<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog and Ping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:07:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yolanda</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-4558053</link>
		<dc:creator>Yolanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-4558053</guid>
		<description>Also I think that everyone needs to understand that everything in moderation is good, pinging included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I think that everyone needs to understand that everything in moderation is good, pinging included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payday Loan</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-4489873</link>
		<dc:creator>Payday Loan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-4489873</guid>
		<description>People need to understand both the benefits and shortcomings of Blog and Ping.  It is a tool for indexing webpages quicker but does not improve search engine rankings significantly.  It can but only when used in conjunction with other strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to understand both the benefits and shortcomings of Blog and Ping.  It is a tool for indexing webpages quicker but does not improve search engine rankings significantly.  It can but only when used in conjunction with other strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilton</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-2532280</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 06:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-2532280</guid>
		<description>I have an automated list of about 30 odd sites that Wordpress pings every time I publish a post.

Are you saying that this is NOT a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an automated list of about 30 odd sites that Wordpress pings every time I publish a post.</p>
<p>Are you saying that this is NOT a good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmelo Lisciotto</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-1755810</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmelo Lisciotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-1755810</guid>
		<description>A very informative post!
Thanks!

Carmelo Lisciotto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very informative post!<br />
Thanks!</p>
<p>Carmelo Lisciotto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seneca SC Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-1134737</link>
		<dc:creator>Seneca SC Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-1134737</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information Darren.  Been thinking of doing a blog myself but I just can&#039;t find a topic that I can write about.  Is there a way to blog by analyzing information on other blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information Darren.  Been thinking of doing a blog myself but I just can&#8217;t find a topic that I can write about.  Is there a way to blog by analyzing information on other blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RadicalAndrew</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-990279</link>
		<dc:creator>RadicalAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-990279</guid>
		<description>Will Memphis win it all? I doubt it. My money is going on Georgetown, Texas, or Kansas. But ya never know.. 
 
Somebody could come up and win it all from nowhere. But please enough of Florida already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Memphis win it all? I doubt it. My money is going on Georgetown, Texas, or Kansas. But ya never know.. </p>
<p>Somebody could come up and win it all from nowhere. But please enough of Florida already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://robins-psychology.blogspot.com/</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-756906</link>
		<dc:creator>http://robins-psychology.blogspot.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-756906</guid>
		<description>Yes i totally agree.
When I first started to blog I pinged a alot.
But i Stopped not only because of the reputation I&#039;ll get, also because of the low traffic that it delivered to my blog site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i totally agree.<br />
When I first started to blog I pinged a alot.<br />
But i Stopped not only because of the reputation I&#8217;ll get, also because of the low traffic that it delivered to my blog site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Longley</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-636014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Longley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-636014</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

I am relative newbie of SEO and I am just starting to use Blog and Ping. Being a MyYahoo account holder, naturally I added my feed to the Yahoo aggregator.
I just see the blog and ping as a great way to get the indexing quicker and updated more often. Of course, Im adding content to my blog and web pages too as I believe as well content is valuable. If the internet is a information tool essentially, can it not be more relevant that the best information gets noticed and appraised better.

I do feel that &quot;gentle&quot; seo practices over the long haul is probably better anyway. Those that are making a quick buck with black hat technologies get caught out, then probably move on to other sources of quick income and start all over again. 

Although content IS king, there a number of sites that are just small pages, flash sites or have no keywords in the few content pages that rank well in Google. Okay, not the most competitve keywords.
 i.e Robot. A flash site with no content ranks #3 just because it has hundreds of quality backlinks. Obviously keywords like digital camera  are so competitive there are numerous factors on the ranking position.

Blog and Ping is a good idea in itself. It does seem though that not many businesses are to be able to produce an idea or technology online that is not exploitable by fraudsters. I think its time that these things are thought over more by the creators. Blogs will be become the new target where the Forums were before.

I am also very fed up with all the competing technologies online. The web is a birds nest of software and practices designed by companies all wanting their share of the online revenue, with no collaboration toward the end user in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I am relative newbie of SEO and I am just starting to use Blog and Ping. Being a MyYahoo account holder, naturally I added my feed to the Yahoo aggregator.<br />
I just see the blog and ping as a great way to get the indexing quicker and updated more often. Of course, Im adding content to my blog and web pages too as I believe as well content is valuable. If the internet is a information tool essentially, can it not be more relevant that the best information gets noticed and appraised better.</p>
<p>I do feel that &#8220;gentle&#8221; seo practices over the long haul is probably better anyway. Those that are making a quick buck with black hat technologies get caught out, then probably move on to other sources of quick income and start all over again. </p>
<p>Although content IS king, there a number of sites that are just small pages, flash sites or have no keywords in the few content pages that rank well in Google. Okay, not the most competitve keywords.<br />
 i.e Robot. A flash site with no content ranks #3 just because it has hundreds of quality backlinks. Obviously keywords like digital camera  are so competitive there are numerous factors on the ranking position.</p>
<p>Blog and Ping is a good idea in itself. It does seem though that not many businesses are to be able to produce an idea or technology online that is not exploitable by fraudsters. I think its time that these things are thought over more by the creators. Blogs will be become the new target where the Forums were before.</p>
<p>I am also very fed up with all the competing technologies online. The web is a birds nest of software and practices designed by companies all wanting their share of the online revenue, with no collaboration toward the end user in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pressed Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-541752</link>
		<dc:creator>Pressed Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-541752</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had my site up for over five years - and it&#039;s getting excellent coverage by continuing to stay on topic.

