<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weblogs Inc: $2,000 a day on Google Adsense &#8211; But Could it be More?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/27/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/27/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul William Tenny</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/27/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1223409</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul William Tenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 06:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/26/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/#comment-1223409</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame I&#039;m so late to the party, I have some thoughts on this. Considering the state of Weblogs Inc. around the time this post was made, I would have reminded Calacanis that he&#039;s not building now, so much as growing, which means he has more to lose than he did five months ago (circa &#039;05.) That ought to weigh heavily on decisions like this. The last thing you want to do is stunt your growth with such great potential.

The network, even at its size in 2005, had leverage that smaller networks and individual sites do not: the availability of sites on which to trial new ideas. What were the numbers back then, 70 or so blogs? There must have been a few that would have stood to benefit greatly from the potential gain in ad clicks while having the least amount to lose inside the network from upsetting users.

It&#039;s still a good theory today, too. So long as you mitigate your risks, anything is worth trying at least once.

I wonder what Weblogs pulls in today from ads..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame I&#8217;m so late to the party, I have some thoughts on this. Considering the state of Weblogs Inc. around the time this post was made, I would have reminded Calacanis that he&#8217;s not building now, so much as growing, which means he has more to lose than he did five months ago (circa &#8217;05.) That ought to weigh heavily on decisions like this. The last thing you want to do is stunt your growth with such great potential.</p>
<p>The network, even at its size in 2005, had leverage that smaller networks and individual sites do not: the availability of sites on which to trial new ideas. What were the numbers back then, 70 or so blogs? There must have been a few that would have stood to benefit greatly from the potential gain in ad clicks while having the least amount to lose inside the network from upsetting users.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a good theory today, too. So long as you mitigate your risks, anything is worth trying at least once.</p>
<p>I wonder what Weblogs pulls in today from ads..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colbert</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/27/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/comment-page-1/#comment-10656</link>
		<dc:creator>colbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 23:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/26/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/#comment-10656</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been seing ads in between content for some time now in other websites. Most of it have been picture ads like those in Cnet. But having adsense text ads in between content should be ok for smaller sites and not big ones like Jason&#039;s. Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been seing ads in between content for some time now in other websites. Most of it have been picture ads like those in Cnet. But having adsense text ads in between content should be ok for smaller sites and not big ones like Jason&#8217;s. Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/27/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/comment-page-1/#comment-10645</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 18:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/26/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/#comment-10645</guid>
		<description>There certainly is a fine line between having well positioned ads and creating spaces for ads that just make an ugly or hard to manage site.  I personally don&#039;t like the ads that run in the middle of the comments section.  It&#039;s a little distracting as a reader and in my opinion it&#039;s almost as bad as asking for clicks. (which you can&#039;t do)  But I certainly don&#039;t stay away from nor does it discourage me as a reader, I have no problem skimming by.  So I say, whatever works.  Like everything, trial and error will produce a good working model for a Bloggers particular audience.

Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There certainly is a fine line between having well positioned ads and creating spaces for ads that just make an ugly or hard to manage site.  I personally don&#8217;t like the ads that run in the middle of the comments section.  It&#8217;s a little distracting as a reader and in my opinion it&#8217;s almost as bad as asking for clicks. (which you can&#8217;t do)  But I certainly don&#8217;t stay away from nor does it discourage me as a reader, I have no problem skimming by.  So I say, whatever works.  Like everything, trial and error will produce a good working model for a Bloggers particular audience.</p>
<p>Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connected Internet - Broadband, Mobile and Gaming News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/27/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/comment-page-1/#comment-10638</link>
		<dc:creator>Connected Internet - Broadband, Mobile and Gaming News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 16:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/26/weblogs-inc-2000-a-day-on-google-adsense-but-could-it-be-more/#comment-10638</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Problogging - how much can you really make?&lt;/strong&gt;

Jason Calacanis of Weblogs has announced that they are generating $2K oer day on Google Adsense.&#160; Darren of Problogger thinks that this could be increased by 10% per day if ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Problogging &#8211; how much can you really make?</strong></p>
<p>Jason Calacanis of Weblogs has announced that they are generating $2K oer day on Google Adsense.&nbsp; Darren of Problogger thinks that this could be increased by 10% per day if &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 4/10 queries in 0.076 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 05:30:19 -->
