<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Affiliate Programs &#8211; Transparency and Disclaimers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-146924</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-146924</guid>
		<description>Quality content is the most important issue.  Shoeblogs is a great example, many of his posts contain affiliate links to products.  And the posts are surrounded by ads.  So what, the blog&#039;s loyal readers keep coming back, probably purchasing from the affiliated merchants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality content is the most important issue.  Shoeblogs is a great example, many of his posts contain affiliate links to products.  And the posts are surrounded by ads.  So what, the blog&#8217;s loyal readers keep coming back, probably purchasing from the affiliated merchants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-145654</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-145654</guid>
		<description>On my blog I will mention that I&#039;m an affiliate if I&#039;m actively reviewing something, whether I like the product or not. When I&#039;m just writing about a topic in which an affiliate&#039;s name appears but isn&#039;t really suggesting readers signup then I&#039;ll add in the affiliate link at the first mention of the vendor, not link the subsequent mentions, and not disclose I&#039;m an affiliate.

I think many readers are savvy enough to realize what links are affiliate links and those that aren&#039;t. The ones who can&#039;t tell the difference probably don&#039;t care.

The only situation in which I see disclosure being important and absolutely necessary is when you review a product and strongly advocate for it, such as your recent reviews of Chitika’s eMiniMalls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my blog I will mention that I&#8217;m an affiliate if I&#8217;m actively reviewing something, whether I like the product or not. When I&#8217;m just writing about a topic in which an affiliate&#8217;s name appears but isn&#8217;t really suggesting readers signup then I&#8217;ll add in the affiliate link at the first mention of the vendor, not link the subsequent mentions, and not disclose I&#8217;m an affiliate.</p>
<p>I think many readers are savvy enough to realize what links are affiliate links and those that aren&#8217;t. The ones who can&#8217;t tell the difference probably don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>The only situation in which I see disclosure being important and absolutely necessary is when you review a product and strongly advocate for it, such as your recent reviews of Chitika’s eMiniMalls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-145423</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-145423</guid>
		<description>I suppose it depends on the site and the product.

My blogs on niche marketing I don&#039;t worry about it. My readers know I include affiliate links.

It get more interesting when you use a registered domain name to redirect a link in a frame, even more so when you include it in an article bio that is submitted to article directories.

Then the windfall when the article gets picked up by a mailing list....

It is nice when you receive an email from the owner of a product or service asking &quot;what did you do?&quot; as your sales just explode for a day or so, especially when the article was actually published 2 months previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it depends on the site and the product.</p>
<p>My blogs on niche marketing I don&#8217;t worry about it. My readers know I include affiliate links.</p>
<p>It get more interesting when you use a registered domain name to redirect a link in a frame, even more so when you include it in an article bio that is submitted to article directories.</p>
<p>Then the windfall when the article gets picked up by a mailing list&#8230;.</p>
<p>It is nice when you receive an email from the owner of a product or service asking &#8220;what did you do?&#8221; as your sales just explode for a day or so, especially when the article was actually published 2 months previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReveNews - Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-145385</link>
		<dc:creator>ReveNews - Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-145385</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bloggers Don&#039;t Know Squat About Affiliate Marketing&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s true. The &quot;new breed&quot; of bloggers out there are really just discovering the power of a rev-share relationship. They have become spoiled by the contextual model and are only just beginning to see that performance based marketing techniques, espe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bloggers Don&#8217;t Know Squat About Affiliate Marketing</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s true. The &#8220;new breed&#8221; of bloggers out there are really just discovering the power of a rev-share relationship. They have become spoiled by the contextual model and are only just beginning to see that performance based marketing techniques, espe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-145381</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-145381</guid>
		<description>Hey Darren, this issue you&#039;re talking about is Trust, not so much affiliate links.

Here&#039;s the deal.  If you have an affiliate link within the text of your article, without any identification as such, I&#039;ll tolerate it because you&#039;ve already won my trust through your valuable and useful content.

