<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s the Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luca Conti</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Conti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with You, Darren: a blog like this has no future in my opinion. Too many ads, like some of yours ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with You, Darren: a blog like this has no future in my opinion. Too many ads, like some of yours ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7758</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7758</guid>
		<description>You might choose some other color than yellow, it&#039;s very hard to read.
                                                  Thanks for the information,
                                                             tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might choose some other color than yellow, it&#8217;s very hard to read.<br />
                                                  Thanks for the information,<br />
                                                             tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7582</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7582</guid>
		<description>These sites tend to be incredibly annoying and in view, really break the cardinal sin of too much text on a page. Especially when it&#039;s bunched up. 

I was worried that maybe I was putting too many ads on my site but that one i just ridiculous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sites tend to be incredibly annoying and in view, really break the cardinal sin of too much text on a page. Especially when it&#8217;s bunched up. </p>
<p>I was worried that maybe I was putting too many ads on my site but that one i just ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7566</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7566</guid>
		<description>Interesting that this is the mob who only pay their bloggers 40% if I recall one of your earlier posts? I suppose with so many ads scaring away the punters they&#039;ve only got their bloggers left to take from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that this is the mob who only pay their bloggers 40% if I recall one of your earlier posts? I suppose with so many ads scaring away the punters they&#8217;ve only got their bloggers left to take from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7525</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7525</guid>
		<description>It seems their feeds do have the full text of the entries (as well as some &quot;related&quot; links), although who knows what their feeds will look like once they get their hands on Google RSS ads :&gt;/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems their feeds do have the full text of the entries (as well as some &#8220;related&#8221; links), although who knows what their feeds will look like once they get their hands on Google RSS ads :&gt;/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s possible to move things around with CSS, so that the content in the example site could still be at, or near the top, of the source code - but having too much clutter on the page can reduce your search engine visibility.

Having just peeked at their source, if I were a spider :) I think I&#039;d have a pretty hard time finding their content, after all that hex-code stuff! The content should be as close to the top of the source as well as being visible on the web page itself. I&#039;d get pretty irritated with this kind of site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s possible to move things around with CSS, so that the content in the example site could still be at, or near the top, of the source code &#8211; but having too much clutter on the page can reduce your search engine visibility.</p>
<p>Having just peeked at their source, if I were a spider :) I think I&#8217;d have a pretty hard time finding their content, after all that hex-code stuff! The content should be as close to the top of the source as well as being visible on the web page itself. I&#8217;d get pretty irritated with this kind of site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/28/wheres-the-content/#comment-7496</guid>
		<description>Good stuff - there&#039;s a thing in Jakob Neilson&#039;s books about categorising screenspace by shading over the screenshot in different colours for different types of things, e.g. content, navigation, advertising, whitespace... guess it&#039;d be a single-colour page in this case.  

If you liked the content but couldn&#039;t stand the layout/design, would you still visit the site, or would you subscribe to the feed - or do you always just subscribe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff &#8211; there&#8217;s a thing in Jakob Neilson&#8217;s books about categorising screenspace by shading over the screenshot in different colours for different types of things, e.g. content, navigation, advertising, whitespace&#8230; guess it&#8217;d be a single-colour page in this case.  </p>
<p>If you liked the content but couldn&#8217;t stand the layout/design, would you still visit the site, or would you subscribe to the feed &#8211; or do you always just subscribe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
