<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Tools Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-231482</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-231482</guid>
		<description>Not full description of available blog engines and very subjective opinion.

I&#039;m using Wordpress for my own blog. But now i&#039;m seeking multyblog engine (multiple users, blog hoster), but can&#039;t find good GPL engine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not full description of available blog engines and very subjective opinion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using WordPress for my own blog. But now i&#8217;m seeking multyblog engine (multiple users, blog hoster), but can&#8217;t find good GPL engine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz L</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-158126</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-158126</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve finally made the jump from Mambo to Wordpress...I&#039;m just feeling out the waters right now, but I must say, they feel fine.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve finally made the jump from Mambo to WordPress&#8230;I&#8217;m just feeling out the waters right now, but I must say, they feel fine.  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8 Ways to Sunday</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-80503</link>
		<dc:creator>8 Ways to Sunday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-80503</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blog Software Comparison&lt;/strong&gt;

	USC Annenberg’s Online Journalism Review just published a comparative review of popular weblog software.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blog Software Comparison</strong></p>
<p>	USC Annenberg’s Online Journalism Review just published a comparative review of popular weblog software.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bennellibrothers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-70572</link>
		<dc:creator>bennellibrothers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-70572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogging: The New Black?&lt;/strong&gt;

Jeremy Zawodny asks the question: While I don&#039;t claim to know or predict the future, I do feel like this whole blogging thing is gonna peak sooner or later. After that it may die off or continue along just fine....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogging: The New Black?</strong></p>
<p>Jeremy Zawodny asks the question: While I don&#8217;t claim to know or predict the future, I do feel like this whole blogging thing is gonna peak sooner or later. After that it may die off or continue along just fine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marti Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-52587</link>
		<dc:creator>Marti Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-52587</guid>
		<description>I am on the thirty-day free trial with TypePad right now, but I doubt I&#039;ll keep it.  Blogger (my current host) lets me make changes to the template (since I DO know a bit of HTML and have the good sense to always save the old template LOL) and I like that.  Have contacted someone to design a custom skin, as I see the &quot;Scribe&quot; Blogger template more and more when I surf, and I hate looking like everyone else - LOL!

Searching for different blogging tools, I saw an ad for &quot;Blog It&quot; (I am in no way affiliated with this company, just curious).  It has a fee but claims the user will MAKE money through readership.  Does anyone have experience with this?  Does it really pay?  Is it difficult to use?

Thanks for the great articles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am on the thirty-day free trial with TypePad right now, but I doubt I&#8217;ll keep it.  Blogger (my current host) lets me make changes to the template (since I DO know a bit of HTML and have the good sense to always save the old template LOL) and I like that.  Have contacted someone to design a custom skin, as I see the &#8220;Scribe&#8221; Blogger template more and more when I surf, and I hate looking like everyone else &#8211; LOL!</p>
<p>Searching for different blogging tools, I saw an ad for &#8220;Blog It&#8221; (I am in no way affiliated with this company, just curious).  It has a fee but claims the user will MAKE money through readership.  Does anyone have experience with this?  Does it really pay?  Is it difficult to use?</p>
<p>Thanks for the great articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suean</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-42977</link>
		<dc:creator>suean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-42977</guid>
		<description>Not a really in-depth chart... Amongst many other, she&#039;s also missing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plogworld.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pLog&lt;/a&gt; which is a multi-blog and multi-user tool really suited for all sorts of communities. The project has gained a lot of momentum lately specially in Europe and Asia: it&#039;s been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/18/plog_recommended_in_e-learnig_book&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recommended in e-learning books&lt;/a&gt;, it&#039;s been &lt;a href=&quot;http://channels.lockergnome.com/web/archives/20050701_why_plog_is_better_than_movabletype.phtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;positively compared to MT in Lockergnome&lt;/a&gt;, it&#039;s being used by the biggest media group in Norway for their &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.vg.no&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;journalistic blogs&lt;/a&gt; and it&#039;s now in many &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogger.net.tw/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogging communities specially in China&lt;/a&gt;.