Better than 75% of my traffic comes from Google, and this is with 5+ years of stats to back it up.  Getting the links to my site DEFINITELY help, and having links from quality blogs always does the trick.

Flirting with a 5 Google pagerank right now, and ALWAYS at the top of my searches.  There is one great thing about the blogs - if you have quality content AND you have a quality RSS feed, you&#039;ll move up in ALL the search engines, every time, guaranteed.

And a 5 PR for my niche site is excellent.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pressedpenny.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pressedpenny.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had my site up for over five years &#8211; and it&#8217;s getting excellent coverage by continuing to stay on topic.</p>
<p>Better than 75% of my traffic comes from Google, and this is with 5+ years of stats to back it up.  Getting the links to my site DEFINITELY help, and having links from quality blogs always does the trick.</p>
<p>Flirting with a 5 Google pagerank right now, and ALWAYS at the top of my searches.  There is one great thing about the blogs &#8211; if you have quality content AND you have a quality RSS feed, you&#8217;ll move up in ALL the search engines, every time, guaranteed.</p>
<p>And a 5 PR for my niche site is excellent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pressedpenny.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pressedpenny.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-324593</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-324593</guid>
		<description>it may work short term, but will not work in the long run.  It&#039;s not worth being on page one of MSN today, then banned for life a year from now. Do it right.  Build something of value and give people a reason to link to you.  Articles and press releases can build links.

Google is tough. They love .edu&#039;s and .gov&#039;s.  Very hard to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may work short term, but will not work in the long run.  It&#8217;s not worth being on page one of MSN today, then banned for life a year from now. Do it right.  Build something of value and give people a reason to link to you.  Articles and press releases can build links.</p>
<p>Google is tough. They love .edu&#8217;s and .gov&#8217;s.  Very hard to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grasshoppermind &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are We due Another SPLOG Explosion?</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-323128</link>
		<dc:creator>Grasshoppermind &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are We due Another SPLOG Explosion?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-323128</guid>
		<description>[...] First there was Blog and Ping. What was initially a legitimate method for informing blog indexes (such as Technorati) of new content, was rapidly morphed into an automated and dubious technique used by some internet marketers to drive their websites up the Search Engine page rankings. And this worked (for a while) until Google et al. caught up and altered their ranking algorithms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First there was Blog and Ping. What was initially a legitimate method for informing blog indexes (such as Technorati) of new content, was rapidly morphed into an automated and dubious technique used by some internet marketers to drive their websites up the Search Engine page rankings. And this worked (for a while) until Google et al. caught up and altered their ranking algorithms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog and ping</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-235158</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog and ping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-235158</guid>
		<description>I am sorry I&#039;ve said spologspot.com instead of www.splogspot.com, please edit, if it&#039;s possible.

Thank you

Vladimir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry I&#8217;ve said spologspot.com instead of <a href="http://www.splogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.splogspot.com</a>, please edit, if it&#8217;s possible.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Vladimir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog and ping</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-235157</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog and ping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-235157</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

This is Vladimir from Pingoat.com.

Here are the real facts about pinging your blog:

- a ping helps you for updating your information on different websites 

- a ping won&#039;t deliver traffic to your blog, a ping will generate indirect traffic to your blog by sending requests to webpages that are using RSS feeds for content.

- a blog is just a blog, it&#039;s not spamming, you won&#039;t get banned unless, you are really spamming (check www.spologspot.com - it&#039;s an extension of pingoat)

Hope this solves the problem a little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>This is Vladimir from Pingoat.com.</p>
<p>Here are the real facts about pinging your blog:</p>
<p>- a ping helps you for updating your information on different websites </p>
<p>- a ping won&#8217;t deliver traffic to your blog, a ping will generate indirect traffic to your blog by sending requests to webpages that are using RSS feeds for content.</p>
<p>- a blog is just a blog, it&#8217;s not spamming, you won&#8217;t get banned unless, you are really spamming (check <a href="http://www.spologspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spologspot.com</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s an extension of pingoat)</p>
<p>Hope this solves the problem a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Valiant</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-217067</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Valiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 05:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-217067</guid>
		<description>Raymond, 

It is very true.  

