<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scoop Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:53:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Grow Your Blog&#8217;s Readership: ProBlogger Blog Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-261722</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Grow Your Blog&#8217;s Readership: ProBlogger Blog Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-261722</guid>
		<description>[...] 5. Scoop stuff - Getting a scoop is another fast track to readership. Break a big story and have the right A-list blog link to you and you&#8217;ll find not only a lot of traffic come directly from them but indirectly from the many smaller blogs that will link up as a result. The other benefit of it beyond the initial traffic and inbound links is the respect and street credibility that can come from breaking a big story. I find that once you break one story you often get others broken directly to you by &#8217;sources&#8217;. Once this happen the snowball effect takes over and you can build a reputation for being someone in the know. More on Scoop Blogging. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5. Scoop stuff &#8211; Getting a scoop is another fast track to readership. Break a big story and have the right A-list blog link to you and you&#8217;ll find not only a lot of traffic come directly from them but indirectly from the many smaller blogs that will link up as a result. The other benefit of it beyond the initial traffic and inbound links is the respect and street credibility that can come from breaking a big story. I find that once you break one story you often get others broken directly to you by &#8217;sources&#8217;. Once this happen the snowball effect takes over and you can build a reputation for being someone in the know. More on Scoop Blogging. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miha</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-111559</link>
		<dc:creator>Miha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-111559</guid>
		<description>Already No. 2 on Google for &quot;nikon d200&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already No. 2 on Google for &#8220;nikon d200&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-111377</link>
		<dc:creator>John (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-111377</guid>
		<description>Martin, that&#039;s good stuff. Note taken :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, that&#8217;s good stuff. Note taken :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin (HomeOfficeVoice)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-110807</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin (HomeOfficeVoice)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-110807</guid>
		<description>Darren ... good on you. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a problem here - actually Nikon would no doubt love the little publicity buzz coming from it. And I don&#039;t think Nikon would be stupid enough to go down that bad Public Relations road - they&#039;re too big and smart for that. 

Secondly, you&#039;ve hit on a tactic that many don&#039;t give much thought to but can be really powerful: writing about something that wil be happening in the future earlier than most. Obviously, if it&#039;s a real exclusive then you run with it but for most of us we should simply look at what is/may be happening many months ahead almost like looking into a crystal ball. 

For exampe: I got a lot of hits when I started writing about ie7 early on. Now that it&#039;s coming closer to release and more people are interested in it, I&#039;ve got a backlog of well linked-to posts and articles. 

Another example that&#039;s Australian-specific was when the GST (it&#039;s a tax, like VAT) was introduced in 2000. Everyone knew it was coming so I started writing about it 6-12 months beforehand. And when it finally came I had a massive influx of visitors for most of late-2000 and early 2001 (of course, this was before the days of blogging).

