<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Carlsson</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-70441</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Carlsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-70441</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;self bondage stories&lt;/strong&gt;

Critiquing the Critiqu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>self bondage stories<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Critiquing the Critiqu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brigitte Hopf</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-60415</link>
		<dc:creator>Brigitte Hopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-60415</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc&lt;/strong&gt;

Critiquing the Critiqu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc</strong></p>
<p>Critiquing the Critiqu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Degener</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-60416</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Degener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-60416</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc&lt;/strong&gt;

Critiquing the Critiqu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc</strong></p>
<p>Critiquing the Critiqu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Kokkonen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-11957</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Kokkonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-11957</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Music Sharing MP3&lt;/strong&gt;

Critiquing the Critiqu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Music Sharing MP3<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Critiquing the Critiqu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-11735</link>
		<dc:creator>Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-11735</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc&lt;/strong&gt;

Critiquing the Critiqu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Critiquing the Critiquing of Weblogs Inc</strong></p>
<p>Critiquing the Critiqu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-8435</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-8435</guid>
		<description>thanks for the comments Chrispian (not sure why trackbacks are not working - they used to...) and Jacob. Good points. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the comments Chrispian (not sure why trackbacks are not working &#8211; they used to&#8230;) and Jacob. Good points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob G.</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-8422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-8422</guid>
		<description>I think my post sounded more negative than it actually was meant to be.  It just seems to me that if you&#039;re going to start a new blog section, you should at least the have means to have it updated.  I like what Weblogs, Inc has done and love several of the blogs(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.luxist.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;luxist&lt;/a&gt; is one of my new favorites), I just meant to point out that it looks like they were overextending.  I&#039;ve done the same thing myself before so it&#039;s no big deal.  You learn from the mistake, and reel it back in(not saying that you made a mistake, just maybe ;P).  Anyway, you&#039;re right, nobody is perfect, least of all me.  Good luck Jason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my post sounded more negative than it actually was meant to be.  It just seems to me that if you&#8217;re going to start a new blog section, you should at least the have means to have it updated.  I like what Weblogs, Inc has done and love several of the blogs(<a href="http://www.luxist.com" rel="nofollow">luxist</a> is one of my new favorites), I just meant to point out that it looks like they were overextending.  I&#8217;ve done the same thing myself before so it&#8217;s no big deal.  You learn from the mistake, and reel it back in(not saying that you made a mistake, just maybe ;P).  Anyway, you&#8217;re right, nobody is perfect, least of all me.  Good luck Jason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrispian</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator>chrispian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 15:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-8416</guid>
		<description>Darren,  your post got me thinking about this a good bit and I posted an entry on my site (you need trackbacks!) regarding this too. It seems web developers take it on themsevles too much to deside what content is valuable to users, that&#039;s something users get to decide for themselves. If the content wasn&#039;t useful in the first place then companies wouldn&#039;t be paying highly for ads on those keywords. Obviously mortgage information is indeed useful to people, people like me who is about to start looking to buy a new home. Great post and nice reply Jason, glad to see you try and take the time and respond. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren,  your post got me thinking about this a good bit and I posted an entry on my site (you need trackbacks!) regarding this too. It seems web developers take it on themsevles too much to deside what content is valuable to users, that&#8217;s something users get to decide for themselves. If the content wasn&#8217;t useful in the first place then companies wouldn&#8217;t be paying highly for ads on those keywords. Obviously mortgage information is indeed useful to people, people like me who is about to start looking to buy a new home. Great post and nice reply Jason, glad to see you try and take the time and respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-8414</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 14:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-8414</guid>
		<description>thanks for the comment Jason - appreciate your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the comment Jason &#8211; appreciate your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 14:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/05/05/critiquing-the-critiquing-of-weblogs-inc/#comment-8413</guid>
		<description>You are correct that a blog suffers when a blogger leaves, get&#039;s sick, has a baby, gets full-time work, or burns out.... it&#039;s a bummer for us to. We don&#039;t have the resources to just hire ten full-time people and have them fill in on these &quot;on hiatus&quot; blogs. Not sure we would want people who didn&#039;t have passion even doing them.

However, if you look at the new blogs we are staffing them up to the point at which we don&#039;t have to worry about losing folks. For example, www.tvsquad.com, www.cinematical.com, www.divester.com, and www.adjab.com are getting a ton of posts every day.

As for our older design (like my blog http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com) it was great a year and half ago and now it really sucks... at least compared to our new good looking sites like www.divester.com and www.cinematical.com and www.enronblog.com.

As for going after high-paying keywords that really isn&#039;t our focus.

Finally, we don&#039;t expect all our blogs to every person... does any publisher? If out of our ~70 blogs you like two or three that is fine for me. Heck, if you love just one of them i&#039;m happy!!!

best j

We&#039;re not perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct that a blog suffers when a blogger leaves, get&#8217;s sick, has a baby, gets full-time work, or burns out&#8230;. it&#8217;s a bummer for us to. We don&#8217;t have the resources to just hire ten full-time people and have them fill in on these &#8220;on hiatus&#8221; blogs. Not sure we would want people who didn&#8217;t have passion even doing them.</p>
<p>However, if you look at the new blogs we are staffing them up to the point at which we don&#8217;t have to worry about losing folks. For example, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvsquad.com</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cinematical.com</a>, <a href="http://www.divester.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.divester.com</a>, and <a href="http://www.adjab.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adjab.com</a> are getting a ton of posts every day.</p>
<p>As for our older design (like my blog <a href="http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com)" rel="nofollow">http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com)</a> it was great a year and half ago and now it really sucks&#8230; at least compared to our new good looking sites like <a href="http://www.divester.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.divester.com</a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cinematical.com</a> and <a href="http://www.enronblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.enronblog.com</a>.</p>
<p>As for going after high-paying keywords that really isn&#8217;t our focus.</p>
<p>Finally, we don&#8217;t expect all our blogs to every person&#8230; does any publisher? If out of our ~70 blogs you like two or three that is fine for me. Heck, if you love just one of them i&#8217;m happy!!!</p>
<p>best j</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