Googles algorithim is leap years ahead of any other Search Engine.

Google knows what the growth pattern for a real site is and will compare your site against that Blueprint.  If you grow too fast... if you have an overnight explosion of incoming links... if you deviate too far in anyway from that Blueprint, Google flags your site.

Mike (#14) is absolutely correct though.  At the end of the day, assuming you don&#039;t make any serious breaches of Google&#039;s policies, everything good you do is a plus, and everything bad you do is a minus.  So just try to do MORE good than bad :)

If you look at the top 3-5 sites in almost any Google search, you will see that those sites are ALMOST ALWAYS well written.  As the saying goes... content is king... but GOOD content will rule the (Google) world.

Michael Valiant
TheMarketersReport.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raymond, </p>
<p>It is very true.  </p>
<p>Googles algorithim is leap years ahead of any other Search Engine.</p>
<p>Google knows what the growth pattern for a real site is and will compare your site against that Blueprint.  If you grow too fast&#8230; if you have an overnight explosion of incoming links&#8230; if you deviate too far in anyway from that Blueprint, Google flags your site.</p>
<p>Mike (#14) is absolutely correct though.  At the end of the day, assuming you don&#8217;t make any serious breaches of Google&#8217;s policies, everything good you do is a plus, and everything bad you do is a minus.  So just try to do MORE good than bad :)</p>
<p>If you look at the top 3-5 sites in almost any Google search, you will see that those sites are ALMOST ALWAYS well written.  As the saying goes&#8230; content is king&#8230; but GOOD content will rule the (Google) world.</p>
<p>Michael Valiant<br />
TheMarketersReport.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-214553</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 04:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-214553</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t quite think that frequent ping submissions will be regarded as spamming, after all that&#039;s what the service is there for isn&#039;t it. And if users of Wordpress publishes a post, and edits it over and over again, wouldn&#039;t it be spamming it&#039;s side through Pingomatic?

By the way, interesting point by @Danger Stevens (first comment) that Google values slow growing sites to quick growing ones. I&#039;m interested to know how true that is!

Thanks, hope you get 6 figured soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t quite think that frequent ping submissions will be regarded as spamming, after all that&#8217;s what the service is there for isn&#8217;t it. And if users of Wordpress publishes a post, and edits it over and over again, wouldn&#8217;t it be spamming it&#8217;s side through Pingomatic?</p>
<p>By the way, interesting point by @Danger Stevens (first comment) that Google values slow growing sites to quick growing ones. I&#8217;m interested to know how true that is!</p>
<p>Thanks, hope you get 6 figured soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-211854</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-211854</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing search engine optimization for myself and friends for several years now.  I&#039;ve tried &quot;black hat&quot; tricks, like blogging and pinging, hidden text- a lot of stuff that search engines eventually banned altogether.

Bottom line:  Whether your site is a blog or just a bunch of html pages, content is king.  My neighbor has a website that he earns about $1000 per month from click-through ads.  He is ranked number six in Google for a very popular search phrase right now.  He asked me to take a look at his site.  The first thing I did was read all 20 pages of it- great writing and great reading!  Then I looked and he had no H1 tags (a big SEO no-no), lousy page titles (did not contain the search phrase he wanted at all), a bad meta description, and way too many keywords.

Yet, he was and still is number six in Google for this popular search term!

Bottom line:  This guy did everything anti-SEO, but still got to the top through good writing and good content.  It just goes to show that if you pour your heart and mind into a site and make it content rich- you&#039;ll go to the top no matter what.  Content is king!  Forget the tricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing search engine optimization for myself and friends for several years now.  I&#8217;ve tried &#8220;black hat&#8221; tricks, like blogging and pinging, hidden text- a lot of stuff that search engines eventually banned altogether.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  Whether your site is a blog or just a bunch of html pages, content is king.  My neighbor has a website that he earns about $1000 per month from click-through ads.  He is ranked number six in Google for a very popular search phrase right now.  He asked me to take a look at his site.  The first thing I did was read all 20 pages of it- great writing and great reading!  Then I looked and he had no H1 tags (a big SEO no-no), lousy page titles (did not contain the search phrase he wanted at all), a bad meta description, and way too many keywords.</p>
<p>Yet, he was and still is number six in Google for this popular search term!</p>
<p>Bottom line:  This guy did everything anti-SEO, but still got to the top through good writing and good content.  It just goes to show that if you pour your heart and mind into a site and make it content rich- you&#8217;ll go to the top no matter what.  Content is king!  Forget the tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-202928</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-202928</guid>
		<description>Okay, I understand your point now.  It&#039;s a good thing we are allowed to comment on the article and clear any misconceptions up. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I understand your point now.  It&#8217;s a good thing we are allowed to comment on the article and clear any misconceptions up. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Valiant</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-202908</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Valiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-202908</guid>
		<description>Scott, 

I realize what he is talking about, and you obviously realize it, but the vast majority of internet users will not.

