<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Page Rank Reappears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:00:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Donelson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/comment-page-1/#comment-11614</link>
		<dc:creator>William Donelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/#comment-11614</guid>
		<description>http://www.taj-mahal.net
- For over 3 years, our Explore the Taj Mahal website was number One in Google when searching for: Taj Mahal
Now we are #11, and despite your article, we have NOT recovered our position. ALL of the websites listed above us have Fewer link-to&#039;s and poorer quality link-to&#039;s that our Taj Mahal site.

How do you explain that?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taj-mahal.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.taj-mahal.net</a><br />
- For over 3 years, our Explore the Taj Mahal website was number One in Google when searching for: Taj Mahal<br />
Now we are #11, and despite your article, we have NOT recovered our position. ALL of the websites listed above us have Fewer link-to&#8217;s and poorer quality link-to&#8217;s that our Taj Mahal site.</p>
<p>How do you explain that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Neumann</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/comment-page-1/#comment-11179</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Neumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 04:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/#comment-11179</guid>
		<description>I lost my PR rank of 5 and my head went spinning ... then I thought, so what! Many think that PR is overrated and I&#039;m heading that way myself too. 

I&#039;ve seen huge, popular sites with PR of 3 and 4&#039;s and I&#039;m a 5 ... with only a handful of backlinks. Now maybe if PR was out of 100 then that would be a better gauge ... and wouldn&#039;t that get the seo&#039;s in a frenzy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost my PR rank of 5 and my head went spinning &#8230; then I thought, so what! Many think that PR is overrated and I&#8217;m heading that way myself too. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen huge, popular sites with PR of 3 and 4&#8217;s and I&#8217;m a 5 &#8230; with only a handful of backlinks. Now maybe if PR was out of 100 then that would be a better gauge &#8230; and wouldn&#8217;t that get the seo&#8217;s in a frenzy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keven johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/comment-page-1/#comment-10878</link>
		<dc:creator>keven johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 04:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/31/google-page-rank-reappears/#comment-10878</guid>
		<description>Darren, 
Indeed this was a much talked about topic. It seemed as though like you said many seo experts were in a frenzy wondering if it was ever going to show back up.  

keven j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,<br />
Indeed this was a much talked about topic. It seemed as though like you said many seo experts were in a frenzy wondering if it was ever going to show back up.  </p>
<p>keven j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
