<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Meta Tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-214299</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-214299</guid>
		<description>Do you think this site is for real? It pulls meta tags from anyone&#039;s webpage. Is there a way to prevent someone from seeing my meta tags? I find this useful but I don&#039;t think we should take someone else&#039;s work? 

What&#039;s your opinion?

The address is http://www.metasucker.com - you enter the website and then you can see the meta tags on the website page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think this site is for real? It pulls meta tags from anyone&#8217;s webpage. Is there a way to prevent someone from seeing my meta tags? I find this useful but I don&#8217;t think we should take someone else&#8217;s work? </p>
<p>What&#8217;s your opinion?</p>
<p>The address is <a href="http://www.metasucker.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.metasucker.com</a> &#8211; you enter the website and then you can see the meta tags on the website page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fintan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-157206</link>
		<dc:creator>Fintan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-157206</guid>
		<description>I know what meta tags are, Darren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what meta tags are, Darren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard McGarry</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-157181</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-157181</guid>
		<description>Ideally, your meta tags would change between pages to reflect the content of each individual page.

I&#039;ve managed this in the past with ASP applications (not blogs! Shock! Horror!), where I&#039;ve used information stored in the database to generate keywords and title tags dynamically, based on the content of that page.

Also, as I understand it, MSN Search gives some weighting toward Meta tags, although I haven&#039;t yet verified this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, your meta tags would change between pages to reflect the content of each individual page.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve managed this in the past with ASP applications (not blogs! Shock! Horror!), where I&#8217;ve used information stored in the database to generate keywords and title tags dynamically, based on the content of that page.</p>
<p>Also, as I understand it, MSN Search gives some weighting toward Meta tags, although I haven&#8217;t yet verified this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-156990</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-156990</guid>
		<description>Look at it this way -- if your pages are well-crafted, it should be easy to fill in the meta tags. If you can&#039;t describe the page in one or two sentences, or come up with a list of keywords for the page, then perhaps you need to work some more on the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at it this way &#8212; if your pages are well-crafted, it should be easy to fill in the meta tags. If you can&#8217;t describe the page in one or two sentences, or come up with a list of keywords for the page, then perhaps you need to work some more on the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matiasn</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-156865</link>
		<dc:creator>matiasn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-156865</guid>
		<description>welly well. Still, keyword stuffed content is getting many sites to top positions.
its disgusting. 
at matt cuts blog i ve just seen examples that are simply funny .. or ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welly well. Still, keyword stuffed content is getting many sites to top positions.<br />
its disgusting.<br />
at matt cuts blog i ve just seen examples that are simply funny .. or ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Wynia</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-156863</link>
		<dc:creator>J Wynia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-156863</guid>
		<description>The key is that there is no one audience for a given HTML page. And, just because something&#039;s not useful for one of those audiences, doesn&#039;t mean that another doesn&#039;t need it. The best pages combine and blend the needs of all of the audiences together.

I&#039;ve been looking at using the Yahoo keyword extraction api to populate those tags as a reinforcement of the content of the page. We&#039;ll see how it turns out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key is that there is no one audience for a given HTML page. And, just because something&#8217;s not useful for one of those audiences, doesn&#8217;t mean that another doesn&#8217;t need it. The best pages combine and blend the needs of all of the audiences together.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at using the Yahoo keyword extraction api to populate those tags as a reinforcement of the content of the page. We&#8217;ll see how it turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-156798</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-156798</guid>
		<description>Fintan - not talking about tagging pages - but &#039;metatags&#039; which is.... well just read the article I linked to - Yaro explains it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fintan &#8211; not talking about tagging pages &#8211; but &#8216;metatags&#8217; which is&#8230;. well just read the article I linked to &#8211; Yaro explains it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fintan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/10/on-meta-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-156560</link>
		<dc:creator>Fintan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1771#comment-156560</guid>
		<description>Tagging pages is Web 2.0, surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagging pages is Web 2.0, surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.130 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 22:47:46 -->