What I am trying to express is that it is important to explain what you are talking about.  This article is seriously misleading if you do not understand the nuances of the Blog world.  

I felt compelled to leave the original comment because this article came up high in a search I ran on Google.  That means alot of beginners who hear about &quot;Blog &amp; Ping&quot; will also stumble across the article, and then leave with a very incorrect picture of how everything works.  

If you are talking about &quot;talking about programs and scripts that ping other blogs in mass&quot;, then SAY you are talking about &quot;talking about programs and scripts that ping other blogs in mass&quot; and try to be objective and mention that there is a good side to the whole Ping thing, which you can then even spin it into a second post if you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, </p>
<p>I realize what he is talking about, and you obviously realize it, but the vast majority of internet users will not.</p>
<p>What I am trying to express is that it is important to explain what you are talking about.  This article is seriously misleading if you do not understand the nuances of the Blog world.  </p>
<p>I felt compelled to leave the original comment because this article came up high in a search I ran on Google.  That means alot of beginners who hear about &#8220;Blog &amp; Ping&#8221; will also stumble across the article, and then leave with a very incorrect picture of how everything works.  </p>
<p>If you are talking about &#8220;talking about programs and scripts that ping other blogs in mass&#8221;, then SAY you are talking about &#8220;talking about programs and scripts that ping other blogs in mass&#8221; and try to be objective and mention that there is a good side to the whole Ping thing, which you can then even spin it into a second post if you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M. Stolz</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-182268</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M. Stolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-182268</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I think Darren was talking about programs and scripts that ping other blogs in mass (thousands at a time) with garbage content, with the sole purpose of getting a link.  I don&#039;t think (and hope) he is not talking about bloggers pinging other blogs with relevant pings.  There is a big difference.

Its people who blog and ping thousands of unrelated sites that is the problem.

I get dozens, sometimes hundeds of spam comments linking to gambling sites and viagra and other undesirable things in one day!  Based on the IP addresses and the fact that the comments are identical formatted and appear very rapidly means they are automated and not manually entered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I think Darren was talking about programs and scripts that ping other blogs in mass (thousands at a time) with garbage content, with the sole purpose of getting a link.  I don&#8217;t think (and hope) he is not talking about bloggers pinging other blogs with relevant pings.  There is a big difference.</p>
<p>Its people who blog and ping thousands of unrelated sites that is the problem.</p>
<p>I get dozens, sometimes hundeds of spam comments linking to gambling sites and viagra and other undesirable things in one day!  Based on the IP addresses and the fact that the comments are identical formatted and appear very rapidly means they are automated and not manually entered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M. Stolz</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/comment-page-1/#comment-182246</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M. Stolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/25/blog-and-ping/#comment-182246</guid>
		<description>This is why I 1.) moderate all comments (including pings, trackbacks), and 2.) require people to create an account to post a comment.  I know it reduces the number of comments, but I was getting tired of the spam comments.  Plus I like responding to comments, so comment moderation is an easy way for me to see what new comments are out there.  

What was interesting is the most of the spam I am getting on one blog (that doesn&#039;t require an account to comment... yet) is automated comment spam, and not ping spam.  It appears, based on the nearly identical spam comments in a short period of time all with different IPs, that they are using zombie (infected) computers to post their spam.

I think that over time its going to push blogs into what forums eventually had to do... require an account with e-mail validation to post a comment.  If you remember, many of the original forums and discussion boards didn&#039;t require an account to post, and usenet, which preceeded them definately didn&#039;t.  And mass spamming was a result.  I think blogs will be okay, just as forums have survived.  Just being able to post comments without an account might go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I 1.) moderate all comments (including pings, trackbacks), and 2.) require people to create an account to post a comment.  I know it reduces the number of comments, but I was getting tired of the spam comments.  Plus I like responding to comments, so comment moderation is an easy way for me to see what new comments are out there.  </p>
<p>What was interesting is the most of the spam I am getting on one blog (that doesn&#8217;t require an account to comment&#8230; yet) is automated comment spam, and not ping spam.  It appears, based on the nearly identical spam comments in a short period of time all with different IPs, that they are using zombie (infected) computers to post their spam.</p>
<p>I think that over time its going to push blogs into what forums eventually had to do&#8230; require an account with e-mail validation to post a comment.  If you remember, many of the original forums and discussion boards didn&#8217;t require an account to post, and usenet, which preceeded them definately didn&#8217;t.  And mass spamming was a result.  I think blogs will be okay, just as forums have survived.  Just being able to post comments without an account might go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
