<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Blogging For Dollars Articles Find a New Angle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-229487</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-229487</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Ok, the Dr. Del article was depressing, but I thought the other article was something else. When I read this, I was out of it, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Ok, the Dr. Del article was depressing, but I thought the other article was something else. When I read this, I was out of it, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-229467</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-229467</guid>
		<description>Dr. Del, that was SO depressing. And I actually found the article in the subject of this entry was half depressing (half inspirational).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Del, that was SO depressing. And I actually found the article in the subject of this entry was half depressing (half inspirational).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisH</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-130241</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-130241</guid>
		<description>Hmmm? This article was actually just a report, it didn&#039;t offer any advice, so it didn&#039;t answer the question &quot;Can bloggers strike it rich?&quot;

Having recently had the honor of some time with The ProBlogger, I have some new perspectives on making money from blogging which I will write up in time, and hopefully provide little bit of an answer to the question.

Truth is though, the only people who can answer the question, are those who have done it - The Manolos, The ProBloggers etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm? This article was actually just a report, it didn&#8217;t offer any advice, so it didn&#8217;t answer the question &#8220;Can bloggers strike it rich?&#8221;</p>
<p>Having recently had the honor of some time with The ProBlogger, I have some new perspectives on making money from blogging which I will write up in time, and hopefully provide little bit of an answer to the question.</p>
<p>Truth is though, the only people who can answer the question, are those who have done it &#8211; The Manolos, The ProBloggers etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rags Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-129140</link>
		<dc:creator>Rags Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-129140</guid>
		<description>Your comment &quot; the article doesn’t contain anything that I’ve not seen written many times in other articles &quot; is very true not just for this article but for most &quot;Make Big Bucks from blogging&quot; articles appearing in Mainstream Media. This falls along the line of the email conversation we had about &lt;a href=&quot;http://unpapier.blogspot.com/2005/09/news-media-on-blogging.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Ms. Kim Komando&#039;s article &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment &#8221; the article doesn’t contain anything that I’ve not seen written many times in other articles &#8221; is very true not just for this article but for most &#8220;Make Big Bucks from blogging&#8221; articles appearing in Mainstream Media. This falls along the line of the email conversation we had about <a href="http://unpapier.blogspot.com/2005/09/news-media-on-blogging.html" rel="nofollow"> Ms. Kim Komando&#8217;s article </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurrum</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-127563</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-127563</guid>
		<description>So, basically, it&#039;s the survival of the fittest, content is king, and never put all your eggs in one basket.

Also, when the game networks were going crazy wasn&#039;t that the time of the dot-com bubble? People with too much money throwing it around to people who knew nothing about economics. Is the current enviornment similar to that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, basically, it&#8217;s the survival of the fittest, content is king, and never put all your eggs in one basket.</p>
<p>Also, when the game networks were going crazy wasn&#8217;t that the time of the dot-com bubble? People with too much money throwing it around to people who knew nothing about economics. Is the current enviornment similar to that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-127538</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-127538</guid>
		<description>There are so many different ways to write about something, whatever the subject and given the number of blogs there are out there now about making money it&#039;s going to be impossible to come up with something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many different ways to write about something, whatever the subject and given the number of blogs there are out there now about making money it&#8217;s going to be impossible to come up with something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-127511</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-127511</guid>
		<description>How about a spinoff of the same article?

http://www.onebyonemedia.com/b4h/archives/000094.php

Self promotion is allowed right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a spinoff of the same article?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onebyonemedia.com/b4h/archives/000094.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.onebyonemedia.com/b4h/archives/000094.php</a></p>
<p>Self promotion is allowed right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrDel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-127467</link>
		<dc:creator>DrDel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-127467</guid>
		<description>Darren,

I have written about blogging for money from a different angle

In my recent article posted yesterday:

http://www.medsim.net/blog/blog.php?id=26 

I refer to the business model of weblog networks and how they threaten to destabilize the blogosphere.

The theory I use is based on another content based publishing genre from the late 1990s: video game networks.

With all of the weblog networks popping up I see the direction of blogging heading towards the same downward spiral as gaming related content based networks have travelled.  Anyways, give it a read and let me know what you think.. is it a &quot;different angle&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,</p>
<p>I have written about blogging for money from a different angle</p>
<p>In my recent article posted yesterday:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.medsim.net/blog/blog.php?id=26" rel="nofollow">http://www.medsim.net/blog/blog.php?id=26</a> </p>
<p>I refer to the business model of weblog networks and how they threaten to destabilize the blogosphere.</p>
<p>The theory I use is based on another content based publishing genre from the late 1990s: video game networks.</p>
<p>With all of the weblog networks popping up I see the direction of blogging heading towards the same downward spiral as gaming related content based networks have travelled.  Anyways, give it a read and let me know what you think.. is it a &#8220;different angle&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Kaufmann</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-127358</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Kaufmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-127358</guid>
		<description>People can learn as much from failure as from success -- and most of the articles focus on the Nick Dentons, the Jason Calacanises (Calacani?) that are pulling in a nice sum through blogging.  Very few focus on the people that are not succeeding -- and those people number in the majority.

So, in other words, I agree with Kevin. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can learn as much from failure as from success &#8212; and most of the articles focus on the Nick Dentons, the Jason Calacanises (Calacani?) that are pulling in a nice sum through blogging.  Very few focus on the people that are not succeeding &#8212; and those people number in the majority.</p>
<p>So, in other words, I agree with Kevin. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/23/can-blogging-for-dollars-articles-find-a-new-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-127312</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1586#comment-127312</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say you&#039;re correct Darren. The article is generally a re-hash of what we do (and don&#039;t) know about certain blogs and their business model. I think the reason that these stories continue to get re-written is because the business model of blogging is relatively new. It&#039;s also evolving all of the time.

Perhaps another way to spin this type of story is a combination of the personal and network blog business models we know that work, along with some of the strategies that haven&#039;t worked. [Disclosure: I blog for WIN]. It&#039;s one thing tto hear the success stories, but often people can learn more through the not-so-successful strategies. People don&#039;t often focus the &quot;blogging for dollars&quot; posts on the painful lessons learned along the journey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say you&#8217;re correct Darren. The article is generally a re-hash of what we do (and don&#8217;t) know about certain blogs and their business model. I think the reason that these stories continue to get re-written is because the business model of blogging is relatively new. It&#8217;s also evolving all of the time.</p>
<p>Perhaps another way to spin this type of story is a combination of the personal and network blog business models we know that work, along with some of the strategies that haven&#8217;t worked. [Disclosure: I blog for WIN]. It&#8217;s one thing tto hear the success stories, but often people can learn more through the not-so-successful strategies. People don&#8217;t often focus the &#8220;blogging for dollars&#8221; posts on the painful lessons learned along the journey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
