<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taughnee&#8217;s Start Up Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-4587192</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/#comment-4587192</guid>
		<description>I will be giving blogexplosion a shot for my somewhat new blog. We will soon see what will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be giving blogexplosion a shot for my somewhat new blog. We will soon see what will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-86565</link>
		<dc:creator>~Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 12:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/#comment-86565</guid>
		<description>I would agree with Taughnee, and say that casting a wide net is helpful at the initial start. But the best quality links and readers have come from my own comments or from forum postings in areas that are around my niche.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frugalforlife.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Frugal for Life&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with Taughnee, and say that casting a wide net is helpful at the initial start. But the best quality links and readers have come from my own comments or from forum postings in areas that are around my niche.<br />
<a href="http://www.frugalforlife.com" rel="nofollow">Frugal for Life</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-86001</link>
		<dc:creator>HART</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/#comment-86001</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- spamk    : Comment text: &#039;I subscribed to the free membership version of &quot;Traffic Swarm&quot; in the late summer of 2004 .. It&#039;s quite obvious from the stats that all your visitors are waiting for the 30 seconds to expire before they move on. That&#039;s not all, everybody who is signed up and using the service is also trying to sell something. So, promoting my online store in there seemed to be either an oxymoron, or I was just a moron.

I didn&#039;t stick with it for 9 months for the traffic credits. I continued to use this to see what other online stores were doing. It&#039;s the same way with Blog Explosion and Blog Clicker. I&#039;ve used both of these since I started blogging May 31st (and Traffic Swarm too) just to see what&#039;s out there in the blogworld.

I may find the odd reader that notices either of my two blogs in the stats that stay awhile, or blogrolls me, but I&#039;m doing it to surf for me.  But I blogExplosion just to see what designs and new things are out there. Some of the time, I quickly scroll down to the utility section, and see what new 91x17 &#039;gifs&#039; are out there and often click those links too. 

Most of the time, it&#039;s all judged by the cover - if I don&#039;t like the front page design or the last entry, I just multi-task in another window until time runs out and I can click again. 

I like it better when there is a chance that I&#039;m random surfing than settling on a specific theme or recommendation from somebody or some site that may be biased. It&#039;s the same reason that if you click on my name and visit my site, I put a random surfing button for all of my categories ... to give people that same randomness chance to view my site, without really thinking what they want to look at.  I&#039;m kooky that way.&#039; matched ((holdem&#124;texas&#124;poker&#124;casino&#124;online&#124;gambl&#124;blackjack&#124;game&#124;free).*){2,} --&gt;
I subscribed to the free membership version of &quot;Traffic Swarm&quot; in the late summer of 2004 .. It&#039;s quite obvious from the stats that all your visitors are waiting for the 30 seconds to expire before they move on. That&#039;s not all, everybody who is signed up and using the service is also trying to sell something. So, promoting my online store in there seemed to be either an oxymoron, or I was just a moron.

I didn&#039;t stick with it for 9 months for the traffic credits. I continued to use this to see what other online stores were doing. It&#039;s the same way with Blog Explosion and Blog Clicker. I&#039;ve used both of these since I started blogging May 31st (and Traffic Swarm too) just to see what&#039;s out there in the blogworld.

I may find the odd reader that notices either of my two blogs in the stats that stay awhile, or blogrolls me, but I&#039;m doing it to surf for me.  But I blogExplosion just to see what designs and new things are out there. Some of the time, I quickly scroll down to the utility section, and see what new 91x17 &#039;gifs&#039; are out there and often click those links too. 

Most of the time, it&#039;s all judged by the cover - if I don&#039;t like the front page design or the last entry, I just multi-task in another window until time runs out and I can click again. 