At this point, I don&#039;t care if they&#039;re affiliate links.  I trust that you&#039;re not trying to take advantage of anyone.  So, it&#039;s not disclosure that matters.   It&#039;s the trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Darren, this issue you&#8217;re talking about is Trust, not so much affiliate links.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal.  If you have an affiliate link within the text of your article, without any identification as such, I&#8217;ll tolerate it because you&#8217;ve already won my trust through your valuable and useful content.</p>
<p>At this point, I don&#8217;t care if they&#8217;re affiliate links.  I trust that you&#8217;re not trying to take advantage of anyone.  So, it&#8217;s not disclosure that matters.   It&#8217;s the trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-145201</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-145201</guid>
		<description>Darren,

Clearly there are a number of points of view on this topic.  I think that much of this largely depends on the nature of the blog.  As a small business advisor, I offer a healthy mix of business start up advice.  Some of the advice or recommendations I give , I would like to monetize.   I have spent years researching and appling much of what I know.  Therefore, I do place a monetary value on my time. 

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>Clearly there are a number of points of view on this topic.  I think that much of this largely depends on the nature of the blog.  As a small business advisor, I offer a healthy mix of business start up advice.  Some of the advice or recommendations I give , I would like to monetize.   I have spent years researching and appling much of what I know.  Therefore, I do place a monetary value on my time. </p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghann Irving</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144946</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoghann Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144946</guid>
		<description>Ruby, I&#039;m not assuming all readers know how to recognize an affiliate link. I&#039;m assuming that those who CARE know how to recognize one.  Most people don&#039;t care.

There is nothing remotely deceptive to sending people to a site where they can buy something I&#039;m talking about. They don&#039;t have to follow the link, they don&#039;t have to buy the product. There is no deception involved.

It would be deceptive if I was hyping up products to encourage people to buy them. But I don&#039;t, I give my opinions (some good, some bad) and then provide a link where they can buy. I see no need to pat myself on the back and tell people who wonderfully honest I&#039;m being. If they care they can see it. Most won&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruby, I&#8217;m not assuming all readers know how to recognize an affiliate link. I&#8217;m assuming that those who CARE know how to recognize one.  Most people don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>There is nothing remotely deceptive to sending people to a site where they can buy something I&#8217;m talking about. They don&#8217;t have to follow the link, they don&#8217;t have to buy the product. There is no deception involved.</p>
<p>It would be deceptive if I was hyping up products to encourage people to buy them. But I don&#8217;t, I give my opinions (some good, some bad) and then provide a link where they can buy. I see no need to pat myself on the back and tell people who wonderfully honest I&#8217;m being. If they care they can see it. Most won&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise O'Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144945</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise O'Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144945</guid>
		<description>Darren -- As evidenced by the comments here, there are many different schools of thought on this issue. I don&#039;t think it is necessary to reveal that you are an affiliate. I recently wrote a post on affiliate marketing that sums up my thoughts about affiliate links. 

Here&#039;s the heart of my message: &quot;The bottom line for me is that I love to see a small business owner get a commission for recommending a good tool that I can use. After all, the responsibility for deciding to purchase is still on my shoulders whether I&#039;ve gone to a site via a direct or affiliate link.&quot; 

If you&#039;re interested in the entire post, Affiliate Marketing Is Not A Dirty Word, you can read it here -- http://www.allbusiness.com/blog/JustForSmallBusiness/3357/003185.html

Thanks for the opportunity to see others opinions on this topic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8212; As evidenced by the comments here, there are many different schools of thought on this issue. I don&#8217;t think it is necessary to reveal that you are an affiliate. I recently wrote a post on affiliate marketing that sums up my thoughts about affiliate links. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the heart of my message: &#8220;The bottom line for me is that I love to see a small business owner get a commission for recommending a good tool that I can use. After all, the responsibility for deciding to purchase is still on my shoulders whether I&#8217;ve gone to a site via a direct or affiliate link.&#8221; </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in the entire post, Affiliate Marketing Is Not A Dirty Word, you can read it here &#8212; <a href="http://www.allbusiness.com/blog/JustForSmallBusiness/3357/003185.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbusiness.com/blog/JustForSmallBusiness/3357/003185.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the opportunity to see others opinions on this topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144822</link>
		<dc:creator>HART</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 07:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144822</guid>
		<description>I think I am with the majority on this issue.

