<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Opens Up Beta of AdSense for Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:49:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B.Greenway</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10210</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 01:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10210</guid>
		<description>Looks like I got mine in fast enough to make the first round. 

&quot;Welcome to Google AdSense for feeds. Your application has been approved.&quot;

 Apparently they had pity :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I got mine in fast enough to make the first round. </p>
<p>&#8220;Welcome to Google AdSense for feeds. Your application has been approved.&#8221;</p>
<p> Apparently they had pity :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10205</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 23:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10205</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t heard of any of us lowly non megablog type sites being added in the last few days yet. I suspect they&#039;ll be inundated with requests to participate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard of any of us lowly non megablog type sites being added in the last few days yet. I suspect they&#8217;ll be inundated with requests to participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Greenway</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10201</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 21:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10201</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- spamk    : Comment text: &#039;So, has anyone been accepted yet? (High traffic sties aside)

I&#039;m really anxious to get started with it, but I’ve noticed some detractors on various sites,  who are of the opinion that feeds should remain ad free. I can’t really comprehend how someone wouldn’t want the creator compelling content to be compensated. The same logic would say “I should be able to get cable without ads”, would you be wiling to pay twice to three times as much to do so?

If news feeds should be “ad free” why not all forms of web? I might be really out of touch here, but I can’t draw a distinction, between someone reading my content on an html page from someone reading it in a news reader. Sure news aggregators were mainly used by “insiders” for a long period of time, and the advertising would have probably gone mostly unnoticed anyway, but with more and more users getting hip to how easy it is to quickly scan a lot sites with a reader, isn’t this just a logical extension of the current forms of advertising?

I say if you don’t want ads in your feeds, don’t read feeds with ads. Might sound harsh, but so is getting your content distributed via RSS with no chance at even a few cents worth of clicks.

My feed views are nearly three times my html views, I for one would easily be able to justify spending even more time than the 25-30 hours a week, I already spend on my site, if I knew that ‘might’ be compensated in some fashion. As it stands now, a feed is a freebie in my opinion, and freebies historically don’t have long track records.


p.s. Darren, great site, truly inspirational.&#039; matched ((holdem&#124;texas&#124;poker&#124;casino&#124;online&#124;gambl&#124;blackjack&#124;game&#124;free).*){2,} --&gt;
So, has anyone been accepted yet? (High traffic sties aside)

I&#039;m really anxious to get started with it, but I’ve noticed some detractors on various sites,  who are of the opinion that feeds should remain ad free. I can’t really comprehend how someone wouldn’t want the creator compelling content to be compensated. The same logic would say “I should be able to get cable without ads”, would you be wiling to pay twice to three times as much to do so?

If news feeds should be “ad free” why not all forms of web? I might be really out of touch here, but I can’t draw a distinction, between someone reading my content on an html page from someone reading it in a news reader. Sure news aggregators were mainly used by “insiders” for a long period of time, and the advertising would have probably gone mostly unnoticed anyway, but with more and more users getting hip to how easy it is to quickly scan a lot sites with a reader, isn’t this just a logical extension of the current forms of advertising?

I say if you don’t want ads in your feeds, don’t read feeds with ads. Might sound harsh, but so is getting your content distributed via RSS with no chance at even a few cents worth of clicks.

My feed views are nearly three times my html views, I for one would easily be able to justify spending even more time than the 25-30 hours a week, I already spend on my site, if I knew that ‘might’ be compensated in some fashion. As it stands now, a feed is a freebie in my opinion, and freebies historically don’t have long track records.


