<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:49:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pcunix</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/comment-page-1/#comment-158625</link>
		<dc:creator>pcunix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1783#comment-158625</guid>
		<description>No, not everyone has a G5 Powerbook.  I have an iBook :-)

One thing I dislike about posts like that is the &quot;Secrets of &quot; title.   OK, sure, there are techniques and things you need to know, but the biggest &quot;secret&quot; is plain old hard work as Darren says over and over again.

I had a discussion with someone the other say who felt that one post per week was sufficient.  I agreed that one good post per week is better than seven junk posts, but I did insist that raw volume has a lot to do with success.  Darren says he does dozens of posts daily; I can&#039;t do that yet, but I do four and am trying to increase that.

The more work you put out, the more chance of it being seen and read.  I don&#039;t mean one liners pointing to someone else&#039;s site, but real posts of 200 to 500 words or so.

That was something I pointed out to my weekly posting person: his posts could sometimes be broken into smaller chunks that individually would be more focused and thus have more chance of being indexed correctly, linked to, etc.

Anyway, I&#039;m rambling.  Hard work pays off, or at least makes you so tired that you don&#039;t care :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not everyone has a G5 Powerbook.  I have an iBook :-)</p>
<p>One thing I dislike about posts like that is the &#8220;Secrets of &#8221; title.   OK, sure, there are techniques and things you need to know, but the biggest &#8220;secret&#8221; is plain old hard work as Darren says over and over again.</p>
<p>I had a discussion with someone the other say who felt that one post per week was sufficient.  I agreed that one good post per week is better than seven junk posts, but I did insist that raw volume has a lot to do with success.  Darren says he does dozens of posts daily; I can&#8217;t do that yet, but I do four and am trying to increase that.</p>
<p>The more work you put out, the more chance of it being seen and read.  I don&#8217;t mean one liners pointing to someone else&#8217;s site, but real posts of 200 to 500 words or so.</p>
<p>That was something I pointed out to my weekly posting person: his posts could sometimes be broken into smaller chunks that individually would be more focused and thus have more chance of being indexed correctly, linked to, etc.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m rambling.  Hard work pays off, or at least makes you so tired that you don&#8217;t care :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/comment-page-1/#comment-158587</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1783#comment-158587</guid>
		<description>LOL - you mean I&#039;m the only one with a G5 powerbook? Steve Jobs told me everyone had one ... :-)

Sorry about that - must have written it just after I ordered my G5 Powermac....doh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL &#8211; you mean I&#8217;m the only one with a G5 powerbook? Steve Jobs told me everyone had one &#8230; :-)</p>
<p>Sorry about that &#8211; must have written it just after I ordered my G5 Powermac&#8230;.doh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Houghton</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/comment-page-1/#comment-158586</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1783#comment-158586</guid>
		<description>Is there something you&#039;re not telling us? I want a G5 powerbook, dammit! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there something you&#8217;re not telling us? I want a G5 powerbook, dammit! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Maddalone</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/comment-page-1/#comment-158340</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Maddalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1783#comment-158340</guid>
		<description>It seems like a well-rounded intro (promo piece?) to Darren and  for many.  The formatting blows - but otherwise a nice overview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a well-rounded intro (promo piece?) to Darren and  for many.  The formatting blows &#8211; but otherwise a nice overview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradFitz</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/11/interview/comment-page-1/#comment-158139</link>
		<dc:creator>BradFitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1783#comment-158139</guid>
		<description>Wow, he really needs to format that article, I didn&#039;t read it because it&#039;s not very user-friendly and I don&#039;t feel like copying and pasting URLS all day.  Sorry this is a peeve of mine because it seems like laziness when bloggers just cut and paste transcripts from a text file and call it good.  If you&#039;re going to go to that much trouble to get an interview, at least do the job right.

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a great interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, he really needs to format that article, I didn&#8217;t read it because it&#8217;s not very user-friendly and I don&#8217;t feel like copying and pasting URLS all day.  Sorry this is a peeve of mine because it seems like laziness when bloggers just cut and paste transcripts from a text file and call it good.  If you&#8217;re going to go to that much trouble to get an interview, at least do the job right.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s a great interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