I like it better when there is a chance that I&#039;m random surfing than settling on a specific theme or recommendation from somebody or some site that may be biased. It&#039;s the same reason that if you click on my name and visit my site, I put a random surfing button for all of my categories ... to give people that same randomness chance to view my site, without really thinking what they want to look at.  I&#039;m kooky that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- spamk    : Comment text: 'I subscribed to the free membership version of "Traffic Swarm" in the late summer of 2004 .. It's quite obvious from the stats that all your visitors are waiting for the 30 seconds to expire before they move on. That's not all, everybody who is signed up and using the service is also trying to sell something. So, promoting my online store in there seemed to be either an oxymoron, or I was just a moron.</p>
<p>I didn't stick with it for 9 months for the traffic credits. I continued to use this to see what other online stores were doing. It's the same way with Blog Explosion and Blog Clicker. I've used both of these since I started blogging May 31st (and Traffic Swarm too) just to see what's out there in the blogworld.</p>
<p>I may find the odd reader that notices either of my two blogs in the stats that stay awhile, or blogrolls me, but I'm doing it to surf for me.  But I blogExplosion just to see what designs and new things are out there. Some of the time, I quickly scroll down to the utility section, and see what new 91x17 'gifs' are out there and often click those links too. </p>
<p>Most of the time, it's all judged by the cover - if I don't like the front page design or the last entry, I just multi-task in another window until time runs out and I can click again. </p>
<p>I like it better when there is a chance that I'm random surfing than settling on a specific theme or recommendation from somebody or some site that may be biased. It's the same reason that if you click on my name and visit my site, I put a random surfing button for all of my categories ... to give people that same randomness chance to view my site, without really thinking what they want to look at.  I'm kooky that way.' matched ((holdem|texas|poker|casino|online|gambl|blackjack|game|free).*){2,} --><br />
I subscribed to the free membership version of &#8220;Traffic Swarm&#8221; in the late summer of 2004 .. It&#8217;s quite obvious from the stats that all your visitors are waiting for the 30 seconds to expire before they move on. That&#8217;s not all, everybody who is signed up and using the service is also trying to sell something. So, promoting my online store in there seemed to be either an oxymoron, or I was just a moron.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t stick with it for 9 months for the traffic credits. I continued to use this to see what other online stores were doing. It&#8217;s the same way with Blog Explosion and Blog Clicker. I&#8217;ve used both of these since I started blogging May 31st (and Traffic Swarm too) just to see what&#8217;s out there in the blogworld.</p>
<p>I may find the odd reader that notices either of my two blogs in the stats that stay awhile, or blogrolls me, but I&#8217;m doing it to surf for me.  But I blogExplosion just to see what designs and new things are out there. Some of the time, I quickly scroll down to the utility section, and see what new 91&#215;17 &#8216;gifs&#8217; are out there and often click those links too. </p>
<p>Most of the time, it&#8217;s all judged by the cover &#8211; if I don&#8217;t like the front page design or the last entry, I just multi-task in another window until time runs out and I can click again. </p>
<p>I like it better when there is a chance that I&#8217;m random surfing than settling on a specific theme or recommendation from somebody or some site that may be biased. It&#8217;s the same reason that if you click on my name and visit my site, I put a random surfing button for all of my categories &#8230; to give people that same randomness chance to view my site, without really thinking what they want to look at.  I&#8217;m kooky that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taughnee</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-85745</link>
		<dc:creator>Taughnee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 02:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/#comment-85745</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I disagree with you about Blog Explosion Darren.  I&#039;ve avoided using it for my other blogs because I didn&#039;t want *random* traffic, preferring instead to grow a quality, targetted readership over time (lots of time).

For this site, I took a chance.  If you want a &quot;wide net&quot; to see what you might catch, you&#039;ll certainly get it.  

It may or may not be a waste of time depending on your intended audience and your own personal goals for the site.  While I wait for google to find me and to develop my blog network, I wanted as many people as possible reading and giving me feedback.  

The biggest benefit so far (other than gaining a few links) is the comments and emails about the content.  It takes some time to find your voice (for me anyway) and to decide what type of content will keep people coming back for more.  For me this experiment has been really helpful in that regard.  

And it doesn&#039;t hurt the old ego either at this stage in the game, I&#039;d rather have a few comments from random BE surfers telling me they enjoy the site than to see empty stats.  lol  

To be honest, I don&#039;t plan on relying too heavily on Blog Explosion long-term.  As Lei says the rate of return is low -- but it&#039;s better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick at this point.  

:)  Thanks for keeping tabs on my progress everyone, I am loving the discussion and appreciate it so much!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I disagree with you about Blog Explosion Darren.  I&#8217;ve avoided using it for my other blogs because I didn&#8217;t want *random* traffic, preferring instead to grow a quality, targetted readership over time (lots of time).</p>
<p>For this site, I took a chance.  If you want a &#8220;wide net&#8221; to see what you might catch, you&#8217;ll certainly get it.  </p>
<p>It may or may not be a waste of time depending on your intended audience and your own personal goals for the site.  While I wait for google to find me and to develop my blog network, I wanted as many people as possible reading and giving me feedback.  </p>
<p>The biggest benefit so far (other than gaining a few links) is the comments and emails about the content.  It takes some time to find your voice (for me anyway) and to decide what type of content will keep people coming back for more.  For me this experiment has been really helpful in that regard.  </p>
<p>And it doesn&#8217;t hurt the old ego either at this stage in the game, I&#8217;d rather have a few comments from random BE surfers telling me they enjoy the site than to see empty stats.  lol  </p>
<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t plan on relying too heavily on Blog Explosion long-term.  As Lei says the rate of return is low &#8212; but it&#8217;s better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick at this point.  </p>
<p>:)  Thanks for keeping tabs on my progress everyone, I am loving the discussion and appreciate it so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lei</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-85655</link>
		<dc:creator>Lei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 01:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/#comment-85655</guid>
		<description>BlogExplosion has worked well for me (in addition to the hard work of networking via commenting on others&#039; blogs and writing content, of course!).  I&#039;ve had over 30 people link to my blog and specific posts.  I don&#039;t know how long it would have taken them to find my blog, esp. the genetics one since most non-scientists would never think to be interested in that unless they&#039;re looking for specific information.  I think the rate of return for traffic exchange sites is low but it&#039;s there and worth a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlogExplosion has worked well for me (in addition to the hard work of networking via commenting on others&#8217; blogs and writing content, of course!).  I&#8217;ve had over 30 people link to my blog and specific posts.  I don&#8217;t know how long it would have taken them to find my blog, esp. the genetics one since most non-scientists would never think to be interested in that unless they&#8217;re looking for specific information.  I think the rate of return for traffic exchange sites is low but it&#8217;s there and worth a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cellounge Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-85525</link>
		<dc:creator>Cellounge Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/08/06/taughnees-start-up-tips/#comment-85525</guid>
		<description>Blogexplosion turned me down for having to many ads.  So be careful.  my blog has what google allows me to have.  But blogexplosion decided that I had more ads then posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogexplosion turned me down for having to many ads.  So be careful.  my blog has what google allows me to have.  But blogexplosion decided that I had more ads then posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.060 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 22:20:21 -->
