<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs as Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-10157</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 22:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/#comment-10157</guid>
		<description>Thanks Toby - some days I just don&#039;t feel I have the time to really develop a brand intentionally - writing, designing and interacting with readers can be so time consuming. I know all of this helps with brand - however its more of an accidental brand than anything else.

Thanks everyone else for the advice too. I tried to get ProBlogger.com before I started here at problogger.net - unfortunately they wanted to sell it to me at an inflated cost - something I didnt feel I wanted to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Toby &#8211; some days I just don&#8217;t feel I have the time to really develop a brand intentionally &#8211; writing, designing and interacting with readers can be so time consuming. I know all of this helps with brand &#8211; however its more of an accidental brand than anything else.</p>
<p>Thanks everyone else for the advice too. I tried to get ProBlogger.com before I started here at problogger.net &#8211; unfortunately they wanted to sell it to me at an inflated cost &#8211; something I didnt feel I wanted to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-10153</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/#comment-10153</guid>
		<description>Darren - thanks for the very kind words...not sure that I&#039;m in your league! My 2 cents is that problogger is one of the best resources about blogging; lots of up-to-date, practical information in an easy to navigate site... that seems like a pretty good place to start in developing your &quot;brand strategy.&quot; Keep up the great work. Toby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8211; thanks for the very kind words&#8230;not sure that I&#8217;m in your league! My 2 cents is that problogger is one of the best resources about blogging; lots of up-to-date, practical information in an easy to navigate site&#8230; that seems like a pretty good place to start in developing your &#8220;brand strategy.&#8221; Keep up the great work. Toby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-10152</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 18:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/#comment-10152</guid>
		<description>I recently wrote a post titled &quot;Why blogs are so good for your  brand&quot; over at www.theblogstudio.com/blog/ Short of dropping a load of cash, I simply cannot imagine a more powerful branding tool. Rather than rehashing all my reasons here, I&#039;ll let the post speak for itself.

Thanks as always Darren!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a post titled &#8220;Why blogs are so good for your  brand&#8221; over at <a href="http://www.theblogstudio.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theblogstudio.com/blog/</a> Short of dropping a load of cash, I simply cannot imagine a more powerful branding tool. Rather than rehashing all my reasons here, I&#8217;ll let the post speak for itself.</p>
<p>Thanks as always Darren!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Piazza</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-10142</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Piazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/#comment-10142</guid>
		<description>Buiding a brand first means giving value. You often encourage blog owners to keep a high quality content, to publish regularly, to answer the comments... all these attitudes create a valuable and trusty ProBlogger brand, in line with what is expected  for such a &quot;claim&quot; (Pro + Blogger). With times, keeping focused on these values, you will indeed have a real brand that you&#039;ll have created at low costs. I mean low costs in terms of media expenditure (no ads, no media buying, only your blog&#039;s costs). Of course, the time spent and the quality of the work have a real cost. But we must admit that it seems to be a real cheap way to create a brand. 
Last, focusing on domain names is one thing. Don&#039;t forget that a brand needs to be protected by copyright and trademarks. You need to check this out before someone else does it...
Congratulations for your good job
Olivier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buiding a brand first means giving value. You often encourage blog owners to keep a high quality content, to publish regularly, to answer the comments&#8230; all these attitudes create a valuable and trusty ProBlogger brand, in line with what is expected  for such a &#8220;claim&#8221; (Pro + Blogger). With times, keeping focused on these values, you will indeed have a real brand that you&#8217;ll have created at low costs. I mean low costs in terms of media expenditure (no ads, no media buying, only your blog&#8217;s costs). Of course, the time spent and the quality of the work have a real cost. But we must admit that it seems to be a real cheap way to create a brand.<br />
Last, focusing on domain names is one thing. Don&#8217;t forget that a brand needs to be protected by copyright and trademarks. You need to check this out before someone else does it&#8230;<br />
Congratulations for your good job<br />
Olivier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-10140</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 15:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/19/blogs-as-brands/#comment-10140</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d need to buy up all the domains, Darren. I see that .org and .biz, even .co.uk are still available, though .com, and .info are taken. If you don&#039;t have these, you have to ask what are the owners are going to do with them. With such a role-specific name as Problogger, they&#039;re sure to be used for something similar to your own operation. I suspect that if you had .com, you&#039;d be using it in preference to .net, so it&#039;s probably a cybersquatter waiting for an offer of $2000+. I have a similar problem with Syntagma, which is owned across the board by a super-small UK tech writing business. Ah, well, life wasn&#039;t meant to be easy, as Malcolm Fraser used to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d need to buy up all the domains, Darren. I see that .org and .biz, even .co.uk are still available, though .com, and .info are taken. If you don&#8217;t have these, you have to ask what are the owners are going to do with them. With such a role-specific name as Problogger, they&#8217;re sure to be used for something similar to your own operation. I suspect that if you had .com, you&#8217;d be using it in preference to .net, so it&#8217;s probably a cybersquatter waiting for an offer of $2000+. I have a similar problem with Syntagma, which is owned across the board by a super-small UK tech writing business. Ah, well, life wasn&#8217;t meant to be easy, as Malcolm Fraser used to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.078 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-10 23:00:38 -->