Best of of all, pLog is free (GPL) and runs on PHP and MySQL. What else can you ask for? :)

PS: sorry about the double-posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a really in-depth chart&#8230; Amongst many other, she&#8217;s also missing <a href="http://www.plogworld.net" rel="nofollow">pLog</a> which is a multi-blog and multi-user tool really suited for all sorts of communities. The project has gained a lot of momentum lately specially in Europe and Asia: it&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/18/plog_recommended_in_e-learnig_book" rel="nofollow">recommended in e-learning books</a>, it&#8217;s been <a href="http://channels.lockergnome.com/web/archives/20050701_why_plog_is_better_than_movabletype.phtml" rel="nofollow">positively compared to MT in Lockergnome</a>, it&#8217;s being used by the biggest media group in Norway for their <a href="http://blogs.vg.no" rel="nofollow">journalistic blogs</a> and it&#8217;s now in many <a href="http://blogger.net.tw/" rel="nofollow">blogging communities specially in China</a>.</p>
<p>Best of of all, pLog is free (GPL) and runs on PHP and MySQL. What else can you ask for? :)</p>
<p>PS: sorry about the double-posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suean</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-42973</link>
		<dc:creator>suean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-42973</guid>
		<description>Not a really in-depth chart... Amongst many other, she&#039;s also missing pLog (http://www.plogworld.net) which is a multi-blog and multi-user tool really suited for all sorts of communities. The project has gained a lot of momentum lately specially in Europe and Asia: it&#039;s been recommended in e-learning books (http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/18/plog_recommended_in_e-learnig_book), it&#039;s been positively compared to MT in Lockergnome (http://channels.lockergnome.com/web/archives/20050701_why_plog_is_better_than_movabletype.phtml), it&#039;s being used by the biggest media group in Norway for their journalistic blogs (http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/24/biggest_media_group_in_norway_is_using_plog) and it&#039;s now in many blogging communities specially in China (http://blogger.net.tw/)

Best of of all, pLog is free (GPL) and runs on PHP and MySQL. What else can you ask for? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a really in-depth chart&#8230; Amongst many other, she&#8217;s also missing pLog (<a href="http://www.plogworld.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.plogworld.net</a>) which is a multi-blog and multi-user tool really suited for all sorts of communities. The project has gained a lot of momentum lately specially in Europe and Asia: it&#8217;s been recommended in e-learning books (<a href="http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/18/plog_recommended_in_e-learnig_book" rel="nofollow">http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/18/plog_recommended_in_e-learnig_book</a>), it&#8217;s been positively compared to MT in Lockergnome (<a href="http://channels.lockergnome.com/web/archives/20050701_why_plog_is_better_than_movabletype.phtml" rel="nofollow">http://channels.lockergnome.com/web/archives/20050701_why_plog_is_better_than_movabletype.phtml</a>), it&#8217;s being used by the biggest media group in Norway for their journalistic blogs (<a href="http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/24/biggest_media_group_in_norway_is_using_plog" rel="nofollow">http://www.plogworld.net/blog.php/plog_development_journal/2005/06/24/biggest_media_group_in_norway_is_using_plog</a>) and it&#8217;s now in many blogging communities specially in China (<a href="http://blogger.net.tw/" rel="nofollow">http://blogger.net.tw/</a>)</p>
<p>Best of of all, pLog is free (GPL) and runs on PHP and MySQL. What else can you ask for? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: padawan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-42932</link>
		<dc:creator>padawan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-42932</guid>
		<description>There are lost of factual errors in her chart for MT:

MT has subcategories
MT APIs are Blogger, MetaWeblog, MT
MT has logs
Datastorage should read Database (MT allows for both a filesystem-based database or a regular database server, but those are both databases)
MT allows for comment moderation out of the box
MT publishing interface is of course password protected!

