<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ProBlogger in the Press Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/28/problogger-in-the-press-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/28/problogger-in-the-press-page/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:57:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin (HomeOfficeVoice)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/28/problogger-in-the-press-page/comment-page-1/#comment-107823</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin (HomeOfficeVoice)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/28/problogger-in-the-press-page/#comment-107823</guid>
		<description>Good move, Darren. One thing though, I don&#039;t like the use of the third-person. Maybe it&#039;s okay for a proper media kit (one to attract advertising and/or to attract media publicity) but it&#039;s still basically a page for potential new visitors to see how much coverage you are getting in the MSM.

Personally, I&#039;d write the page up as a normal &quot;first-person&quot; post and then offer a link to a fully-fledged pdf &quot;media kit&quot;. 

And I know what you&#039;re going to say: By writing &quot;I&quot; have been in this media and &quot;I&quot; have been in that media it might make you seem like you&#039;re tooting your own horn too much ... but stiff, no one&#039;s going to do it for you.

just my 2 cents worth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good move, Darren. One thing though, I don&#8217;t like the use of the third-person. Maybe it&#8217;s okay for a proper media kit (one to attract advertising and/or to attract media publicity) but it&#8217;s still basically a page for potential new visitors to see how much coverage you are getting in the MSM.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d write the page up as a normal &#8220;first-person&#8221; post and then offer a link to a fully-fledged pdf &#8220;media kit&#8221;. </p>
<p>And I know what you&#8217;re going to say: By writing &#8220;I&#8221; have been in this media and &#8220;I&#8221; have been in that media it might make you seem like you&#8217;re tooting your own horn too much &#8230; but stiff, no one&#8217;s going to do it for you.</p>
<p>just my 2 cents worth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/28/problogger-in-the-press-page/comment-page-1/#comment-107757</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/28/problogger-in-the-press-page/#comment-107757</guid>
		<description>Well, now that is a sign that things are happening for you and that your readers can trust your advice. Congrats, Darren!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now that is a sign that things are happening for you and that your readers can trust your advice. Congrats, Darren!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