That&#039;s why us bloggers we&#039;re more like investigative journlaists then we realise - we&#039;re all looking for that next litle scoop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8230; good on you. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a problem here &#8211; actually Nikon would no doubt love the little publicity buzz coming from it. And I don&#8217;t think Nikon would be stupid enough to go down that bad Public Relations road &#8211; they&#8217;re too big and smart for that. </p>
<p>Secondly, you&#8217;ve hit on a tactic that many don&#8217;t give much thought to but can be really powerful: writing about something that wil be happening in the future earlier than most. Obviously, if it&#8217;s a real exclusive then you run with it but for most of us we should simply look at what is/may be happening many months ahead almost like looking into a crystal ball. </p>
<p>For exampe: I got a lot of hits when I started writing about ie7 early on. Now that it&#8217;s coming closer to release and more people are interested in it, I&#8217;ve got a backlog of well linked-to posts and articles. </p>
<p>Another example that&#8217;s Australian-specific was when the GST (it&#8217;s a tax, like VAT) was introduced in 2000. Everyone knew it was coming so I started writing about it 6-12 months beforehand. And when it finally came I had a massive influx of visitors for most of late-2000 and early 2001 (of course, this was before the days of blogging).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why us bloggers we&#8217;re more like investigative journlaists then we realise &#8211; we&#8217;re all looking for that next litle scoop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-110798</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-110798</guid>
		<description>Darren, it&#039;s cool that you got some early info.  And I think you&#039;re within bounds publishing.  Given the current situation with Mr. Wall, are you concerned that you may be sued over this (I haven&#039;t read it to see if anything seriously proprietary is in there)?  I am in agreement with Tim that just because you&#039;ve not signed anything, you&#039;re certainly not safe.  In fact, this post here may be evidence for the company that you are aware that you&#039;re publishing something that you shouldn&#039;t be and therefore culpable.  But, I don&#039;t really know anything at all about anything.  I just don&#039;t want you to get into any legal hot water, despite the positive effect it might have on your readership levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, it&#8217;s cool that you got some early info.  And I think you&#8217;re within bounds publishing.  Given the current situation with Mr. Wall, are you concerned that you may be sued over this (I haven&#8217;t read it to see if anything seriously proprietary is in there)?  I am in agreement with Tim that just because you&#8217;ve not signed anything, you&#8217;re certainly not safe.  In fact, this post here may be evidence for the company that you are aware that you&#8217;re publishing something that you shouldn&#8217;t be and therefore culpable.  But, I don&#8217;t really know anything at all about anything.  I just don&#8217;t want you to get into any legal hot water, despite the positive effect it might have on your readership levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-110779</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-110779</guid>
		<description>The strangest and most successful scoop I&#039;ve had was by checking out a company that was advertising using a google ad on my site (not by clicking through... this can cause grief with the Google folks).

 It was a little electric scooter that looked cool, so I ran a story that was picked up by Gizmodo and Engadget. Congrats Darren, it&#039;s tough to do. I hope you have many more like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strangest and most successful scoop I&#8217;ve had was by checking out a company that was advertising using a google ad on my site (not by clicking through&#8230; this can cause grief with the Google folks).</p>
<p> It was a little electric scooter that looked cool, so I ran a story that was picked up by Gizmodo and Engadget. Congrats Darren, it&#8217;s tough to do. I hope you have many more like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-110762</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-110762</guid>
		<description>This is quite similar to what happened to me shortly after I started a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpsreview.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GPS reviews&lt;/a&gt; site. I obtained information about the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpsreview.net/2005/08/09/garmin-rino-530-review-preview/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Garmin Rino 520 and 530 GPS&lt;/a&gt; before they were announced. When the rest of the world found out about the device my page was already indexed by the search engines and I was on top for a couple of days. 

Quite nice on a site that was only a few days old at the time!

Just because you don&#039;t have a signed NDA doesn&#039;t mean you are always out of the water. Don&#039;t forget the trouble Apple Insider is in after Apple&#039;s lawyers attacked them when they published information about not yet released products. Most companies are not as aggressive as Apple when it comes to protecting secrets though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite similar to what happened to me shortly after I started a <a href="http://www.gpsreview.net/" rel="nofollow">GPS reviews</a> site. I obtained information about the new <a href="http://www.gpsreview.net/2005/08/09/garmin-rino-530-review-preview/" rel="nofollow">Garmin Rino 520 and 530 GPS</a> before they were announced. When the rest of the world found out about the device my page was already indexed by the search engines and I was on top for a couple of days. </p>
<p>Quite nice on a site that was only a few days old at the time!</p>
<p>Just because you don&#8217;t have a signed NDA doesn&#8217;t mean you are always out of the water. Don&#8217;t forget the trouble Apple Insider is in after Apple&#8217;s lawyers attacked them when they published information about not yet released products. Most companies are not as aggressive as Apple when it comes to protecting secrets though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maruthi</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-110741</link>
		<dc:creator>maruthi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-110741</guid>
		<description>Wow, this sounds fun and cool. You have beaten the &quot;big boys&quot;.  Congrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this sounds fun and cool. You have beaten the &#8220;big boys&#8221;.  Congrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/09/01/scoop-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-110739</link>
		<dc:creator>John (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/?p=1506#comment-110739</guid>
		<description>Darren, this is the Joe Vitale method of getting to #1. It usually works :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, this is the Joe Vitale method of getting to #1. It usually works :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