I wonder if the accuracy is the same for other tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lost of factual errors in her chart for MT:</p>
<p>MT has subcategories<br />
MT APIs are Blogger, MetaWeblog, MT<br />
MT has logs<br />
Datastorage should read Database (MT allows for both a filesystem-based database or a regular database server, but those are both databases)<br />
MT allows for comment moderation out of the box<br />
MT publishing interface is of course password protected!</p>
<p>I wonder if the accuracy is the same for other tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stories from a Web Junkie life &#187; Blogging jargon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-42015</link>
		<dc:creator>stories from a Web Junkie life &#187; Blogging jargon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-42015</guid>
		<description>[...] feeds 	Blogroll/lists 	News aggregation 	Moblogging 	Blacklist 	Captchas 	 	Link found via ProBlogger.  			 			 			Permalink 						         [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feeds 	Blogroll/lists 	News aggregation 	Moblogging 	Blacklist 	Captchas 	 	Link found via ProBlogger.  			</p>
<p> 			Permalink</p>
<p>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supersusie</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-42014</link>
		<dc:creator>supersusie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-42014</guid>
		<description>Hi folks, Thanks for all the comments. The chart covers only the features that come with the installed version of the blogging tools listed, and I do think that should show up on the chart as well as in the article. I&#039;ll see if that can&#039;t be noted.

I did want to say that yes, there are hundreds of plugins for nearly all of these, and if you think putting the chart together was a big job, doing so and accounting for all those plugins was even bigger! At any rate, there are many new bloggers who are daunted by plugins and customization. The capabilities included in a tool&#039;s standard-installed feature set is important, no matter how extensible it ultimately is.

Best,
Susannah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks, Thanks for all the comments. The chart covers only the features that come with the installed version of the blogging tools listed, and I do think that should show up on the chart as well as in the article. I&#8217;ll see if that can&#8217;t be noted.</p>
<p>I did want to say that yes, there are hundreds of plugins for nearly all of these, and if you think putting the chart together was a big job, doing so and accounting for all those plugins was even bigger! At any rate, there are many new bloggers who are daunted by plugins and customization. The capabilities included in a tool&#8217;s standard-installed feature set is important, no matter how extensible it ultimately is.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Susannah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LexBlog Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-42007</link>
		<dc:creator>LexBlog Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-42007</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogging tools compared&lt;/strong&gt;

Susannah Gardner, author of Buzz Marketing with Blogs for Dummies, has written a great article comparing blog tools. There&#039;s even one heck of chart comparing the features of the various blog solutions. If you are a lawyer or law firm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogging tools compared</strong></p>
<p>Susannah Gardner, author of Buzz Marketing with Blogs for Dummies, has written a great article comparing blog tools. There&#8217;s even one heck of chart comparing the features of the various blog solutions. If you are a lawyer or law firm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Musante</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-41391</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Musante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-41391</guid>
		<description>I really like the chart. I might switch over to WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the chart. I might switch over to WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz L</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-41319</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-41319</guid>
		<description>As I do all over when I see talks like these spring up:

Here&#039;s my Mambo (http://www.mamboserver.com/).  Mambo is a very powerful CMS.  Mainly used for non-blogs, it has been used quite nicely (with plugins and addons of course) to create some extremly good blogs.

A big learning curve is needed IF and only IF you dive into all the features which this contains.

If all you do is blog, you should be up and running in 30 mins.  I was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I do all over when I see talks like these spring up:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my Mambo (<a href="http://www.mamboserver.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mamboserver.com/</a>).  Mambo is a very powerful CMS.  Mainly used for non-blogs, it has been used quite nicely (with plugins and addons of course) to create some extremly good blogs.</p>
<p>A big learning curve is needed IF and only IF you dive into all the features which this contains.</p>
<p>If all you do is blog, you should be up and running in 30 mins.  I was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitrax</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-41159</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-41159</guid>
		<description>Like at least a million other people, I&#039;m still with Google&#039;s Blogger.

 I&#039;ve wanted to switch to get the benefits of the fee-based services, but I&#039;ve decided to hang in there because I think we&#039;re in for a pleasant surprise with new (fee-based) features to be announced by Google soon.  This is just a hunch.

