Give me 31 Days and I’ll Give You a Better Blog… Guaranteed

Check out 31 Days to Build a Better Blog

Give me 31 Days and I’ll Give You a Better Blog

Check it out

A Practical Podcast… to Help You Build a Better Blog

The ProBlogger Podcast

A Practical Podcast…

FREE Problogging tips delivered to your inbox  

Google TrustRank

Posted By Darren Rowse 27th of April 2005 Pro Blogging News 6

Search Engine Watch notes a few new trademarks from Google – including one interesting one ‘ TrustRank’ which they speculate that it could be an indication that Google are cooking up some new ranking system (like PageRank?) that is for combatting web spam.

Also trademarked by Good are the terms:

  • ‘Advertise On the Neighborhood World Wide Web’
  • ‘Its All About Results’
  • ‘Picture Simplicity’
About Darren Rowse
Darren Rowse is the founder and editor of ProBlogger Blog Tips and Digital Photography School. Learn more about him here and connect with him on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and LinkedIn.
Comments
  1. […] t they’ve also registered “TrustRank”. Darren supposed that it might be like PageRank, I expect it to be a replacement altogether. It used to be that Pa […]

  2. Fyi,
    It’s All About Results is the tagline they use with Adwords.
    Picture Simplicity is the tagline they use with Picasa, the imaging package they recently acquired.

  3. TrustRank

    The ProBlogger reports that Google have trademarked TrustRank .

  4. Trustrank makes sense. Worked good on PGP and I have been waiting for a similar concept on connected webpages / blogs for a long time now. :)

  5. On first glance I’d speculate that TrustRank would be a system much more focused towards ecommerce and Froogle than being a replacement to PageRank.Maybe something like eBay’s feedback system. Well that’s what it’d be if I ran Google.

  6. >ranking system (like PageRank?) that is for combatting web spam.

    all ranking systems aim to promote good sites and combat spam. One thing that is interesting about TrustRank as a concept is that it is reliant upon human editors to seed the set. So Google can say that its all automated or all algorithmic, but they felt it necissary to trademark a process which as described in its original form required human editors.

Comments are closed for this post.