p.s. Darren, great site, truly inspirational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- spamk    : Comment text: 'So, has anyone been accepted yet? (High traffic sties aside)</p>
<p>I'm really anxious to get started with it, but I’ve noticed some detractors on various sites,  who are of the opinion that feeds should remain ad free. I can’t really comprehend how someone wouldn’t want the creator compelling content to be compensated. The same logic would say “I should be able to get cable without ads”, would you be wiling to pay twice to three times as much to do so?</p>
<p>If news feeds should be “ad free” why not all forms of web? I might be really out of touch here, but I can’t draw a distinction, between someone reading my content on an html page from someone reading it in a news reader. Sure news aggregators were mainly used by “insiders” for a long period of time, and the advertising would have probably gone mostly unnoticed anyway, but with more and more users getting hip to how easy it is to quickly scan a lot sites with a reader, isn’t this just a logical extension of the current forms of advertising?</p>
<p>I say if you don’t want ads in your feeds, don’t read feeds with ads. Might sound harsh, but so is getting your content distributed via RSS with no chance at even a few cents worth of clicks.</p>
<p>My feed views are nearly three times my html views, I for one would easily be able to justify spending even more time than the 25-30 hours a week, I already spend on my site, if I knew that ‘might’ be compensated in some fashion. As it stands now, a feed is a freebie in my opinion, and freebies historically don’t have long track records.</p>
<p>p.s. Darren, great site, truly inspirational.' matched ((holdem|texas|poker|casino|online|gambl|blackjack|game|free).*){2,} --><br />
So, has anyone been accepted yet? (High traffic sties aside)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really anxious to get started with it, but I’ve noticed some detractors on various sites,  who are of the opinion that feeds should remain ad free. I can’t really comprehend how someone wouldn’t want the creator compelling content to be compensated. The same logic would say “I should be able to get cable without ads”, would you be wiling to pay twice to three times as much to do so?</p>
<p>If news feeds should be “ad free” why not all forms of web? I might be really out of touch here, but I can’t draw a distinction, between someone reading my content on an html page from someone reading it in a news reader. Sure news aggregators were mainly used by “insiders” for a long period of time, and the advertising would have probably gone mostly unnoticed anyway, but with more and more users getting hip to how easy it is to quickly scan a lot sites with a reader, isn’t this just a logical extension of the current forms of advertising?</p>
<p>I say if you don’t want ads in your feeds, don’t read feeds with ads. Might sound harsh, but so is getting your content distributed via RSS with no chance at even a few cents worth of clicks.</p>
<p>My feed views are nearly three times my html views, I for one would easily be able to justify spending even more time than the 25-30 hours a week, I already spend on my site, if I knew that ‘might’ be compensated in some fashion. As it stands now, a feed is a freebie in my opinion, and freebies historically don’t have long track records.</p>
<p>p.s. Darren, great site, truly inspirational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mind Sharer - For The Marketing Mind &#187; Application open on Adsense for Feeds (RSS and Atom) Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10141</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind Sharer - For The Marketing Mind &#187; Application open on Adsense for Feeds (RSS and Atom) Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10141</guid>
		<description>[...] 	Links: Register here Google Opens Up Beta of AdSense for Feeds - [Clickz via JenSense via Problogger]                                        [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 	Links: Register here Google Opens Up Beta of AdSense for Feeds &#8211; [Clickz via JenSense via Problogger]                </p>
<p>   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10137</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10137</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be looking into it Andy - probably test it on one or two feeds to see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be looking into it Andy &#8211; probably test it on one or two feeds to see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10132</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 09:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure this is such a great thing.  I have a feeling the widespread adoption of AdSense and other ads in feeds may alienate people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure this is such a great thing.  I have a feeling the widespread adoption of AdSense and other ads in feeds may alienate people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony E</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10129</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 07:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10129</guid>
		<description>I am hoping that they will try a new look for the RSS ads. I&#039;m not sure what, but something a bit different that will keep the whole online ad space fresh and interesting for site / blog readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping that they will try a new look for the RSS ads. I&#8217;m not sure what, but something a bit different that will keep the whole online ad space fresh and interesting for site / blog readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-10128</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 07:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/18/google-opens-up-beta-of-adsense-for-feeds/#comment-10128</guid>
		<description>Darren, will you be &#039;beta-testing&#039; this (I sense you are often an &#039;early adopter&#039;) or are you going to wait and see if there are any tech problems or potential fallout before adopting? (Or are you even planning on adopting Adsense in your feeds at all?)  Tell me to mind my own business if you like - I&#039;m curious.

I am going to investigate how it works and how it looks before commiting to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, will you be &#8216;beta-testing&#8217; this (I sense you are often an &#8216;early adopter&#8217;) or are you going to wait and see if there are any tech problems or potential fallout before adopting? (Or are you even planning on adopting Adsense in your feeds at all?)  Tell me to mind my own business if you like &#8211; I&#8217;m curious.</p>
<p>I am going to investigate how it works and how it looks before commiting to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
