<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google considers changes to Blogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/12/google-considers-chages-to-blogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/12/google-considers-chages-to-blogger/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Becky Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/12/google-considers-chages-to-blogger/comment-page-1/#comment-4535238</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/12/google-considers-chages-to-blogger/#comment-4535238</guid>
		<description>Really interesting post with some excellent points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post with some excellent points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/12/google-considers-chages-to-blogger/comment-page-1/#comment-9273</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/12/google-considers-chages-to-blogger/#comment-9273</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Merger of Blogger and gmail?&lt;/strong&gt;

Of course, Google owns both properties, but it could lead to some great synergies....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Merger of Blogger and gmail?</strong></p>
<p>Of course, Google owns both properties, but it could lead to some great synergies&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