It&#039;s no secret that SOMEBODY benefits from every product or service sold on the internet. It&#039;s not really important who sells it - people KNOW that and (i.m.h.o.) appreciate when we do this because they become more informed at what the real price or value on something is and can comparison shop. So, if I happen to casually mention something in my blog I will just try to offer an affiliate link if I can - if that&#039;s what they are looking for - better through me (if I can compete)

however, if I mention that a particular product is BETTER than others or recommend that people try or buy something - I will go out of my way to mention that I am affiliated and do get a commission. I  also mention that it is a very small commission because its true ... 

I also think what &quot;james&quot; said is true .. if you recommend something and people like and appreciate what you recommend, I think they might be loyal and click on your link BECAUSE you recommended it and they want to support you either as a reward or thank-you for the &#039;heads up&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am with the majority on this issue.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that SOMEBODY benefits from every product or service sold on the internet. It&#8217;s not really important who sells it &#8211; people KNOW that and (i.m.h.o.) appreciate when we do this because they become more informed at what the real price or value on something is and can comparison shop. So, if I happen to casually mention something in my blog I will just try to offer an affiliate link if I can &#8211; if that&#8217;s what they are looking for &#8211; better through me (if I can compete)</p>
<p>however, if I mention that a particular product is BETTER than others or recommend that people try or buy something &#8211; I will go out of my way to mention that I am affiliated and do get a commission. I  also mention that it is a very small commission because its true &#8230; </p>
<p>I also think what &#8220;james&#8221; said is true .. if you recommend something and people like and appreciate what you recommend, I think they might be loyal and click on your link BECAUSE you recommended it and they want to support you either as a reward or thank-you for the &#8216;heads up&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144446</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144446</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s a site that I like, I&#039;m actually more likely to go through their link if I know they&#039;ll get something for it. That being said, I&#039;m savvy enough to mouse over the link and determine whether or not it&#039;s an affiliate link without being told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s a site that I like, I&#8217;m actually more likely to go through their link if I know they&#8217;ll get something for it. That being said, I&#8217;m savvy enough to mouse over the link and determine whether or not it&#8217;s an affiliate link without being told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIck W</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144410</link>
		<dc:creator>NIck W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144410</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whether I loved it, hated it or could care less about it, if they have an affiliate program then it is probably an affiliate link.&quot;

I LOVE that! heh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whether I loved it, hated it or could care less about it, if they have an affiliate program then it is probably an affiliate link.&#8221;</p>
<p>I LOVE that! heh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144405</guid>
		<description>Eoghann Irving, that is assuming that your readers are web savy enough to know what a URL that is an affiliate link looks like. I think you&#039;re assuming something that the average web user has no idea about. I know I didn&#039;t understand what these links were until I got into affiliate marketing myself.

I think it&#039;s deceptive to send people to a link if you are going to gain from it without letting them know before hand. These days i put my cursor over links before clicking them and if there is no disclaimer I avoid clicking them. If there is a disclaimer and I&#039;m interested in the product I will click them.

In fact I have had readers go out of their way to buy products from my affiliate links from time to time just because they want to support me. So transparency can actually pay off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eoghann Irving, that is assuming that your readers are web savy enough to know what a URL that is an affiliate link looks like. I think you&#8217;re assuming something that the average web user has no idea about. I know I didn&#8217;t understand what these links were until I got into affiliate marketing myself.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s deceptive to send people to a link if you are going to gain from it without letting them know before hand. These days i put my cursor over links before clicking them and if there is no disclaimer I avoid clicking them. If there is a disclaimer and I&#8217;m interested in the product I will click them.</p>
<p>In fact I have had readers go out of their way to buy products from my affiliate links from time to time just because they want to support me. So transparency can actually pay off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144404</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144404</guid>
		<description>When it comes to affiliate links or advertising, I always go for transparency. With my sites I&#039;m far more interested in building a long-term legacy and pattern of success. Whenever I see sites do the &quot;soft sell&quot; with embedded and non-noted affiliate links I know that&#039;s *exactly* what I don&#039;t want to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to affiliate links or advertising, I always go for transparency. With my sites I&#8217;m far more interested in building a long-term legacy and pattern of success. Whenever I see sites do the &#8220;soft sell&#8221; with embedded and non-noted affiliate links I know that&#8217;s *exactly* what I don&#8217;t want to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason of TVaholic</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason of TVaholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144399</guid>
		<description>It gets bothersome to me to always see (affiliate link) next to everything in a post or some other demarcation of such. It interrupts the flow of the text and its readability. A disclaimer at the bottom of a post as Darren does here at ProBlogger is preferable if you feel you need to overtly make known your affiliate links. For me on the two blogs I started recently I just put the following on the About this Blog page:

Whether I loved it, hated it or could care less about it, if they have an affiliate program then it is probably an affiliate link.

