<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quotable Seth Godin &#8211; From &#8216;Who&#8217;s There?&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:19:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gone Away</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/comment-page-1/#comment-117156</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone Away</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1536#comment-117156</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting Martin.  I&#039;m at the point now where I can predict fairly accurately which posts will draw lots of attention and which will just have a solid core of regulars commenting on.  The question facing me now is: Do I stick with the original vision for the blog and so please some of the people some of the time, or do I forget the main goal and just go for the big hitters?  Something tells me I should stay with my original intent but I could be wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting Martin.  I&#8217;m at the point now where I can predict fairly accurately which posts will draw lots of attention and which will just have a solid core of regulars commenting on.  The question facing me now is: Do I stick with the original vision for the blog and so please some of the people some of the time, or do I forget the main goal and just go for the big hitters?  Something tells me I should stay with my original intent but I could be wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ralya</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/comment-page-1/#comment-117122</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Ralya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1536#comment-117122</guid>
		<description>(Michael) &lt;i&gt;I’m trying to learn to just write “good enough” posts and let the readers decide whether they’re important enough.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve also found that the posts I expect to do well (as defined by generating interest among readers) often don&#039;t, and the posts I didn&#039;t expect much out of are the ones that generate the most attention. This has been one of my favorite parts of the learning process, actually. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Michael) <i>I’m trying to learn to just write “good enough” posts and let the readers decide whether they’re important enough.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also found that the posts I expect to do well (as defined by generating interest among readers) often don&#8217;t, and the posts I didn&#8217;t expect much out of are the ones that generate the most attention. This has been one of my favorite parts of the learning process, actually. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/comment-page-1/#comment-117117</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1536#comment-117117</guid>
		<description>I have downloaded Seth&#039;s book but have not had a chance to read it, maybe tonight, although Lost is on tv tonight.

What Seth say&#039;s is common sense although we rarely use this sense.

Darren I notice you will be hitting 1000 RSS subscribers soon, I am so envious. How about giving us some insights into how you use RSS over your sites.

PS. Sorry didn&#039;t intend to hijack your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have downloaded Seth&#8217;s book but have not had a chance to read it, maybe tonight, although Lost is on tv tonight.</p>
<p>What Seth say&#8217;s is common sense although we rarely use this sense.</p>
<p>Darren I notice you will be hitting 1000 RSS subscribers soon, I am so envious. How about giving us some insights into how you use RSS over your sites.</p>
<p>PS. Sorry didn&#8217;t intend to hijack your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Moncur</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/comment-page-1/#comment-117116</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Moncur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1536#comment-117116</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Every blog post should be designed to be important enough to get another blog to eagerly post a link or quote you or reprint the whole thing.&lt;/i&gt;

I just wanted to mention that having this attitude somewhere in the back of my head has been one of the biggest issues for me writing weblogs. I spend too much time worrying about whether a post is &quot;important enough&quot; and half the time it means I don&#039;t post at all. I&#039;m trying to learn to just write &quot;good enough&quot; posts and let the readers decide whether they&#039;re important enough.

I like Darren&#039;s line better: &lt;i&gt;does this post add to or subtract from the vision and goals that I have for this blog?&lt;/i&gt; - I can definitely write posts that add at least a bit of value or inch a little closer to my goals without necessarily writing &quot;important&quot; posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Every blog post should be designed to be important enough to get another blog to eagerly post a link or quote you or reprint the whole thing.</i></p>
<p>I just wanted to mention that having this attitude somewhere in the back of my head has been one of the biggest issues for me writing weblogs. I spend too much time worrying about whether a post is &#8220;important enough&#8221; and half the time it means I don&#8217;t post at all. I&#8217;m trying to learn to just write &#8220;good enough&#8221; posts and let the readers decide whether they&#8217;re important enough.</p>
<p>I like Darren&#8217;s line better: <i>does this post add to or subtract from the vision and goals that I have for this blog?</i> &#8211; I can definitely write posts that add at least a bit of value or inch a little closer to my goals without necessarily writing &#8220;important&#8221; posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone Away</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/07/quotable-seth-godin-from-whos-there/comment-page-1/#comment-117112</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone Away</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1536#comment-117112</guid>
		<description>Whilst I agree with you that it&#039;s wise to wait until the blood has cooled before posting, I have noticed that I get more comments on posts that are (for me) controversial.  I suppose the answer is to know your readers and what they&#039;re likely to be able to cope with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I agree with you that it&#8217;s wise to wait until the blood has cooled before posting, I have noticed that I get more comments on posts that are (for me) controversial.  I suppose the answer is to know your readers and what they&#8217;re likely to be able to cope with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
