. That is an untrue generalization. You&#039;re inflating the program to something that it isn&#039;t. 

It all depends on the products displayed in the Chitika ads.

I&#039;m in a fairly tight niche, and the click values on my Chitika ads are more consistent than AdSense, but when everything is averaged out, my click value is higher on AdSense.

As for the CTR, I have my Chitika ads optimized quite well, I think, and it&#039;s despicably low. I have strong double digit CTR with AdSense and low single digit CTR with Chitika on the same page. In fact, if CTR drops on Chitika, it&#039;s going to start looking like most affiliate programs I&#039;ve attempted to promote: no profit for my efforts.

Your experience sounds good, but you have something to gain by saying nice things and promoting their referral program, which seems out of character for you, based on what I&#039;ve been reading for months...but it&#039;s important not to state generalizations that are not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right to state something such as: &#8220;already generous click values&#8221; when referring to Chitika. That is an untrue generalization. You&#8217;re inflating the program to something that it isn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>It all depends on the products displayed in the Chitika ads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a fairly tight niche, and the click values on my Chitika ads are more consistent than AdSense, but when everything is averaged out, my click value is higher on AdSense.</p>
<p>As for the CTR, I have my Chitika ads optimized quite well, I think, and it&#8217;s despicably low. I have strong double digit CTR with AdSense and low single digit CTR with Chitika on the same page. In fact, if CTR drops on Chitika, it&#8217;s going to start looking like most affiliate programs I&#8217;ve attempted to promote: no profit for my efforts.</p>
<p>Your experience sounds good, but you have something to gain by saying nice things and promoting their referral program, which seems out of character for you, based on what I&#8217;ve been reading for months&#8230;but it&#8217;s important not to state generalizations that are not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