It gives me a place to point, should anyone question my affiliate linking policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets bothersome to me to always see (affiliate link) next to everything in a post or some other demarcation of such. It interrupts the flow of the text and its readability. A disclaimer at the bottom of a post as Darren does here at ProBlogger is preferable if you feel you need to overtly make known your affiliate links. For me on the two blogs I started recently I just put the following on the About this Blog page:</p>
<p>Whether I loved it, hated it or could care less about it, if they have an affiliate program then it is probably an affiliate link.</p>
<p>It gives me a place to point, should anyone question my affiliate linking policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIck W</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144388</link>
		<dc:creator>NIck W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144388</guid>
		<description>We had a big discussion on this over on TW a while back, upshot was, although lots of people in the thread said i should do it - i didn&#039;t in the end, mostly on the basis that quite a few felt that there would be a loss of integrity to reporting and recommending. 

Im curious as to how Darren can do it, and I cant. And I wonder if actually, I can heh..

Perhaps its just the different nature of the sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a big discussion on this over on TW a while back, upshot was, although lots of people in the thread said i should do it &#8211; i didn&#8217;t in the end, mostly on the basis that quite a few felt that there would be a loss of integrity to reporting and recommending. </p>
<p>Im curious as to how Darren can do it, and I cant. And I wonder if actually, I can heh..</p>
<p>Perhaps its just the different nature of the sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athomemama</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144386</link>
		<dc:creator>Athomemama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144386</guid>
		<description>Like you, Darren, I do and I don&#039;t.  If I am saying &#039;buy this product&#039; or &#039;use this service&#039; I will spell it out, but otherwise, no.  I am in the Chikita aff. program too.  If I review it, I&#039;ll say it&#039;s an affiliate link, but if I just stick the banner up or even a text link elsewhere I won&#039;t state the obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you, Darren, I do and I don&#8217;t.  If I am saying &#8216;buy this product&#8217; or &#8216;use this service&#8217; I will spell it out, but otherwise, no.  I am in the Chikita aff. program too.  If I review it, I&#8217;ll say it&#8217;s an affiliate link, but if I just stick the banner up or even a text link elsewhere I won&#8217;t state the obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144382</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144382</guid>
		<description>Jim said: &quot;One of my biggest arguments from that past discussion was that the vast majority of people do not know what an affiliate link is, and/or do not even know how to look for what the url is, and most importantly…They simply don’t care.&quot;

I agree.  I find that bloggers are more sensitive to this issue because of the history of blogs - they were originally a purely non commerical medium and some in the blogosphere are purists who still want it to be this way. I&#039;ve been doing affiliate marketing for two years and none of the affiliate marketers I know creating websites use disclaimers near affiliate links.   

Personally I think sometimes it good to identify that you are sending visitors to another site and the nature of that relationship, but it should be brief.  Something such as &quot;Products are offered by partner merchants&quot; or having a separate page that lists all of the partner merchants, and then within posts do not identify the links as affiliate links.  