See the future for Google&#039;s Blogger:

http://beyondthevoip.blogspot.com/2005/07/future-for-googles-blogger.html


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like at least a million other people, I&#8217;m still with Google&#8217;s Blogger.</p>
<p> I&#8217;ve wanted to switch to get the benefits of the fee-based services, but I&#8217;ve decided to hang in there because I think we&#8217;re in for a pleasant surprise with new (fee-based) features to be announced by Google soon.  This is just a hunch.</p>
<p>See the future for Google&#8217;s Blogger:</p>
<p><a href="http://beyondthevoip.blogspot.com/2005/07/future-for-googles-blogger.html" rel="nofollow">http://beyondthevoip.blogspot.com/2005/07/future-for-googles-blogger.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-41114</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-41114</guid>
		<description>Well, as per usual, you got me going on a good rant Darren! I&#039;ve continued the above at my place. Be warned, I call you on recommending the chart.

http://www.peterflaschner.com/index.php?id=189</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as per usual, you got me going on a good rant Darren! I&#8217;ve continued the above at my place. Be warned, I call you on recommending the chart.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peterflaschner.com/index.php?id=189" rel="nofollow">http://www.peterflaschner.com/index.php?id=189</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-41003</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-41003</guid>
		<description>While it is at first glance an impressive piece of work, it fails to mention several important and popular software options, and ignores simple plugin functionality. It misleads the reader by implying that the options listed are the &quot;right blogging tool&quot;, and its scholarly appearance and banner gives false authority to a marginal piece.

Drupal, as mentioned above, and Textpattern are both missing. I know it&#039;s impossible to include every CMS, but imo, passing over Textpattern is a significant oversight. There is a very large base of users, a very healthy library of plugins, and hundreds of tutorials available. And its free. And a heck of a lot easier to install than some of the listed options.

Not including plugin capabilities on the chart is a huge oversight. I&#039;m at a loss as to why the writer chose to include the API (which only a tiny fraction of the population cares about) and not whether the software supports third party functionality. The three CMSs that I am familiar with (Textpattern, Wordpress, and MT) make heavy use of plugins. If one were to go by the chart alone, one would be left with the impression that MT lacks the ability to blacklist commentors (a fact that would likely dissuade most users). In fact, adding blacklist ability is a simple matter of installing a plugin. Plugins are given a short sentence in the body of the article, but leaving their mention off the chart is tantamount to intellectual dishonesty.

In all, while this is at first glance an impressive accomplishment, it falls quite short of being a useful tool.  No mention is made as to what criteria were used to select the programs, nor is any mention made of the plethora of other choices available. The fact that this article is posted at a major University&#039;s Online Journalism Review shows just how far behind the time journalists and academia have fallen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is at first glance an impressive piece of work, it fails to mention several important and popular software options, and ignores simple plugin functionality. It misleads the reader by implying that the options listed are the &#8220;right blogging tool&#8221;, and its scholarly appearance and banner gives false authority to a marginal piece.</p>
<p>Drupal, as mentioned above, and Textpattern are both missing. I know it&#8217;s impossible to include every CMS, but imo, passing over Textpattern is a significant oversight. There is a very large base of users, a very healthy library of plugins, and hundreds of tutorials available. And its free. And a heck of a lot easier to install than some of the listed options.</p>
<p>Not including plugin capabilities on the chart is a huge oversight. I&#8217;m at a loss as to why the writer chose to include the API (which only a tiny fraction of the population cares about) and not whether the software supports third party functionality. The three CMSs that I am familiar with (Textpattern, WordPress, and MT) make heavy use of plugins. If one were to go by the chart alone, one would be left with the impression that MT lacks the ability to blacklist commentors (a fact that would likely dissuade most users). In fact, adding blacklist ability is a simple matter of installing a plugin. Plugins are given a short sentence in the body of the article, but leaving their mention off the chart is tantamount to intellectual dishonesty.</p>
<p>In all, while this is at first glance an impressive accomplishment, it falls quite short of being a useful tool.  No mention is made as to what criteria were used to select the programs, nor is any mention made of the plethora of other choices available. The fact that this article is posted at a major University&#8217;s Online Journalism Review shows just how far behind the time journalists and academia have fallen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-40977</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-40977</guid>
		<description>Hello,


Really interesting. However, as it was mentioned, plugins exists to enable bloggers to do anything with their blog platform(and if it doesn&#039;t exist, they can develop it) like WordPress, b2Evolution, Drepal, etc (all non hosted blog applications).

