<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bots, Aggregation and Content Creation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:07:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: feedbuzzard &#124; Maximize your Adsense Earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-22778</link>
		<dc:creator>feedbuzzard &#124; Maximize your Adsense Earnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/#comment-22778</guid>
		<description>Google is well aware of these fly by night spam artists, but they are a moving target, and expensive to keep up with.  

That is why they are giving us the tools to report them now.  They need all the help they can get.

I for one have no problem reporting abuse where I see it.  From there, Google can decide.

I think we are all responsible in making the world (and the web) a better place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is well aware of these fly by night spam artists, but they are a moving target, and expensive to keep up with.  </p>
<p>That is why they are giving us the tools to report them now.  They need all the help they can get.</p>
<p>I for one have no problem reporting abuse where I see it.  From there, Google can decide.</p>
<p>I think we are all responsible in making the world (and the web) a better place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-21608</link>
		<dc:creator>John (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/#comment-21608</guid>
		<description>Well, as a writer I do gag at this sort of thing. But when words are monetized (by AdSense), it&#039;s an invitation to skew them anyhow to maximize returns. That&#039;s how business works. We shouldn&#039;t complain, especially if we benefit ourselves from the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as a writer I do gag at this sort of thing. But when words are monetized (by AdSense), it&#8217;s an invitation to skew them anyhow to maximize returns. That&#8217;s how business works. We shouldn&#8217;t complain, especially if we benefit ourselves from the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-20943</link>
		<dc:creator>IO ERROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/#comment-20943</guid>
		<description>Google News already subscribes to major blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google News already subscribes to major blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-19274</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/#comment-19274</guid>
		<description>These sorts of software are almost always used for spam like content creation. The aggregation of RSS feeds can be done properly to offer a value added service to web visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sorts of software are almost always used for spam like content creation. The aggregation of RSS feeds can be done properly to offer a value added service to web visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-19213</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/09/bots-aggregation-and-content-creation/#comment-19213</guid>
		<description>Wait until the Google News&#039; &quot;bot&quot; starts aggregating from major blogs in addition to news sources... then it&#039;ll be interesting. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until the Google News&#8217; &#8220;bot&#8221; starts aggregating from major blogs in addition to news sources&#8230; then it&#8217;ll be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