In regard to Chitika, most web surfers assume images and banners are some kind of advertisement so there&#039;s no reason IMO to label them as ads.  Text links in a sidebar can be labeled as sponsored links or partner merchants and that should suffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim said: &#8220;One of my biggest arguments from that past discussion was that the vast majority of people do not know what an affiliate link is, and/or do not even know how to look for what the url is, and most importantly…They simply don’t care.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree.  I find that bloggers are more sensitive to this issue because of the history of blogs &#8211; they were originally a purely non commerical medium and some in the blogosphere are purists who still want it to be this way. I&#8217;ve been doing affiliate marketing for two years and none of the affiliate marketers I know creating websites use disclaimers near affiliate links.   </p>
<p>Personally I think sometimes it good to identify that you are sending visitors to another site and the nature of that relationship, but it should be brief.  Something such as &#8220;Products are offered by partner merchants&#8221; or having a separate page that lists all of the partner merchants, and then within posts do not identify the links as affiliate links.  </p>
<p>In regard to Chitika, most web surfers assume images and banners are some kind of advertisement so there&#8217;s no reason IMO to label them as ads.  Text links in a sidebar can be labeled as sponsored links or partner merchants and that should suffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose Tacher</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144376</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose Tacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144376</guid>
		<description>Ads are a way to monetize SERP crowd. You don&#039;t really have a mile high disclaimer saying that if you - dear search engine visitor - click this ad here, I make money. Not only that, the whole game is about finding the best earning placement for ads. Is this somehow less dubious than having affiliate links that you don&#039;t declare as such?

Affiliate programs are the best way to monetize repeat visitors. Frequents are usually aware of affiliate programs and therefore disclaimers tend to carry a holier-than-thou image. 

I recommend dropping either affiliate links or disclaimers. Please don&#039;t make this kind of a number out of them, just focus on helping likeminded and optimize revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ads are a way to monetize SERP crowd. You don&#8217;t really have a mile high disclaimer saying that if you &#8211; dear search engine visitor &#8211; click this ad here, I make money. Not only that, the whole game is about finding the best earning placement for ads. Is this somehow less dubious than having affiliate links that you don&#8217;t declare as such?</p>
<p>Affiliate programs are the best way to monetize repeat visitors. Frequents are usually aware of affiliate programs and therefore disclaimers tend to carry a holier-than-thou image. </p>
<p>I recommend dropping either affiliate links or disclaimers. Please don&#8217;t make this kind of a number out of them, just focus on helping likeminded and optimize revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144373</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been writing about this for years, before blogs came on the scene even. One of my biggest arguments from that past discussion was that the vast majority of people do not know what an affiliate link is, and/or do not even know how to look for what the url is, and most importantly...

They simply don&#039;t care.

This is still true even today, however I&#039;m sure a lesser majority of them who don&#039;t have a clue.

It&#039;s your personal preference Darren, but in my opinion, why should you care if nobody else does?

Deep down, do you spend time writing this blog to be a good person who needs to share with others, or is it simply because you want to make money? Decide that and you&#039;ll know the answer to your problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been writing about this for years, before blogs came on the scene even. One of my biggest arguments from that past discussion was that the vast majority of people do not know what an affiliate link is, and/or do not even know how to look for what the url is, and most importantly&#8230;</p>
<p>They simply don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>This is still true even today, however I&#8217;m sure a lesser majority of them who don&#8217;t have a clue.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s your personal preference Darren, but in my opinion, why should you care if nobody else does?</p>
<p>Deep down, do you spend time writing this blog to be a good person who needs to share with others, or is it simply because you want to make money? Decide that and you&#8217;ll know the answer to your problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/10/16/affiliate-programs-transparency-and-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-144343</link>
		<dc:creator>~Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1678#comment-144343</guid>
		<description>I use a (aff.lk) item after the link, so people know, I that if they click on purchase I get some money. I also have an (affiliate links) on my left side, like you do. 

I feel better doing it that way, thus people know I am not pulling something over on them. Also my site is primarily info and based on my readership they are trying to NOT spend money- so a very difficult fence to walk.  

I have a loosely based criteria for using ads, most have to provide something to the clicker at little or no cost. But I still would like to get some money for the time I put into my site. Anyway, that is how it stands now... who knows how it will evolve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a (aff.lk) item after the link, so people know, I that if they click on purchase I get some money. I also have an (affiliate links) on my left side, like you do. </p>
<p>I feel better doing it that way, thus people know I am not pulling something over on them. Also my site is primarily info and based on my readership they are trying to NOT spend money- so a very difficult fence to walk.  </p>
<p>I have a loosely based criteria for using ads, most have to provide something to the clicker at little or no cost. But I still would like to get some money for the time I put into my site. Anyway, that is how it stands now&#8230; who knows how it will evolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/26 queries in 0.081 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 04:31:27 -->