I think that if you liked that article, you could like that list that I created with my readers: 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php?title=28_things_to_check_when_searching_for_a&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;32 things to check when searching for a blog system and a hosting service&lt;/a&gt;


Salutations,

Fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Really interesting. However, as it was mentioned, plugins exists to enable bloggers to do anything with their blog platform(and if it doesn&#8217;t exist, they can develop it) like WordPress, b2Evolution, Drepal, etc (all non hosted blog applications).</p>
<p>I think that if you liked that article, you could like that list that I created with my readers: </p>
<p><a href="http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php?title=28_things_to_check_when_searching_for_a&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1" rel="nofollow">32 things to check when searching for a blog system and a hosting service</a></p>
<p>Salutations,</p>
<p>Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amit agarwal</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-40970</link>
		<dc:creator>amit agarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-40970</guid>
		<description>Surprised to see that MSN spaces and Yahoo 360 are in the comparison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised to see that MSN spaces and Yahoo 360 are in the comparison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hanna</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-40968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-40968</guid>
		<description>That chart does WordPress an injustice or two.  You can edit template files offline. I have no idea where they came up with only 7 skins (by which I assume they mean themes.)  I would guess the number is over 100, just on the Codex theme list alone. Admin panel design and layout can be configured. &quot;Work offline&quot; I&#039;m not sure of the meaning, but you can write posts offline using any XMLRPC compatible client. 

There are also some errors that are arguable since they involve nonstandard installs or plugins. You can easily run multiple WordPress blogs off a single database.  http://news.tom-hanna.com and http://library.tom-hanna.com are both running off the same database.  Yeah, you upload a second copy of the core files and run a second install, but it doesn&#039;t cost anything for that second copy and without creating a new database the time is way less than five minutes. There is also a mutliuser version available, though I had less luck getting it installed. Photogalleries and CAPTCHAs are both available by way of multiple (free) plugins.  

To be fair, if that many features are wrong on WordPress, they may have underestimated some of the other platforms as well. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That chart does WordPress an injustice or two.  You can edit template files offline. I have no idea where they came up with only 7 skins (by which I assume they mean themes.)  I would guess the number is over 100, just on the Codex theme list alone. Admin panel design and layout can be configured. &#8220;Work offline&#8221; I&#8217;m not sure of the meaning, but you can write posts offline using any XMLRPC compatible client. </p>
<p>There are also some errors that are arguable since they involve nonstandard installs or plugins. You can easily run multiple WordPress blogs off a single database.  <a href="http://news.tom-hanna.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.tom-hanna.com</a> and <a href="http://library.tom-hanna.com" rel="nofollow">http://library.tom-hanna.com</a> are both running off the same database.  Yeah, you upload a second copy of the core files and run a second install, but it doesn&#8217;t cost anything for that second copy and without creating a new database the time is way less than five minutes. There is also a mutliuser version available, though I had less luck getting it installed. Photogalleries and CAPTCHAs are both available by way of multiple (free) plugins.  </p>
<p>To be fair, if that many features are wrong on WordPress, they may have underestimated some of the other platforms as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-40960</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/16/blogging-tools-compared/#comment-40960</guid>
		<description>Sorry
I saw this yesterday and didn&#039;t run with it. Not indepth and doesn&#039;t really take a proper look, stange definitions as well. I know Im pretty much an advanced user so tend to be picky, but even recommending this to newbies is bad form. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry<br />
I saw this yesterday and didn&#8217;t run with it. Not indepth and doesn&#8217;t really take a proper look, stange definitions as well. I know Im pretty much an advanced user so tend to be picky, but even recommending this to newbies is bad form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/26 queries in 0.102 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 22:17:05 -->
